ETERNAL LIFE -
Supernotes from Beyond
Cyclic Philosophy
Copyright © 1995–2012 John O'Loughlin
________________
CYCLE 1
1. HEATHEN REVOLT. Protestantism
is nothing more than a Heathen revolt against Christianity, viz. Catholicism.
2. POST-HUMAN PROGRESSIONS. From the supermen/superbeings of the old brain to the
suprabeings/ultrabeings of the new brain, as from the backbrain/right midbrain
to the left midbrain/forebrain.
3. HEATHEN/CHRISTIAN DISTINCTIONS.
To distinguish the Humanities, the Sciences, and the Arts from the
Divinities, as one would distinguish universities, academies, and
colleges/schools from seminaries, or Heathen knowledge
from Christian knowledge.
4. PROTESTANT/CATHOLIC DISTINCTIONS.
To distinguish the Heathen intellect of the Son, the Heathen soul of the
Father, and the Heathen will of the Mother from the Christian spirit of the
Holy Ghost, as one would distinguish Protestantism (in its three main
denominations, viz. Puritanism, Presbyterianism, and Anglicanism) from
Catholicism.
5. TRIANGULAR/PENTAGONAL DISTINCTIONS. To distinguish the inverted triangle of the
Son from the triangle of the Father, and to contrast both of these with the
pentagon of the Mother, as one would contrast Puritanism and Presbyterianism
with Anglicanism or, alternatively, Rugby Union and Rugby League with
Association Football.
CYCLE 2
1. HEATHEN FATALITY. Mass has
a Heathen fatality to suck-up, almost heliotropically, to Time, like an
audience enrapt by a poetry recital.
2. SEXUAL SUBMISSION. Coitus
exemplifies the submission of Mass to Time, like nature to the sun.
3. FATHER TIME. Mass
movements are characterized by their almost reverential respect for
military-style dictatorships.
4. MILLENNIAL EXPECTATION.
When there are no longer men but, following a cyborg-like transition,
supermen, superbeings, suprabeings, and ultrabeings ... in successive stages of
post-human, or millennial, salvation.
5. ETERNAL LIFE. Men die, but
the life forms of the post-Human Millennium will live for ever ... in the
Eternal Life of the spirit.
CYCLE 3
1. CONTRASTING QUALITIES. To
contrast the holiness of World-denying virginity with the emptiness of the
grave on the one hand, but the emptiness of abortion-affirming vacuity with the
holiness of transcendental spirituality on the other hand - the former pair of
contrasts Christian and the latter pair Superchristian.
2. NOUMENAL CONTRASTS. To contrast the Superhell and Subheaven of
Superheathen primacy with the Subhell and Superheaven of Superchristian
supremacy, as one would contrast the alpha with the omega, the beginning with
the end.
3. PHENOMENAL INTERMEDIARY.
Christian Hell and Heaven are neither primal nor supreme but
phenomenally intermediate between the noumenal extremes of the Superheathen and
the Superchristian. In this respect,
they are akin to (though not identical with) the Heathen realms of the World
and Purgatory, which are also phenomenal.
4. CENTRIFUGAL AGGRESSION.
That man who is full of Heathen expletives will never make a Christian,
much less a Superchristian!
5. SHADOWS AND GUIDES. Every
religion has its political shadow and every politics its religious guide.
CYCLE 4
1. PROTESTANT COROLLARIES.
One could be forgiven for regarding, within the Heathen triad of
Protestant civilization, Socialism as the political corollary of Anglicanism, Conservatism
as the political corollary of Puritanism, and Liberalism as the political
corollary of Presbyterianism.
2. CATHOLIC COROLLARIES.
Likewise one is tempted, within the Christian triad of Catholic
civilization, to regard Communism as the political corollary of Eastern
Orthodoxy, Nazism as the political corollary of Celtic Christianity, and
Fascism as the political corollary of Roman Catholicism.
3. CHRISTIAN/HEATHEN TRIADS.
This is to distinguish between the Virgin Mary, the Christ Child, and the
Holy Spirit with regard to the Catholic parallels, but the Mother, the Son, and
the Father with regard to the Protestant ones - the former Christian and the
latter Heathen.
4. TRANSCENDENTALIST/FUNDAMENTALIST TRIADS. The Mary Child (of feminism), the Second
Coming, and the Holy Spirit of Heaven would of course constitute the principal
parts of a Superchristian triad whose religious essence was transcendentalist,
in contrast to the fundamentalist essence of the Clear Light of the Void,
Mohammed, and Jehovah within the Superheathen context of a triad more
authoritarian than totalitarian.
5. SUPERHEATHEN. There is a
sense in which, compared to the Heathen Father, Mother, and Son, Jehovah is a
Subfather, the Clear Light of the Void a Supermother, and Mohammed a Subson, as
relevant to the Superheathen (which is ruled by the Supermother).
6. SUPERCHRISTIAN. Similarly,
there is a sense in which, compared to the Christian Virgin Mary, Christ Child,
and Holy Spirit, the Mary Child is a Subvirgin, the Second Coming a
Superchrist, and the Holy Spirit of Heaven a Superspirit, as relevant to the
Superchristian (which is led by the Superspirit).
7. CHRISTIAN PHENOMENALITY.
Neither the Virgin-Mary Hell nor the Holy-Spirit Heaven of Christianity
is genuinely hellish or heavenly, on account of the fact that, like Heathenism,
Christianity is less noumenal than phenomenal.
8. CHRISTIAN RELATIVITY.
Hence the Christian Hell of the Virgin Mary is less subfeminine than
pseudo-feminine in relation to the Mother and quasi-subfeminine in relation to
the Mary Child, while the Christian Heaven of the Holy Spirit is less
supermasculine than pseudo-masculine in relation to the Son and
quasi-supermasculine in relation to the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
9. GENUINE NOUMENAL EXTREMES.
Only the Superchristian Hell of the Mary Child would be genuinely
subfeminine, and the Superchristian Heaven of the Holy Spirit of Heaven
genuinely supermasculine, given their noumenal standings in relation to
'Kingdom Come'.
CYCLE 5
1. NOUMENAL VACUUM. Compared
to the virginal vacuum (in the womb) of the quasi-subfeminine female, the
psychic vacuum (behind the eyes) of the superfeminine female is noumenal.
2. OPTICAL PROJECTION. Behold
the 'mirror Zen' of the superfeminine female as she applies and contemplates
her eye make-up in selfless objectivity!
3. SELFLESS OBJECTIVITY.
Beware the penetrating eyes of the superfeminine female as she brings
the mystic allure of her selfless objectivity to bear on potentially suitable
(submasculine) males.
4. RISING TO THE BAIT. The
oriental male does not so much fall for women as ... 'suck up' to superwomen,
particularly where saris are concerned.
5. ORIENTAL SUBMASCULINITY.
The oriental male is less masculine than submasculine in his deference
to superfeminine females.
6. SUBMASCULINE REALITY. To
succumb to a superwoman is to be a subman, whether in relation to saris or
kaftans. This is the traditional
oriental reality.
7. COMPLEMENTARY PLENUMS/VACUUMS.
A vacuum behind the eyes, in oriental fashion, is not incompatible with
a plenum between the legs (pregnancy), just as, in the Christian Occident, a
vacuum in the womb (virginity) is not incompatible with a plenum in the mind
(prayer).
CYCLE 6
1. LIBERATION THROUGH CELIBACY.
Celibacy is a Christian/Superchristian ideal, not a Heathen/Superheathen
one. For celibacy is incompatible with
the domination of men/submen by women/superwomen, since relative to the
liberation of quasi-supermen/supermen from quasi-subwomen/subwomen.
2. GENDER FISSION. Liberated
from sex, the quasi-supermen/supermen ascend into Heaven/Superheaven, while the
quasi-subwomen/subwomen descend towards the Hell/Subhell of sexual self-denial.
3. PHENOMENAL/NOUMENAL DISTINCTIONS.
Hell and Heaven are relative to Christian phenomenality, whereas Subhell
and Superheaven are germane to Superchristian noumenality.
4. CHRISTIAN/HEATHEN CONTRASTS.
The Christian Hell contrasts with the Heathen World as the Virgin Mary
with the Mother, whereas the Christian Heaven contrasts with the Heathen
Overworld/Netherworld, as the Holy Ghost with the Son/Father.
5. SUPERCHRISTIAN/SUPERHEATHEN CONTRASTS. The Superchristian Superheaven contrasts with
the Superheathen Subheaven, as the Holy Spirit of Heaven with Jehovah, whereas
the Superchristian Subhell contrasts with the Superheathen Superhell, as the
Mary Child with the Clear Light of the Void.
CYCLE 7
1. SEXUAL OPPOSITES. Woman is
alpha where man is omega, Hell where man is Heaven,
light where man is spirit, flesh where man is intellect, beauty where man is
knowledge, and illusion where man is truth.
2. FIRST AND LAST. Woman is
rooted in the eyes where man is centred in the lungs, rooted in the womb where
man is centred in the brain. She is
science where he is religion, politics where he is economics, the State where
he is the Church, conservatism where he is radicalism, the past where he is the
future. For what began in the
superfeminine must end in the supermasculine.
The First shall be last, and the Last shall be first!
3. ROOTED IN THE DEVIL. Women
are incapable, physically and psychologically, of taking spirituality
seriously. God for them is 'beyond the
pale' ... of that which is rooted in the eyes/light; for the fluid-based
heaviness of their breasts screens off the possibility of their taking the
lightness of air in relation to lung-centred spirituality seriously, and they
will strive, in consequence, to disparage those who reject the light in favour
of the spirit.
CYCLE 8
1. NOUMENAL SALVATION. Just
as Christianity rejected the flesh in favour of the word (intellect), so must
Superchristianity reject the light in favour of the spirit. For whereas Christianity only aspires towards
a phenomenal salvation, through Christ, from the flesh-bound World,
Superchristianity (which I equate with Social Transcendentalism) will aspire
towards a noumenal salvation, through the Second Coming, from the light-bound
Netherworld ... of cosmic Hell. The
'Heaven' of Christianity is effectively purgatorial. The Heaven of Superchristianity, by contrast,
will be truly divine - the noumenal spirituality of the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
2. ETERNITY BEYOND THE GRAVE.
Only the noumenal spirituality of the Holy Spirit of Heaven is
commensurate with Eternal Life in the Beyond.
For the phenomenal spirituality (prayerful intellectuality) of Christ
leads to the grave, and thus to the visionary afterlife of the Holy Ghost in
what can only be a subliminal consciousness of chemical changes in the brain
until such time as extensive decomposition sets-in, which is to say, for a
comparatively short period of time.
Compared with the Eternity of 'Kingdom Come', in which a true spirituality
was being cultivated beyond the human plane to one that was manifestly
post-human (superhuman), the 'Eternity' of the grave, always excepting the
gravestone, would be as a moment in time, a mere instant of visionary bliss
that was over almost before it had really begun.
3. BEYOND VISIONARY EXPERIENCE.
Whilst utilizing visionary bliss, albeit on the synthetic terms of
hallucinogenic enlightenment such that one could metaphorically equate with a
'resurrection of the Dead', the true spirituality of 'Kingdom Come' would go
far beyond visionary experience in its aspiration towards and eventual
attainment of the truest spirituality.
For what began on the level of the Second Coming could only culminate on
that of the Holy Spirit of Heaven, just as what began with Christ can only
culminate in the Holy Ghost. Hence, in the latter case, from praying to contemplating; in the
former case, from tripping to meditating. Essence precedes appearance in the Christian
context, whereas appearance precedes essence in the Superchristian one. For essence is alone truly commensurate with supreme being.
CYCLE 9
1. MALE/FEMALE BLUES.
Distinguish between the Rock-Blues of guitar-based instrumental 'Blues'
and the Blues-Rock of guitar-based vocal 'Blues'. But, above all, distinguish each of these
from the authentic Blues of vocal-based superfeminine idealism, as in 'Lady
sings the Blues'. For, fundamentally,
the Blues is pure Hell!
2. HEATHEN
3. CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS. To
see a connection, relative to Catholic republicanism, between the Irish Labour
Party and the Virgin Mary, Fine Gael and the Christ Child, and Fianna Fàil and
the Holy Ghost, as though Labour were a democratic version of Communism, Fine
Gael a democratic version of Nazism, and Fianna Fàil a democratic version of
Fascism. The Democratic Left would, I
guess, be beyond the Christian pale in a sort of Superchristian affiliation
with 'Mary-Child' feminism, as though the subfeminine precondition of
supermasculine revolution in Social Theocracy/Transcendentalism, as germane to
'Kingdom Come', and hence the Second Coming/Holy Spirit of Heaven.
4. NO STRICT EQUIVALENTS. Clearly,
one cannot regard Irish political parties as equivalent to British ones, as
though the distinction between Protestant parliamentarianism and Catholic
republicanism was of no account. In
CYCLE 10
1. PSYCHIC ELEMENTS.
Inspiration is the proton, intuition the electron, logic the neutron,
and (if you're lucky) enlightenment the photon ... of mind, as one moves from
the soul to the spirit via the will and the intellect of psychic fulfilment.
2. DIALECTICAL PROCESS. Logic
does not follow from inspiration alone, but is the result of managing
inspiration and intuition to achieve a rational synthesis.
3. SYNTHETIC RESULT. If
inspiration is the thesis and intuition the antithesis, then logic is the
synthesis, which may or may not lead to the superthesis, as it were, of enlightenment.
4. HEATHEN QUALITIES.
Inspiration, intuition, and logic are fundamentally Heathen qualities
which usually correspond to the Father, the Mother, and the Son of emotional
intellect (reading), wilful intellect (speaking), and rational intellect (writing),
not to their noumenal preconditions in the Superheathen realms of the Clear
Light, Jehovah, and Mohammed, where they are more fittingly associated with
photographic speaking, filmic reading, and magazine writing respectively.
5. LOGICAL RESOLUTION.
Intuition precedes inspiration in the Superheathen context, but
inspiration precedes intuition in the Heathen one, the synthesis, in each case,
being a logical resolution of the struggle between thesis and antithesis. Yet logic is compromised by the Heathen
nature of such a struggle, and is therefore unable, as a rule, to transcend its
dialectic.
CYCLE 11
1. SYNTHETIC INTERMEDIARY.
Christian enlightenment rejects the dialectical struggle between thesis
and antithesis in favour of a superthesis whose precondition is synthetic, as
though deriving, in part, from Heathen logic and simultaneously transcending
such logic through the Christ Child, Who is intermediate between Hell and
Heaven, the former antithetical to the latter but not engaged in a dialectical
struggle with it ... by dint of the synthetic intermediary of Purgatory, which
protects the latter from the former.
2. SUPERCHRISTIAN LOGIC.
Likewise, what I have called Superchristianity rejects the dialectic in favour
of a superthesis whose precondition is synthetic, the superpurgatorial
synthesis of the Second Coming whose Superchristian logic, in rejecting
intuition, paves the way for the divine enlightenment of the Holy Spirit of
Heaven.
3. REJECTION. Enlightenment
is not really possible to Heathens/Superheathens by dint of the powerful
position of inspiration in the dialectical equation. Only the rejection of inspiration/intuition
opens the way to full enlightenment, which is centred in the spirit.
4. INTUITIVE ROOTS. Woman is
rooted in intuition, whether as thesis (superfeminine) or antithesis
(feminine), as well as in the antithetical contexts (subfeminine) to
enlightenment, whether phenomenal (Christian) or noumenal (Superchristian),
which are post-dialectical. In fact,
these latter contexts are less intuitive than insightful, and amount to a sort
of centring.
5. INSPIRATIONAL ROOTS.
Conversely, man is rooted in inspiration, whether as antithesis
(submasculine) or thesis (masculine), though in the superthetical contexts
(supermasculine) of Heaven, whether phenomenal (Christian) or noumenal
(Superchristian), he is centred in enlightenment.
6. PURGATORIAL INTERMEDIARY.
Logic is always intermediate between intuition/insight and
inspiration/enlightenment, like Christ, the Christ Child, the Second Coming,
whose purgatorial intermediary between Hell and Heaven, or (relative to
Heathenism) the World and the Netherworld, is variously synthetic.
7. OVERWORLDLY CHRIST. I
guess the position of the Son (Christ) in relation to the Mother and the Father
(of Heathen Protestantism) is less purgatorial than simply overworldly, which
is to say, of the Overworld in relation to the World/Netherworld.
8. LIMBO. I have always
regarded Purgatory as intermediate between Heaven and Hell, much as Limbo was
intermediate, in the Greek myths, between Hades and
CYCLE 12
1. MASS/TIME RELATIONSHIPS.
Mass 'sucks up' to Time when poetry is being recited to a seated
audience, but Time patronizes Mass when drama is being performed to the
balconies. Either way, a Heathen
relationship between the Father and the Mother, the upper class and the lower
class, the sun and the earth, etc., etc.
2. CHRISTIAN ALTERNATIVE.
Volume and Space are alien to the contexts of poetry and drama but
germane to the contexts of literature (fiction) and philosophy respectively,
which suggest the possibility of a Christian alternative to Heathen Time/Mass,
an alternative, I mean, in which it is possible to progress from the one to the
other, as from the Son to the Holy Ghost, and thereby go 'over the moon' in a
Saturn-oriented commitment to philosophy, thought duly eclipsing or, rather,
replacing writing.
3. LITERARY DAMNATION/SALVATION.
To fall from reading to speaking, as from poetry to drama, but to rise
from writing to thinking, as from literature to philosophy - the one an
intellectual damnation from Time to Mass, the other an intellectual salvation
from Volume to Space.
4. PHILOSOPHICAL SPRINGBOARD.
Philosophy is the thinking man's equivalent of prayer, which requires theological
guidance. If the masses can only be
brought to thought through theology, then the free spirit, who is beyond the
pale of Time, Mass, and Volume, achieves his thought through philosophy, and,
if he is genuinely wise, will use it as a springboard to a certain theosophical
praxis, which is truly of the (spiritual) peace that surpasses all
(intellectual) understanding.
5. VOLUME TO SPACE. By its
very mundane nature, Mass 'sucks up' to Time, like a flower to the sun. You cannot take Mass, and thus by implication
the masses, to spiritual Space, since Mass and Space are incommensurable. You can only take Volume to Space, preferably
a certain type of Volume (quasi-spiritual and thus thoughtful/prayerful) to a certain
type of Space (spiritual and thus airily spaced). Such a Volume will be 'beyond the pale' of
Time and Mass, and therefore neither submasculine nor feminine but decidedly
masculine, with a thoughtful enthusiasm for the prospect of supermasculine salvation
in God (the Holy Spirit of Heaven).
CYCLE 13
1. VACUOUS HELL. The
salvation of man to superman demands the damnation of woman to subwoman, whose
Christian/Superchristian Hell is the precondition of a Christian/Superchristian
Heaven. Verily, Hell for woman is the
self-denial of a uterine vacuum, whether through vocation or abortion, since
Hell is a vacuum on any plane (phenomenal or noumenal), and propels the devil
of selfless flight, the negative power that issues from a negative glory. Normally, woman will seek deliverance from
her uterine vacuum through sex and the probability of a maternal plenum (in
pregnancy, etc.). Thus motherhood is for
woman a sort of salvation from her void, and accordingly denial of this
salvation can only mean one thing: Hell!
2. HEATHEN LIE. Normally, man
strives to palliate the Hell of woman's basic vacuum by making love to her, as
though to make life easier for himself.
But, in reality, the cost of such a procedure is very high, even unto
death through the 'wages of sin', since he is constrained, as subman, to enact
Time into Mass, and thus forego Christian redemption, as man, through Volume
into Space, becoming superman. Thus he
lives a Heathen lie, the lie of selfless sin.
3. HEAVENLY PLENUM. True
selfishness, which is centred in the spirit, is so desirable to the man who
cultivates it, that any external distraction, including women, is painful to
him and something, in consequence, to avoid or, at the very least,
minimize. The man who is centred in his
true self is acutely aware of the inconvenience of external distractions. He will not allow others - women in
particular - to prevail upon him.
Selfless service of others is akin, in his estimation, to a subfeminine
Hell. He lives Heaven, the
supermasculine Heaven of an airy plenum.
CYCLE 14
1. MASCULINE TRINITY. Subman
is that which is more emotional than either spiritual or intellectual; man that
which is more intellectual than either emotional or spiritual; superman that
which is more spiritual than either intellectual or emotional.
2. FEMININE TRINITY.
Superwoman is that which is more optical than either sensual or
devotional; woman that which is more sensual than either optical or devotional;
subwoman that which is more devotional than either sensual or optical.
3. ASCENT OF MAN. From the
subconscious emotionality of subman to the superconscious
spirituality/universality of superman via the conscious intellectuality of man
- the ascent of man from beast to God.
4. DESCENT OF WOMAN. From the
super-unconscious personality of superwoman to the sub-unconscious
chastity/humility of subwoman via the unconscious sensuality of woman - the
descent of woman from Devil to angel.
5. INDIRECT HEATHEN REFERENCE.
The Father has reference to the Son via the Mother, like Presbyterianism
to Puritanism via Anglicanism.
6. INDIRECT SUPERHEATHEN REFERENCE.
The Supermother has reference to the Subson via the Subfather, like
Hinduism to Mohammedanism via Judaism.
CYCLE 15
1. LUNAR PARALLEL. Whatever
people think, the Father cannot be associated with and/or extrapolated from
either the heart or the sun; He derives, on the contrary, from the emotional
aspect of the brain as the fundamentalist component of the 'Three in One', a
'One' which, being cerebral, has reference to a lunar parallel which finds its
intellectual cynosure in Christ.
2. MOHAMMED. The deity of the
heart is Mohammed, who contrasts with the deity of the sun, viz. Jehovah and,
to a greater extent, Satan, pretty much as Count Dracula contrasts with
sunlight. In fact, it could be argued
that Mohammed stands in a filial relationship to Jehovah, as Subson to
Subfather.
3. NOUMENAL FIRST MOVER.
Before the Subfather, however, there was (is) a Supermother, the Hindi
Clear Light of the Void, which is the noumenal First Mover in the Cosmos, the
real 'Creator' from which Lucifer (Jehovah/Satan) 'fell', as solar from stellar
... in what I have elsewhere described as a submasculine revolt against
superfeminine primacy, the beginnings, in solar monotheism, of a heavenly
alternative to the stellar polytheism of the superdiabolic First Cause(s).
4. SUPERFEMININE BEGINNINGS.
Thus the Cosmos/Universe didn't begin with Jehovah/Satan, but with the
Clear Light of the Void, a superfeminine entity of stellar light and fire from
which smaller stars like the sun 'fell', in due process of cosmic
devolution. The concept of God as 'He',
as in some sense masculine, has no reference to the stellar Cosmos whatsoever,
but only to the sun, which may be held responsible, in some degree, for
creating life on Earth, since without it there would have been no nature, and
thus no plants, animals, birds, reptiles, etc.
5. SUPERMOTHERLY CREATOR.
Therefore while there is some truth in arguing that God (as
Jehovah/Satan) created the world, there would be no truth whatsoever in the
theory that God created the sun. On the
contrary, the sun was effectively created, along with other small stars, by the
Clear Light of the Void, or any large stellar star which may be held to have
preceded the sun, and to have preceded it not as a submasculine 'he' but as a
superfeminine 'she' - the supermotherly Creator whose essence is less
(sub)divine than superdiabolic.
6. SUBMASCULINE SUBGOD. The
superdiabolic polytheism of the Cosmos preceded the subdivine monotheism of the
Sun, as Hinduism preceded Judaism. For
whereas polytheism was stellar, monotheism was solar, and the consequence was
that a submasculine Subgod superseded a superfeminine Superdevil. In other words, that which is relatively
godly (if on submasculine and hence modest terms) came to pass for the first
time!
7. OUTER SUBGOD. Yet such a
Subgod, necessarily subdivine, is outer rather than inner, solar rather than
cardiac, scientific as opposed to religious, and thus morally inferior to the
Mohammedan Subgod of the 'Kingdom Within', the heart-god who stands to the
sun-god as subson to subfather, or blood to fire.
CYCLE 16
1. REVERSE METAPHORS. Blood
is the 'light' of the heart, just as, to reverse the metaphor, fire is the
'heart' of the sun.
2. THE ESSENCE. It could be
that the heart, the 'seat of the soul', is to blood what fire is to light,
which is to say, the essence of the context in question, which finds its
religious personification in Mohammed/Allah no less surely than the sun ... in
Satan/Jehovah.
3. HEART/SUN ESSENCES.
Mohammed would be more essentially of the heart than Allah, just as
Satan would be more essentially of the sun than Jehovah.
4. SATANIC SUBMASCULINITY.
Satan is not the Cosmos from a Judaic point of view, for Jehovah is that
which 'sucks up' to the Cosmos in quasi-superfeminine idealism, whereas Satan
is submasculine through and through!
5. DIABOLIC SUPERFEMININITY.
I could not now regard that which was submasculine, and hence subdivine,
as the Devil. On the contrary, the Devil
is fundamentally a superfeminine ideality which has its Clear-Light basis in
the Cosmos, the original font of Creation.
6. DIVINE SUPERMASCULINITY.
Ultimately, God is not subdivine, nor even divine, but superdivine, the
supermasculine superdivinity of the Holy Spirit of Heaven, which is supreme
being.
7. SUBMASCULINE BEAST. The
Subgod is a submasculine beast that revolted against ('fell from') the
superfeminine Devil ... of the Clear Light of the (stellar) Void, but is no
more a devil himself than ... the subfeminine angel ... of feminist humility
... is a god. Angel is no less distinct
from God ... the Holy Spirit of Heaven ... than beast from Devil ... the Clear
Light of the Void.
8. PERSONALITY SOURCE.
Certainly the stellar Cosmos cannot be personified as angelic, since
there is nothing humble about stars. On
the contrary, they are the source of superfeminine personality, which issues
optically from a psychic vacuum.
9. GOD AND ANGEL. Just as God
is the most evolved degree of masculinity (supermasculine), so the angelic is
the most devolved degree of femininity (subfeminine). The former is at the furthest possible
psychic remove from the submasculine beast, and the latter at the furthest
possible physical remove from the superfeminine Devil.
CYCLE 17
1. MYSTICAL BASIS. Television
beams personality at one from its mystical basis in the light.
2. PERSONALITY PARADE. How
morally obscene is the parade of superfeminine personality which so often
issues, in diabolical disarray, from the TV screen, sucking the life out of
those whose souls have fallen victim to its optical allure!
3. NEGATIVE POWER. The
Illusion-Devil of personality launches-out from the Woe-Hell of negative glory,
to claim fresh victims on the barbs of its negative power, a superfeminine
tyrant whose subjects idolize her mystical charms.
4. FINANCIAL SACRIFICES. Like
all tyrants, television is merciless in exacting tributes from its subjects,
who must make financial sacrifices in order that it may continue to rule at
their expense.
5. TELEVISION DISTINCTIONS.
Strictly speaking, colour television is submasculine compared to what
might be described as the quasi-superfeminine nature of black-and-white TV,
which is arguably more Jehovahesque than Satanic.
6. PHOTOGRAPHY. At the back
of, or anterior to, film ... there is always photography, whether
black-and-white or colour, which is to say, whether superfeminine or
quasi-submasculine, Hindu-like or Buddhist.
7. PHOTOGRAPHIC SLIDES. At
the back of cinema film there can only be photography, though more of the kind
that is projected, as slides, onto a white screen than as snaps as such.
8. ACTORS AND ACTRESSES. Film
and television actors are a sort of submen, by which I mean that they pertain
to the submasculine in an alpha-stemming context of light/heat. By a converse token, film and television
actresses are less superfeminine than quasi-submasculine. For the genuine superfeminine context is one
of photography, not film!
CYCLE 18
1. STAR-TEARS. Women's tears
are akin to stars that fall from the cosmos of their eyes ... in testimony to
the sadness of negative glory.
2. NUNS AND MONKS. Nuns can
be quasi-subfeminine saints, but not angels!
Likewise monks can be quasi-supermasculine saints, but not gods! For angels are no less genuinely subfeminine
(and humble) than gods are genuinely supermasculine (and universal).
3. LOWERED EYES. The 'humble
angel' keeps her eyes lowered, in contrast to the 'personality devil', whose
eyes are aflame with negative power, constraining submen to her superfeminine
whims.
4. BEYOND SAINTS. Angels are
more devolved than female saints (nuns), just as gods are more evolved than
masculine saints (monks). The saint is
Christian, whereas the angel and the god are Superchristian.
5. HUMILITY/UNIVERSALITY DESTINATIONS. Angels can no more depart the Subhell of
their subfeminine humility ... than gods depart the Superheaven of their
supermasculine universality.
6. SAVING AND DAMNING. The
Second Coming will save Christian men to the Superheaven of supermasculine
universality, and damn, relatively speaking, Christian women to the Subhell of
subfeminine humility, thereby creating gods and angels.
7. GODS AND ANGELS VIS-À-VIS DEVILS AND BEASTS. The gods and angels of the
supermasculine/subfeminine extremes of Superchristianity will contrast with the
devils and beasts of the superfeminine/submasculine extremes of Superheathenism.
8. MONKS AND NUNS VIS-À-VIS MEN AND WOMEN. Likewise, it could be said that the monks and
nuns of the saintly extremes of Christianity contrast with the men and women of
the masculine/feminine divide of Heathenism.
CYCLE 19
1. REVERSED TRIANGLES.
Generally speaking, the Superheathen context (of the Supermother,
Subfather, and Subson) is symbolized by a pyramidal triangle, whereas the
Heathen context (of the Father, Mother, and Son) is symbolized by an inverted
triangle. Hence the one context is symbolically
dominated by the Supermother, and the other context ... by the Son. The Heathen context reverses the Superheathen
situation.
2. REVERSED OBLIQUES.
Although the Christian and Superchristian contexts are non-triangular,
the sort of oblique ascent from the Virgin Mary to the Holy Ghost via the
Christ Child is effectively reversed in the Superchristian context, as the
Second Coming and the Holy Spirit of Heaven ascend away from the Mary Child of
subfeminine humility on the basis of two modes of objective selfishness from
subjective selflessness, the opposite of the Christian context, wherein
objective selflessness in Christian chastity/charity is rejected by two modes
of subjective selfishness in a heavenly ascent from prayer to contemplation.
3. EFFECTIVE BLASPHEMY. The
notion of God creating the Universe is so logically absurd as to be effectively
blasphemous! Even the Sun-God
(Jehovah/Satan) that may be held responsible, in some degree, for creating the
earth ... is only a Subgod, and thus no better than submasculine, which is to
say, beastly.
4. LARGELY SELF-CREATING.
Most of the earth, and thus by implication nature, is self-creating,
since it exists in relation not only to the sun but to the soil and, amongst
other things, its molten core. For, in
reality, the greater part of nature owes its existence less to the sun than to
the earth itself, which may be assumed to be its true creator.
5. WORLDLY PHENOMENON. Nature
owes less to the sun, a subgodly parallel, than to the earth itself, and is
thus a phenomenon of the World, having a mundane, or worldly, essence. For this reason, it is heathen rather than
divine.
CYCLE 20
1. FEMININE/MASCULINE CONTRASTS.
Collectivism/collectivity is basically feminine, having its roots, so to
speak, in the noumenal collectivism of the stellar Cosmos, where it is
superfeminine, and extending, via the feminine World, to World-denying
subfemininity. Thus
collectivism/collectivity contrasts with the individualism/individuality of
man, whether with regard to the submasculine, the masculine, or the
supermasculine.
2. FROM COLLECTIVISM TO INDIVIDUALISM. Collectivism begins in the Devil and ends in
the angelic subwoman. Conversely,
individualism begins in the beastly subman and ends in God.
3. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.
Collectivism is largely public and, by contrast, individualism private -
the former feminine and the latter masculine.
Though it is also possible to think in terms of a sort of androgynous
cross between the two, as in 'collections of individuals' or 'individual
collectives', which is arguably less left or right wing than centrist
(Liberal), and thus profoundly amoral.
4. SUBMASCULINE/SUPERFEMININE CONTRASTS. Solar monotheism (Judaism/Satanism) contrasts
with stellar polytheism (Hinduism/Buddhism) as submasculine individualism with
superfeminine collectivism. Even the
submasculine beast will keep himself individually aloof from the collectivity
of superfeminine devils.
5. INDIVIDUALLY ALOOF. Just
so, the Heathen man will keep himself individually aloof from the collectivity
of Heathen women, as will the Christian man (monk) from the collectivity of
Christian women (nuns), and, last but hardly least, the Superchristian god
(superman) from the collectivity of Superchristian angels (subwomen).
6. HEAVEN AND HELL. Heaven is
no less private and individual than Hell is public and collective - all the
difference between the supermasculine god and superfeminine devils.
7. COMPETITION AND CO-OPERATION.
Competition, like collectivism, is feminine, whereas co-operation, like
individualism, is masculine. For the
competitive mind is rooted in the collective, whereas the co-operative mind is
centred in the individual. People
compete with others from a collective point-of-view, and co-operate with others
from an individual standpoint. The
collective no more recognizes individuals than the individual recognizes
collectives. One rejects individualism
from a collective point-of-view, which is competitive, and transcends
collectivism from an individual standpoint, which is co-operative. The transmutation of collectivism devolves in
the feminine (from superfeminine to subfeminine via feminine), while the
transmutation of individualism evolves in the masculine (from submasculine to
supermasculine via masculine).
8. REJECTION OF GOD. Society,
like socialism, will always reject God; for God is the supreme individual. High society will reject God from the Devil's
point-of-view; low society will reject Him from woman's point-of-view.
9. FROM ALPHA TO OMEGA. From
the Devil (of superfeminine personality) to God (in supermasculine
universality) - from alpha to omega via the World/Overworld, etc.
10. SUBDEVILS AND SUBGODS.
Angels are no less subdevils than beasts are subgods, for neither
subwomen nor submen can be other than subdiabolic or subdivine respectively.
CYCLE 21
1. MODES OF FEMALE SALVATION.
Women can be saved, noumenally, from superfeminine personality to
subfeminine humility, and, phenomenally, from feminine sensuality to feminine
chastity, since in the former case they are progressing from Superheathen evil
to Superchristian good, whereas in the latter case they are progressing from
Heathen evil to Christian good. Thus, in
the one case, from an absolute evil to an absolute good ... as germane to
noumenal devolution, whilst, in the other case, from relative evil to relative
good ... as germane to phenomenal devolution.
2. MODES OF FEMALE DAMNATION.
Conversely, women can be damned, noumenally, from subfeminine humility to
superfeminine personality, and, phenomenally, from feminine chastity to
feminine sensuality, since in the former case they are regressing from
Superchristian good to Superheathen evil, whereas in the latter case they are
regressing from Christian good to Heathen evil.
A regression, in other words, from absolute good to absolute evil and
from relative good to relative evil.
3. MODES OF MALE SALVATION.
Men can be saved, noumenally, from submasculine emotionality to
supermasculine universality, and, phenomenally, from masculine intellectuality
to masculine spirituality, since in the former case they are progressing from
Superheathen evil to Superchristian good, whereas in the latter case they are
progressing from Heathen evil to Christian good. Thus, in the one case, from absolute evil to
absolute good ... as germane to noumenal evolution, whilst, in the other case,
from relative evil to relative good ... as germane to phenomenal evolution.
4. MODES OF MALE DAMNATION.
Conversely, men can be damned, noumenally, from supermasculine
universality to submasculine emotionality, and, phenomenally, from masculine
spirituality to masculine intellectuality, since in the former case they are
regressing from Superchristian good to Superheathen evil, whereas in the latter
case they are regressing from Christian good to Heathen evil. A regression, in other words, from absolute
good to absolute evil and from relative good to relative evil.
5. COMPARATIVE FEMALE DAMNATION.
When we compare the genders, on the other hand, the
Christian/Superchristian females are 'damned' vis-à-vis their male
counterparts, since the latter exist in a Christian/Superchristian Heaven which
is at a masculine/supermasculine remove from feminine/subfeminine Hell.
6. COMPARATIVE MALE DAMNATION.
Conversely, the Superheathen/Heathen males are 'damned' vis-à-vis their
female counterparts, since the latter exist in a Superheathen/Heathen Hell
which, existing at a superfeminine/feminine remove from submasculine/masculine
Heaven, has tended to be regarded in a superior, if not heavenly, light.
CYCLE 22
1. HEATHEN/CHRISTIAN MALES.
Heathen males are inclined to 'look up' to women, whereas Christian
males are disposed to 'look down' upon women - the former damned (cursed by
female domination) and the latter saved (from female domination). Damned to the Devil and saved by God, whether
relatively (Heathen/Christian) or absolutely (Superheathen/Superchristian).
2. CHRISTIAN SALVATION. The
Christian salvation, whether with regard to females (from sensuality to
chastity) or males (from intellectuality to spirituality) does not logically
lead to the Superchristian salvation, the true salvation (noumenal) of 'Kingdom
Come'. One does not save from chastity
to humility or, conversely, from spirituality to universality. The person who has accepted Christian
salvation will not normally seek an alternative salvation. On the contrary, he/she lives on the
phenomenal plane of Christianity and is resigned to it. Christian salvation is effectively an
end-in-itself for such a person.
3. VISIONARY AFTERLIFE.
Because of its phenomenal limitations, Christianity cannot logically be
regarded as the precondition of noumenal salvation in Superchristianity, e.g.
Social Transcendentalism. The Omega
Point of the Church is not some Superchristian 'Kingdom Come' but the grave,
wherein 'Eternity' is achieved on the basis of a visionary afterlife. By and large, the Church is resigned to this
personal salvation of the grave, which fulfils rather than threatens its
existence.
4. SECOND COMING. Yet the
Church also acknowledges the possibility of a Second Coming and, in
consequence, 'Kingdom Come', in which there will be a 'resurrection of the
Dead' to Eternal Life. In other words
something more than the visionary 'resurrection of the Dead' in the grave ...
through chemical changes in the brain.
It acknowledges the possibility of Eternal Life through the Second
Coming, which is nothing less than the prospect of noumenal salvation. Yet how can the phenomenal, viz. Christians, be
noumenally saved? Obviously, people who
cling to chastity (females) and to spirituality (males) cannot be saved to the
noumenal Beyond, since humility is only possible from a Superheathen basis in
personality, whilst universality is only possible from a like-basis in
emotionality. One saves from noumenal
evil to noumenal good, as from phenomenal evil to phenomenal good. Thus Christians cannot be saved to either
humility or universality (unlike Superheathens), but only to the intermediate
salvation, through the Second Coming, of hallucinogenic enlightenment, which is
the only way in which the 'resurrection of the Dead', viz. visionary experience
in the grave, can be interpreted from a Superchristian standpoint, the
standpoint, as already intimated, of noumenal salvation.
5. INTERMEDIATE SALVATION.
Christians can be brought to 'Kingdom Come', but only via the Second
Coming, which is to say, on an intermediate basis in between the humility of
angelic subfemininity and the universality of divine supermasculinity. Such an intermediate position will be a
precondition of the Superchristian noumenal extremes of the Mary Child below
(subfeminine) and the Holy Spirit of Heaven above (supermasculine).
CYCLE 23
1. RACIAL TRANSMUTATION. A Christian
people who have been saved to synthetic spirituality ... may yet require the
assistance of racial transmutation, in order to pass beyond this to the
properly noumenal extremes of 'Kingdom Come'.
2. NOUMENAL ROUTE TO SALVATION.
For Superheathen peoples, however, the route to Superchristian salvation
is more direct, since those who, as superwomen, were given to the devil of
personality can be saved to the angel of humility, while those who, as submen,
were given to the beast of emotionality can be saved to the god of
universality.
3. HEATHEN/SUPERHEATHEN INKLING OF SALVATION. Just as Heathen peoples can know chastity (if
female) and spirituality (if male) while remaining predominantly either sensual
or intellectual, so Superheathen peoples can know humility (if superfeminine)
and universality (if submasculine)
while remaining predominantly either optical or emotional.
4. CHRISTIAN/SUPERCHRISTIAN INKLING OF DAMNATION. Conversely, just as Christian peoples can
know sensuality (if feminine) and intellectuality (if masculine) while
remaining predominantly either chaste or spiritual, so Superchristian peoples
can know personality (if subfeminine) and emotionality (if supermasculine)
while remaining predominantly either humble or universal.
5. FROM LAST TO FIRST. No
people can be absolutely any one thing or another, i.e. one thing or another all the time,
but they can certainly be predominantly one thing or another, depending on
whether they are Superheathen/Heathen 'born' or Christian/Superchristian
'reborn'. The significant feature about
'Kingdom Come' is that those who, depending on their gender, were predominantly
optical or emotional in the Superheathen past will become predominantly
universal or humble in the Superchristian future, thereby passing from one
noumenal extreme to another ... as Superchristian criteria effect the gradual
transmutation of life on Earth from an alpha-stemming to an omega-oriented bias
... thanks to a variety of technological and cultural procedures.
6. SAVED TO ANGELS. To save
superwomen from the Clear Light of the Void to the Mary Child of subfeminine
humility (eyes lowered or shaded instead of aggressively seductive in naked
glare), as devils become angels, and optical immodesty is rejected.
7. SAVED TO GODS. To save
submen from Jehovah/Allah/the Father to the Holy Spirit of Heaven in
supermasculine universality (calmly one with the air one breathes), as beasts
become gods, and emotional agitation is rejected.
CYCLE 24
1. DEVIL/DEMON DICHOTOMY.
Just as superwomen can be of the light per se
or of lightfire (the fiery core of a light context), so we can distinguish the
one from the other on the basis of a devil/demon dichotomy, the former
genuinely superfeminine and the latter quasi-submasculine. Generally speaking, I have tended, in the
past, to characterize such a distinction in terms of a Hindu/Buddhist analogy,
equating the superfeminine per se with black-and-white photography, and
the quasi-submasculine 'bovaryization' of the superfeminine with colour photography.
2. BEAST/WARRIOR DICHOTOMY.
Similarly, just as a subman can be of the fire per se
or of firelight (the light-aside of a fiery context), so we can distinguish the
one from the other on the basis of a beast/warrior dichotomy, the former
genuinely submasculine and the latter quasi-superfeminine. Generally speaking, I have tended, in the
past, to characterize such a distinction in terms of a Satanic/Judaic analogy,
equating the submasculine per se with colour film and the
quasi-superfeminine 'bovaryization' of the submasculine with black-and-white
film.
3. DEMON/WARRIOR DISTINCTION.
It could be said that whereas the demon 'comes on' to the beast, the
warrior 'sucks up' to the devil.
4. COMPARATIVE SUPERHEATHEN STANDINGS. The beast is subdivine and the warrior
quasi-superdiabolic, whereas the demon is quasi-subdivine and the devil ...
superdiabolic.
5. COMPARATIVE STANDINGS OF ANGELS TO DEVILS. Compared to devils, angels are subdiabolic,
but it makes things easier to regard them simply as angelic vis-à-vis the Devil
per se.
6. COMPARATIVE STANDINGS OF BEASTS TO GODS. Likewise, compared to gods, beasts are
subdivine, but it makes things easier to regard them simply as bestial
vis-à-vis God per se.
CYCLE 25
1. SUPREME BEING. What people
have taken for God, namely the Judaic and/or Christian 'Creator', is really
subdivine and therefore no more than bestial.
For God is the supreme (level of) willing that, as an air-focused
meditation technique, makes possible the supreme (level of) being, which is
Heaven. God/Heaven has nothing
whatsoever to do with a 'Creator', least of all a 'Creator of the Universe',
and everything to do with an ultimate level of willing/being.
2. ABSOLUTE CONTRAST. This
ultimate level of willing/being, of positive power/glory, is the Holy Spirit of
Heaven, which contrasts absolutely with the Clear Light of the Void, the primal
level of being/willing, in negative glory/power. Such an absolute contrast is nothing less
than one between superfeminine primacy and supermasculine supremacy, or, in
simple terms, Hell/the Devil and God/Heaven.
3. COMPLEMENTARY OPPOSITES.
There is obviously a sense in which submen are subhuman and supermen no
less superhuman, but, equally, one should remember that submen and superwomen
are complementary, as are supermen and subwomen - the former in Superheathen
terms and the latter within a Superchristian framework.
CYCLE 26
1. ETHNIC CORRELATIONS VIS-À-VIS THE CHRISTIAN AFTERLIFE. The possibility of all corpses being subject
to a visionary afterlife in the grave, irrespective of whether they had
formerly lived as Heathens or Christians, must be greater than the
converse. For, unless their brains had
been removed prior to burial, they would surely be exposed to chemical changes
in the brain and thus be subliminally conscious, in an otherworldly manner, of
what that meant. Where they would
differ, however, would be in regard to the extent to which these chemical
changes were purely visionary or subject, on the other hand, to the subversive
intrusion, from a visionary standpoint, of either intellectual, emotional, or
sensual overtones. Now I hold that where
the corpse of a devout Christian, a lifelong Catholic, would be the most likely
to experience pure visions, the corpse of a Heathen, or Protestant, would be
more likely to experience impure visions, which is to say, visions coloured by
either subliminal thoughts, emotions, or feelings of a sensual nature,
depending on his psychic bias and, in some correlative sense, denominational
past. For it is my belief that where the
Catholic brain will be quasi-spiritual by dint of Catholicism's emphasis on
prayer, the Puritan brain will be intellectual by dint of Puritanism's emphasis
on writing (letters, sermons, epistles with regard to the New Testament, etc.),
the Presbyterian brain will be quasi-emotional by dint of Presbyterianism's
emphasis on reading (especially from the Old Testament, with its poetic
psalms), and the Anglican brain will be quasi-sensual by dint of Anglicanism's
emphasis on speech (as with regard to the Eucharist). Doubtless other factors, both hereditary and
environmental, also play a part in the conditioning of any given brain towards
the likelihood of a particular posthumous bias, but, whatever the reasons,
there can be little doubt that the part played by ethnicity in one's posthumous
fate is significant, and that, as one had
lived, so shall one 'live again', if only for the duration of one's
death (which is to say, until extensive decomposition of the brain puts an end
to the Afterlife and reduces the corpse to a skeleton).
2. SPIRITUALITY OF THE GRAVE.
Christianity offers one - meaning principally men - the 'peace that
surpasses understanding', or the spirituality, ultimately, of the grave, which
is not only beyond intellectuality per se but, more appositely,
beyond the quasi-spiritual 'bovaryization' of the intellect through prayer, and
hence the final mode of 'understanding' prior to a visionary 'peace'. But that is all that Christianity, and by implication
Christ, can offer one.
3. SUPERCRISTIAN GOOD. For
something more, for something which is truly of ultimate significance, one must
turn to the Second Coming and/or True World Messiah, who would rather speak of the
calmness that surpasses emotionality (not to mention, for females, the humility
that surpasses personality), and thus of true salvation, which is less a
substitution of phenomenal grace for phenomenal sin ... than a substitution of
noumenal grace for noumenal sin, a conversion, in short, from absolute sin in
Superheathen evil to absolute grace in Superchristian good, the goodness of
'Kingdom Come', which will also embrace the intermediate goodness of
hallucinogenic enlightenment for Christians who opt for Superchristian
salvation ... through the Second Coming, in order that they may achieve a
synthetic spirituality as a precondition of subsequent humble and/or universal
grace as and when the time is adjudged ripe.
4. MESSIANIC RELATIVITY. He
who is Second Coming to Christians, meaning principally Catholics, may well be
True World Messiah to Superheathens, or those who, whether Hindus/Buddhists,
Judaists/Satanists, or Islamics/Mohammedans, can be saved more directly from
absolute sin to absolute grace, thereby passing either from personality to
humility (if female) or from emotionality to universality (if male).
CYCLE 27
1. LIGHT/FIRE DISTINCTIONS.
For me, there is a sort of superfeminine/submasculine distinction,
analogous to that between the light and the fire, devil and beast, between
Hindus and Buddhists, Judaists and Satanists, and Islamic Fundamentalists and
Mohammedans, as though the first in each pair primarily related to different
manifestations of the Light (stellar, solar, and bloody respectively), whereas
the second in each pair primarily related to different manifestations of the
Fire (stellar, solar, and cardiac respectively).
2. BLOCKING-DEVICE REDUCTION.
The only thing that will really guarantee a 'rebirth', or transmutation
from absolute sin to absolute grace, in the future ... will be the development
and siting in space of large blocking devices, or 'solar panels', such that
will progressively reduce the sun's influence and thus permit people to be
predominantly omega-orientated rather than, as before, alpha-stemming in their
moral integrities.
3. EXCEPTION TO THE RULE.
Thus, for the first time, there will be more supermasculine calm for men
than submasculine emotion, more subfeminine humility for women than
superfeminine personality. The alpha
will become the exception to the rule, the shadow side of the moral psyche, in
which gods and angels will have supplanted beasts and devils. Even those who, as former Christians, had
opted for the 'resurrection of the Dead' through hallucinogenic enlightenment,
would be as saintly spirituals to spiritual saints, leading a superior form of
spiritual life to what they would have known as Christians, prayerfully waiting
upon the grave. And even that will, in
due course, be superseded by properly divine and angelic extremes ... as racial
and cultural transmutation, voluntarily entered into, bring the 'phenomenal' to
a genuinely noumenal salvation.
4. RACIAL GENERALIZATIONS.
Racial transmutations for the Irish cannot be the same as those for the British,
since the Irish are a predominantly Catholic and thus Christian people, whereas
the British are a predominantly Protestant and thus Heathen people, for whom
Christianity is, by and large, a lost cause.
Hence whereas the Irish will ultimately require a pattern of racial
transmutation in keeping with their omega-oriented Christian traditions, the
British can only be transmuted backwards, as it were, in terms of Superheathen
cultural influence, so that, eventually, they or, more correctly, their descendants
... will be in a position, as effective Superheathens, to be directly saved to
'Kingdom Come' at both universal and humble extremes, rather than have to pass
through an hallucinogenic salvation ... like, presumably, the Christic Irish. My personal view is that, because of their
contrary moral biases traditionally, caucasoid Asians
and Blacks are more suited to
5. NECESSITY OF RACIAL INTERBREEDING. Certainly, one cannot ignore race in its relationship
to culture and, beyond that, to morality.
Only a fool would pretend that racial transmutation was of no
consequence to historical and moral progress!
For one thing, it dilutes the blood, and thus precludes the kind of
strength-affirming Paganism that tends to characterize those peoples overly
enamoured of 'racial purity'. For
another thing, it breaks down national barriers and tends to encourage a
universal perspective in people which transcends race. Thirdly, it helps to quicken the slow and
even, in some respects, to slow the quick, bringing disparate cultures
together. Fourthly, it breaks down
prejudice, since racial (and thus sexual) exclusiveness is a major cause of
prejudice, which can only be eliminated through interbreeding. In short, the more cross-fertilization there
is, the more will people come together into one universal family of brotherly
(and sisterly) love. Difference is
conflict. Similarity is peace - the
peace of divine calm above and of angelic humility below.
CYCLE 28
1. APPEARANCE AND ESSENCE.
The superwoman is the most external/centrifugal of persons, whereas the
superman is the most internal/centripetal of persons. Appearance and essence, Devil and God.
2. CONTRARY MODES OF GENDER DOMINATION. Men dominate women physically, through sex,
but women dominate men metaphysically, as personality rides-out on the back of
sensuality, and man is constrained, as submasculine beast, to the Devil.
3. PARADOXICAL CHRISTIANS. One
wonders what business women can have in the 'House of Christ', since they are
fundamentally creatures of the World, if not also of the Devil. But, then again, women can be converted from
sensuality to chastity, becoming less Heathen and more Christian.
4. INTERDEPENDENT SALVATIONS.
Salvation is not just for men, neither phenomenally nor noumenally, but
is also for women, since the rejection of sin by men cannot last unless women
also reject it, thereby passing to either Christian (phenomenal) or Superchristian
(noumenal) grace. A sinful woman will
always be a threat to a graceful man.
CYCLE 29
1. PRECURSORS OF PHOTOS.
Drawings and paintings are, in effect, the precursors of monochromatic
photos and colour photos respectively; which is to say, drawings and paintings
are metaphysically aligned with the stellar in both its primary (light) and
secondary (lightfire) manifestations, and are accordingly correlative of
diabolic and demonic alternatives.
2. METAPHYSICAL RELATIONSHIP OF DRAWINGS TO PAINTINGS. One could argue that whereas drawings are,
like black-and-white photos, superfeminine, paintings, like colour photos, are
quasi-submasculine. Hence drawings stand
to paintings as devils to demons, with, religiously, Hindu- and Buddhist-like
implications ... as between the Clear Light of the Void (Space) and, for want
of a better term, the Clear Fire of the Void, this latter the fiery core of a
stellar star.
3. SUPERNATURAL VISIONS. Even
older than drawings and paintings are sculptures and stained-glass windows,
while more ancient again, though of analogous import, are supernatural visions,
whether primary, and monochromatic, or secondary, and polychromatic. Yet such visions would be no better than
diabolic (if monochromatic) and demonic (if polychromatic), since appertaining
to pre-Judaic levels of spirituality, which have their basis in a negatively
superconscious part of the psyche correlating with 'cosmic consciousness'.
4. SUBCONSCIOUS DREAMS. By
contrast to supernatural visions, dreams would correspond to the subconscious,
an altogether more solar-like part of the psyche with Judaic implications ...
such as would suggest that whereas monochromatic dreams were Jehovah-like,
polychromatic dreams have a Satanic correlation which more accords with the
Clear Fire of Time than with, say, the Clear Light of Time, or the
quasi-superfeminine light-aside, in this latter instance, to properly
submasculine fire. Thus while colour
dreams would correlate with the subdivine beast, their black-and-white counterparts
would suggest to this thinker the likelihood of a warrior correlation, the
former Davidian and the latter Mosaic.
Like colour films vis-à-vis black-and-white films, colour dreams are
more (sub)masculine than black-and-white ones, but both alike are naturalistic
as opposed to idealistic ... unlike, by contrast, visions and photos.
5. MOLECULAR INTERMEDIARY.
Also naturalistic in this solar-like sense of a Judaic/Communist plane,
are carnivals and pageants, and it seems to me that whereas carnivals correlate
with the quasi-superfeminine on account of their overly spectacular and
therefore light-affirming nature, pageants have a submasculine correlation more
Satanic (or Marxist) than Jehovahesque (or Leninist). Yet both of these would contrast not with
visions, as do dreams, but with sculptures/stained-glass windows and
drawings/paintings. In fact, I would
argue for a distinction between carnivals/pageants and, further,
parades/festivals, contending that the former would more exactly parallel
sculptures/stained-glass windows and the latter ... drawings/paintings, as we
move through the relative (molecular) towards a return to the absolute
(elemental) in the form of a filmic antithesis, in both black-and-white and
colour, to dreams, this latter effectively communistic where dreams would be
Judaic, just as photos, their noumenal counterpart, are effectively fascistic
where visions would be Hindu.
6. STELLAR/SOLAR PLANES.
Certainly it helps to distinguish the alpha elemental from the omega or,
rather, super-alpha elemental ... on the basis of a Hindu/Fascist distinction
(subdivisible between primary and secondary options) where the stellar plane is
concerned, reserving for the solar one underneath (also subdivisible between
primary and secondary options) a Judaic/Communist distinction. Doubtless the molecular realms in between are
rather more Christian and Parliamentary, or Catholic/Monarchist and
Protestant/Liberal respectively, than Judaic/Communist or Hindu/Fascist, and I
would hold that whereas carnivals/pageants are broadly monarchist and
parades/festivals no less broadly liberal, sculptures/stained-glass windows are
Catholic and drawings/paintings effectively Protestant, thereby aligning,
relative to their molecular status, Monarchism and Liberalism with Judaism and
Communism, but Catholicism and Protestantism with Hinduism and Fascism, so that
we can speak of a progression or, more correctly in regard to these alpha
parallels, regression ... from Judaism to Monarchism on the one hand, and from
Liberalism to Communism on the other, that of the submasculine, while reserving
for the superfeminine spectrum, so to speak, a devolutionary regression from
Hinduism to Catholicism on the one hand, and from Protestantism to Fascism on
the other hand.
7. FULL GAMUT. The 'Fascism'
of photography vis-à-vis the 'Communism' of film. A contemporary Superheathen parallel to the
'Hinduism' of visions and the 'Judaism' of dreams. Likewise, intermediate between these
elemental alpha-stemming extremes, one could speak of the 'Catholicism' of
sculptures/stained-glass windows vis-à-vis the 'Monarchism' of
carnivals/pageants on the one hand, but the 'Protestantism' of
drawings/paintings vis-à-vis the 'Liberalism' of parades/festivals on the other
hand.
CYCLE 30
1. WORLDLY PLANE. Theatre
differs from the netherworldly plane of dreams - carnivals/pageants -
parades/festivals - films ... as a worldly art form having its basis not in
acting but in speech. For although in
practice acting and speaking tend to overlap, the former is more germane to
emotionality and the latter to sensuality, which is nothing short of a
submasculine/feminine distinction, as relevant to the planes in question.
2. NOCTURNAL 'DRAMA'. Wet
dreams are the 'theatre' of sleep.
3. THEATRE. I would argue
that, being a worldly art form, theatre is less Catholic or Protestant than ...
royalist or republican, not to mention socialist or, at any rate, social at the
television-play extreme and personal at the contrary extreme ... of wet dreams.
4. DRAMATIC DISTINCTIONS. By
and large, I would argue for a tragedy/comedy distinction between 'royalist'
and 'republican' drama, the sort of distinction which is arguably rather more
tragic and comic at the 'personal' and 'social' extremes of wet dreams and television
plays!
CYCLE 31
1. UNIVERSAL MAN. The type of
the 'universal man' is the furthest removed of human beings from the Universe,
since he relates not to personality (in the mystical alpha) but to universality
(in the gnostical omega), and is accordingly of an extreme evolutionary
character.
2. MORAL TRANSVALUATION. When
people come to understand my work, they will realize that Satan is as
preferable to Jehovah as ... David to Moses, the beast (or shepherd boy) to the
warrior (or Egyptian prince). For the
beast is properly submasculine, and hence subdivine, whereas the warrior is
quasi-superfeminine, and hence quasi-superdiabolic, which is to say, nearer to
the Devil per se, the devil of cosmic light.
3. PARALLEL 'SELL OUT'.
Likewise, they will realize that Mohammed is as preferable to Allah as
... the heart to the blood, the 'fiery core' to its 'light-aside', since Islam
(Shi'ite) took the same road as Judaism in deferring, through upper-class will,
to the cosmic light of Hindu primacy, and such a road smacks of a 'sell out' to
the Devil, the 'sell out' in this case being to value blood above the heart, so
that Allah ranks above Mohammed in much the same way that Jehovah ranks above
Satan (or Moses above David) in Judaism, which is less rooted, fundamentally,
in the alpha-most region of the 'Kingdom Within', viz. heart/blood, than ...
naturalistically, in the omega-most region of the 'Kingdom Without', wherein
sunlight takes moral precedence over sunheat/fire in the Satanic core.
4. DAVID AND GOLIATH. David
was a beast, or shepherd boy, who 'got lucky' against the demon named Goliath
who 'came on' to him from a contrary realm, the realm, we may well believe, of
Clear-Light primacy, or bona fide philistinism.
CYCLE 32
1. RELATIONSHIP OF EARTH TO MOON.
Just as the sun in some sense stands in an omega relationship to the
Cosmos, so, by contrast, the earth stands in an alpha relationship to the moon,
since, like the Cosmos, the earth is basically feminine, whereas the moon has a
masculine correlation deriving from its materialistic essence.
2. RELATIONSHIP OF ANGLICANISM TO PURITANISM. Yet this alpha/omega dichotomy between the
earth and the moon does not, contrary to superficial appearances, translate
into a Catholic/Protestant polarity. On the
contrary, Protestantism is itself divisible in such a fashion, with Anglicanism
as the denomination which is most of the World and Puritanism as the
denomination which has a lunar and thus, by implication, purgatorial
correlation. Thus Anglicanism and
Puritanism form a sort of alpha/omega polarity relative to Protestantism, with
Presbyterianism taking a pseudo-netherworldly position as the denomination
which is closest to the sun without, however, being of the sun (like Judaism),
since Protestantism tends, like Christianity in general, to be more lunar than
solar or stellar, with a trinity which is correspondingly more
cerebral/intellectual than soulful or spiritual. Hence even the Father is less genuinely
fundamentalist/naturalist than pseudo-fundamentalist, having His basis in
neither the blood nor the sun but the emotional aspect of the brain, which is
to the left, as it were, of its properly intellectual aspect, like
Presbyterianism to the left of Puritanism, the Father to the left of the Son,
Rugby League to the left of Rugby Union or even, in political terms, the
Liberals to the left of the Conservatives.
3. CATHOLIC DENOMINATIONS.
Catholicism also has its alpha and omega, or feminine and masculine
poles, with Eastern Orthodoxy broadly reflective of the alpha and Roman
Catholicism of the omega, as between the Blessed Virgin and the Holy
Ghost. It also, of course, has an
intermediate denomination/deity, which is rather akin to the Celtic Church
traditionally, and which may be identified with the Christ Child, the deity
most correlative, so I maintain, with a quasi-spiritual 'bovaryization' of the
intellect through prayer, since aptly symbolizing the interiorization of the
intellect contrary to any adult predilections for writing, reading, or speaking. For it is this quasi-spiritual form of
intellectuality, necessarily thoughtful, which most prepares the psyche for the
grave, and thus for the 'visionary afterlife' which is properly spiritual - the
spirituality, in short, of the Holy Ghost.
4. MORAL JUDGEMENT. So
morally ignorant and un-Christian was the twentieth century, that people
voluntarily opted for cremation rather than burial, so accustomed were they to
a light-based and cinema/television-conditioned lifestyle closer, in effect, to
the fiery alpha than to the spiritual omega.
Hence they willingly agreed to have their corpse reduced to a pile of
smouldering ashes rather than suffer a spiritual afterlife in the grave. They were not even Heathen (Protestant), but
effectively Superheathen, for whom there was no afterlife (as I have defined it
both here and elsewhere), but simply death, and thus a complete shutdown of
psychic activity. And so they wished to
have their corpse disposed of as quickly as possible. Yet cremation is, in some sense, a moral
judgement, whereby instead of going straight to Heaven (in the narrowly
Christian sense of posthumous 'visionary' experience in the grave) ones goes if
not straight ... then presently to Hell or, at any rate, to a fiery Subheaven
which is closer to the Satanic beast.
Thus do they 'meet their Maker'!
CYCLE 33
1. CEREBRAL CORE AND ASIDE.
In the more or less Protestant context of the Father and the Son
(Christ), the Father takes precedence over the Son in Presbyterianism, but the
Son takes precedence over the Father in Puritanism, given the
emotional/intellectual distinctions which exist between the two
denominations. Now if, for the sake of
clarification, we identify the Father with the emotional aspect of the brain
and Christ with its properly intellectual aspect, it soon becomes evident that
the emotional brain corresponds to the core of the context, necessarily
cerebral, in question, since the core is everywhere fiery compared to the
light-aside, as in the solar and cardiac contexts already investigated, and the
emotional brain, or emotional aspect thereof, is nothing if not a fiery core
whose light-aside corresponds to what is commonly called the intellect. Thus Christ stands to the Father pretty much
as Allah to Mohammed or Jehovah to Satan - that is to say, as the light-aside
to a fiery core. Such a light,
necessarily intellectual, would not exist were it not for the Father, Whose
emotional essence corresponds to the fiery core of the brain. Neither, we may believe, would blood exist
without the heart, or sunlight without the sun.
Nevertheless, the fact that Christ takes precedence over the Father in
Puritanism would suggest to me that Puritanism followed both Islam and Judaism
in deferring to Clear-Light primacy by attaching more importance to the
light-aside of its particular context than to the fiery core itself, thus
putting Christ on a par with Allah and Jehovah ... as the primary deity of
Protestantism.
2. UNTRANSVALUATED DEFERENCE.
Yet if the light-aside of both the solar and cardiac contexts, viz.
sunlight and blood, is quasi-superfeminine compared to the submasculinity of
the fiery core, viz. sunfire and heart, then the light-aside of the cerebral
context, viz. intellect, can only be quasi-superfeminine compared to the fiery
core, viz. brain emotionality, of that context, which is arguably
submasculine. Thus Protestantism would
be guilty of the same moral error as was earlier committed by both Judaism and
Islam ... in ascribing more significance to the light-aside of their respective
contexts than to the core itself.
Puritanism would rank with Islam and Judaism against Presbyterianism,
Mohammedanism (Sunni Moslem), and Satanism, or those sects in which the core
takes precedence over the aside. For in
siding with the light-aside, in this case intellectual, at the expense of the
fiery core, one is effectively placing the Devil above God, since such a
procedure attests to an untransvaluated deference to the Clear Light, the
diabolic primacy of which takes precedence over the Clear Fire of the Void ...
as Hinduism over Buddhism, or monochromatic visions over polychromatic
ones. Even the negative core of a
stellar star, the Clear Fire of the Void, would be less diabolical than the
fierce light which radiates from it as the Clear Light of the Void, and we may
believe that whereas the light is primary and thus superfeminine, the
lightfire, or negative core of a stellar star, is secondary and thus
quasi-submasculine, which is to say, demonic rather than diabolic, a compacted
entity which, existing in a direct relationship to the Void, serves to glorify
light rather than to generate heat.
3. MALE AND FEMALE BRAINS.
With regard to the above, one might contrast the female brain with the
male brain, the latter of which is not only larger than the former but,
existing independently of a physical void (the womb), is primarily a generator
of heat (emotions) rather than light (personality), and thus stands closer to
the solar sun than to the stellar cosmos.
CYCLE 34
1. STELLAR CONTRAST. To contrast
the Clear Light of the Void with the Clear Fire of the Void ... as one would
contrast Hinduism with Buddhism or
2. SOLAR CONTRAST.
Conversely, to contrast the Clear Fire of Time with the Clear Light of
Time ... as one would contrast Satanism with Judaism or Satan with Jehovah -
the latter merely the light-aside of the former.
3. STELLAR/SOLAR COINS. No
less than
4. IDEALIST/NATURALIST DISTINCTIONS.
A modern equivalent of the above 'coins', or dichotomies, would be Fascism
(light-primal) and Nazism (heat-secondary) with regard to idealism, but
Communism (heat-primal) and Bolshevism (light-secondary) with regard to
naturalism, the cultural parallel having less to do with visions and dreams
than with photos and films, photos being no less idealistic than films are
naturalistic.
5. FILM NATURALISM VIS-À-VIS PHOTOGRAPHIC IDEALISM. Film actors/producers are all somehow
communistic in their naturalist stance before life, a stance no less contrary
to the idealism of photography than the Judaic/Satanic essence of dream
naturalism could be regarded as being contrary to the visionary idealism of
Hinduism/Buddhism.
CYCLE 35
1. SCOOTERS AND MOPEDS.
Whereas the Fascist/Nazi dichotomy within modern idealism would
translate into a transportational distinction between, say, Lambretta-type
streamlined scooters and Vespa-type bubble-panel and/or plain scooters, the
Communist/Bolshevik, or Marxist/Leninist, dichotomy within modern naturalism
would just as credibly translate into a transportational distinction between,
say, fixed-pedal plain mopeds and a more streamlined type of retractable-pedal
moped. For scooters stand to mopeds as
idealism to naturalism, the stellar to the solar, or, in political parlance,
Fascism to Communism.
2. MOTORBIKES AND TRIKES. By
contrast to mopeds, motorbikes are rather more fundamentalist, and thus
Neo-Islamic and/or Vampiresque in their correlation, due in large part to
engine and panelling, with heart and blood, as though they stood in an
antithetical relationship to mopeds ... as two-wheeled vehicles owing more, by
dint of the absence of pedals, to the 'Kingdom Within' at its alpha-most level
than to the 'Kingdom Without' at its omega-most level. In this respect, they are probably the
fundamentalist counterpart to trikes, which must surely stand in an
antithetical relationship to scooters - namely, as transcendentalist
three-wheeled vehicles owing more to the spirit than to the soul, and thus
standing closer, in a metaphysical manner-of-speaking, to the lungs/air than to
the heart/blood, the avoidance of a petrol engine being of especial
significance in their transcendence not only of the heart but, owing to the
engine's use of petrol, the blood as well, which must surely rank as an
additional factor to streamlining in the identification of motorbikes with the
blood, an identification which, in the 'Kingdom-Without' contexts of scooters
and mopeds, would translate into light and fire respectively. Hence a stellar/spiritual antithesis between
scooters and trikes would be paralleled, on the next spectrum down, by a
solar/soulful antithesis between mopeds and motorbikes.
3. OPEN-TOPPED AND ENCLOSED CARS.
Doubtless, one could distinguish, on a like-alpha/omega basis, between
open-topped cars and enclosed cars on the next spectrum down, the
lunar/intellectual one, so to speak, and I would argue that whereas mopeds and
motorbikes constitute a naturalist/fundamentalist antithesis, open-topped and
enclosed cars are constitutive of a materialist/nonconformist one.
4. BUSES AND COACHES.
Likewise, on the bottom spectrum ... of worldly mundaneness, I would
argue for a planar/sensual antithesis between, for example, single-decker
buses/coaches and double-decker buses/coaches, contending that whereas the
former were realistic and alpha-stemming, the latter are humanistic and
omega-orientated.
5. VANS AND LORRIES.
Obviously a similar dichotomy between open-topped vans/lorries and
enclosed vans/lorries would also have to be allowed for, and it could well
transpire that vans/lorries are intermediate between cars above and buses below
... rather than either strictly materialist/nonconformist or realist/humanist.
CYCLE 36
1. SUBDIVISIONS OF THE BRAIN/MIND.
I used to think that the fourfold physiological subdivisions of the
brain to which my philosophy was especially partial, viz. backbrain, right
midbrain, left midbrain, and forebrain, should be exactly correlated with
psychological subdivisions of the mind, viz. subconscious, unconscious,
conscious, and superconscious, so that one would have a
physiological/psychological pairing as follows: backbrain/subconscious, right
midbrain/unconscious, left midbrain/conscious, and
forebrain/superconscious. These days,
however, I would consider such pairings too facile, even though I am still very
much partial to subdivisions in both physiological and psychological
contexts. For it seems to me that, in
light of my recent contentions relating to the different kinds or stages of
idealism and naturalism, not to mention realism and materialism (about which
more in a moment), one should allow for the notion of, say, superconscious mind
in all four subdivisions of the brain, so that the progression or, rather,
devolutionary regression of idealism from visions to photos via sculptures/stained-glass
windows and drawings/paintings ... follows a superconscious course, necessarily
negative vis-à-vis the alpha-stemming constitution of idealism, through all
four physiological subdivisions of the overall brain.
2. NEGATIVE SUPERCONSCIOUS MIND.
Thus visions (both monochromatic and polychromatic) as germane to
negative superconscious mind in the backbrain; sculptures/stained-glass windows
as germane to negative superconscious mind in the right midbrain;
drawings/paintings as germane to negative superconscious mind in the left
midbrain; and photos as germane to negative superconscious mind in the
forebrain. Consequently, it could be
argued that not only does negative superconsciousness stretch through all four
subdivisions of the brain, but that, as we pass from one to another such
subdivision, largely though not exclusively on the basis of a devolutionary
regression, the cultural manifestations of superconscious mind change
accordingly, as outlined above.
3. NEGATIVE SUBCONSCIOUS MIND.
Having briefly dealt with the negative, or alpha-stemming,
superconscious, let us now concentrate on its subconscious counterpart, the
mode of mind most correlative, so I shall contend, with naturalism, and thus
advance the theory that the negative subconscious likewise stretches through
all four subdivisions of the brain, beginning with dreams and ending, as
before, with films. Thus dreams (both
monochromatic and polychromatic) as germane to negative subconscious mind in
the backbrain; carnivals/pageants as germane to negative subconscious mind in
the right midbrain; parades/festivals as germane to negative subconscious mind
in the left midbrain; and films as germane to negative subconscious mind in the
forebrain. As before, I shall argue that
negative subconsciousness in the forebrain is the most devolved form of the
subconscious, a form antithetical to its backbrain counterpart, wherein
subconsciousness is most (rather than least) subconscious.
4. NEGATIVE UNCONSCIOUS MIND.
Likewise, I shall argue that wet dreams are germane to negative
unconscious mind in the backbrain; that royalist drama (tragic) is germane to
negative unconscious mind in the right midbrain; that republican drama (comic)
is germane to negative unconscious mind in the left midbrain; and that
television drama is germane to negative unconscious mind in the forebrain, this
latter the most devolved, and therefore least unconscious, form of dramatic
unconsciousness.
5. NEGATIVE CONSCIOUS MIND.
Before I proceed from realism, as above, to materialism, I should point
out that the principal cultural manifestations of this spectrum of mind
(conscious) are literary, and that literature can be subdivided, no less than
theatre, along lines correlating with our fourfold physiological subdivisions of
the brain. Such subdivisions would, I
believe, be as follows: poetry, short stories, novels, and philosophy, and I
shall argue for a correlation between poetry and the backbrain, short stories
and the right midbrain, novels and the left midbrain, and philosophy and the
forebrain. Thus poetry as germane to
negative conscious mind in the backbrain; short stories as germane to negative
conscious mind in the right midbrain; novels as germane to negative conscious
mind in the left midbrain; and philosophy as germane to negative conscious mind
in the forebrain. A devolutionary
regression, as before, would therefore place poetry in the alpha-most
subdivision of the brain as the least devolved form of negative consciousness,
and philosophy in the alpha-least subdivision of the brain as the most devolved
form of negative consciousness, a form which was no less noumenally beyond
short stories/novels ... than poetry is noumenally behind them, so to
speak. For, of course, the
backbrain/forebrain subdivisions of the overall brain are here, with regard to
negative conscious mind, no less elemental than the
right-midbrain/left-midbrain subdivisions of it molecular. And what applies to the conscious in its
alpha-stemming manifestations applies no less to the superconscious, the
subconscious, and the unconscious, as already discussed.
CYCLE 37
1. POSITIVE MIND. Where there
is negative mind there is always the possibility of positive mind, whether with
regard to the superconscious, the subconscious, the conscious, or the
unconscious, and what has been argued of negative mind can just as logically be
argued of its positive, or omega-oriented, antithesis - namely, that any given
manifestation of it is to be found in all four subdivisions of the brain ...
from the backbrain to the forebrain via the right and left midbrains.
2. DEVOLUTIONARY/EVOLUTIONARY DISTINCTION. The real distinction between negative and
positive mind will be that whereas the former is devolutionary, the latter is
evolutionary, since the one is symptomatic of a regression from particle
primacy, while the other is symptomatic of a progression towards wavicle
supremacy. Thus whereas negative mind becomes
regressively less idealistic or naturalistic or materialistic or realistic ...
the more it devolves from alpha primacy, positive mind becomes progressively
more transcendentalist or fundamentalist or nonconformist or humanist ... the
more it evolves towards omega supremacy.
Now this applies to all manifestations of negative/positive mind, from
the superconscious and subconscious at the noumenal top, so to speak, to the
conscious and unconscious at the phenomenal bottom.
3. DIVERGENCE AND CONVERGENCE.
The alpha-stemming manifestations of mind (negative) are generally
characterized by a certain distancing from the experiencer, since they tend to
happen to him, whereas the omega-oriented manifestations of mind (positive) are
more directly experienced as manifestations of a personal commitment on the
part of their practitioner. There is,
furthermore, the suggestion of a scientific/religious distinction between the
two orders of mind, since negative mind expresses a divergence from self or,
more correctly, not-self, whereas positive mind expresses or, more correctly,
impresses a convergence towards self, a suggestion complicated by the fact that
both the not-self and the self are divisible between noumenal and phenomenal
manifestations.
4. EXPRESSION AND IMPRESSION.
Hence whereas negative superconscious mind expresses negative being in
idealism, positive superconscious mind impresses positive being in
transcendentalism. Likewise, whereas
negative subconscious mind expresses negative doing in naturalism, positive
subconscious mind impresses positive doing in fundamentalism. Similarly, whereas negative conscious mind
expresses negative taking in materialism, positive conscious mind impresses
positive taking in nonconformism. And,
finally, whereas negative unconscious mind expresses negative giving in
realism, positive unconscious mind impresses positive giving in humanism.
5. EXPLOSIVE AND IMPLOSIVE.
The expression of negative being, doing, taking, and giving is
explosive, whereas the impression of positive being, doing, taking, and giving
is implosive. The particle alpha
explodes centrifugally, the wavicle omega implodes centripetally. The explosion of negative mind into particles
expresses the negative being, doing, taking, or giving of the not-self, whereas
the implosion of positive mind into wavicles impresses the positive being,
doing, taking, and giving of the self.
CYCLE 38
1. THE SELF. What, then, is
the self in both its phenomenal and noumenal forms? Clearly, the opposite of the not-self ... as
described earlier in relation, for example, to visions, dreams, poetry, and wet
dreams at the alpha-most points of their respective psychological spectra. It does not happen to one as negative being,
doing, etc., but is something one directly invests in oneself. It is not visionary but spiritual, not
emotional but soulful, not intellectual but devotional, not sensual but
graceful. It is religious (in the best
sense of that word), musical, prayerful, and choreographic. It is true or strong or knowledgeable or
beautiful. It is not illusory or weak or
ignorant or ugly. It is good, not
evil! It is reborn, not once-born!
2. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE ORDERS OF WILL. It is the will of negative mind to diverge
from negative being, doing, taking, and giving, but the will of positive mind to
converge towards positive being, doing, taking, and giving. For the will that is negative is an
expression of power with regard to the explosive nature of the not-self,
whereas the will that is positive is an impression of power with regard to the
implosive nature of the self.
3. OBJECTIVE/SUBJECTIVE DISTINCTIONS. Before I proceed further, I should like to
clarify the distinction between the self/not-self not simply on the basis of a
noumenal/phenomenal dichotomy, but in terms, moreover, of the objective and the
subjective, so that we can distinguish not only between, say, the noumenal self
and the phenomenal self, but also, and more specifically, between the objective
noumenal self, or heart, and the subjective noumenal self, or lungs, on the one
hand, and between the objective phenomenal self, or sex organs, and the
subjective phenomenal self, or brain, on the other hand. Thus will we do justice to the four levels of
self, which exist in a contrary relationship to the four levels of not-self,
viz. the objective noumenal not-self of the eyes, the subjective noumenal
not-self of the ears, the objective phenomenal not-self of the tongue, and the
subjective phenomenal not-self of the flesh, or, in other words, the senses of
sight, hearing, tasting, and touching.
The sense of smell is also, in some degree, connected to taste, although
the nose is more generally a filter and channel for the passage of air into the
lungs, and is accordingly of a function which brings it closer to the
subjective noumenal self, wherein sensuality is transcended.
4. CRUDE AND FINE. All
sensuality is effectively crude, by dint of its association with the not-self,
whether noumenally or phenomenally, objectively or subjectively. In this respect, it contrasts with the
fineness of that which one would associate with the self, whether noumenally or
phenomenally, objectively or subjectively.
5. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY. The
subjective noumenal/phenomenal self is no more exclusively subjective ... than
the objective phenomenal/noumenal self exclusively objective. On the contrary, it is primarily and, as it
were, predominantly subjective. Hence
the lungs are primarily about breathing-in (subjective) and only secondarily
about breathing-out (objective), whereas the heart is primarily about
pumping-out (objective) and only secondarily about pumping-in (subjective).
6. PSYCHCO-PHYSICAL CORRELATIONS.
It should be possible to maintain that whereas negative mind is
associated with the not-selves, positive mind has associations, by contrast,
with the selves, both noumenal/phenomenal and objective/subjective. Now it seems to me that the division of mind
into superconscious, subconscious, conscious, and unconscious aspects enables
us to infer that each subdivision will also be associated with a particular
sense/organ, irrespective of to which subdivision of the overall brain it may
appertain. Hence it should be feasible
to contend that the negative superconscious, for example, will always be
associated, in some degree, with the eyes, irrespective of whether with regard
to the backbrain, the right midbrain, the left midbrain, or the forebrain,
whereas the positive superconscious will always be associated with the lungs,
whether with regard to one or another of the above-mentioned subdivisions of
the overall brain. Likewise, while the
negative subconscious will be associated with the ears, its positive
counterpart will have associations with the heart. Similarly, whereas the negative conscious
will be associated with the tongue, its positive counterpart will have
associations with the brain. And,
finally, while the negative unconscious will be associated with the flesh, its
positive counterpart will have associations with the womb. Thus we have a crude/fine distinction between
the contrary orders of mind and their respective associations with the sensuous
'Kingdom Without' and the spiritual 'Kingdom Within'.
7. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIVERGENCE AND CONVERGENCE. Obviously, just as negative mind devolves
from the alpha-most association with the physical senses through the backbrain
to the alpha-least association with the physical senses through the forebrain,
so, by a contrary token, positive mind evolves from the omega-least association
with the physical organs through the backbrain to the omega-most association
with the physical organs through the forebrain.
Positive mind does not so much diverge, in negative will, from an
exterior vacuum ... as converge, in positive will, towards an interior plenum,
wherein it is saved. For salvation is
precisely the opposite of damnation - the convergence of mind, through positive
willpower, upon a plenum ... as opposed to the divergence of mind, through
negative willpower, from a vacuum. The
mind that diverges from the hell of whichever external physical organ is
damned, whereas the mind that converges upon the heaven of whichever internal
physical organ is saved ... whether relatively or absolutely, with regard to
the phenomenal or to the noumenal, in objective or, more importantly,
subjective terms. Let us therefore take
a look at the various modes of salvation, from the unconscious in relation to
the womb to the superconscious in relation to the lungs.
CYCLE 39
1. UNCONSCIOUS DANCE. Dance
is to the positive unconscious what theatre (drama) is to the negative
unconscious, and we may hold that the convergence of the unconscious, through
positive will, upon the womb as the interior focus for the impression of bodily
grace ... will vary in intensity and quality according to whether such a
convergence takes place via the backbrain, the right midbrain, the left
midbrain, or the forebrain, with a correspondingly different kind of dance in
consequence. Broadly, I am going to
contend that the dancing per se, as it were, of this unconscious
convergence is through the right midbrain, which is the subdivision of the
overall brain most correlative, so I maintain, with the body, and that the mode
of dancing with which this correlates will be between loving couples in what
can only be described as an intensely romantic, even harmonious, co-operation
of objective phenomenal self with objective phenomenal self. Less harmonious but more melodic, so to
speak, will be the mode of dancing that corresponds to the convergence of
unconscious mind through the left midbrain, wherein we may envisage a
correlation with the subjective phenomenal self, and such dancing, almost
intellectually aloof from the interior body per se, viz. the womb, is
more likely to be of the ballroom variety, the couples virtually holding each
other at arm's length, so to speak, than of anything more sexually
intimate. However, if Mass and Volume
are characteristic of the more phenomenal approaches to dance, then Time and
Space are their noumenal counterparts, with the convergence of unconscious mind
through the backbrain making for a correlation with Time, presumably through
some intensely rhythmic and/or collective mode of dance that defers to the
heart, and the convergence of unconscious mind through the forebrain making for
a more spatial if not spaced approach to dance, such as one would associate
with free dancing or freak dancing or even belly dancing, or that which, far
from paying an oblique tribute to the heart, would seem to be paying such a
tribute, via the forebrain, to the lungs ... in what could only be described as
a quasi-spiritual mode of dance, one whose musical parallel would be
pitch. Yet all dancing, whether of the
interior body per se or of some, as it were, 'bovaryized' approximation
to something other than Inner Mass, is fundamentally of the objective
phenomenal self even in its elemental forms where, as we have seen, it either
takes the form of a deference, via the backbrain, to objective noumenal self or
of a deference, via the forebrain, to subjective noumenal self. At bottom, however, it is still the cultural
manifestation of the objective phenomenal self, since it is the unconscious
which converges upon the womb to establish a graceful impression with that self
which is its mode of salvation.
2. CONSCIOUS DEVOTION. Having
dealt with the positive unconscious, I should like to proceed to the positive
conscious, which I regard as converging, through positive willpower, upon the
brain in what is, by and large, a context of devotion. Such a cerebral context is rather more
purgatorial than mundane, and would seem to be the type of interior rebirth
congenial to those who have turned their back on the intellect, and thus
literature, in pursuit of inner knowledge.
Doubtless the convergence of the conscious upon the brain is more in its
per se mode when associated with the left midbrain, the most
lunar or purgatorial part of the overall brain, than when associated with any
of its other subdivisions, and so much must this be the case ... that the other
modes of devotion should be considered 'bovaryizations' of the purgatorial
realm. Now if letter/sermon writing is
the Christic per se of positive conscious mind, then its 'bovaryized'
modes will include speaking, reading, and praying, with speaking significant of
the convergence of positive conscious mind upon the right midbrain, reading
significant of the convergence of such mind upon the backbrain, and praying
significant of its convergence upon the forebrain, these latter two modes of
positive conscious activity being elemental where the other two modes - viz.
writing and speaking - are molecular. Of
course, by 'speaking' I do not mean any old conversation or chatter, but, on
the contrary, the sort of ecclesiastical responses and chants, not to mention
aural readings, that follow, it seems to me, from a devotional premise having
its physical basis in the convergence of positive conscious mind upon the right
midbrain, the most bodily-oriented subdivision of the overall brain. Certainly, I would have no hesitation in
regarding devotion as broadly, though not exclusively, Protestant, with
letter/sermon writing effectively Puritan, Bible reading effectively
Presbyterian, speaking effectively Anglican, and praying, that quasi-spiritual
mode of devotion and exception to the Protestant rule, effectively Catholic;
though this is, as ever, to generalize the issue for the sake of categorical
clarity. Nevertheless, one would have to
contrast the purgatorial realm with the mundane realm on the basis of a sort of
Christian/Heathen or, better, nonconformist/humanist dichotomy, since the
distinction in question is between the conscious and the unconscious with
regard to positive mind.
3. SUBCONSCIOUS MUSIC. Having
dealt with the positive conscious, let us now turn to its subconscious
parallel, the order of positive mind which is antithetical to the spectrum of
negative mind stretching from dreams to films (as already discussed), and which
one would have difficulty not associating with music. For music is a discipline of the soul, as we
may call the convergence of subconscious mind upon the heart, and the soul is
never more accurately articulated than when such a convergence takes places via
the backbrain, the subdivision of the brain most correlative with the heart,
and the musical result is accordingly rhythmic.
Yet if music is most fundamentalist with regard to rhythm, then it is
more (relative to most) fundamentalist with regard to harmony, less (relative
to least) fundamentalist with regard to melody, and least fundamentalist with
regard to pitch, as we proceed from the convergence of subconsciousness through
the backbrain to its convergence through the forebrain via the intermediate,
and therefore molecular, realms of the right and left midbrains - the former
deferring, in harmony, to the womb, and the latter deferring, in melody, to the
brain. Fundamentally, however, music is
most 'true' to itself in rhythm and least 'true' to itself in pitch, although
the quasi-spiritual 'bovaryization' of the soul through pitch could only rank
higher the more omega-orientated the person and the less soulful, in
consequence, his commitment to cultural fundamentalism. Yet the soul is no less metaphysical than the
mind (the convergence of consciousness upon the brain) or, lower down in the
mundane realm, the id (the convergence of unconsciousness upon the womb), since
a species of self, in this instance objectively noumenal, which contrasts with
the subjective noumenal not-self of sensual naturalism ... from dreams to
films.
4. SUPERCONSCIOUS MEDITATION.
Higher than the cultural fundamentalism, however, of the soul ... is the
cultural transcendentalism of the spirit, or the convergence of
superconsciousness upon the lungs, which is never more transcendentalist than
when such a convergence takes place via the forebrain, and the metaphysical
result is the spiritual per se ... of the Holy Spirit of Heaven, or
union between the superconscious and the subjective noumenal self (of
air-breathing lungs) through meditation.
Thus it is that the convergence, through the forebrain, of positive
superconscious mind upon the lungs brings both the mind in question and the
lungs to the Holy Spirit which, being universal, is the ultimate salvation of
the self. Yet if meditation is the most
transcendentalist mode of spirituality, then it should follow that the
convergence of superconsciousness through the backbrain upon the lungs will
make, in a deference to the heart, for the least transcendentalist mode of
spirituality, namely for singing, whilst its convergence through the right midbrain
will make, in deference to the womb, for the less (relative to least)
transcendentalist mode of spirituality in kissing, and its convergence through
the left midbrain will make, in deference to the brain, for the more (relative
to most) transcendentalist mode of spirituality in the sniffing and/or snorting
of certain chemicals, including incense.
Thus the cultivation of the subjective noumenal self (both
psychologically and metaphysically) may be regarded as stretching from the
least transcendentalist context of singing to the most transcendentalist
context of meditating via the less (relative to least) transcendentalist
context of kissing, and the more (relative to most) transcendentalist context
of sniffing. One might say that whereas
meditating is the transcendentalist per se of the Divine, the context
that brings the subjective noumenal self to a unitary accommodation with the
universal self (of the air being breathed), singing is a quasi-fundamentalist
mode of transcendentalism, kissing a quasi-humanist mode of transcendentalism,
and sniffing a quasi-nonconformist mode of transcendentalism. Yet the spirit is revealed, to a greater or
lesser extent, in all modes of transcendentalism, just as the soul is revealed,
to greater or lesser extents, in all modes of fundamentalism, the mind ... in
all modes of nonconformism, and the id ... in all modes of humanism.
5. REVELATIONS OF THE SOUL.
Thus while the soul is most revealed through the convergence of
subconsciousness upon the heart via the backbrain in rhythmical music, the
fundamentalist per se of the soul, it is more (relative to most) revealed
through the convergence of subconsciousness upon the heart via the right
midbrain in harmonic music, which is the quasi-humanist mode of
fundamentalism. Conversely, while the
soul is least revealed through the convergence of subconsciousness upon the
heart via the forebrain in pitch-oriented music, the quasi-transcendentalist
mode of fundamentalism, it is less (relative to least) revealed through the
convergence of subconsciousness upon the heart via the left midbrain in melodic
music, which is the quasi-nonconformist mode of fundamentalism.
6. REVELATIONS OF THE MIND.
Similarly, while the mind is most revealed through the convergence of consciousness
upon the brain via the left midbrain in letter writing, the puritan or, rather,
nonconformist per se of the mind, it is more (relative to most) revealed
through the convergence of consciousness upon the brain via the forebrain in
thoughtful praying, which is the quasi-transcendentalist mode of
nonconformism. Conversely, while the
mind is least revealed through the convergence of consciousness upon the brain
via the right midbrain in responsive speaking, the quasi-humanist mode of
nonconformism, it is less (relative to least) revealed through the convergence
of consciousness upon the brain via the backbrain in scriptural reading, which
is the quasi-fundamentalist mode of nonconformism.
7. REVELATIONS OF THE ID.
Finally, while the id is most revealed through the convergence of
unconsciousness upon the womb via the right midbrain in romantic dancing, the
humanist per se of the id, it is more (relative to most) revealed,
through the convergence of unconsciousness upon the womb via the backbrain in
tap dancing, which is the quasi-fundamentalist mode of humanism. Conversely, while the id is least revealed
through the convergence of unconsciousness upon the womb via the left midbrain
in ballroom dancing, the quasi-nonconformist mode of humanism, it is less
(relative to least) revealed through the convergence of unconsciousness upon
the womb via the forebrain in belly dancing, which is the
quasi-transcendentalist mode of humanism.
CYCLE 40
1. ELEMENTAL AND MOLECULAR.
What all this and other such variations on a theme of positive mind
tells us ... is that where the least and most omega-oriented modes of any given
positive self (not necessarily synonymous with the degree of that self's
revelation in relation to its context) are elemental, the less (relative to
least) and more (relative to most) omega-oriented modes of such a self are
molecular, being intermediate between the elemental extremes. Furthermore, we should distinguish the least
and less omega-oriented manifestations of any given self from the more and most
omega-oriented manifestations of it on the basis of an old/new brain dichotomy,
with, broadly, those selves that pertain to the backbrain and the right
midbrain being affiliated to the old brain, and those which, by contrast,
pertain to the left midbrain and the forebrain being affiliated to the new
brain. Hence in the context of
transcendentalism, for example, the least and less omega-oriented
manifestations of the subjective noumenal self, viz. singing and kissing, will
be affiliated to the old brain, whilst its more and most omega-oriented
manifestations, viz. sniffing and meditating, will be affiliated to the new
brain.
2. OLD/NEW BRAIN SPIRITUAL DISTINCTIONS. Now what applies to the subjective noumenal
self, or spirit, applies no less to the objective noumenal self, or soul, as
well as to the subjective phenomenal self, or mind, and to the objective
phenomenal self, or id. It also applies,
in a reverse kind of way, to the fourfold levels of the not-self, or negative
self, from the alpha-most to the alpha-least, with both the alpha-most and
alpha-more (relative to most) forms of the not-self being affiliated to the old
brain, but the alpha-less (relative to least) and alpha-least forms of it being
affiliated to the new brain. Hence, with
regard to negative transcendentalism, we can list visions and stained-glass
windows as being affiliated to the old brain by dint of their association with
the backbrain and the right midbrain respectively, whereas paintings and photos
would have to be affiliated to the new brain on account of their association
with the left midbrain and the forebrain respectively. Thus whereas the old brain would have visions
and stained-glass windows pitted, as alpha-most and alpha-more, against singing
and kissing, as omega-least and omega-less, the new brain would have paintings
and photos pitted, as alpha-less and alpha-least, against sniffing and
meditating, as omega-more and omega-most.
3. OLD/NEW BRAIN SOULFUL DISTINCTIONS. Likewise, in terms of the soul, the old brain
would have dreams and carnivals pitted, as alpha-most and alpha-more, against
rhythmic music and harmonic music, as omega-least and omega-less, whereas the
new brain would have parades and films pitted, as alpha-less and alpha-least,
against melodic music and pitchful music, as omega-more and omega-most.
4. OLD/NEW BRAIN INTELLECTUAL DISTINCTIONS. Similarly, with regard to the mind, the old
brain would have poetry and short stories pitted, as alpha-most and alpha-more,
against reading and speaking, as omega-least and omega-less, whereas the new
brain would have novels and philosophy pitted, as alpha-less and alpha-least,
against writing and praying, as omega-more and omega-most.
5. OLD/NEW BRAIN PHYSICAL DISTINCTIONS. Finally, with regard to the id, the old brain
would have wet dreams and royalist drama pitted, as alpha-most and alpha-more,
against tap dancing and romantic dancing, as omega-least and omega-less,
whereas the new brain would have republican drama and television drama pitted,
as alpha-less and alpha-least, against ballroom dancing and belly dancing, as
omega-more and omega-most.
6. NOT-SELVES VIS-À-VIS SELVES.
However that may be, the alpha contexts of negative self are always
distinguishable from the omega contexts of positive self on the basis of an
exterior/interior, particle/wavicle, crude/fine division, with those in the
former contexts (not-self) symptomatic of a divergence from a sensory vacuum,
and those in the latter contexts (self) symptomatic of a convergence upon an organic
plenum. The former are, as it were,
vicious, and the latter virtuous. For
the not-self, in whichever manifestation, is forever inferior, both morally and
qualitatively, to the self, whether with regard to subjectivity or to
objectivity at both phenomenal and noumenal levels. The visionary not-self will always be morally
inferior to the spiritual self, the emotional not-self morally inferior to the
soulful self, the intellectual not-self morally inferior to the devotional
self, and the sensuous not-self morally inferior to the graceful self. Only the 'reborn' of the self can have any
experience of salvation, whether with regard to the Mother (of the objective
phenomenal self), the Son (of the subjective phenomenal self), the Father (of
the objective noumenal self), or the Holy Spirit (of the subjective noumenal
self). But we still have to distinguish
between salvation in the old brain and salvation in the new brain, on both
molecular and elemental terms with regard to any given noumenal/phenomenal self,
as well as between damnation (of the not-self) in the old and new brains - this
latter having been the prevailing form of damnation in the twentieth century, a
century more damned than saved.
CYCLE 41
1. CLEAR/UNCLEAR LIGHT. To
distinguish, on the plane of negative transcendentalism, between the Clear
Light of the Outer Void (Space) with regard to the alpha-most objective
noumenal not-self and the Unclear Light of the Outer Void with regard to the
alpha-more (relative to most) objective noumenal not-self on the one hand, but
between the Unclear Light of the Inner Void with regard to the alpha-less
(relative to least) objective noumenal not-self and the Clear Light of the
Inner Void with regard to the alpha-least objective noumenal not-self on the other
hand.
2. HOLY/UNHOLY SPIRIT.
Conversely, to distinguish, on the plane of positive transcendentalism,
between the Holy Spirit of Outer Heaven with regard to the omega-least
subjective noumenal self and the Unholy Spirit of Outer Heaven with regard to the
omega-less (relative to least) subjective noumenal self on the one hand, but
between the Unholy Spirit of Inner Heaven with regard to the omega-more
(relative to most) subjective noumenal self and the Holy Spirit of Inner Heaven
with regard to the omega-most subjective noumenal self on the other hand.
3. CLEAR/UNCLEAR FIRE.
Similarly, to distinguish on the plane of negative fundamentalism,
between the Clear Fire of Outer Time with regard to the alpha-most subjective
noumenal not-self and the Unclear Fire of Outer Time with regard to the
alpha-more (relative to most) subjective noumenal not-self on the one hand, but
between the Unclear Fire of Inner Time with regard to the alpha-less (relative
to least) subjective noumenal not-self and the Clear Fire of Inner Time with
regard to the alpha-least subjective noumenal not-self on the other hand.
4. HOLY/UNHOLY SOUL.
Conversely, to distinguish, on the plane of positive fundamentalism,
between the Holy Soul of Outer Hell (Subheaven) with regard to the omega-least
objective noumenal self and the Unholy Soul of Outer Hell with regard to the
omega-less (relative to least) objective noumenal self on the one hand, but
between the Unholy Soul of Inner Hell with regard to the omega-more (relative
to most) objective noumenal self and the Holy Soul of Inner Hell with regard to
the omega-most objective noumenal self on the other hand.
5. CLEAR/UNCLEAR ICE.
Likewise, to distinguish, on the plane of negative nonconformism,
between the Clear Ice of Outer Volume with regard to the alpha-most objective
phenomenal not-self and the Unclear Ice of Outer Volume with regard to the
alpha-more (relative to most) objective phenomenal not-self on the one hand,
but between the Unclear Ice of Inner Volume with regard to the alpha-less
(relative to least) objective phenomenal not-self and the Clear Ice of Inner
Volume with regard to the alpha-least objective phenomenal not-self on the
other hand.
6. HOLY/UNHOLY MIND.
Conversely, to distinguish, on the plane of positive nonconformism, between
the Holy Mind of Outer Purgatory with regard to the omega-least subjective
phenomenal self and the Unholy Mind of Outer Purgatory with regard to the
omega-less (relative to least) subjective phenomenal self on the one hand, but
between the Unholy Mind of Inner Purgatory with regard to the omega-more
(relative to most) subjective phenomenal self and the Holy Mind of Inner
Purgatory with regard to the omega-most subjective phenomenal self on the other
hand.
7. CLEAR/UNCLEAR SOIL.
Finally, to distinguish, on the plane of negative humanism, between the
Clear Soil of Outer Mass with regard to the alpha-most subjective phenomenal
not-self and the Unclear Soil of Outer Mass with regard to the alpha-more
(relative to most) subjective phenomenal not-self on the one hand, but between
the Unclear Soil of Inner Mass with regard to the alpha-less (relative to
least) subjective phenomenal not-self and the Clear Soil of Inner Mass with
regard to the alpha-least subjective phenomenal not-self on the other hand.
8. HOLY/UNHOLY ID.
Conversely, to distinguish, on the plane of positive humanism, between
the Holy Id of the Outer World with regard to the omega-least objective
phenomenal self and the Unholy Id of the Outer World with regard to the
omega-less (relative to least) objective phenomenal self on the one hand, but
between the Unholy Id of the Inner World with regard to the omega-more
(relative to most) objective phenomenal self and the Holy Id of the Inner World
with regard to the omega-most objective phenomenal self on the other hand.
CYCLE 42
1. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LIGHT/SPIRIT AND BRAIN. In all of the above examples, the 'outer'
contexts appertain to the old brain and the 'inner' contexts, by contrast, to
the new brain. Hence whereas the
Clear/Unclear Light of the Outer Void and the Holy/Unholy Spirit of Outer
Heaven appertain to the old brain, the Unclear/Clear Light of the Inner Void
and the Unholy/Holy Spirit of Inner Heaven appertain to the new brain.
2. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FIRE/SOUL AND BRAIN. Likewise, whereas the Clear/Unclear Fire of
Outer Time and the Holy/Unholy Soul of Outer Hell appertain to the old brain,
the Unclear/Clear Fire of Inner Time and the Unholy/Holy Soul of Inner Hell
appertain to the new brain.
3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ICE/MIND AND BRAIN. Similarly, whereas the Clear/Unclear Ice of
Outer Volume and the Holy/Unholy Mind of Outer Purgatory appertain to the old
brain, the Unclear/Clear Ice of Inner Volume and the Unholy/Holy Mind of Inner
Purgatory appertain to the new brain.
4. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL/ID AND BRAIN. Finally, whereas the Clear/Unclear Soil of
Outer Mass and the Holy/Unholy Id of the Outer World appertain to the old
brain, the Unclear/Clear Soil of Inner Mass and the Unholy/Holy Id of the Inner
World appertain to the new brain.
CYCLE 43
1. PHOTONS AND PHOTINOS.
Whereas the element of the objective noumenal not-self is the photon,
the element of the subjective noumenal self is the photino.
2. PROTONS AND PROTINOS.
Whereas the element of the subjective noumenal not-self is the proton,
the element of the objective noumenal self is the protino.
3. NEUTRONS AND NEUTRINOS.
Whereas the element of the objective phenomenal not-self is the neutron,
the element of the subjective phenomenal self is the neutrino.
4. ELECTRONS AND ELECTRINOS.
Whereas the element of the subjective phenomenal not-self is the
electron, the element of the objective phenomenal self is the electrino.
CYCLE 44
1. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE SUPERCONSCIOUS.
The objective noumenal not-self, or negative superconscious, is of the
Clear/Unclear Light of the Void, whereas the subjective noumenal self, or
positive superconscious, is of the Holy/Unholy Spirit of Heaven.
2. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE SUBCONSCIOUS.
The objective noumenal not-self, or negative subconscious, is of the
Clear/Unclear Fire of Time, whereas the objective noumenal self, or positive
subconscious, is of the Holy/Unholy Soul of Hell.
3. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE CONSCIOUS.
The objective phenomenal not-self, or negative conscious, is of the
Clear/Unclear Ice of Volume, whereas the subjective phenomenal self, or
positive conscious, is of the Holy/Unholy Mind of Purgatory.
4. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE UNCONSCIOUS.
The subjective phenomenal not-self, or negative unconscious, is of the
Clear/Unclear Soil of Mass, whereas the objective phenomenal self, or positive
unconscious, is of the Holy/Unholy Id of the World.
CYCLE 45
1. OBJECTIVE NOUMENAL NOT-SELF.
From the elemental photon particles of the alpha-most objective noumenal
not-self to the elemental photon wavicles of the alpha-least objective noumenal
not-self via the molecular photon particles of the alpha-more (relative to
most) objective noumenal not-self and the molecular photon wavicles of the
alpha-less (relative to least) objective noumenal not-self.
2. SUBJECTIVE NOUMENAL SELF.
From the elemental photino particles of the omega-least subjective
noumenal self to the elemental photino wavicles of the omega-most subjective
noumenal self via the molecular photino particles of the omega-less (relative
to least) subjective noumenal self and the molecular photino wavicles of the
omega-more (relative to most) subjective noumenal self.
3. SUBJECTIVE NOUMENAL NOT-SELF.
From the elemental proton particles of the alpha-most subjective
noumenal not-self to the elemental proton wavicles of the alpha-least
subjective noumenal not-self via the molecular proton particles of the
alpha-more (relative to most) subjective noumenal not-self and the molecular
proton wavicles of the alpha-less (relative to least) subjective noumenal
not-self.
4. OBJECTIVE NOUMENAL SELF.
From the elemental protino particles of the omega-least objective
noumenal self to the elemental protino wavicles of the omega-most objective
noumenal self via the molecular protino particles of the omega-less (relative
to least) objective noumenal self and the molecular protino wavicles of the
omega-more (relative to most) objective noumenal self.
5. OBJECTIVE PHENOMENAL NOT-SELF.
From the elemental neutron particles of the alpha-most objective
phenomenal not-self to the elemental neutron wavicles of the alpha-least
objective phenomenal not-self via the molecular neutron particles of the
alpha-more (relative to most) objective phenomenal not-self and the molecular
neutron wavicles of the alpha-less (relative to least) objective phenomenal
not-self.
6. SUBJECTIVE PHENOMENAL SELF.
From the elemental neutrino particles of the omega-least subjective
phenomenal self to the elemental neutrino wavicles of the omega-most subjective
phenomenal self via the molecular neutrino particles of the omega-less
(relative to least) subjective phenomenal self and the molecular neutrino
wavicles of the omega-more (relative to most) subjective phenomenal self.
7. SUBJECTIVE PHENOMENAL NOT-SELF.
From the elemental electron particles of the alpha-most subjective
phenomenal not-self to the elemental electron wavicles of the alpha-least
subjective phenomenal not-self via the molecular electron particles of the
alpha-more (relative to most) subjective phenomenal not-self and the molecular
electron wavicles of the alpha-less (relative to least) subjective phenomenal
not-self.
8. OBJECTIVE PHENOMENAL SELF.
From the elemental electrino particles of the omega-least objective
phenomenal self to the elemental electrino wavicles of the omega-most objective
phenomenal self via the molecular electrino particles of the omega-less
(relative to least) objective phenomenal self and the molecular electrino
wavicles of the omega-more (relative to most) objective phenomenal self.
CYCLE 46
1. ELEMENTINOS. In all the
omega-oriented, or 'reborn', contexts, the elementinos (as one may call
photinos, protinos, neutrinos, and electrinos) are both smaller and therefore
finer than the elements of the alpha-stemming contexts. Thus they have a higher wavicle threshold
than their larger antitheses. Yet they
are still divisible, like their alpha-stemming counterparts, between objective
and subjective options ... only the photino and neutrino being subjective.
2. ELEMENTS VIS-À-VIS ELEMENTINOS.
The elements, being larger than elementinos, are fundamentally vacuums
from which negative will diverges, whereas the elementinos, being smaller than
elements, are essentially plenums towards which positive will converges. Hence to diverge from photons, protons,
neutrons, and electrons, but to converge upon photinos, protinos, neutrinos,
and electrinos. Or, more specifically,
to diverge objectively from photons and neutrons, but subjectively from protons
and electrons; and to converge objectively upon electrinos and protinos, but
subjectively upon neutrinos and photinos.
3. CONTRARY MODES OF CONVERGENCE/DIVERGENCE. That which converges/diverges objectively
does so in a rectilinear fashion (+), whereas that which converges/ diverges
subjectively does so in a curvilinear fashion (o). Thus there are two contrary external and
internal modes of convergence/divergence.
CYCLE 47
1. SCIENTIFIC EXTREME RIGHT VIS-À-VIS RELIGIOUS EXTREME LEFT. That which is of the objective noumenal
not-self, like optical idealism, is of the scientific Extreme Right, whereas
that which is of the subjective noumenal self, like airy transcendentalism, is
of the religious Extreme Left.
2. SCIENTIFIC EXTREME LEFT VIS-À-VIS RELIGIOUS EXTREME RIGHT. Conversely, that which is of the subjective
noumenal not-self, like aural naturalism, is of the scientific Extreme Left,
whereas that which is of the objective noumenal self, like blood-based
fundamentalism, is of the religious Extreme Right.
3. SCIENTIFIC RIGHT VIS-À-VIS RELIGIOUS LEFT. Similarly, that which is of the objective
phenomenal not-self, like lingual materialism, is of the scientific Right,
whereas that which is of the subjective phenomenal self, like cerebral
nonconformism, is of the religious Left.
4. SCIENTIFIC LEFT VIS-À-VIS RELIGIOUS RIGHT. Conversely, that which is of the subjective
phenomenal not-self, like tactile realism, is of the scientific Left, whereas
that which is of the objective phenomenal self, like maternal humanism, is of the
religious Right.
CYCLE 48
1. ALPHA EXTREME RIGHT VIS-À-VIS OMEGA EXTREME LEFT. Broadly, 'Leftism' is identifiable with
subjectivity and 'Rightism', by contrast, with objectivity, the former radical
and the latter conservative. Thus in the
idealist/transcendentalist distinction, for example, between the eyes and the
lungs, the former are identifiable with noumenal not-self objectivity, and
hence the alpha Extreme Right, while the latter are identifiable with noumenal
self subjectivity, and hence the omega Extreme Left.
2. ALPHA EXTREME LEFT VIS-À-VIS OMEGA EXTREME RIGHT. Similarly, in the naturalist/fundamentalist
distinction between the ears and the heart, the former are identifiable with
noumenal not-self subjectivity, and hence the alpha Extreme Left, while the
latter are identifiable with noumenal self subjectivity, and hence the omega
Extreme Right.
3. ALPHA RIGHT VIS-À-VIS OMEGA LEFT.
Likewise, in the materialist/nonconformist distinction between the
tongue and the brain, the former is identifiable with phenomenal not-self
objectivity, and hence the alpha Right, while the latter is identifiable with
phenomenal self subjectivity, and hence the omega Left.
4. ALPHA LEFT VIS-À-VIS OMEGA RIGHT.
Finally, in the realist/humanist distinction between the flesh and the
womb, the former is identifiable with phenomenal not-self subjectivity, and
hence the alpha Left, while the latter is identifiable with phenomenal self
objectivity, and hence the omega Right.
CYCLE 49
1. BRIGHTNESS VIS-À-VIS LIGHTNESS.
To contrast the alpha-most to alpha-least extreme right-wing nature of
the Clear/Unclear Brightness (Light) of the Void (in both external and internal
manifestations) with the omega-least to omega-most extreme left-wing nature of
the Holy/Unholy Lightness (Spirit) of Heaven (in both external and internal
manifestations).
2. HOTNESS VIS-À-VIS BADNESS.
To contrast the alpha-most to alpha-least extreme left-wing nature of
the Clear/Unclear Hotness (Fire) of Time with the omega-least to omega-most
extreme right-wing nature of the Holy/Unholy Badness (Soul) of Hell.
3. COLDNESS VIS-À-VIS GOODNESS.
To contrast the alpha-most to alpha-least right-wing nature of the
Clear/Unclear Coldness (Ice) of Volume with the omega-least to omega-most
left-wing nature of the Holy/Unholy Goodness (Mind) of Purgatory.
4. DARKNESS VIS-À-VIS HEAVINESS.
To contrast the alpha-most to alpha-least left-wing nature of the
Clear/Unclear Darkness (Soil) of Mass with the omega-least to omega-most
right-wing nature of the Holy/Unholy Heaviness (Womb) of the World.
CYCLE 50
1. FASCISM AND TRANSCENDENTALISM.
From the extreme right-wing negative noumenal objectivity of fascism to
the extreme left-wing positive noumenal subjectivity of transcendentalism, as
from the eyes to the lungs, light to air.
2. COMMUNISM AND FUNDAMENTALISM.
From the extreme left-wing negative noumenal subjectivity of communism
to the extreme right-wing positive noumenal objectivity of fundamentalism, as
from the ears to the heart, fire to blood.
3. PARLIAMENTARIANISM AND NONCONFORMISM. From the right-wing negative phenomenal
objectivity of parliamentarianism to the left-wing positive phenomenal
subjectivity of nonconformism, as from the tongue to the brain, water to
thought.
4. REPUBLICANISM AND HUMANISM.
From the left-wing negative phenomenal subjectivity of republicanism to
the right-wing positive phenomenal objectivity of humanism, as from the flesh
to the womb, earth to sperm.
CYCLE 51
1. SUPERFEMININITY VIS-À-VIS SUPERMASCULINITY. To contrast the superfemininity of the
objective noumenal not-self with the supermasculinity of the subjective
noumenal self, Devil with God, antispirit with spirit.
2. ALPHA/OMEGA SUBMASCULINITY.
To contrast the alpha submasculinity of the subjective noumenal not-self
with the omega submasculinity of the objective noumenal self, beast with
warrior, antisoul with soul.
3. ALPHA/OMEGA MASCULINITY.
To contrast the alpha masculinity of the objective phenomenal not-self
with the omega masculinity of the subjective phenomenal self, sinner with
saint, antimind with mind.
4. ALPHA/OMEGA FEMININITY. To
contrast the alpha femininity of the subjective phenomenal not-self with the
omega femininity of the objective phenomenal self, whore with angel, anti-id
with id.
CYCLE 52
1. SPATIAL/SPACED SPACE. To
distinguish between the spatial Space of antispirit (light) and the spaced
Space of spirit (breath cycle), whether external or internal.
2. SEQUENTIAL/REPETITIVE TIME.
To distinguish between the sequential Time of antisoul (fire) and the
repetitive Time of soul (heartbeat), whether external or internal.
3. VOLUMETRIC/VOLUMINOUS VOLUME.
To distinguish between the volumetric Volume of antimind (ice) and the
voluminous Volume of mind (bookish thoughts), whether external or internal.
4. MASSED/MASSIVE MASS. To
distinguish between the massed Mass of the anti-id (soil) and the massive Mass
of the id (pregnant womb), whether external or internal.
CYCLE 53
1. MASS/TIME ATTRACTIONS.
Mass is attracted towards Time, and Volume towards Space. Hence the attraction, negatively, of massed
Mass towards sequential Time on the one hand, but the attraction, positively,
of massive Mass towards repetitive Time on the other hand - the former alpha
subjective, the latter omega objective.
2. VOLUME/SPACE ATTRACTIONS.
Likewise, the attraction, negatively, of volumetric Volume towards
spatial Space on the one hand, but the attraction, positively, of voluminous
Volume towards spaced Space on the other hand - the former alpha objective, the
latter omega subjective.
3. POLITICAL LEFT AND RELIGIOUS RIGHT. The negative attraction of the republican
Left towards the communist Far Left is objectively paralleled by the positive
attraction of the humanist Right towards the fundamentalist Far Right.
4. POLITICAL RIGHT AND RELIGIOUS LEFT. Similarly, the negative attraction of the
parliamentary Right towards the fascist Far Right is subjectively paralleled by
the positive attraction of the nonconformist Left towards the transcendentalist
Far Left.
CYCLE 54
1. BRITAIN AND IRELAND.
Whereas Britain is broadly politically Right (liberal
parliamentarianism) and religiously Left (Protestant nonconformism), Ireland,
by contrast, is broadly politically Left (social republicanism) and religiously
Right (Catholic humanism).
2. CATHOLIC NONCONFORMISM.
Although the voluminous Volume of nonconformism tends towards the spaced
Space of transcendentalism, as from the religious Left to the religious Extreme
Left, or the Son to the Holy Spirit, it should not be inferred that this
implies a special predilection on the part of Protestantism towards
transcendentalism. On the contrary, it
is the nonconformism (prayer) of Catholicism which is most orientated towards
the heavenly Beyond and the possibility, in consequence, of an extreme
left-wing religious alternative to Christianity. For, despite its indubitably populist
conservatism, Catholicism still opens out, through prayerful nonconformism,
towards a properly spiritual salvation in the heavenly Beyond, turning its
back, in the process, on the massive-Mass-to-repetitive-Time attraction which
leads from the Mother to the Father in due fundamentalist fashion, the heart
duly eclipsing the womb.
3. PROTESTANT NONCONFORMISM.
Only an anti-Catholic reductionist of overly Protestant tendency would
seek to reduce Catholicism to a Mass/Time fatality on the basis of its
'Heathen' populism, overlooking the Volume/Space relationship which
characterizes its properly Christian dimension, a dimension as
nonconformist/transcendentalist as the popular dimension 'lower down' is
humanist/fundamentalist. No, such
populism does not exclude the truly Christian alternative but, rather, extends
Christianity to the masses, both male and, especially, female, who would
otherwise be overlooked and scorned ... as, unfortunately, tends to the case
with Protestant nonconformism, particularly in its overly masculine or
purgatorial manifestations, as in Puritanism and Presbyterianism. However that may be, it is more damaging to
exclude the masses from religion than to embrace them on a 'pseudo-Christian'
basis via Mass and Time; for Christianity is not intended to be a specifically
middle-class religion. Yet the
'nonconformism' of Protestantism does not lead 'over the moon', in a
Saturn-oriented bias for transcendentalist Space but, on the contrary, either
remains loyal to the intellect per se, as in the strictly
voluminous case of Puritanism (the Son), with its epistolary New-Testament bias
towards writing, or 'bovaryizes' the intellect towards Time, as in the case of
the rather more patriarchal Presbyterianism ... with its poetical Old-Testament
bias towards reading, or, alternatively, towards Mass, as in the case of
Anglicanism ... with its dramatic bias towards speaking, so that
quasi-emotional (the Father) and quasi-sensual (the Mother) modes of
intellectual devotion tend to be the prevailing norms, and things either remain
at an overworldly/netherworldly remove from the possibility of spiritual
salvation or, worse again, 'bog down' in the World, where they tend to glorify
what is Heathen to the detriment of all that is Christian, the dramatic taking
precedence, through the Mother, over the poetic and the epistolary, as in the
strictly Anglican mode of nonconformism.
Only the quasi-spiritual 'bovaryization' of the intellect through prayer
actually leads the mind towards spaced Space, and this tends to be the mode of
nonconformism one would most readily associate with Catholicism, which is
arguably more mindful of the Beyond than its superficially more nonconformist
detractors would allow!
4. UNIVERSALITY OF ETERNAL LIFE.
Yet, that said, there is still a significant distinction between the
'spirituality' of the grave and the spirituality, or, rather, universality, of
Eternal Life ... the other side of Christendom, as espoused by me with regard
to 'Kingdom Come'. This latter is not so
much beyond prayer/contemplation in the cerebral afterlife of the grave ... as
antithetical to emotionality in the meditative calm of pure transcendentalism,
which is as religiously extreme left wing as it is possible to be, the joyful
liberation of the noumenally saved spirit in the holiness of universal Heaven.
CYCLE 55
1. BRAIN/MIND DISTINCTIONS. To
distinguish, further to my previous theorizing on the subject, between the old
brain and the old mind on the one hand, and between the new brain and the new
mind on the other hand, conceiving of the old brain as host to
elemental/molecular particle elements, the old mind as host to
molecular/elemental wavicle elements, the new brain as host to
elemental/molecular particle elementinos, and the new mind as host to
molecular/elemental wavicle elementinos.
2. PHOTON PARTICLES/WAVICLES OF THE OLD BRAIN/MIND. Thus the alpha-most elemental photon particles
and the alpha-more (relative to most) molecular photon particles of the
objective noumenal not-self (eyes) would appertain to the old brain, whereas
the alpha-less (relative to least) molecular photon wavicles and the
alpha-least elemental photon wavicles of the objective noumenal not-self would
appertain to the old mind.
3. PHOTINO PARTICLES/WAVICLES OF THE NEW BRAIN/MIND. Conversely, the omega-least elemental photino
particles and the omega-less (relative to least) molecular photino particles of
the subjective noumenal self (lungs) would appertain to the new brain, whereas
the omega-more (relative to most) molecular photino wavicles and the omega-most
elemental photino wavicles of the subjective noumenal self would appertain to
the new mind.
4. PROTON PARTICLES/WAVICLES OF THE OLD BRAIN/MIND. Likewise, the alpha-most elemental proton
particles and the alpha-more (relative to most) molecular proton particles of
the subjective noumenal not-self (ears) would appertain to the old brain,
whereas the alpha-less (relative to least) molecular proton wavicles and the
alpha-least elemental proton wavicles of the subjective noumenal not-self would
appertain to the old mind.
5. PROTINO PARTICLES/WAVICLES OF THE NEW BRAIN/MIND. Conversely, the omega-least elemental protino
particles and the omega-less (relative to least) molecular protino particles of
the objective noumenal self (heart) would appertain to the new brain, whereas the
omega-more (relative to most) molecular protino wavicles and the omega-most
elemental protino wavicles of the objective noumenal self would appertain to
the new mind.
6. NEUTRON PARTICLES/WAVICLES OF THE OLD BRAIN/MIND. Likewise, the alpha-most elemental neutron
particles and the alpha-more (relative to most) molecular neutron particles of
the objective phenomenal not-self (tongue) would appertain to the old brain,
whereas the alpha-less (relative to least) molecular neutron wavicles and the
alpha-least elemental neutron wavicles of the objective phenomenal not-self
would appertain to the old mind.
7. NEUTRINO PARTICLES/WAVICLES OF THE NEW BRAIN/MIND. Conversely, the omega-least elemental
neutrino particles and the omega-less (relative to least) molecular neutrino
particles of the subjective phenomenal self (brain) would appertain to the new
brain, whereas the omega-more (relative to most) molecular neutrino wavicles
and the omega-most elemental neutrino wavicles of the subjective phenomenal
self would appertain to the new mind.
8. ELECTRON PARTICLES/WAVICLES OF THE OLD BRAIN/MIND. Finally, the alpha-most elemental electron
particles and the alpha-more (relative to most) molecular electron particles of
the subjective phenomenal not-self (flesh) would appertain to the old brain,
whereas the alpha-less (relative to least) molecular electron wavicles and the
alpha-least elemental electron wavicles of the subjective phenomenal not-self
would appertain to the old mind.
9. ELECTRINO PARTICLES/WAVICLES OF THE NEW BRAIN/MIND. Conversely, the omega-least elemental
electrino particles and the omega-less (relative to least) molecular electrino
particles of the objective phenomenal self (womb) would appertain to the new
brain, whereas the omega-more (relative to most) molecular electrino wavicles
and the omega-most elemental electrino wavicles of the objective phenomenal
self would appertain to the new mind.
CYCLE 56
1. OLD/NEW BRAIN AND MIND DICHOTOMY BETWEEN
ELEMENTS/ELEMENTINOS. Hence we can
distinguish, it seems to me, the elements from the elementinos on the basis of
an old and/or new brain/mind dichotomy, with particle/wavicle elements
appertaining to the old brain/mind, but particle/wavicle elementinos appertaining, by contrast, to the new
brain/mind.
2. ELEMENTS VIS-À-VIS ELEMENTINOS IN BOTH PHYSIOLOGICAL AND
PSYCHOLOGICAL MODES. Thus it should
follow that elements, or the larger particles/ wavicles, will always appertain
to the old brain/mind, whereas elementinos, or the smaller particles/wavicles,
will always appertain to the new brain/mind.
3. STATE/CHURCH PARALLELS.
Particle elements/ elementinos stand to wavicle elements/elementinos
pretty much as the State to the Church, whether on the 'particle/wavicle' terms
of the old brain/mind, or on the 'particle/wavicle' terms of the new brain/mind,
wherein we can envisage a presidential/messianic as opposed to a
monarchic/papal distinction. For whereas
the 'particle/ wavicle' elements of the old brain/mind would indeed suggest an
unconstitutional distinction between autocratic forms of State and Church, the
'particle/wavicle' elementinos of the new brain/mind would suggest the
attainment of a constitutional distinction between democratic forms of State
and Church - this latter only likely to reach full maturity, so I contend, on
the basis of religious sovereignty for the People and the consequent
establishment, following a majority democratic mandate, of what I am apt to
term a Social Theocratic/Transcendentalist Centre, commensurate with 'Kingdom
Come'.
CYCLE 57
1. THE NATURE OF DEATH. It is
said that, at death, one 'gives up the ghost'.
But what is this 'ghost' one 'gives up', if not one's breathing of the
air that keeps one alive? Thus, at
death, one ceases to breathe and loses consciousness ... only to be taken over,
slowly but surely, by the unconscious, with its 'inner light'. For, assuredly, that which replaces the
'ghost' of one's spiritual breathing can only be a light, since light thrives
in a vacuum and, besides, death is normally followed - at any rate
traditionally - by burial, which brings one's corpse more under the influence
of the earth's core. Now the earth's
core is a kind of inner light compared with the external light, for example, of
the sun or, more completely, the cosmos in general. Thus to die is effectively to succumb,
following loss of consciousness, or the 'ghost', to the earth's core and sink
back, via chemical changes in the brain, into the visionary unconscious. It is not, I repeat not, to
experience a higher spiritual plane, as though spirituality had anything to do
with the inner light of a visionary afterlife!
Rather, it is to fail from a Christian standpoint, the standpoint, we
may believe, of spiritual peace, and embrace not the Holy Ghost, still less the
Son (Christ), but a condition closer, in effect, to the Mother, since a return,
in more than a simple physical sense, to 'Mother Earth'. Can one therefore look upon this condition as
a sort of spiritual Beyond? Is it not,
rather, a kind of visionary Beneath? A
condition less Christian than Heathen in its visionary unfolding? For one has already 'given up the ghost', and
thus ceased to lead anything approximating to a spiritual life. One has lost one's consciousness in the
process, becoming, thereafter, a plaything of the unconscious, the visionary
essence of which, being internal, is closer to 'Mother Earth' than ever it is
to 'Father Heaven' or, rather, 'Hell' (given that Heaven is the spiritual
'peace' of the Holy Ghost which follows upon the purgatorial 'understanding' of
the Son). If one does not exactly return
to one's 'Fatherly Maker' in the solar/stellar context of the outer light
(though cremation would be an equivalent phenomenon, as, more barbarously,
would having been blown-up in a war or whatever), one has assuredly returned to
one's 'Motherly Maker' in the mundane context of the inner light, and thus
ceased to have anything to do with either the Son or the Holy Ghost, the
intellectual understanding or the spiritual peace that lies beyond it in what
is truly the 'Kingdom of Heaven'. One
has, I repeat, failed as a Christian, ceased to be Christian, and become,
instead, a heathenistic corpse. So much
for the 'spirituality of the grave', the 'afterlife' of posthumous visionary
experience which many people, and not a few clergymen, would be only too ready
to mistake for Heaven! Alas, it would be
nearer the truth to say that there had been more Heaven in life, whilst one was
yet breathing, than can ever be found in the grave!
2. SUPERHUMAN CREATION. Only,
however, with the establishment, under Messianic auspices, of 'Kingdom Come'
... will there be any real prospect of Heaven ... as a truly spiritual
condition both dependent upon and inseparable from the air one breathes or,
rather, that post-human life forms would breathe ... as man was transmuted
forwards, little by little, from a human creature capable of spirituality who
nevertheless dies ... to a superhuman one who won't die ... because his brain
will be artificially supported and just as artificially sustained.
3. MILLENNIAL BEYOND. Yes,
only in 'Kingdom Come' could there be such a thing as Eternal Life, the life of
a life form that does not and cannot die because it lives on a largely
artificial plane ... above the mortality of the flesh and its sinful/heathen
shortcomings. Call it superman,
superbeing, suprabeing, ultrabeing, or all four ... in successively more
advanced stages of post-human, even post-cyborg, Eternal Life, the life of the
millennial Beyond, wherein spirituality will peak at an all-time high of
maximum joy in the lightness of the Holy Spirit of Heaven. Backbrain collectivizations, right-midbrain
collectivizations, left-midbrain collectiviza-tions, and, finally, forebrain
collectivizations ... of ever-more evolving/evolved post-human life? That is conceivably the kind of prospect
which lies in store for humanity in the millennial Beyond ... of 'Kingdom
Come'. That is what, amongst other
things, the Second Coming has to offer those who, mindful of the Heathen fate
in store for those who die, yearn prayerfully for a better world to come, a
world in which, ultimately, there is no death, as people know it, but only
Eternal Life, the life of the spirit, of superconscious mind, at one, via the
forebrain, with the air it breathes and/or has pumped into it in the blessed peace
of ultimate salvation.
CYCLE 58
1. SUPERCHRISTIAN BEYOND.
Since I tend to identify 'Kingdom Come' with Social Transcendentalism,
and that, in turn, with Superchristianity, I should like to clarify my position
in relation to the Social Transcendentalist alternative to the World and its
Heathen afterlife (inner light). As the
reader may recall from previous texts, I divide the Superchristian Beyond, as
it were, into three parts, deities, stages, tiers, or whatever one would like
to call its equivalents to the Christian Trinity, meaning the strictly Catholic
triad of the Blessed Virgin, the Christ Child, and the Holy Ghost. These Superchristian equivalents, by
contrast, are the Mary Child, the Second Coming, and the Holy Spirit of Heaven,
and whereas the first is subfeminine, the second is quasi-supermasculine (from
a masculine standpoint), and the third properly supermasculine, the
supermasculinity of the superman.
Actually, the third part of the Superchristian triad is or has the
capacity to become rather more than that, but, for the time being, it will
suffice to think of it in supermasculine terms.
2. SUBFEMININE NADIR. Now if
the subfeminine is regarded as the nadir or basis of our Superchristian
'Kingdom of Heaven', then the supermasculine is very firmly its zenith or apex,
the most genuinely heavenly mode of divine redemption, while the
quasi-supermasculine plane of the Second Coming, which would be broadly
intellectual in a contemplation-inducing fashion, is intermediate between these
two extremes - the one below and the other above. In fact, there is also another dimension to
each of these Superchristian planes, but, since it is secondary, I shall
refrain from elaborating on it at present.
What I shall elaborate on, however, is the relationship between each of
these planes and their cultural corollaries, as well as attempt to clarify,
once again, the concept of 'resurrecting the Dead'. For the 'resurrection of the Dead' is crucial
to the establishment of 'Kingdom Come', even though its interpretation can only
be loosely applied to 'the Dead' as such, since what is dead is dead and
subject, as we have seen, to decomposition.
All it really means, this phrase, is the resurrection, through
legalization, of the inner light of the cerebral afterlife on the basis of
synthetic hallucinogens like LSD, which are less spiritual than visionary and
therefore eminently suited, so I contend, to fill the role of an artificial
alternative to 'Mother Earth', an alternative which is only truly possible to a
people who have died to the World the better to be reborn into the Social
Transcendentalist Beyond, renouncing 'sins of the World' in order to embrace
the grace of religious sovereignty, with its Superchristian 'rights'. Thus until one has democratically died to the
World via the Second Coming, one cannot legally enter the 'Kingdom of Heaven',
not even at its nadir in what I contend would be a broadly subfeminine realm of
artificial visionary experience. For LSD
trips, for example, in resurrecting the inner light on visionary terms,
correspond to the subfeminine ... as the basis upon which to advance humility
for the subfeminine Redeemed, all those who, in superfeminine contexts, would
otherwise be the victims of personality and thus given, through optical allure,
to the outer light. Such a diabolic
situation, so characteristic of the superfeminine, is precisely what LSD trips,
or hallucinogenic enlightenment, would be designed to save women from ... in
order that they may be saved to ... the visionary humility of the Inner Light,
and thus become angelic in their subfeminine redemption. Hence LSD is not for supermen ... so much as
their subfemale counterparts in 'Kingdom Come', whose appreciation of what is
effectively a synthetic parallel to the inner light of 'Mother Earth' could
only be greater, bearing in mind the bias of women, necessarily more
superficial than men, for visionary appearances as opposed to spiritual
essences. The angelic subwoman will
consequently be someone for whom the humility-inducing inner light of LSD, or
some such synthetic hallucinogen, is a guarantor of eternal salvation from the
diabolical threat of resurgent personality, rooted, superheathenly, in the
outer light. She will be a committed Superchristian.
3. PSEUDO-SUPERMEN. Yet there
will be males whose closeness, culturally and temperamentally, to the subwomen
... would preclude one from regarding them as properly supermasculine. Males, I mean, who would be, at best,
pseudo-supermasculine in their cultural propinquity with these subfeminine
females, and for them the appropriate 'drug' in 'Kingdom Come' would be cocaine
or, at any rate, something that requires to be sniffed/snorted as opposed to
swallowed. For such a nasal method of
drug consumption is assuredly closer to the spirit than to the id, closer to
the superconscious than to the unconscious, and therefore more masculine than
feminine. Nevertheless, its usage
implies recourse to a higher mode of the inner light ... such that removes it,
in some degree, from the fieriness of the earth's molten core without entirely
bringing it into harmony with the lightness of the air's space. Hence its propinquity to the subfeminine
obliges one to regard it in a pseudo-supermasculine light, and to conceive of
it as a secondary dimension to what would properly be affiliated to the Mary
Child. Yet such a dimension must also be
legislated for, and consequently it would be no less necessary to legalize
cocaine, or some derivative thereof, than LSD ... come the official
establishment, under Messianic auspices, of 'Kingdom Come'. For a people who had democratically opted to
die to the flesh of 'worldly sin' would have every right to the inner light of
otherworldly grace. Such grace precludes
the existence of punishment, or penalties for criminal wrongdoing, and
therefore the decriminalization of drugs would be a matter of divine necessity
in 'Kingdom Come', if graceful people, or those who, constituting a majority,
had democratically opted for religious sovereignty, were not to be regarded as
criminals and duly punished from a less than heavenly viewpoint, the viewpoint
of a Superheathen dispensation. For
whereas sin is Christian and grace ... Superchristian, crime is Heathen and
punishment ... Superheathen, and nothing Superheathen, much less Heathen or
Christian, could expect to find favour in a Superchristian civilization.
CYCLE 59
1. INTERMEDIATE REALM. Now if
LSD-induced humility is to be regarded as the nadir of 'Kingdom Come', or of an
avowedly Superchristian civilization run on Social Transcendentalist lines,
then what may be called VDU-induced intellectuality ... should be regarded as
germane to an intermediate realm lying in-between the humility of the Mary
Child and the universality of the Holy Spirit of Heaven. Such an intermediate realm would approximate
to the second deity of our Superchristian triad, viz. the Second Coming, and
could be conceived of as standing in a sort of purgatorial light vis-à-vis the
Superchristian nadir down below in the subfeminine depths, and the
Superchristian zenith up above in the supermasculine heights, a light, I mean,
which would enable us to regard it as serving, in addition to the strictly
purgatorial, a dual purpose, both in terms of its relationship to 'the below'
and to 'the above'. In the first case,
that of its relationship to subfeminine humility, it would be concerned to
deliver a poetical impression. In
the second case, that of its relationship to supermasculine universality, it
would be concerned to deliver a philosophical impression. In between, would come the strictly
purgatorial realm of a fictional impression ... also delivered via VDU.
2. SECOND TIER OF 'KINGDOM COME'.
Thus the second tier of 'Kingdom Come' would be divisible between a quasi-subfeminine
context of abstract superpoems, which formerly Christic females could be
expected to find it congenial to contemplate, and, above this, an androgynous
context of avant-garde fiction ... likely to appeal to both genders, and,
finally, a quasi-supermasculine context of transcendental philosophy
(theosophy), such that only the most Heaven-oriented of formerly Christic males
could be expected to appreciate, all aspects of this second tier deriving from
my oeuvre (for I am, after all, the self-proclaimed 'literary'
Second Coming), and existing on computer disc (both hard and soft) for VDU
appreciation.
3. SUPERCHRISTIAN PURGATORY.
Thus whereas the first tier of our projected Superchristian civilization
could be regarded as being especially applicable to formerly Superheathen
females, the second tier would have more relevance to formerly Christian
(Catholic) persons, irrespective of gender, given its intellectual rather than
visionary essence. It would, as I say,
constitute a kind of Superchristian Purgatory, in which one could dally or from
which one could either regress or progress towards the Superchristian
extremes. Again, its division is largely
gender-based, since the poetic/philosophic extreme division is of a character
that would tend to condition either humility or universality, but in a way,
relative to the mind, that was rather more 'middle class' than either 'lower
class' or 'upper class', as befitting an intellectual middle-ground (never more
strictly 'middle class' than in the fictional context) lying in-between
visionary and spiritual extremes, a sort of mesamorphic plane in between
endomorphic (below) and ectomorphic (above) planes, whose cultural appeal could
only be rather more for 'intellectuals' than for 'the sensual' or 'the spiritual'.
4. DRUG CORRELATIONS OF SECOND TIER.
However that may be, such an intermediate plane would initially be open
to all former Christians, who would subsequently discover whether they were
meant to regress down via poetry, remain in Purgatory with fiction, or progress
up via philosophy. Probably those whose
drug bias was for heroin would feel more at home there than in the visionary or
spiritual realms of 'the below' and 'the above', since a correlation indubitably
exists, at this computerized level of literature, between fiction and heroin,
not to mention poetry and hashish, just as, traditionally, correlations would
have existed between book fiction and alcohol, and book poetry and tobacco,
which is to say, between 'water' in relation to the intellect and 'fire' in
relation to the soul. Now although it
would be better for people not to inject or smoke, those who habitually do so
would find the second tier of 'Kingdom Come' more to their tastes than either of
the other tiers, bearing in mind its purgatorial essence, and could be expected
to dally there until such time, if ever, as they were ripe for the 'visionary
below' or the 'spiritual above'.
5. INTELLECTUAL EMPHASIS OF SECOND TIER. One could not, in the event of legalizing LSD
and cocaine, reasonably discriminate against hashish and heroin, thereby
criminalizing their use. For virtually
all spectra of human life have to be accounted for ... even when there is a
specific bias for one spectrum rather than another, and in 'Kingdom Come',
which is a context of grace, it would not be feasible to discriminate against
one category of drug user for the sake of another, particularly in view of the
fact that each category has its specific cultural niche, whether vis-à-vis the
outer light, the outer spirit or, as in the case of LSD, the inner light. Nevertheless the principal emphasis in the
second tier of our Superchristian civilization must be intellectual, with drugs
subsidiary to the prevailing element of computerized graphics/texts. In fact, those who were overly given to
smoking and/or injecting (not to mention the far greater number of persons
coming across from Christian sin whose preferred 'drugs' were tobacco or
alcohol, and who would therefore exist in an obsolescent relationship, drug-wise,
to VDU literature) would not be encouraged to attend the second-tier Centres at
the same time/day as their more puritanical counterparts or, at the very least,
would have to contemplate/read in a separate section of the Superchristian
Purgatory than those entitled to philosophy, thus precluding the sort of
inconvenience to the latter which could arise from having drug users in their
midst. Yet no-one need feel pressurized
to smoke and/or inject fiery/watery drugs just because they were available or,
at any rate, legal, albeit on a strictly non-commercial basis. Quite the contrary, the pressure will rather
be on those who do so either to quit using them altogether or, failing that,
regress to the use of LSD or cocaine instead, with, in the first instance, the
reward of philosophical study and the option, thereafter, of progressing-on up
to the spiritual realm, and, in the second instance, the reward of
regressing-back down to the visionary realm - the former from VDU philosophy to
transcendental meditation, the latter from VDU poetry to hallucinogenic
contemplation.
6. 'THREE IN ONE'. Thus one
should distinguish between a kind of Father - Son - Holy Ghost (Three-in-One)
of the second tier of 'Kingdom Come', as between VDU poetry - fiction -
philosophy, or hashish - heroin - puritanical abstinence, this latter alone
commensurate with the study of my philosophy, and thus a prerequisite of
subsequent progress to the meditative tier above. Conversely, a tobacco-smoking habit would
automatically qualify one for admission to the poetry section, whilst an
alcohol-drinking habit would just as automatically lead to the fiction section,
a combination of smoking and drinking (as of doping and injecting) entitling
one to alternate/choose between the two sections, but not permitting one access
to the third section. For people should
be judged according to their drug habits, with those who smoke being foregone
candidates for the poetry section, those who drink being foregone candidates
for the fiction section, and those who neither drink nor smoke being qualified
for the philosophy section.... This does not mean to say that they would have
to read philosophy in preference to poetry or fiction, but, rather, have that
option, whereas the rest of formerly Christian humanity would not have the
philosophy option until such time as they had learnt to dispense with tobacco
and alcohol and/or hashish and heroin, after the fashion of
proto-transcendentalists. Actually,
those who smoked and/or drank would be advised to gravitate, in 'Kingdom Come',
to hashish and/or heroin instead, in order to come into line, as it were, with
the VDU-based medium of computer literature, thereby abandoning something more
relevant to books and the 'open' commercial societies of the Christian/Heathen
past. Though anyone who could give-up
smoking or drinking anyway need not feel obliged to dope or inject instead, but
would be entitled to gravitate to the philosophy section as a prerequisite of
subsequent spiritual progress.
CYCLE 60
1. THIRD TIER OF 'KINGDOM COME'.
Just as Superheathen females would be the principal candidates for the
subfeminine humility of the first tier of 'Kingdom Come', so Superheathen males
would be the principal candidates for the supermasculine universality of its
third, and highest, tier, namely that of the Holy Spirit of Heaven, in what
would be a context largely, if not exclusively, given to meditation. However, as in the case of the first tier of
our projected triadic Beyond, there would be a primary and a secondary form of
the universality to which it aspires, a distinction, in other words, between
the properly supermasculine meditation of air-breathing calmness, and what
could be called a pseudo-subfeminine context of yoga posturings and/or
aerobics, the former reserved for males and the latter for females whose
entitlement to the third tier ... would be premised on the basis of a long-term
commitment to yogic practices, and who were, in any case, manifestly
ectomorphic, or slender, in build, not to say, in a certain related sense, of
an upper-class disposition. Thus just as
certain males would be foregone candidates for the subfeminine tier of 'Kingdom
Come' by dint of their cocaine habits, so there would be females who, for a
variety of reasons, couldn't be regarded in a strictly subfeminine light, but
had to be admitted to its third tier ... as a matter of moral necessity. Yet they would not, as pseudo-subwomen, be
permitted to encroach upon the transcendental meditation of their
supermasculine counterparts, but would be confined to a separate section of the
third-tier Centres ... wherein their more bodily approach to transcendentalism
could be conducted at a discreet remove from those for whom any physical
work-outs or yogic posturings would be completely irrelevant. For, in the final analysis, those 'higher'
women would not be supermen but still fundamentally women, and no genuinely
spiritual organization can afford to gloss over or underestimate the gender
divide! There can be no amoral
equalitarianism in 'Kingdom Come'. For
men are of a physical and psychological disposition that can outstrip women in
spiritual development, and if they are to progress towards the post-Human
Millennium, they will certainly have to turn their back on women and get on
with the morally more significant task of spiritual purification.
2. POSSIBILITY OF MOVEMENT.
The sketch of 'Kingdom Come' outlined above, in all three tiers, should
indicate the possibility of movement up and down the scale, so to speak, from
one tier to another, since it is my belief that the initial judgements which
will tend to consign people to one tier rather than another ... can be
reversed, in the course of time, if there is sufficient evidence of a 'change
of heart' or, more correctly, of a willingness to undergo a new lifestyle, for
better or worse, on the part of those for whom confinement to any given tier
could not be indefinitely sustained.
Certainly, it is probable that a majority of those initially assigned to
a particular tier ... would be unable or unwilling to move to another one,
especially in the case of those for whom the inner light was the only viable
option. Yet there must be an allowance
made for exceptional circumstances, even for people who abuse their third-level
entitlement to be 'kicked out of Heaven' to some inferior realm of 'Kingdom
Come', so that there is both hope and fear, hope of being able to move up from
below and fear, if insincere, of having to move down from above. Now especially in the purgatorial middle tier
would there be the possibility of movement either way, depending upon one's
entitlement and/or record. But, by and
large, I envisage a situation whereby those in the bottom tier and those, by
contrast, in the top one ... remain where they are ... in keeping with their
contrary standings in humility and universality, subfemininity and
supermasculinity. The movement either
way would mostly come from pseudo-supermen moving up to the second tier in the
event of 'kicking' their cocaine habit and, conversely, of pseudo-subwomen moving
down to the second tier in the event of not pulling their aerobic weight, or
whatever, in regard to the yogic exercises and posturings of their more bodily
mode of transcendentalism, with the possibility, in both cases, of further
movement up or down ... as and when circumstances permit. Certainly, the Mary Child and the Holy Spirit
of Heaven will remain poles apart while there is a purgatorial intermediate
realm of judgemental assessment to ensure that those whose entitlement to the
one or the other is upheld for the sake of all that is genuinely good and
holy. The context of the inner light
below would not be allowed to encroach upon that of the inner spirit above, nor
will subwomen, whatever their status, find any way of transforming themselves into
supermen.
3. VIDEO ALTERNATIVE. In
addition to the 'resurrection of the Dead' to the inner light of LSD/cocaine,
the first tier of 'Kingdom Come' would be given to video, so that people could
watch videos instead of tripping and/or snorting, and thus gradually gravitate
to a context from which subsequent movement ... to the poetry and/or fiction
sections of the computer-based second tier ... could be achieved. Yet such movement would presuppose the
rejection of LSD and/or cocaine as a precondition of promotion to the
purgatorial realm, as it were, of the Second Coming, and would also involve the
rejection, at least in a Centrist context, of videos.
4. HOLOGRAPHIC STIMULUS. If
the first tier is video-based and the second tier computer-based, then the
third tier would have to be holography-based, with all manner of spiritually
edifying holograms in situ to assist the devotee, whether pseudo-subfeminine or
supermasculine, with her/his meditations.
In fact, it is likely that the higher the plane of meditation, as in the
genuinely supermasculine context, the more abstract and fewer in number would
the holograms become, until, at the topmost level, they would scarcely figure
at all, not even as a vehicle for spiritual sublimation. The true meditator would be beyond all
visionary aids to the union of his self with the universal self in focused
breath. He would be truly saved!
CYCLE 61
1. SENSE AND SENSIBILITY. To
contrast idealism with transcendentalism, naturalism with fundamentalism,
materialism with nonconformism, and realism with humanism ... on the basis of a
distinction between sensuality and sensibility, elements and elementinos.
2. DEVOLVING WITHIN SPACE. To
devolve from the sequential Space of the Clear Light of the Outer Void to the
spatial Space of the Clear Light of the Inner Void via the massed Space of the
Unclear Light of the Outer Void and the volumetric Space of the Unclear Light
of the Inner Void.
3. EVOLVING WITHIN SPACE. To
evolve from the repetitive Space of the Holy Spirit of Outer Heaven to the
spaced Space of the Holy Spirit of Inner Heaven via the massive Space of the
Unholy Spirit of Outer Heaven and the voluminous Space of the Unholy Spirit of
Inner Heaven.
4. DEVOLVING WITHIN TIME. To
devolve from the sequential Time of the Clear Fire of Outer Time to the spatial
Time of the Clear Fire of Inner Time via the massed Time of the Unclear Fire of
Outer Time and the volumetric Time of the Unclear Fire of Inner Time.
5. EVOLVING WITHIN TIME. To
evolve from the repetitive Time of the Holy Soul of Outer Hell to the spaced
Time of the Holy Soul of Inner Hell via the massive Time of the Unholy Soul of
Outer Hell and the voluminous Time of the Unholy Soul of Inner Hell.
6. DEVOLVING WITHIN VOLUME.
To devolve from the sequential Volume of the Clear Ice of Outer Volume
to the spatial Volume of the Clear Ice of Inner Volume via the massed Volume of
the Unclear Ice of Outer Volume and the volumetric Volume of the Unclear Ice of
Inner Volume.
7. EVOLVING WITHIN VOLUME. To
evolve from the repetitive Volume of the Holy Mind of Outer Purgatory to the
spaced Volume of the Holy Mind of Inner Purgatory via the massive Volume of the
Unholy Mind of Outer Purgatory and the voluminous Volume of the Unholy Mind of
Inner Purgatory.
8. DEVOLVING WITHIN MASS. To
devolve from the sequential Mass of the Clear Soil of Outer Mass to the spatial
Mass of the Clear Soil of Inner Mass via the massed Mass of the Unclear Soil of
Outer Mass and the volumetric Mass of
the Unclear Soil of Inner Mass.
9. EVOLVING WITHIN MASS. To
evolve from the repetitive Mass of the Holy Id of the Outer World to the spaced
Mass of the Holy Id of the Inner World via the massive Mass of the Unholy Id of
the Outer World and the voluminous Mass of the Unholy Id of the Inner World.
CYCLE 62
1. PHOTON DEVOLUTION. To
devolve from the sequential Space of elemental photon particles to the spatial
Space of elemental photon wavicles via the massed Space of molecular photon
particles and the volumetric Space of molecular photon wavicles.
2. PHOTINO EVOLUTION. To
evolve from the repetitive Space of elemental photino particles to the spaced
Space of elemental photino wavicles via the massive Space of molecular photino
particles and the voluminous Space of molecular photino wavicles.
3. PROTON DEVOLUTION. To
devolve from the sequential Time of elemental proton particles to the spatial
Time of elemental proton wavicles via the massed Time of molecular proton
particles and the volumetric Time of molecular proton wavicles.
4. PROTINO EVOLUTION. To
evolve from the repetitive Time of elemental protino particles to the spaced
Time of elemental protino wavicles via the massive Time of molecular protino
particles and the voluminous Time of molecular protino wavicles.
5. NEUTRON DEVOLUTION. To
devolve from the sequential Volume of elemental neutron particles to the
spatial Volume of elemental neutron wavicles via the massed Volume of molecular
neutron particles and the volumetric Volume of molecular neutron wavicles.
6. NEUTRINO EVOLUTION. To
evolve from the repetitive Volume of elemental neutrino particles to the spaced
Volume of elemental neutrino wavicles via the massive Volume of molecular
neutrino particles and the voluminous Volume of molecular neutrino wavicles.
7. ELECTRON DEVOLUTION. To
devolve from the sequential Mass of elemental electron particles to the spatial
Mass of elemental electron wavicles via the massed Mass of molecular electron
particles and the volumetric Mass of molecular electron wavicles.
8. ELECTRINO EVOLUTION. To
evolve from the repetitive Mass of elemental electrino particles to the spaced
Mass of elemental electrino wavicles via the massive Mass of molecular
electrino particles and the voluminous Mass of molecular electrino wavicles.
CYCLE 63
1. IDEALIST DEVOLUTION. To
devolve from the naturalist idealism in elemental photon particles of the Clear
Light of the Outer Void to the idealist idealism in elemental photon wavicles
of the Clear Light of the Inner Void via the realist idealism in molecular
photon particles of the Unclear Light of the Outer Void and the materialist
idealism in molecular photon wavicles of the Unclear Light of the Inner Void.
2. TRANSCENDENTALIST EVOLUTION.
To evolve from the fundamentalist transcendentalism in elemental photino
particles of the Holy Spirit of Outer Heaven to the transcendentalist
transcendentalism in elemental photino wavicles of the Holy Spirit of Inner
Heaven via the humanist transcendentalism in molecular photino particles of the
Unholy Spirit of Outer Heaven and the nonconformist transcendentalism in
molecular photino wavicles of the Unholy Spirit of Inner Heaven.
3. NATURALIST DEVOLUTION. To
devolve from the naturalist naturalism in elemental proton particles of the
Clear Fire of Outer Time to the idealist naturalism in elemental proton
wavicles of the Clear Fire of Inner Time via the realist naturalism in
molecular proton particles of the Unclear Fire of Outer Time and the
materialist naturalism in molecular proton wavicles of the Unclear Fire of
Inner Time.
4. FUNDAMENTALIST EVOLUTION.
To evolve from the fundamentalist fundamentalism in elemental protino
particles of the Holy Soul of Outer Hell to the transcendentalist
fundamentalism in elemental protino wavicles of the Holy Soul of Inner Hell via
the humanist fundamentalism in molecular protino particles of the Unholy Soul
of Outer Hell and the nonconformist fundamentalism in molecular protino
wavicles of the Unholy Soul of Inner Hell.
5. MATERIALIST DEVOLUTION. To
devolve from the naturalist materialism in elemental neutron particles of the
Clear Ice of Outer Volume to the idealist materialism in elemental neutron
wavicles of the Clear Ice of Inner Volume via the realist materialism in
molecular neutron particles of the Unclear Ice of Outer Volume and the
materialist materialism in molecular neutron wavicles of the Unclear Ice of
Inner Volume.
6. NONCONFORMIST EVOLUTION.
To evolve from the fundamentalist nonconformism in elemental neutrino
particles of the Holy Mind of Outer Purgatory to the transcendentalist
nonconformism in elemental neutrino wavicles of the Holy Mind of Inner
Purgatory via the humanist nonconformism in molecular neutrino particles of the
Unholy Mind of Outer Purgatory and the nonconformist nonconformism in molecular
neutrino wavicles of the Unholy Mind of Inner Purgatory.
7. REALIST DEVOLUTION. To
devolve from the naturalist realism in elemental electron particles of the
Clear Soil of Outer Mass to the idealist realism in elemental electron wavicles
of the Clear Soil of Inner Mass via the realist realism in molecular electron
particles of the Unclear Soil of Outer Mass and the materialist realism in
molecular electron wavicles of the Unclear Soil of Inner Mass.
8. HUMANIST EVOLUTION. To
evolve from the fundamentalist humanism in elemental electrino particles of the
Holy Id of the Outer World to the transcendentalist humanism in elemental
electrino wavicles of the Holy Id of the Inner World via the humanist humanism
in molecular electrino particles of the Unholy Id of the Outer World and the
nonconformist humanism in molecular electrino wavicles of the Unholy Id of the
Inner World.
CYCLE 64
1. PRIMAL DOING VIS-À-VIS SUPREME BEING. To contrast the extreme right-wing status of
primal doing with the extreme left-wing status of supreme being ... with regard
to the noumenal distinction, relative to photons/photinos, between idealism and
transcendentalism.
2. PRIMAL BEING VIS-À-VIS SUPREME DOING. To contrast the extreme left-wing status of
primal being with the extreme right-wing status of supreme doing ... with
regard to the noumenal distinction, relative to protons/protinos, between
naturalism and fundamentalism.
3. PRIMAL GIVING VIS-À-VIS SUPREME TAKING. To contrast the right-wing status of primal
giving with the left-wing status of supreme taking ... with regard to the
phenomenal distinction, relative to neutrons/neutrinos, between materialism and
nonconformism.
4. PRIMAL TAKING VIS-À-VIS SUPREME GIVING. To contrast the left-wing status of primal
taking with the right-wing status of supreme giving ... with regard to the
phenomenal distinction, relative to electrons/electrinos, between realism and
humanism.
CYCLE 65
1. BEING AND CULTURE. To
perceive a correlation between being and culture ... with regard to extreme
left-wing subjectivity, whether primal or supreme.
2. DOING AND BARBARISM. To
perceive a correlation between doing and barbarism ... with regard to extreme
right-wing objectivity, whether primal or supreme.
3. GIVING AND CIVILIZATION.
To perceive a correlation between giving and civilization ... with
regard to right-wing objectivity, whether primal or supreme.
4. TAKING AND NATURE. To
perceive a correlation between taking and nature ... with regard to left-wing
subjectivity, whether primal or supreme.
CYCLE 66
1. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE BARBARISM.
The negative barbarism of primal doing vis-à-vis the positive barbarism
of supreme doing, as regards idealism and fundamentalism, eyes and heart.
2. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE CULTURE.
The negative culture of primal being vis-à-vis the positive culture of
supreme being, as regards naturalism and transcendentalism, ears and lungs.
3. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE CIVILIZATION. The negative civilization of primal giving
vis-à-vis the positive civilization of supreme giving, as regards materialism
and humanism, tongue and womb.
4. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE NATURE.
The negative nature of primal taking vis-à-vis the positive nature of
supreme taking, as regards realism and nonconformism, flesh and brain.
CYCLE 67
1. FEAR OF BARBARISM.
Civilization, whether primal or supreme, lives in fear of barbarism, as
crime fears punishment.
2. HOPE OF CULTURE. Nature,
whether primal or supreme, lives in hope of culture, as sin hopes for grace.
3. BEHIND AND BEYOND. The
barbarism of punishment lies behind the civilization of crime, whereas the
culture of grace lies beyond the nature of sin.
4. FALL AND RISE. To fall
from civilized politics/science to barbarous politics/science, as from (parliamentary)
materialism to (fascist) idealism, but to rise from natural politics/science to
cultural politics/science, as from (republican) realism to (communist)
naturalism.
5. DAMNATION AND SALVATION.
To be damned from civilized economics/religion to barbarous
economics/religion, as from (sensual) humanism to (emotional) fundamentalism,
but to be saved from natural economics/religion to cultural economics/religion,
as from (prayerful) nonconformism to (meditative) transcendentalism.
6. BEGINNING AND END. From
elemental photon particles to elemental photino wavicles, as from the Clear
Light of the Outer Void to the Holy Spirit of Inner Heaven, the alpha-most
idealism to the omega-most transcendentalism of science and religion
respectively.
CYCLE 68
1. FROM SCIENTIFIC TO RELIGIOUS IDEALISM. To devolve from the scientific idealism of
the Clear Light of the Outer Void to the religious idealism of the Clear Light
of the Inner Void via the political idealism of the Unclear Light of the Outer
Void and the economic idealism of the Unclear Light of the Inner Void, as from
the elemental photon particles of sequential Space to the elemental photon
wavicles of spatial Space via the molecular photon particles of massed Space
and the molecular photon wavicles of volumetric Space.
2. FROM SCIENTIFIC TO RELIGIOUS TRANSCENDENTALISM. To evolve from the scientific
transcendentalism of the Holy Spirit of Outer Heaven to the religious
transcendentalism of the Holy Spirit of Inner Heaven via the political
transcendentalism of the Unholy Spirit of Outer Heaven and the economic
transcendentalism of the Unholy Spirit of Inner Heaven, as from the elemental
photino particles of repetitive Space to the elemental photino wavicles of
spaced Space via the molecular photino particles of massive Space and the
molecular photino wavicles of voluminous Space.
3. FROM SCIENTIFIC TO RELIGIOUS NATURALISM. To devolve from the scientific naturalism of
the Clear Fire of Outer Time to the religious naturalism of the Clear Fire of
Inner Time via the political naturalism of the Unclear Fire of Outer Time and
the economic naturalism of the Unclear Fire of Inner Time, as from the
elemental proton particles of sequential Time to the elemental proton wavicles
of spatial Time via the molecular proton particles of massed Time and the
molecular proton wavicles of volumetric Time.
4. FROM SCIENTIFIC TO RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM. To evolve from the scientific fundamentalism
of the Holy Soul of Outer Hell to the religious fundamentalism of the Holy Soul
of Inner Hell via the political fundamentalism of the Unholy Soul of Outer Hell
and the economic fundamentalism of the Unholy Soul of Inner Hell, as from the
elemental protino particles of repetitive Time to the elemental protino
wavicles of spaced Time via the molecular protino particles of massive Time and
the molecular protino wavicles of voluminous Time.
5. FROM SCIENTIFIC TO RELIGIOUS MATERIALISM. To devolve from the scientific materialism of
the Clear Ice of Outer Volume to the religious materialism of the Clear Ice of
Inner Volume via the political materialism of the Unclear Ice of Outer Volume
and the economic materialism of the Unclear Ice of Inner Volume, as from the
elemental neutron particles of sequential Volume to the elemental neutron wavicles
of spatial Volume via the molecular neutron particles of massed Volume and the
molecular neutron wavicles of volumetric Volume.
6. FROM SCIENTIFIC TO RELIGIOUS NONCONFORMISM. To evolve from the scientific nonconformism
of the Holy Mind of Outer Purgatory to the religious nonconformism of the Holy
Mind of Inner Purgatory via the political nonconformism of the Unholy Mind of
Outer Purgatory and the economic nonconformism of the Unholy Mind of Inner
Purgatory, as from the elemental neutrino particles of repetitive Volume to the
elemental neutrino wavicles of spaced Volume via the molecular neutrino
particles of massive Volume and the molecular neutrino wavicles of voluminous
Volume.
7. FROM SCIENTIFIC TO RELIGIOUS REALISM. To devolve from the scientific realism of the
Clear Soil of Outer Mass to the religious realism of the Clear Soil of Inner
Mass via the political realism of the Unclear Soil of Outer Mass and the
economic realism of the Unclear Soil of Inner Mass, as from the elemental
electron particles of sequential Mass to the elemental electron wavicles of
spatial Mass via the molecular electron particles of massed Mass and the
molecular electron wavicles of volumetric Mass.
8. FROM SCIENTIFIC TO RELIGIOUS HUMANISM. To evolve from the scientific humanism of the
Holy Id of the Outer World to the religious humanism of the Holy Id of the
Inner World via the political humanism of the Unholy Id of the Outer World and
the economic humanism of the Unholy Id of the Inner World, as from the
elemental electrino particles of repetitive Mass to the elemental electrino
wavicles of spaced Mass via the molecular electrino particles of massive Mass
and the molecular electrino wavicles of voluminous Mass.
CYCLE 69
1. DEVOLUTION OF THE OBJECTIVE NOUMENAL NOT-SELF (EYES). To devolve from the outer (particle)
elementality of the objective noumenal not-self in relation to the backbrain to
the inner (wavicle) elementality of the objective noumenal not-self in relation
to the subconscious via the outer (particle) molecularity of the objective
noumenal not-self in relation to the right midbrain and the inner (wavicle)
molecularity of the objective noumenal not-self in relation to the unconscious,
as from negative scientific barbarism in alpha-most primal doing to negative
religious barbarism in alpha-least primal doing via negative political
barbarism in alpha-more (relative to most) primal doing and negative economic
barbarism in alpha-less (relative to least) primal doing.
2. EVOLUTION OF THE SUBJECTIVE NOUMENAL SELF (LUNGS). To evolve from the outer elementality of the
subjective noumenal self in relation to the forebrain to the inner elementality
of the subjective noumenal self in relation to the superconscious via the outer
molecularity of the subjective noumenal self in relation to the left midbrain
and the inner molecularity of the subjective noumenal self in relation to the
conscious, as from positive scientific culture in omega-least supreme being to
positive religious culture in omega-most supreme being via positive political
culture in omega-less (relative to least) supreme being and positive economic
culture in omega-more (relative to most) supreme being.
3. DEVOLUTION OF THE SUBJECTIVE NOUMENAL NOT-SELF (EARS). To devolve from the outer elementality of the
subjective noumenal not-self in relation to the backbrain to the inner
elementality of the subjective noumenal not-self in relation to the
subconscious via the outer molecularity of the subjective noumenal not-self in
relation to the right midbrain and the inner molecularity of the subjective
noumenal not-self in relation to the unconscious, as from negative scientific
culture in alpha-most primal being to negative religious culture in alpha-least
primal being via negative political culture in alpha-more (relative to most)
primal being and negative economic culture in alpha-less (relative to least)
primal being.
4. EVOLUTION OF THE OBJECTIVE NOUMENAL SELF (HEART). To evolve from the outer elementality of the
objective noumenal self in relation to the forebrain to the inner elementality
of the objective noumenal self in relation to the superconscious via the outer
molecularity of the objective noumenal self in relation to the left midbrain
and the inner molecularity of the objective noumenal self in relation to the
conscious, as from positive scientific barbarism in omega-least supreme doing
to positive religious barbarism in omega-most supreme doing via positive
political barbarism in omega-less (relative to least) supreme doing and
positive economic barbarism in omega-more (relative to most) supreme doing.
5. DEVOLUTION OF THE OBJECTIVE PHENOMENAL NOT-SELF (TONGUE). To devolve from the outer elementality of the
objective phenomenal not-self in relation to the backbrain to the inner
elementality of the objective phenomenal not-self in relation to the
subconscious via the outer molecularity of the objective phenomenal not-self in
relation to the right midbrain and the inner molecularity of the objective
phenomenal not-self in relation to the unconscious, as from negative scientific
civilization in alpha-most primal giving to negative religious civilization in
alpha-least primal giving via negative political civilization in alpha-more
(relative to most) primal giving and negative economic civilization in
alpha-less (relative to least) primal giving.
6. EVOLUTION OF THE SUBJECTIVE PHENOMENAL SELF (BRAIN). To evolve from the outer elementality of the
subjective phenomenal self in relation to the forebrain to the inner
elementality of the subjective phenomenal self in relation to the
superconscious via the outer molecularity of the subjective phenomenal self in
relation to the left midbrain and the inner molecularity of the subjective
phenomenal self in relation to the conscious, as from positive scientific
nature in omega-least supreme taking to positive religious nature in omega-most
supreme taking via positive political nature in omega-less (relative to least)
supreme taking and positive economic nature in omega-more (relative to most)
supreme taking.
7. DEVOLUTION OF THE SUBJECTIVE PHENOMENAL NOT-SELF (FLESH). To devolve from the outer elementality of the
subjective phenomenal not-self in relation to the backbrain to the inner
elementality of the subjective phenomenal not-self in relation to the
subconscious via the outer molecularity of the subjective phenomenal not-self
in relation to the right midbrain and the inner molecularity of the subjective
phenomenal not-self in relation to the unconscious, as from negative scientific
nature in alpha-most primal taking to negative religious nature in alpha-least
primal taking via negative political nature in alpha-more (relative to most)
primal taking and negative economic nature in alpha-less (relative to least)
primal taking.
8. EVOLUTION OF THE OBJECTIVE PHENOMENAL SELF (WOMB). To evolve from the outer elementality of the
objective phenomenal self in relation to the forebrain to the inner
elementality of the objective phenomenal self in relation to the superconscious
via the outer molecularity of the objective phenomenal self in relation to the
left midbrain and the inner molecularity of the objective phenomenal self in
relation to the conscious, as from positive scientific civilization in
omega-least supreme giving to positive religious civilization in omega-most
supreme giving via positive political civilization in omega-less (relative to
least) supreme giving and positive economic civilization in omega-more
(relative to most) supreme giving.
CYCLE 70
1. DEVOLUTIONARY NOT-SELF VIS-À-VIS EVOLUTIONARY SELF. That which is devolutionary ... is of the
not-self because negative, whereas whatever is evolutionary ... is of the self
because positive.
2. ELEMENT CRUDITY VIS-À-VIS ELEMENTINO REFINEMENT. The negative, or alpha-stemming, options are
of sensuality in element crudity, whereas the positive, or omega-oriented,
options are of sensibility ... in elementino refinement.
3. DIVERGENCE OF SENSE VIS-À-VIS CONVERGENCE OF SENSIBILITY. Sensuality diverges from a vacuum, whereas
sensibility converges upon a plenum, whether objectively (and in rectilinear
fashion) or subjectively (and in curvilinear fashion).
4. 'ANTI/PRO' FORMS OF DISCIPLINARY OPTIONS. The negative options of the not-self are the
'anti' forms of each discipline, in contrast to the positive options of the
self with regard to what are effectively their 'pro' forms.
CYCLE 71
1. SCIENTIFIC BARBARISM/CULTURE.
Hence the anti-science of negative scientific barbarism in primal doing
... as against the science of positive scientific culture in supreme being ...
with regard to the alpha-most/omega-least distinction between the Clear Light
of the Outer Void and the Holy Spirit of Outer Heaven.
2. POLITICAL BARBARISM/CULTURE.
Hence the antipolitics of negative political barbarism in primal doing
... as against the politics of positive political culture in supreme being ...
with regard to the alpha-more (relative to most)/omega-less (relative to least)
distinction between the Unclear Light of the Outer Void and the Unholy Spirit
of Outer Heaven.
3. ECONOMIC BARBARISM/CULTURE.
Hence the anti-economics of negative economic barbarism in primal doing
... as against the economics of positive economic culture in supreme being ...
with regard to the alpha-less (relative to least)/omega-more (relative to most)
distinction between the Unclear Light of the Inner Void and the Unholy Spirit
of Inner Heaven.
4. RELIGIOUS BARBARISM/CULTURE.
Hence the anti-religion of negative religious barbarism in primal doing
... as against the religion of positive religious culture in supreme being ...
with regard to the alpha-least/omega-most distinction between the Clear Light
of the Inner Void and the Holy Spirit of Inner Heaven.
CYCLE 72
1. SCIENTIFIC CULTURE/BARBARISM.
Hence, too, the anti-science of negative scientific culture in primal
being ... as against the science of positive scientific barbarism in supreme
doing ... with regard to the alpha-most/omega-least distinction between the
Clear Fire of Outer Time and the Holy Soul of Outer Hell.
2. POLITICAL CULTURE/BARBARISM.
Hence the antipolitics of negative political culture in primal being ...
as against the politics of positive political barbarism in supreme doing ...
with regard to the alpha-more (relative to most)/omega-less (relative to least)
distinction between the Unclear Fire of Outer Time and the Unholy Soul of Outer
Hell.
3. ECONOMIC CULTURE/BARBARISM.
Hence the anti-economics of negative economic culture in primal being
... as against the economics of positive economic barbarism in supreme doing
... with regard to the alpha-less (relative to least)/omega-more (relative to
most) distinction between the Unclear Fire of Inner Time and the Unholy Soul of
Inner Hell.
4. RELIGIOUS CULTURE/BARBARISM.
Hence the anti-religion of negative religious culture in primal being
... as against the religion of positive religious barbarism in supreme doing
... with regard to the alpha-least/omega-most distinction between the Clear
Fire of Inner Time and the Holy Soul of Inner Hell.
CYCLE 73
1. SCIENTIFIC CIVILIZATION/NATURE.
Hence, also, the antiscience of negative scientific civilization in
primal giving ... as against the science of positive scientific nature in
supreme taking ... with regard to the alpha-most/omega-least distinction
between the Clear Ice of Outer Volume and the Holy Mind of Outer Purgatory.
2. POLITICAL CIVILIZATION/NATURE.
Hence the anti-politics of negative political civilization in primal
giving ... as against the politics of positive political nature in supreme
taking ... with regard to the alpha-more (relative to most)/omega-less
(relative to least) distinction between the Unclear Ice of Outer Volume and the
Unholy Mind of Outer Purgatory.
3. ECONOMIC CIVILIZATION/NATURE.
Hence the anti-economics of negative economic civilization in primal
giving ... as against the economics of positive economic nature in supreme
taking ... with regard to the alpha-less (relative to least)/omega-more
(relative to most) distinction between the Unclear Ice of Inner Volume and the
Unholy Mind of Inner Purgatory.
4. RELIGIOUS CIVILIZATION/NATURE.
Hence the anti-religion of negative religious civilization in primal
giving ... as against the religion of positive religious nature in supreme
taking ... with regard to the alpha-least/omega-most distinction between the
Clear Ice of Inner Volume and the Holy Mind of Inner Purgatory.
CYCLE 74
1. SCIENTIFIC NATURE/CIVILIZATION.
Hence, finally, the antiscience of negative scientific nature in primal
taking ... as against the science of positive scientific civilization in
supreme giving ... with regard to the alpha-most/omega-least distinction
between the Clear Soil of Outer Mass and the Holy Id of the Outer World.
2. POLITICAL NATURE/CIVILIZATION.
Hence the anti-politics of negative political nature in primal taking
... as against the politics of positive political civilization in supreme
giving ... with regard to the alpha-more (relative to most)/omega-less
(relative to least) distinction between the Unclear Soil of Outer Mass and the
Unholy Id of the Outer World.
3. ECONOMIC NATURE/CIVILIZATION.
Hence the anti-economics of negative economic nature in primal taking
... as against the economics of positive economic civilization in supreme
giving ... with regard to the alpha-less (relative to least)/omega-more
(relative to most) distinction between the Unclear Soil of Inner Mass and the
Unholy Id of the Inner World.
4. RELIGIOUS NATURE/CIVILIZATION.
Hence the anti-religion of negative religious nature in primal taking
... as against the religion of positive religious civilization in supreme
giving ... with regard to the alpha-least/omega-most distinction between the
Clear Soil of Inner Mass and the Holy Id of the Inner World.
CYCLE 75
1. FEAR/LOVE OF GOD(S). To
distinguish between the 'fear of God' which follows from a Mass/Time Heathen
relationship between the Mother and the Father, and the 'love of God' which
follows from a Volume/Space Christian relationship between Christ and the Holy
Spirit, the latter being the spiritual peace that surpasses prayerful
understanding. Hence whereas 'fear of
God' follows from a humanist/fundamentalist populism, 'love of God' appertains
to what is properly Christian in nonconformist/ transcendentalist redemption.
2. PERFECT SYMBOL OF PRAYER.
Because the Christ Child is the perfect symbol of prayerful
understanding, or a thoughtful interior life, since He can neither read nor
write, never mind speak, being too young for any such inclination, it follows
that this symbol can only be sustained with the aid of the Blessed Virgin, Who
is the 'Mother' of that which perfectly symbolizes the possibility of divine
redemption (in spiritual peace) through prayer.
Such a virginal 'Mother', miraculously impregnated, is necessarily
young, since her association is with a Child and not an adult.
3. FATE OF THE SON. Where, on
the other hand, an adult Mother is concerned, as in Anglicanism, we have a
relationship with the (correspondingly) adult Son and, to a greater extent, the
Father, Who is more adult, in familial terms, than the Son, and Who accordingly
stands to Him pretty much as dissentient nonconformism to puritan nonconformism
(say Presbyterians to Baptists), or the Old Testament to the New Testament, or
Psalms (poems) to Epistles (letters), or the emotional brain to the
intellectual brain (the light-aside of the cerebral core). This Father-Mother-Son relationship is
Protestant, whereas the relationship between the Virgin Mary, the Christ Child,
and the Holy Ghost is Catholic, the former effectively Heathen, the latter
indubitably Christian. For, unlike the
Catholic Virgin Mary, the Anglican Mother is open, in her objective sensuality,
to the emotional Father of dissentient nonconformism, and such openness,
nothing short of sexual, precludes the possibility of divine redemption, via
the Christ Child, in the Holy Ghost. For
the Father and the Holy Ghost are as alpha and omega of the Trinity, and where
there is alpha, there can be no progression towards omega! Hence the Son of puritan nonconformism is
fated, vis-à-vis His adult Mother, to remain enslaved to the Father of
dissentient nonconformism, Whose sexual imposition upon the Anglican Mother may
be held responsible for perpetuating the inverted triangle, as it were, of
Protestant so-called solidarity ... in what is effectively a vicious circle of
Heathen delusion having its cynosure in the World. Even the populism of the Mass/Time
relationship to which I referred earlier in connection with humanism ... is
more germane to Anglicanism than to Catholicism, given the fact that the Mother
and Father appertain to Protestantism in, as it were, Anglican and Dissenter
options, and that any such populist fatality can only be fundamentally
Protestant even within the bounds of Catholicism, where, as we have seen, there
is no real place for the Father, since the Virgin Mary is beyond the Mother in
Her relationship to the Christ Child, and such a refined relationship
necessarily precludes the kind of gross populism which more typifies the
Mother/Father clash of heathenistic Protestantism.
4. MOTHER/VIRGIN DISTINCTION.
One should therefore distinguish, on an Anglican/Catholic basis, between
the Mother and the Virgin Mary, since the latter can only be younger than the
former in view of Her relationship to the Christ Child, Who alone symbolizes
that which, as prayerful devotion, is capable of passing to the peace that lies
beyond understanding, the meditative spirituality transcending the
spirit-oriented mode of intellectuality.
Thus, even regarding the grave, the inner light of the Virgin Mary
should be distinguished from the inner light of the Mother, since the former,
appertaining to Catholicism, can only be purer and less Heathen than the
latter, with its sensuous overtones and closer affiliation, in all probability,
to 'Mother Earth'. The Catholic
afterlife, so I contend, would be more of the Virgin Mary than of the Mother
... where the quality of the inner light is concerned. But this inner light should not be confounded
with Heaven, or anything that appertains to the airy spirituality of the Holy
Spirit. One has already 'given up the
ghost' in dying, and thereby passed to a realm which is less Christian, in
Volume/Space terms, than fundamentally Heathen and of Mass, even when this has
been to some extent 'Christianized' through the purificatory vessel of the
Blessed Virgin.
5. ALTERNATIVE MOTHER/VIRGIN RELATIONSHIPS. From the Mother of the Father to the Virgin
of the Second Coming via the Mother of the Son and the Virgin of the Christ
Child - a Superheathen/Heathen/Christian/Superchristian humanist sequence from
fundamentalism to transcendentalism via Anglicanism and Catholicism.
6. IN RELATION TO ETERNAL LIFE.
Compared to the non-triangular triad of Christianity, viz. the Virgin
Mary, the Christ Child, and the Holy Spirit (which never quite comes to pass in
its heavenly entirety by dint of its association, as the so-called 'Third
Person' of the 'Holy Trinity', with the Father), the non-triangular, or
vertical, triad of the Superchristianity to which I subscribe, viz. the Mary
Child, the Second Coming, and the Holy Spirit of Heaven, is indubitably of
'Kingdom Come' in its most omega-orientated of radical stances before life or,
rather, in relation to Eternal Life. For
the Mary Child is even younger than the Blessed Virgin ... as one who
epitomizes the 'resurrection of the Dead' through the inner light of
hallucinogens like LSD, and thus enables such a mundane light to come to pass
on an even more refined, because synthetic, basis than the Catholic refinement
of it vis-à-vis the Anglican Mother.
Such a Mary Child is in one sense a precondition of the Second Coming,
or the eternally youthful 'Christ' of 'Kingdom Come', and, in another sense, a
theological creation of the Second Coming, whose spiritualized intellectuality
straddles the Trinity on terms which surpass anything to be found in the Bible,
whether in Old or New Testaments, and whose preferred medium, the computer,
transcends the Heathen materialism of books, conceived as rectilinear entities,
as it electronically advances beyond the 'outer light/spirit' of VDU
poetry/fiction to the 'inner spirit', relevant to the understanding, of
philosophical theosophy ... as a means, in the utmost refinement of purgatorial
intellectuality, to the pure spirituality of transcendental meditation.
7. THE DIVINE WILL TO HEAVENLY GLORY. Thus, in rising above the Mary Child, the
Second Coming paves the way for the Holy Spirit of Heaven in what should be the
zenith of 'Kingdom Come', the airy lightness of which will bring the spiritual
self to union with the universal self in a supreme being of ineffable joy. This, verily, is the true peace of a
Superchristian redemption of the understanding self, or conscious mind, in the
spiritual self, or superconscious mind, as the latter achieves full union,
through the lungs, with the calm-breathed airiness of the universal self ... in
due process of becoming the Holy Spirit of Heaven, God leading to Heaven as
surely as truth leads to joy, or divine will to divine glory - the divine glory
of ultimate salvation in Eternal Life.
CYCLE 76
1. THREE SIMULTANEOUS PARADISES.
The centres of 'Kingdom Come' should be conceived in a tower-like curvilinear
fashion, with the three tiers designed on a more bulbous, or globular, basis
... from the bottom to the top via the intermediate level of the purgatorial
tier. In fact, these tiers should be
thought of in terms of the Beautiful, the Good, and the True, since
respectively symptomatic of a 'New Earth' (the synthetic inner light), a 'New
Purgatory' (Messianic VDU literature of, by and large, the outer spirit), and a
'New Heaven' (transcendental meditation of, by and large, the inner spirit),
such that correlates with the Mary Child, the Second Coming, and the Holy
Spirit of Heaven ... as Eternity ascends from the Beautiful to the True via the
Good, or from electrinos to photinos via neutrinos, with no place, in
consequence, for the Strong, or what, in protinos, could be identified with the
Father and even, in a certain relative sense, with Hell itself. For, in reality, the first tier of 'Kingdom
Come' is less a 'New Hell' than a 'New World', a resurrected 'Mother Earth'
such that brings the inner light to the ultimate refinement, through synthetic
hallucinogens, of the Mary Child, thereby transcending both the Catholic
Blessed Virgin and the Anglican Mother.
Therefore there can be no outer-light Hell in 'Kingdom Come' but,
rather, three simultaneous paradises stretching from the inner light to the
inner spirit via the outer spirit.
2. EARTH/SPACE TOWERS.
Because each tower complex will house three separate centres, or tiers,
and their subsections thereof, we can envisage this curvilinear structure being
engineered beyond the Earth to Space itself, so that it would be the form of
Space Centres at the most evolved stage of 'Kingdom Come', a form, I mean, in
which there were three 'Omega Points' comprising the Beautiful, the Good, and
the True, with, by and large, subfeminine, masculine, and supermasculine
implications with regard to their respective tiers. Such 'Omega Points' would, of course, have
existed when Earth Towers were the rule and Space Towers, if at all, the
exception; for each centre, or tier, would be an Omega Point complete unto
itself.
3. FROM RIGHT MIDBRAIN TO FOREBRAIN.
Ultimately, the evolution of Superchristian humanity towards the
post-Human Millennium via a sort of cyborg transition ... in which man is
largely though obviously not exclusively 'overcome' ... would mean that three
simultaneous levels of post-human life will co-exist in these towering
monoliths, since such levels would correspond to the Beautiful, the Good, and
the True, or to electrinos, neutrinos, and photinos, with a different cerebral
bias, and possibly even structuring, in consequence.... Which is to say that
if, following a cyborg transition, the brain is artificially supported and
sustained, as germane to what I habitually identify with the properly post-human,
then the chances must be fairly high that whatever is being supported and
sustained artificially on the first tier of 'Kingdom Come' would differ from
its second- and third-tier counterparts.
In other words, it would differ in terms of exactly what was being
artificially supported and sustained.
Hence while the emotional backbrain would be unlikely to survive into a
mature phase of 'Kingdom Come' by dint of its association with the Father and
thus, by implication, the extreme right-wing barbarism of the hellish outer
light, the emphasis in the first-tier centres of the millennial Beyond would be
on the sensual right midbrain, the emphasis in the second-tier centres ... on the intellectual left midbrain, and
the emphasis in the third-tier centres ... on the spiritual forebrain, thus
suggesting the possibility, indeed virtual certainty, of three simultaneous
manifestations of post-human life ... ranging from right-midbrain
collectivizations given to the furthest stretch of humanist civilization at the
right-wing bottom of any given tower complex, to forebrain collectivizations
given to the furthest stretch of transcendentalist culture at the extreme
left-wing top thereof, via left-midbrain collectivizations given to the
furthest stretch of nonconformist nature at the intermediate tier-level of what
would be a specifically purgatorial and thus religiously left-wing centre. Hence one may speculate that the removal or,
at the very least, neutralization of, firstly, the backbrain from
cyborg/post-human life would elevate the ensuing life forms from a superhuman
plane to the planes, respectively, of superbeings, suprabeings, and
ultrabeings, these latter alone commensurate with what is properly germane to
Heaven, since manifesting a religiously extreme left-wing context of truth
striving towards joy, or meditative power leading to transcendent glory.
4. BEING THEIR RESPECTIVE SELVES.
Thus, ultimately, 'Kingdom Come' should have civilized superbeings,
natural suprabeings, and cultural ultrabeings simultaneously being their
respective selves ... in beauty, goodness, and truth, the first through LSD, or
some such synthetic hallucinogen that will take the inner light of the World
into Space, the second through heroin, or some derivative thereof that will
take the outer spirit of Purgatory into Space, and the third through
transcendental meditation, or calm focused breathing that will take the inner
spirit of Heaven into Space.
CYCLE 77
1. ALPHA/OMEGA ANTITHESES.
The antispirit of primal doing vis-à-vis the spirit of supreme being;
the antisoul of primal being vis-à-vis the soul of supreme doing; the antimind
of primal giving vis-à-vis the mind of supreme taking; the anti-id of primal
taking vis-à-vis the id of supreme giving.
2. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE DEITIES.
Just as the omega-oriented contexts (electrinos) can be identified with
positive deities, so the alpha-stemming contexts (elements) should be
identified with negative deities, viz. the Antispirit, the Antifather, the
Antichrist, the Antimother, etc.
3. DEFINITION OF A FREE SELF.
The term 'free spirit' really only applies to the omega-more and/or
omega-most photino contexts, namely those with a wavicle essence (whether
molecular or elemental, economic or religious), since positive spirit has to do
with the photino, not with the protino, neutrino, or electrino. A more appropriate terminological description
for someone into the omega-more and/or omega-most protino contexts, by
contrast, would be a free soul, whereas his neutrino and electrino counterparts
could be described as free minds and free ids respectively.
4. DEFINITION OF A FREE ANTISELF.
Conversely, the person who is into the alpha-less and/or alpha-least
contexts of the photon, i.e. either its molecular or elemental wavicle aspects,
could be described as a free antispirit, whereas someone who was into the
alpha-less and/or alpha-least contexts of the proton would be a free antisoul,
his neutron and electron counterparts being free antiminds and free anti-ids
respectively.
5. BOUND ANTISELVES/SELVES.
That which is not 'free', or affiliated to wavicle fineness, is bound to
particle crudity, whether with regard to the elements or the elementinos. It is a reflection of Time/Mass 'damnation'
with regard to science and politics, as opposed to Volume/Space 'salvation'
with regard to economics and religion.
The 'bound' person, like the bound element/elementino, remains enslaved
to particle appearances. He has not,
like the 'free' person, been liberated by wavicle essences. Though that person is only truly liberated
whose essence is positive, and whose positivity, moreover, appertains to the
photino at its omega-most elemental best.
CYCLE 78
1. DEVOLUTION OF PRIMAL DOING.
From the antisoul of the alpha-most objective noumenal not-self, or eyes,
to the antispirit of the alpha-least objective noumenal not-self via the
anti-id and antimind of the alpha-more (relative to most) and alpha-less
(relative to least) objective noumenal not-selves, as primal doing devolves
from the backbrain to the subconscious via the right midbrain and the
unconscious of the old brain/mind.
2. EVOLUTION OF SUPREME BEING.
From the soul of the omega-least subjective noumenal self, or lungs, to
the spirit of the omega-most subjective noumenal self via the id and mind of
the omega-less (relative to least) and omega-more (relative to most) subjective
noumenal selves, as supreme being evolves from the forebrain to the
superconscious via the left midbrain and the conscious of the new brain/mind.
3. DEVOLUTION OF PRIMAL BEING.
From the antisoul of the alpha-most subjective noumenal not-self, or
ears, to the antispirit of the alpha-least subjective noumenal not-self via the
anti-id and antimind of the alpha-more (relative to most) and alpha-less
(relative to least) subjective noumenal not-selves, as primal being devolves
from the backbrain to the subconscious via the right midbrain and the
unconscious of the old brain/mind.
4. EVOLUTION OF SUPREME DOING.
From the soul of the omega-least objective noumenal self, or heart, to
the spirit of the omega-most objective noumenal self via the id and mind of the
omega-less (relative to least) and omega-more (relative to most) objective
noumenal selves, as supreme doing evolves from the forebrain to the
superconscious via the left midbrain and the conscious of the new brain/mind.
5. DEVOLUTION OF PRIMAL GIVING.
From the antisoul of the alpha-most objective phenomenal not-self, or
tongue, to the antispirit of the alpha-least objective phenomenal not-self via
the anti-id and antimind of the alpha-more (relative to most) and alpha-less
(relative to least) objective phenomenal not-selves, as primal giving devolves
from the backbrain to the subconscious via the right midbrain and the
unconscious of the old brain/mind.
6. EVOLUTION OF SUPREME TAKING.
From the soul of the omega-least subjective phenomenal self, or brain,
to the spirit of the omega-most subjective phenomenal self via the id and mind
of the omega-less (relative to least) and omega-more (relative to most)
subjective phenomenal selves, as supreme taking evolves from the forebrain to
the superconscious via the left midbrain and the conscious of the new
brain/mind.
7. DEVOLUTION OF PRIMAL TAKING.
From the antisoul of the alpha-most subjective phenomenal not-self, or
flesh, to the antispirit of the alpha-least subjective phenomenal not-self via
the anti-id and antimind of the alpha-more (relative to most) and alpha-less
(relative to least) subjective phenomenal not-selves, as primal taking devolves
from the backbrain to the subconscious via the right midbrain and the
unconscious of the old brain/mind.
8. EVOLUTION OF SUPREME GIVING.
From the soul of the omega-least objective phenomenal self, or womb, to
the spirit of the omega-most objective phenomenal self via the id and mind of
the omega-less (relative to least) and omega-more (relative to most) objective
phenomenal selves, as supreme giving evolves from the forebrain to the
superconscious via the left midbrain and the conscious of the new brain/mind.
CYCLE 79
1. PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL DISTINCTIONS.
To distinguish between the physical in relation to the phenomenal and
the chemical in relation to the noumenal, further distinguishing between the
metaphysical in relation to the physical and the metachemical in relation to
the chemical. Hence whereas the
physical/metaphysical options have reference to the phenomenal, the
chemical/metachemical options have reference to the noumenal.
2. CHEMICAL VIS-À-VIS PHYSICAL.
Both light and fire are chemical, as are air and blood, whereas both ice
and soil (water and earth) are physical, as are the brain and the womb.
3. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE METACHEMISTRY.
To distinguish the negative metachemistry of the antispirit and the
antisoul from the positive metachemistry of the spirit and the soul, thereby
distinguishing the metachemical divergence of negative spirit/soul with regard
to a chemical vacuum from the metachemical convergence of positive spirit/soul
upon a chemical plenum.
4. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE METAPHYSICS.
To distinguish the negative metaphysics of the antimind and the anti-id
from the positive metaphysics of the mind and the id, thereby distinguishing
the metaphysical divergence of negative mind/id with regard to a physical
vacuum from the metaphysical convergence of positive mind/id upon a physical
plenum.
CYCLE 80
1. DIVERGENCE/CONVERGENCE OF THE METACHEMICAL. The negative metachemistry of sight diverges
objectively from the chemical vacuum of the eyes, whereas the negative
metachemistry of hearing diverges subjectively from the chemical vacuum of the
ears. Conversely, the positive
metachemistry of awareness converges subjectively upon the chemical plenum of
the air, whereas the positive metachemistry of emotion converges objectively
upon the chemical plenum of the blood.
2. DIVERGENCE/CONVERGENCE OF THE METAPHYS-ICAL. Likewise, the negative metaphysics of taste
diverges objectively from the physical vacuum of the tongue, whereas the
negative metaphysics of touch diverges subjectively from the physical vacuum of
the flesh. Conversely, the positive
metaphysics of thought converges subjectively upon the physical plenum of the
brain, whereas the positive metaphysics of sex converges objectively upon the
physical plenum of the womb.
3. NOUMENAL OBJECTIVE/SUBJECTIVE CONVERGENCE AND DIVERGENCE. To diverge objectively through the outer
noumenal not-self of the eyes and subjectively through the inner noumenal
not-self of the ears, but to converge subjectively through the inner noumenal
self of the lungs and objectively through the outer noumenal self of the heart.
4. PHENOMENAL OBJECTIVE/SUBJECTIVE CONVERGENCE AND DIVERGENCE. To diverge objectively through the outer
phenomenal not-self of the tongue and subjectively through the inner phenomenal
not-self of the flesh, but to converge subjectively through the inner
phenomenal self of the brain and objectively through the outer phenomenal self
of the womb.
CYCLE 81
1. METACHEMICAL CONTRAST BETWEEN PRIMAL DOING AND SUPREME BEING. The primal doing of objective divergence
through the outer noumenal not-self contrasts metachemically with the supreme
being of subjective convergence through the inner noumenal self, as photons
contrast with photinos.
2. METACHEMICAL CONTRAST BETWEEN PRIMAL BEING AND SUPREME
DOING. The primal being of subjective
divergence through the inner noumenal not-self contrasts metachemically with
the supreme doing of objective convergence through the outer noumenal self, as
protons contrast with protinos.
3. METAPHYSICAL CONTRAST BETWEEN PRIMAL GIVING AND SUPREME
TAKING. The primal giving of objective
divergence through the outer phenomenal not-self contrasts metaphysically with
the supreme taking of subjective convergence through the inner phenomenal self,
as neutrons contrast with neutrinos.
4. METAPHYSICAL CONTRAST BETWEEN PRIMAL TAKING AND SUPREME
GIVING. The primal taking of subjective
divergence through the inner phenomenal not-self contrasts metaphysically with
the supreme giving of objective convergence through the outer phenomenal self,
as electrons contrast with electrinos.
CYCLE 82
1. METACHEMICAL CONTRAST BETWEEN IDEALIST BARBARISM AND
TRANSCENDENTALIST CULTURE. To contrast
the metachemical barbarism of primal doing with the metachemical culture of
supreme being, as one would contrast idealism with transcendentalism in a
noumenally right-wing/left-wing distinction.
2. METACHEMICAL CONTRAST BETWEEN NATURALIST CULTURE AND
FUNDAMENTALIST BARBARISM. To contrast
the metachemical culture of primal being with the metachemical barbarism of
supreme doing, as one would contrast naturalism with fundamentalism in a
noumenally left-wing/right-wing distinction.
3. METAPHYSICAL CONTRAST BETWEEN MATERIALIST CIVILIZATION AND
NONCONFORMIST NATURE. To contrast the
metaphysical civilization of primal giving with the metaphysical nature of
supreme taking, as one would contrast materialism with nonconformism in a
phenomenally right-wing/left-wing distinction.
4. METAPHYSICAL CONTRAST BETWEEN REALIST NATURE AND HUMANIST
CIVILIZATION. To contrast the
metaphysical nature of primal taking with the metaphysical civilization of
supreme giving, as one would contrast realism with humanism in a phenomenally
left-wing/right-wing distinction.
CYCLE 83
1. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE ORDERS OF MEDITATION. Distinguish carefully between the negative
meditation of sensuality (eyes) and the positive meditation of sensibility
(lungs), as one would distinguish the Clear Light of the Inner Void from the
Holy Spirit of Inner Heaven.
2. FALSE UNITY. Negative
meditation is often advanced on the basis of establishing unity between the
elemental photon wavicles of the objective noumenal not-self (eyes) and the
elemental photon particles of the Cosmos, thereby bringing the alpha-least mode
of primal doing into harmony with the alpha-most mode of primal doing. Ultimately, however, this can only fail from
a religious or, rather, pseudo-religious point-of-view, since anything
approximating to an accommodation of the objective noumenal not-self with the
Cosmos would be scientific and not religious, which is to say of astronomy
rather than meditation.
3. TRUE UNITY. In this
respect, negative meditation is the opposite of positive meditation, which
seeks to establish unity between the elemental photino wavicles of the
subjective noumenal self (lungs) and the breath, thereby bringing the conscious
self to the divine salvation of the omega-most mode of supreme being.
4. PSEUDO-RELIGIOUS 'BOVARYIZATION' OF IDEALISM. In reality, one should distinguish between
the scientific idealism of the alpha-most mode of primal doing, which brings
the objective noumenal not-self to an accommodation with the cosmos/light on
the basis of an optical vacuum appertaining to the backbrain, and the religious
idealism of the alpha-least mode of primal doing, which brings the objective
noumenal not-self to an accommodation with the cosmos/light on the basis of an
aural vacuum appertaining to the subconscious, thereby 'bovaryizing' idealism
from a pseudo-religious point-of-view, the view, more usually, of audible
chanting.
5. OTHER 'BOVARYIZATIONS' OF IDEALISM. Besides the aural 'bovaryization' of the
objective noumenal not-self (eyes) in a deference, via the subconscious, to the
ears, there is its tactile 'bovaryization' through the right midbrain in a
deference to the flesh (political) and its lingual 'bovaryization' through the
unconscious in a deference to the tongue (economics), the former affiliated to
molecular photon particles and the latter to molecular photon wavicles, so that
the senses of touch and taste are being idealistically embraced. Hence the addition of political and economic
forms of idealism to the scientific and religious forms of idealism of the
backbrain and the subconscious respectively, the former directly availing of
optical vacuity in an unequivocally objective stance, such as astronomy and the
worse forms of Zen, but the latter paying deference to the ears via the rather
more subjective medium of the subconscious.
6. 'BOVARYIZATIONS' OF TRANSCENDENTALISM. Just as one can distinguish the
'bovaryizations' of idealism through an old brain/mind deference to senses
other than the eyes from the per se context of the objective
noumenal not-self, so the 'bovaryizations' of transcendentalism can be
distinguished from the per se context of the subjective noumenal self
through a new brain/mind deference to sensibilities other than the lungs, viz.
to the heart via the forebrain in the case of the omega-least mode of supreme
being, viz. singing; to the womb via the left midbrain in the case of the
omega-less (relative to least) mode of supreme being, viz. kissing; and to the
brain via the conscious in the omega-more (relative to most) mode of supreme
being, viz. sniffing.
CYCLE 84
1. ANTITHETICAL EQUIVALENTS.
Singing is the antithetical equivalent of staring, the omega-least mode
of supreme being to the alpha-most mode of primal doing, the former
pseudo-scientific and the latter genuinely scientific; kissing is the
antithetical equivalent of touching, the omega-less (relative to least) mode of
supreme being to the alpha-more (relative to most) mode of primal doing, the
former pseudo-political and the latter genuinely political; sniffing is the
antithetical equivalent of tasting, the omega-more (relative to most) mode of
supreme being to the alpha-less (relative to least) mode of primal doing, the
former genuinely economic and the latter pseudo-economic; meditating
(breathing) is the antithetical equivalent of chanting (listening), the former
genuinely religious and the latter pseudo-religious.
2. GENUINE VIS-À-VIS PSEUDO SCIENCE AND POLITICS. When science and politics are affiliated to
the old brain (primarily a context of Time and Mass, or backbrain and right
midbrain) they are genuine, but when affiliated to the new brain (primarily a
context of Volume and Space, or left midbrain and forebrain) they become
pseudo. Hence a distinction between
elemental and molecular photon particles with regard to idealist science and
politics, and elemental and molecular photino particles with regard to
transcendentalist science and politics.
Alpha-most and alpha-more vis-à-vis omega-least and omega-less.
3. GENUINE VIS-À-VIS PSEUDO ECONOMICS AND RELIGION. Conversely, when economics and religion are
affiliated to the new mind (primarily a context of Volume and Space, or
conscious and superconscious) they are genuine, but when affiliated to the old
mind (primarily a context of Time and Mass, or subconscious and unconscious)
they become pseudo. Hence a distinction
between molecular and elemental photino wavicles with regard to
transcendentalist economics and religion, and molecular and elemental photon
wavicles with regard to idealist economics and religion. Omega-more and omega-most vis-à-vis
alpha-less and alpha-least.
4. OLD/NEW BRAIN SCIENCE AND POLITICS. Thus science and politics are genuine in the
backbrain/right-midbrain contexts of the old brain, but pseudo in the
forebrain/left-midbrain contexts of the new brain, where they are affiliated to
elementinos as opposed to elements.
5. OLD/NEW MIND ECONOMICS AND RELIGION. Conversely, economics and religion are pseudo
in the unconscious/subconscious contexts of the old mind, but genuine in the
conscious/superconscious contexts of the new mind, where they are likewise
affiliated to elementinos as opposed to elements.
6. APPLICATION TO OTHER SPECTRA.
The above of course applies to all alpha spectra ... from idealism (as
described) to realism via naturalism and materialism, as well as to all omega
spectra ... from transcendentalism (as described) to humanism via
fundamentalism and nonconformism.
Genuine science and politics co-exist with pseudo-economics and
pseudo-religion in the old brain/mind, whereas genuine economics and religion
co-exist with pseudo-science and pseudo-politics in the new brain/mind. The old brain dominates (rules) the old mind,
whereas the new mind has the capacity to transcend (lead) the new brain.
7. PASSING TO THE BEYOND.
With regard to the positive meditation of supreme being, don't force the
breath! Just let it happen to you of its
own accord. People who breathe overly
consciously, when meditating, are guilty of spiritual greed, since they are
using the mind to dominate the lungs, rather than allowing the latter to lead
and enlighten the mind or, rather, replace it with the pure consciousness of
the spiritual self, that which is, in any case, affiliated to the lungs and
would not exist were there no breathing.
Thus the spiritual self, or superconscious, can only come to the fore
when one has died to the intellectual self, or conscious mind, with its
manifold thoughts, and thereby passed into the peace of the universal self, or
lungs, which are the channel through which the universal medium of air is
transmuted, via the breath, into spirit, the pure consciousness of supreme
being.
CYCLE 85
1. SUPERFEMININE/SUBMASCULINE SMOKING DISTINCTION. Smokers are basically either superfeminine or
submasculine, since to smoke is to be either superfeminine or submasculine with
regard to pipes on the one hand and to cigarettes/cigars on the other hand.
2. PIPE SMOKING. Those who
smoke pipes are effectively superfeminine, whether in purist terms with regard
to straight pipes or in quasi-submasculine terms with regard to drop-bowl
pipes, as though in a distinction between light and 'lightfire', the latter
subordinate to the former. Hence not
only is pipe smoking idealistic; it is effectively, if not literally,
fascistic, with fascist/nazi overtones analogous to the distinction we had
earlier drawn between black-and-white photos and colour photos.
3. CIGARETTE SMOKING. In
contrast, I shall argue, to the communist essence of cigarette smoking,
something more genuinely submasculine in the context of tipped cigarettes but
quasi-superfeminine in the context of untipped ones, where we might be forgiven
for advancing a parallel with firelight as opposed to fire, given the absence
of a fiery core, or filter, from this purer type of cigarette, one arguably
more Leninist than Marxist (if Judaic parallels are not to be elicited in view
of the comparatively contemporary nature of cigarettes). Be that as it may, the distinction between
pipes and cigarettes is akin to a stellar/solar one, the former objective and
the latter subjective.
4. ROLL-UPS. Subjectivity is
not, however, a word one would associate with roll-ups, which require to be
hand rolled in objective fashion, and which I would therefore contend to be fundamentalist
... where cigarettes are naturalist. In
other words, roll-ups would be akin to motorbikes vis-à-vis mopeds, something
to be associated with the heart and blood rather than with fire and firelight,
and I hold to the view that the more or less Moslem distinction between the
heart and the blood can be respectively correlated with 'joints' and standard
roll-ups, which is to say, between that which, employing a filter of sorts,
appertains to the core of the context in question, namely the heart, and that
which, employing no such thing, can be equated with its light aside, after the
manner of untipped cigarettes. Hence the
heart/blood distinction of fundamentalism would have its smoking parallel, so I
maintain, in 'joints' and plain roll-ups, the former of course a means of
smoking dope and therefore more profoundly fundamentalist than the latter. Both, however, are equally submasculine.
5. CIGAR SMOKING. As, on a
more phenomenal basis, are cigars, whether large and unwrapped or small and
wrapped (in cellophane), the idea being that the one approximates to the Father
and the other to the Son in what would be a materialist distinction paralleling
the emotional brain and its light aside, the intellect, which latter is
superficially more watery (hence the cellophane wrapper around small cigars)
than fiery. Probably the Antifather and
the Antichrist would be more apt descriptive parallels for the kind of smoking
we have in mind, but, whatever the case, it is clear that cigar smoking is
somewhat less than genuinely Christian, given its materialist basis in
submasculine objectivity.
6. PURGATORIAL EXCEPTION.
Needless to say, none of the above modes of smoking, from pipes to
cigars, would be relevant to 'Kingdom Come', since the latter is beyond idealism,
naturalism, fundamentalism, and materialism ... in the humanism, nonconformism,
and transcendentalism of its subfeminine to supermasculine salvations. Probably the only appropriate form of smoking
in 'Kingdom Come' would be with regard to the use of bubble pipes for hashish,
since the tempering of fire by water has a Christic ring to it which smacks of
a purgatorial alternative, suitable for use within second-tier centres, to
overly fire-based smoking in pipes, cigarettes, cigars, etc. Should this transpire to being the case, then
one need not expect any of the traditional modes of smoking to survive into the
Messianic Beyond. They would be
altogether too hellish for heavenly life.
CYCLE 86
1. IDEALIST OPTIONS. With
regard to idealism, the Clear Light of the Outer Void is its scientific
Antifather (light), the Unclear Light of the Outer Void its political
Antimother (soil), the Unclear Light of the Inner Void its pseudo-economic
Antison (ice), and the Clear Light of the Inner Void its pseudo-religious
Antispirit (fire).
2. TRANSCENDENTALIST OPTIONS.
With regard, conversely, to transcendentalism, the Holy Spirit of Outer
Heaven is its pseudo-scientific Father (soul), the Unholy Spirit of Outer
Heaven its pseudo-political Mother (id), the Unholy Spirit of Inner Heaven its
economic Son (mind), and the Holy Spirit of Inner Heaven its religious Ghost
(spirit).
3. NATURALIST OPTIONS. With
regard to naturalism, the Clear Fire of Outer Time is its scientific
Antifather, the Unclear Fire of Outer Time its political Antimother, the
Unclear Fire of Inner Time its pseudo-economic Antison, and the Clear Fire of
Inner Time its pseudo-religious Antispirit.
4. FUNDAMENTALIST OPTIONS.
With regard, conversely, to fundamentalism, the Holy Soul of Outer Hell
is its pseudo-scientific Father, the Unholy Soul of Outer Hell its
pseudo-political Mother, the Unholy Soul of Inner Hell its economic Son, and
the Holy Soul of Inner Hell its religious Spirit.
5. MATERIALIST OPTIONS. With regard
to materialism, the Clear Ice of Outer Volume is its scientific Antifather, the
Unclear Ice of Outer Volume its political Antimother, the Unclear Ice of Inner
Volume its pseudo-economic Antison, and the Clear Ice of Inner Volume its
pseudo-religious Antispirit.
6. NONCONFORMIST OPTIONS.
With regard, conversely, to nonconformism, the Holy Mind of Outer
Purgatory is its pseudo-scientific Father, the Unholy Mind of Outer Purgatory
its pseudo-political Mother, the Unholy Mind of Inner Purgatory its economic
Son, and the Holy Mind of Inner Purgatory its religious Spirit.
7. REALIST OPTIONS. With
regard to realism, the Clear Soil of Outer Mass is its scientific Antifather,
the Unclear Soil of Outer Mass its political Antimother, the Unclear Soil of
Inner Mass its pseudo-economic Antison, and the Clear Soil of Inner Mass its
pseudo-religious Antispirit.
8. HUMANIST OPTIONS. With
regard, conversely, to humanism, the Holy Id of the Outer World is its
pseudo-scientific Father, the Unholy Id of the Outer World its pseudo-political
Mother, the Unholy Id of the Inner World its economic Son, and the Holy Id of
the Inner World its religious Spirit.
CYCLE 87
1. NEGATIVE DAMNATION/SALVATION OF ELEMENTS. To be negatively damned from materialism to
idealism, as from neutrons to photons, ice to light, but negatively saved from
realism to naturalism, as from electrons to protons, soil to fire.
2. POSITIVE DAMNATION/SALVATION OF ELEMENTINOS. To be positively damned from humanism to
fundamentalism, as from electrinos to protinos, id to soul, but positively
saved from nonconformism to transcendentalism, as from neutrinos to photinos,
mind to spirit.
3. PREDESTINATION. One can no
more save ice (water) than damn soil (earth); no more save the id than damn the
mind.
4. DAMNABLE FATALITY OF PHENOMENAL OBJECTIVITY. That which is phenomenally objective is
always exposed to the possibility of becoming noumenally objective, thereby
passing from the physical to the chemical.
5. SALVATIONAL FATALITY OF PHENOMENAL SUBJECTIVITY. That which is phenomenally subjective is
always exposed to the possibility of becoming noumenally subjective, thereby
passing from physical to chemical.
6. CONTRARY FATES OF PHENOMENAL OBJECTIVITY/SUBJECTIVITY. The noumenal/chemical transmutation and/or
eclipse of the phenomenal/physical is a damnation when objective but a
salvation when subjective, whether negatively or positively.
7. PARADOXICAL FATES. Thus
the 'reborn' are just as prone, if objective, to damnation ... as the 'once born'
prone, if subjective, to salvation, albeit in contrary directions.
CYCLE 88
1. 'JERKS' AND 'BUMS'. To
distinguish the barbarism of 'jerks', if you will, from the culture of 'bums',
further distinguishing the negative barbarism of 'snogg*** jerks' from the
positive culture of 'snogg*** bums', and the negative culture of 'frigg***
bums' from the positive barbarism of 'frigg*** jerks'.
2. 'PRICKS' AND 'CUNTS'. To
distinguish the civilization of 'pricks', if you will, from the nature of
'cunts', further distinguishing the negative civilization of 'sodd*** cunts'
from the positive nature of 'sodd*** pricks', and the negative nature of
'fuck*** pricks' from the positive civilization of 'fuck*** cunts'.
3. FROM 'SNOGGING' TO 'FUCKING'.
To descend from 'snogging' at the idealist/transcendentalist top to
'fucking' at the realist/humanist bottom via 'frigging' at the
naturalist/fundamentalist lower top and 'sodding' at the
materialist/nonconformist upper bottom.
4. 'SNOGGING' AND 'FRIGGING'.
Hence whereas idealists and transcendentalists are respectively 'jerks'
and 'bums', they are alike 'snoggingly' so ... unlike naturalists and
fundamentalists who, although respectively 'bums' and 'jerks', are 'friggingly'
so.
5. 'SODDING' AND 'FUCKING'.
Hence whereas materialists and nonconformists are respectively 'cunts'
and 'pricks', they are alike 'soddingly' so ... unlike realists and humanists
who, although respectively 'pricks' and 'cunts', are 'fuckingly' so.
6. DAMNABLE FATALITY OF 'CUNTS'.
'Cunts', being objective, are exposed to the possibility of damnation as
'jerks', whether 'snoggingly' (if negative) or 'friggingly' (if positive).
7. SALVATIONAL FATALITY OF 'PRICKS'.
'Pricks', being subjective, are exposed to the possibility of salvation
as 'bums', whether 'friggingly' (if negative) or 'snoggingly' (if positive).
8. DAMNATION OF 'CUNTS' TO 'JERKS'.
The damnation of negative 'cunts' to negative 'jerks', or materialists
to idealists, is paralleled, in the 'reborn' context, by the damnation of
positive 'cunts' to positive 'jerks', or humanists to fundamentalists.
9. SALVATION OF 'PRICKS' TO 'BUMS'.
The salvation of negative 'pricks' to negative 'bums', or realists to
naturalists, is paralleled, in the 'reborn' context, by the salvation of
positive 'pricks' to positive 'bums', or nonconformists to transcendentalists.
10. POSITIVE 'BUM' VIS-À-VIS NEGATIVE 'JERK'. Ultimately, God is a positive 'bum' and the
Devil a negative 'jerk' ... as we distinguish the supermasculine from the
superfeminine, the spirit of photinos from the light of photons, supreme being
from primal doing, positive culture from negative barbarism.
11. LIGHT/SPIRIT DISTINCTION IN KISSING. Negative 'jerks' will always keep their eyes open
when kissing, whereas positive 'bums' will kiss with closed eyes, bestowing the
kiss of sensibility as opposed to sensuality.
CYCLE 89
1. FOUR DIFFERENT MODES OF CHRISTIANITY. Because Catholicism is the true mode of
Christianity, or that which encourages respect for the truth of the Holy Ghost
via the quasi-truthful understanding, or inner prayer, of the Christ Child, it
cannot be the beautiful or the good or the strong mode of Christianity. On the contrary, the 'beautiful' mode of
Christianity, rooted in the aesthetics of the Mother, is Anglicanism, whereas
its 'good' mode, centred in the epistolary understanding of New-Testament
ethics, is Puritanism, and its 'strong' mode, rooted in the poetic emotion of
Old-Testament ethnicity, is Presbyterianism, or Dissenter Nonconformism. In fact, so much does each of these
denominational subdivisions of the overall Christian Church correspond to a
separate ideal, or virtue, that it is inconceivable they could be confounded or
treated as equal. Catholicism is as much
true Christianity per se as Anglicanism is beautiful Christianity per se,
Puritanism ... good Christianity per se and Presbyterianism ... strong
Christianity per se. Yet only
Catholicism is strictly Christian, since the Beautiful, the Good, and the
Strong are less Christian than Heathen virtues which correspond to the Mother,
the Son, and the Father ... as opposed to the Holy Ghost achieved via the
quasi-true 'bovaryization' of the intellect through prayer, that attribute of
the Christ Child Who, being what Christ Himself said one would have to become
in order to enter the 'Kingdom of Heaven', is a precondition of spiritual
peace. The other deities, on the
contrary, correspond to speaking, writing, and reading, or that which is
quasi-sensual, strictly intellectual, and quasi-emotional respectively. Hence they typify the Protestant alternative,
and opposition, to properly Christian, and Catholic, criteria.
2. TIMELESS ETERNITY.
Nevertheless 'Kingdom Come', as taught by he who corresponds to a Second
Coming, the Messianic prophet of the triadic Beyond, is not just a matter of
Heaven, and thus the truth, as a vehicle for achieving it. If I used to think that way, then these days
I am a lot more 'liberal' and, I hope, wiser in my attitude as to what
constitutes the Beyond. The student of
my work will know, if he has progressed thus far, that the Beyond is
subdivisible between three verities, arranged in separate tiers - namely, the
Beautiful, the Good, and the True, the first corresponding to a 'New Earth',
the second to a 'New Purgatory', and the third to a 'New Heaven', this latter
presided over by the Holy Spirit of Heaven, while the former two options are
presided over by the Mary Child (or refined Virgin/Mother of synthetic
resurrection) and the Second Coming respectively. Hence while there is room in the Beyond for
the salvation of those whose Christian affiliation, as church-goers, is either
to the Beautiful, the Good, or to the True, namely to Anglicans, Puritans, and
Catholics, there can be no place in it for those whose Christian affiliation is
to the Strong, or all who, as Dissenters, are effectively fundamentalist, their
allegiance being primarily, though not of course exclusively, to the Father as
opposed to the Mother, the Son, or the Holy Ghost. What you can't have in 'Kingdom Come' is a
'New Hell' of Father Time, and therefore it must follow that unless
fundamentalist Dissenters convert, in due course, to one of the denominations
which do, in fact, primarily correspond to the Beautiful, the Good, or the
True, the Second Coming will have no option but to have them banished from his
'Kingdom', the 'Kingdom of the triadic Beyond' which a majority mandate from
the People would permit the establishment of ... with regard to a democratically-expressed
wish, on their part, for religious sovereignty and the 'rights', appertaining
to self-realization at any of our three projected millennial levels, which such
a sovereignty would confer. Thus
Dissenters will have to face the truth about themselves and come to a decision
in due course. Only Mass, Volume, and
Space can have any place in 'Kingdom Come', since it will signal the end of
Time, and hence the dominion of all that is effectively, if not literally,
hellish.
3. CASE FOR BRITAIN. For the
British, the case from the Messianic standpoint is perfectly clear: the
'beautiful Church' of Anglicanism cannot be saved to the Beyond whilst it has a
monarchic figurehead, since the 'Blood Royal' connotes with strength, the
strength of emotional fundamentalism, and while the Beautiful is subject to the
Strong, like the Mother to the Father, it is not in a position to be saved,
since effectively under the dominion of Hell.
Thus if there is to be a 'New Earth' for the 'beautiful Church' of
Anglicanism, rooted in the mundane World, Anglicans will have to support the
democratic development, within Britain, of both devolution and disestablishment
... in order that the British 'superstate', rooted in monarchic strength, may
be superseded by English, Scottish, and Welsh freedom from the dominion of
Hell, with its fundamentalist 'greatness', and these countries, no longer a
part of the United Kingdom (effectively a 'Kingdom of Hell'), be rendered
eligible for subsequent admittance, following a democratic mandate, to the
'Kingdom of Heaven', the Social Theocratic Centres of what will hopefully, one
day, become a federation of religiously-sovereign peoples.
4. PASSING DIRECTLY AND/OR INDIRECTLY INTO THE BEYOND. Thus those whose affiliation, irrespective of
country, is to the Beautiful, the Good, or the True can pass democratically
into the Beyond, wherein they will be transmuted and elevated to manifestations
of their respective virtues corresponding to the Mary Child, the Second Coming,
and the Holy Spirit of Heaven, if not directly for Anglicans and Catholics
then, at any rate, indirectly, following a period in the 'New Purgatory' of the
Second Coming ... until such time as they may decide and/or are adjudged fit
for either the 'New Earth' below or the 'New Heaven' above or, indeed, decide
and/or are adjudged fit to remain in the 'New Purgatory' for ever (as,
presumably, would especially apply to ex-Puritans ... with their overly
intellectual bias). Certainly, it has
been a logically-underpinned belief of mine that Christians cannot be saved
directly to the 'New Earth' or the 'New Heaven', since logic would suggest that
only Superheathens, including non-practising so-called Christians, are in a
position to gravitate straight from personality/emotionality to humility/universality,
as the (largely gender-based) case may be, while practising Christians, given
traditionally to sexual chastity and prayerful spirituality, will have to spend
some time in the 'New Purgatory' as a precondition of subsequent movement. Yet, even if this still applies (though the
final decision as to who goes where should rest, circumstances allowing, with
the religiously-sovereign individual himself), those who had been Anglican
should have priority access to the beauty of its transmuted poetry; while those
who had been Puritan should have priority access to the goodness of its
transmuted fiction; and those who had been Catholic should have priority access
to the truth of its transmuted philosophy.
Now such will continue to be the most likely scenario until the case for
'earthly beauty' with regard to ex-Anglicans or 'heavenly truth' with regard to
ex-Catholics is firmly established, and they move down or up, as the case may
be. Doubtless those ex-Christians with
LSD and/or cocaine habits would be eligible, sooner than later, for the 'New
Earth', whatever their denominational background, while those who could prove a
long-term commitment to aerobics and/or transcendental meditation would
presently, if not directly, pass into the 'New Heaven' of the third tier of
'Kingdom Come'.
5. CLASS AND CLASSLESS. With
regard to the three tiers of 'Kingdom Come', the first would effectively be a
lower-class tier, the second a middle-class tier, and the third ... a classless
tier. What one would not have is an
upper-class tier, since that which is 'upper class' connotes with the Father,
whose Time can have no place in the Eternity of the Beyond. Hence while the 'New Earth' would be lower
class in its visionary beauty, the 'New Purgatory' would be middle class in its
intellectual goodness, and the 'New Heaven' alone classless in its spiritual
truth, the truth of the Holy Spirit of Heaven as proclaimed by he who
corresponds to a Second Coming and will complete, if allowed to, what the
'First Coming' started - namely the freeing of mankind from the dominion of the
Father and their release, in consequence, from the bondage of Time. Only thus will there be Eternal Life in the
triadic Beyond.
CYCLE 90
1. WHISTLES AND PIPES. To
contrast the idealism, comparatively speaking, of tin whistles with the
transcendentalism of pipes, e.g. uilleann pipes - the former affiliated, in
their shrill pitch, to the light/eyes ... and the latter, in the lung-like
nature of their pouches, to the spirit, an objective/subjective distinction
between photons and photinos, the Devil and God.
2. BRASS AND WIND. To
contrast the naturalism of brass with the fundamentalism of wind, e.g. flutes -
the former affiliated, in their metallic brightness and convex apertures, to
the fire/ears ... and the latter, in their vein-like narrow constructions, to
the soul - a subjective/objective distinction between protons and protinos,
beast and warrior.
3. KEYBOARDS AND ACCORDIONS.
To contrast the materialism of keyboards, e.g. pianos, with the nonconformism
of accordions - the former affiliated, in their tinkering keys, to the
ice/tongue ... and the latter, in their cerebral compactness, to the mind, an
objective/subjective distinction between neutrons and neutrinos, crook and
saint.
4. GUITARS AND STRINGS. To
contrast the realism of plucked stringed instruments, e.g. guitars, with the
humanism of bowed stringed instruments, e.g. violins - the former affiliated,
in their bodily openness, to the soil/flesh ... and the latter, in their womb-like
interiority, to the id, a subjective/objective distinction between electrons
and electrinos, sinner and angel.
5. CORRELATION BETWEEN SCORES AND INSTRUMENT TYPE. Generally speaking, objective instruments
tend to be played in conjunction with a score, whereas subjective instruments
are normally played independently of scores.
6. NEGATIVE DAMNATION OF PIANOS.
Just as materialism can be negatively damned to idealism, so pianos can
be negatively damned to tin whistles, and electric pianos likewise negatively
damned to whistle-like synthesizers.
7. NEGATIVE DAMNATION OF BOOKS.
A literary parallel to the above ... would be the contemporary negative
damnation of paperbacks to photographic plates, whereas, traditionally, one
would have to consider the inclusion of drawings and/or illustrations in
hardbacks as significant of a negative damnation.
8. PARLIAMENTARY MATERIALISM IN BRITAIN. Parliamentary materialism in Britain
resembles a choice between three different types of piano - the stiff-upperlip
uprights of Conservatism, the tongue-loose grand pianos of Liberalism, and the
tongue-loose baby grands of Labour.... None of which can lead to salvation, not
even negatively.
9. SUMMING-UP. The idealism
of the Devil contrasts with the transcendentalism of God ... as the naturalism
of the beast contrasts with the fundamentalism of the warrior, the materialism
of the crook with the nonconformism of the saint, and the realism of the sinner
with the humanism of the angel.
CYCLE 91
1. CENTRED IN THE MIND. From
the standpoint of Christianity, there should be no question that prayer leads
to, or can be used as a vehicle leading to, meditation ... pretty much as the
Christ Child leads to the Holy Spirit, or Volume of a voluminous nature to
Space of a spaced nature. What I would
like to establish, however, is that, while prayer is a necessary precondition
of the 'peace that surpasses all understanding', it is more likely to lead to
mind-based meditation than to anything exclusively lung-based, and for the
simple reason that the practising Christian is centred in the mind rather than
the spirit, thereby tending to exaggerate the importance of mind through
prayerful conditioning. But meditation
that is dominated by the mind, even when the person concerned is aware of the
spiritual significance of the lungs, is not true or universal but, on the
contrary, good and personal, being of the Holy Spirit rather than of the Holy
Spirit of Heaven. Thus the failure of
prayer, from a truly spiritual standpoint, is that it relies upon the mind to
such an extent ... that the peace which surpasses it, through meditation, is
compromised and even subverted by mind, resulting in the personal spirituality
of the Holy Ghost, a spirituality which is always exposed, unlike its universal
counterpart, to the 'sin' of spiritual greed, as when the Christian meditator
breathes more deeply and perhaps regularly than would be commensurate with
lung-centred meditation.
2. CENTRED IN THE LUNGS. No,
much as Christian meditation is good, the Superchristian meditation which
follows from a more radically transcendental approach to the spirit ... is
alone true, since transcending mind in the ultimate peace of the universal
self, the meditator centred in his lungs and allowing them to, as it were, speak
for themselves, with more genuinely spiritual consequences the heavenly
reward. In fact, so much will the
personal self of the mind be 'eclipsed' and transcended by the universal self
of the spirit ... that the Holy Spirit of Heaven will be the inevitable
consequence, as superconsciousness replaces consciousness, and the meditator is
transported, on wings of divine joy, completely 'over the moon', so to speak,
in what can only be the most genuine mode of spirituality.
3. LOGICAL PRECONDITION. Yet
just as the Christ Child is, logically speaking, the necessary precondition of
the Holy Spirit, so the Second Coming is the logical precondition of the Holy
Spirit of Heaven, his VDU-centred thoughts as superior to the thought-based
intellectuality (prayer) of the Christ Child ... as the Holy Spirit of Heaven
... to the Holy Ghost. For the passive
contemplation and/or study of his works in the coming 'New Purgatory' of the
triadic Beyond ... will be of crucial significance to the development, within
the People or, more correctly, what should by then be a Superchristian
humanity, of the necessary frame-of-mind for gravitating, thereafter, to the
'New Heaven' of pure meditation, the lung-centred passivity of which will bring
the spirit to universal heights. Thus
through passivity vis-à-vis the computerized word of the Second Coming, the
Superchristian Saved will achieve passivity vis-à-vis the universal self, with
no intellectual or psychological subversion of the lungs ... after the fashion
of mind-based Christians. The Second
Coming is, verily, the precondition of the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
4. ERRONEOUS NOTIONS OF THE HOLY GHOST. Curiously, many Christians would not
associate the Holy Ghost with mind-dominated meditation, but with some crasser
and more fundamentalist notion ... like 'tongues of fire'. Yet, despite its scriptural basis, the notion
of the Holy Ghost as 'tongues of fire' is really rather mystical, which is to
say, deplorably fundamentalist in what would appear to be an overt connection
with the Father, the Creator, Jehovah, etc.
In point of fact, 'tongues of fire' would suggest to me a connection
with Satan, and thus have specifically naturalist or beastly correlations more
appropriate, in their solar basis, to Judaism than to Christianity. But if 'the Father' is the worst subversion
of the Holy Spirit, then the notion of its being in some way associated with
the grave is hardly better, since reducing it to the inner light of the
Mother/Virgin in a patently mundane concession to 'heathen populism'. No, the Holy Ghost is no more of the inner
light than of the outer light/fire. Nor,
incidentally, is it of the Son in some kind of inspirational intellectuality
which smacks of outer spirit. The Holy
Spirit is, indeed, inner spirit, but not, alas, the inner spirit of the lungs per se,
so much as the egocentric control and manipulation of that spirit from the
rather more purgatorial standpoint of the mind, so that the 'Christian result'
is less genuinely transcendentalist than quasi-transcendentalist in relation to
prayerful nonconformism.
5. OBLIQUE CONTRASTS WITHIN CHRISTIANITY. To contrast, relative to Christianity,
Catholic transcendentalism with Puritan nonconformism, and Dissenter fundamentalism
with Anglican humanism, the former pair affiliated to the Holy Ghost and the
Son (not to be confused with the more radical, and prayerful, form of
nonconformism which is associated with the Christ Child), and the latter pair
affiliated, by contrast, to the Father and the Mother (not to be confused with
the more radical, and responsive, form of humanism which is associated with the
Blessed Virgin).
6. INTELLECTUAL OPTIONS OF CHRISTENDOM. To contrast, again relative to Christianity,
Catholic 'bums', if you will, with Puritan 'pricks', and Dissenter 'jerks' with
Anglican 'cunts' - thereby effectively contrasting thinking and writing, on the
one hand, with reading and speaking on the other hand ... as one embraces the
full-gamut of intellectual options within the broadly purgatorial framework of
the Christian civilization, a civilization built around, albeit with different
denominational emphases, the Son, viz. Christ, but also embracing the Father,
the Mother, and the Holy Ghost ... in quasi-Heathen, or non-Christian,
alternatives.
7. GOOD ESSENCE OF CHRISTIANITY.
To contrast the religious nature, relatively disposed to the True, of
Catholicism with the economic nature, classically disposed to the Good, of
Puritanism on the one hand, but the scientific nature, relatively disposed to
the Strong, of Presbyterianism with the political nature, relatively disposed
to the Beautiful, of Anglicanism on the other hand. Thus it follows that whereas Puritanism is more
genuinely Christian vis-à-vis the Son than any of the other denominations of
Christianity, such a genuineness is in relation to the Good rather than to the
True (Catholicism), the Strong (Presbyterianism), or the Beautiful
(Anglicanism). Christianity is not,
strictly speaking, a religion of the True/Truth, but of the Good, centred in
Christ, in which case it is not strictly religious at all but essentially
economic. Therefore it is centred not in
prayerful subversion of the Good through the Christ Child, considered as a
vehicle for the peace of the Holy Ghost (the nearest thing to Christian truth),
but in the epistolary intellectuality of the New Testament, with, in
consequence, a strictly purgatorial (writerly) correlation, germane to the Son.
CYCLE 92
1. RELIGION FOR 'PRICKS'. I
suppose, if I am to be completely fair to Christians, I should start by making
the admission that, given its purgatorial foundations in Christ, Christianity
is, if you will, a religion for 'pricks', and that, strictly speaking,
Catholics are less 'bums' than 'quasi-bums' in relation to the Holy Ghost; that
Dissenters are less 'jerks' than 'quasi-jerks' in relation to the Father; and
that Anglicans are less 'cunts' than 'quasi-cunts' in relation to the
Mother. Only Puritans could be regarded,
it would seem, as 'pricks' per se, given their strictly purgatorial
association, through the New Testament, with the Son, and hence an intellectual
context based in writing (epistles). No,
the real or genuine 'bums', 'jerks' and 'cunts' lie, it would appear, outside
the Christian realm ... in contexts either anterior or, in regard to 'Kingdom
Come', posterior to Christianity.
2. CHRISTIAN PREDESTINATION.
On a more serious note, it should be evident that, despite allowances
for exceptions, one's denominational background with regard to Anglicanism,
Puritanism, or Catholicism should determine, in no small degree, one's rightful
place in 'Kingdom Come', since it would be as illogical for Anglicans, say,
with their bias towards the Beautiful, to have immediate access to the realm of
truth, as for Catholics, with their bias for the truth of the Holy Spirit, to
be adjudged foregone candidates for beauty in what would be the 'New Earth' of
the bottom tier of our projected triadic Beyond. Yet since all Christians, with the possible exception
of Dissenters, are essentially affiliated to the Good, to intellectual goodness
through the word of Christ, it should follow that no Christian can gain
immediate access to either the 'New Earth' below or the 'New Heaven' above, but
that all Christians will have to spend some time in the 'New Purgatory' of the
second tier of 'Kingdom Come' before they can be adjudged ripe, where
applicable, for either the first or the third tiers, the tiers more immediately
accessible to peoples of non-Christian, and therefore effectively Superheathen,
descent, whose extreme standings in relation to the Christian tradition would
entitle them to priority access.
Christians, in short, would be foregone candidates for the poetic quasi-beauty,
the literary goodness, and the philosophical quasi-truth of the 'New
Purgatory', with Anglicans gaining priority access to the first, Puritans
priority access to the second, and Catholics priority access to the third. Subsequent movement, where appropriate, would
follow from this purgatorial precondition, and entail the integration of
ex-Christians into the non-Christian realms of the 'New Earth' below and the
'New Heaven' above, both of which would have been more immediately accessible
to peoples of non-Christian descent.
3. VARIABLE THREEFOLD DELIVERANCE.
Of course, the above scenario was conceived against the multiracial, and
hence multi-ethnic, background of contemporary Britain, and hopefully it does
some justice to the variety of ethnic allegiances that would have to be accommodated
in my hypothetical Beyond. It does not
necessarily follow, however, that this would be the best course for all countries,
some of which might warrant a shorter stay for Anglicans and Catholics in the
'New Purgatory' than others, some of which would not have all that many people
in the purgatorial tier anyway, whether because a majority of their citizens
were foregone candidates for the 'New Earth' or, alternatively, the 'New
Heaven'. Whatever the case, it should be
evident that all three tiers are crucial to the establishment of 'Kingdom
Come', and that no country should be excluded or exclude itself from the
benefits of having the Beautiful, the Good, and the True delivered from the
diabolical clutches of the Strong, in order that Time may be transcended,
threefold, by the Eternity of that which is beyond the Father, etc., in the
blessed salvation of the 'New Virgin' (the Mary Child), the 'New Christ' (the
Second Coming), and the 'New Spirit' (the Holy Spirit of Heaven).
CYCLE 93
1. ENSLAVEMENT OF BEAUTY AND GOODNESS TO STRENGTH. So long as the Beautiful and the Good allow
themselves to be seduced and dominated by the Strong, they will continue to
remain enslaved to the Devil and be in no position, as woman and man, to go
forward with God into 'Kingdom Come'. So
long, in other words, as Anglicans and Puritans in, for example, Northern
Ireland remain enslaved to the anti-Catholic stance of hard-line Presbyterians,
drawn to the Strong, or quasi-Strong, like filings to a magnet, they will be
unable to join with Catholics in the march of the Beautiful, the Good, and the
True towards the triadic Beyond.
2. OPPOSITIONAL INEVITABILITY OF THE STRONG. Only the Strong, or quasi-Strong, have
anything to lose from truth, since strength and truth are incommensurate, as
incommensurate, in fact, as the Devil and God, the Father and the Holy Spirit,
and no-one who is overly into strength can reasonably seek an accommodation
with truth. Hence the opposition of
Northern-Ireland Protestants, though principally, I would guess, Dissenters, to
unity with the Catholic South can be regarded as, in no small degree, a
reflection of the incommensurability of strength and truth, since it is the
Catholic Church which stands closest of all Christian denominations to truth, and
thus to that which is an implicit, if not explicit, rejection of strength. The Strong have most to lose from an
accommodation with truth, even the relative truth of Catholicism, and therefore
it is inevitable that they should be in the vanguard of opposition to a united
Ireland, exploiting the ruse of 'Protestant solidarity' to draw Anglicans and
Puritans away from any move towards an accommodation with Catholics in an
all-Ireland framework.
3. LAST JUDGEMENT. This much,
however, is certain: until Anglicans and Puritans turn away from the
reactionary control of Dissenters and opt to join with Catholics in the
democratic march towards freedom, there can be no salvation of the Beautiful,
the Good, and the True (relative to Christianity) in the triadic Beyond, and
thus no Social Transcendentalist Centre in which religious sovereignty would be
the presiding norm. Anglicans and
Puritans have more to lose from remaining loyal to the Strong than from joining
with the True in the struggle to defeat and transcend evil. Only after the Mother and the Son
democratically turn away from the Father, in order to join with the Holy Spirit
in the march towards salvation, will 'Kingdom Come' become a reality, and the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland be consigned to the
rubbish heap of world history. Only when
the Beautiful, the Good, and the True join together in moral solidarity against
the tyrannous influence of the Strong ... will there be an end to the dominion
of Time and a fresh start for Mass, Volume, and Space in the Eternity of the
triadic Beyond. To be free from Father
Time is to be saved to the New Mass, New Volume, and New Space of 'Kingdom
Come' in the ultimate beauty, goodness, and truth of Eternal Life. Only when the Devil's Kingdom dies,
democratically and peacefully, will God's Kingdom officially come to pass.
CYCLE 94
1. ALPHA/OMEGA COROLLARIES.
From the science of war to the religion of peace via the politics of sex
and the economics of sport. Or, conversely,
from the war of science to the peace of religion via the sex of politics and
the sport of economics. A distinction
between elements and elementinos?
2. MODES OF SALUTING.
Although saluting is normally political, we may distinguish between eight
basic modes thereof, four of which are alpha and the other four omega. Now since that which is right wing is
objective and that which is left wing comparatively subjective, we may
distinguish objective saluting from its subjective counterpart on the basis of
an extended-hand/clenched-fist dichotomy, with the former right wing and the
latter left. Hence to distinguish, in an
ascending order of spectra, between the realism of clenched-fist-to-breast and
the humanism of extended-hand-to-breast saluting; between the materialism of
extended-hand-to-temple and the nonconformism of clenched-fist-to-brow
saluting; between the naturalism of clenched-fist-on-bent-arm and the
fundamentalism of extended-hand-on-bent-arm saluting; and between the idealism
of extended-hand-on-raised-arm and the transcendentalism of
clenched-fist-on-raised-arm saluting.
3. POLITICAL STATUS OF DIFFERENT MODES OF SALUTING. To distinguish, politically, between the
negative left-wing status of clenched-fist-to-breast saluting, and the positive
right-wing status of extended-hand-to-breast saluting; between the negative
right-wing status of extended-hand-to-temple saluting, and the positive
left-wing status of clenched-fist-to-brow saluting; between the negative
extreme left-wing status of clenched-fist-on-bent-arm saluting, and the
positive extreme right-wing status of extended-hand-on-bent-arm saluting; and
between the negative extreme right-wing status of extended-hand-on-raised-arm
saluting, and the positive extreme left-wing status of clenched-fist-on-raised-arm
saluting.
4. SALVATION/DAMNATION OF PHENOMENAL MODES OF SALUTING. To contrast the negative salvation, as from
republicanism to communism, of clenched-fist-to-breast in
clenched-fist-on-bent-arm saluting ... with the negative damnation, as from
liberalism to fascism, of extended-hand-to-temple in
extended-hand-on-raised-arm saluting.
Conversely, to contrast the positive salvation, as from nonconformism to
transcendentalism, of clenched-fist-to-brow in clenched-fist-on-raised-arm
saluting ... with the positive damnation, as from humanism to fundamentalism,
of extended-hand-to-chest in extended-hand-on-bent-arm saluting.
5. EFFECTIVELY SALUTES. Even
the clenched-fist-to-brow posture of 'The Thinker' (Rodin) is a mode, if
unconscious, of saluting, as is the extended-hand-to-breast posture of the
Anglican and/or Catholic humanist.
CYCLE 95
1. FULL RANGE OF SALUTING.
Although saluting is mainly political, I take the view that science,
economics, and religion are also susceptible to modes of saluting which, in
some way, reflect their respective natures.
In fact, it should be possible to logically establish, over and above
the aforementioned eightfold distinctions, a mode of saluting for each
subdivision of any given spectrum, be it alpha or omega, phenomenal or
noumenal, negative or positive. Thus we
should have thirty-two different salutes, four to each ideological spectrum,
with due consideration given to the distinction between the elemental extremes
and the molecular intermediaries, as well as to the particle/wavicle dichotomy
between, for example, science and religion in relation to the elemental, and
politics and economics in relation to the molecular.
2. ELEMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MODES OF SALUTING. How, you may wonder, does one go about
distinguishing the elemental from the molecular with regard to saluting? Simply, I maintain, by distinguishing between
a hand and/or fist held at right-angles to the self and the same held parallel
with the self. In other words, between
that which, held at right-angles to the self, is more extreme than that which,
extended or clenched parallel to the self, is comparatively middle-ground, and
hence molecular.
3. CONSERVATIVE AND RADICAL SALUTING. However, much as we can distinguish the elemental
from the molecular, or vice versa, on the above basis, we cannot know whether
with regard to politics and science on the one hand, or to economics and
religion on the other ... unless we make a further distinction concerning this
very point. For it seems to me that
while most saluting is indeed political, it is such precisely because it makes
use of the right hand and/or fist in what is for a majority of people the most
natural and forceful manner. In other words,
saluting with the right hand and/or fist is an expression of political power,
the power to crush, if necessary, those who stand in the way of one's
particular allegiance, and we may believe that if the parallel placement of the
right hand and/or fist to the self in whatever context is political, then its
placement at right angles to the self ... is scientific, both of which are
comparatively conservative vis-à-vis their economic and religious alternatives,
and this irrespective of the ideological standing of the overall context.
4. LEFT-HANDED SALUTING. Now
if politics and science are signified by the use, one way or another, of the
right hand and/or fist, then it should logically follow that the use of the
left hand and/or fist will signify adherence to economics and religion,
depending whether the salute is molecular or elemental, which is to say,
parallel to the self or at right angles with it. For the left hand and/or fist would seem to
be the most appropriate choice for that which, like economics and religion, is
radical, since it goes against the natural grain in a way and to an extent that
is the opposite of conservative. One
cannot be more radical, whether absolutely or relatively, than to be into the
left hand and/or fist with regard to economics and religion.
CYCLE 96
1. IDEALIST SALUTING. Thus to
distinguish, spectrum by spectrum, the alpha-most and alpha-more from the
alpha-less and alpha-least modes of idealism with regard to an
extended-hand-on-raised-arm salute, the scientific and political modes thereof
making use of the right hand held at right and parallel angles to the self, but
the economic and religious modes using the left hand held at parallel and right
angles respectively.
2. TRANSCENDENTALIST SALUTING.
Conversely, to distinguish the omega-least and omega-less from the
omega-more and omega-most modes of transcendentalism with regard to a
clenched-fist-on-raised-arm salute, the scientific and political modes thereof
making use of the right fist held at right and parallel angles to the self, but
the economic and religious modes using the left fist held at parallel and right
angles respectively.
3. NATURALIST SALUTING.
Likewise, to distinguish the alpha-most and alpha-more from the
alpha-less and alpha-least modes of naturalism with regard to a clenched-fist-on-bent-arm
salute, the scientific and political modes thereof making use of the right fist
held at right and parallel angles to the self, but the economic and religious
modes using the left fist held at parallel and right angles respectively.
4. FUNDAMENTALIST SALUTING.
Conversely, to distinguish the omega-least and omega-less from the
omega-more and omega-most modes of fundamentalism with regard to an
extended-hand-on-bent-arm salute, the scientific and political modes thereof
making use of the right hand held at right and parallel angles to the self, but
the economic and religious modes using the left hand held at parallel and right
angles respectively.
5. MATERIALIST SALUTING.
Similarly, to distinguish the alpha-most and alpha-more from the
alpha-less and alpha-least modes of materialism with regard to an
extended-hand-to-temple salute, the scientific and political modes thereof
making use of the right hand held at right and parallel angles to the temple,
but the economic and religious modes using the left hand held at parallel and
right angles respectively.
6. NONCONFORMIST SALUTING.
Conversely, to distinguish the omega-least and omega-less from the
omega-more and omega-most modes of nonconformism with regard to a
clenched-fist-to-brow salute, the scientific and political modes thereof making
use of the right fist held at right and parallel angles to the brow, but the
economic and religious modes using the left fist held at parallel and right
angles respectively.
7. REALIST SALUTING. Finally,
to distinguish the alpha-most and alpha-more from the alpha-less and
alpha-least modes of realism with regard
to a clenched-fist-to-chest salute, the scientific and political modes thereof
making use of the right fist held at right and parallel angles to the chest,
but the economic and religious modes using the left fist held at parallel and
right angles respectively.
8. HUMANIST SALUTING.
Conversely, to distinguish the omega-least and omega-less from the
omega-more and omega-most modes of humanism with regard to an
extended-hand-to-breast salute, the scientific and political modes thereof
making use of the right hand held at right and parallel angles to the chest,
but the economic and religious modes using the left hand held at parallel and
right angles respectively.
CYCLE 97
1. DOMINION OF BARBAROUS STRENGTH.
So long as the civilized Beautiful and the natural Good remain under the
dominion of the barbarous Strong, the cultural True will remain 'beyond the
pale' ... of that which is acceptable to that dominion. Only when they democratically opt to join
with the cultural True in 'Kingdom Come' ... will the civilized Beautiful and
the natural Good be able to break free of the barbarous Strong, and thus be
saved to the triadic Beyond.
2. ERROR OF REPUBLICANISM.
The above contention has nothing whatsoever to do with republicanism,
which, in Ireland, seeks an accommodation between the barbarous Strong and the
cultural True, viz. Orange and Green, Presbyterian and Catholic, with Anglicans
and Puritans in the middle. Such an
accommodation, culminating in a united Ireland, is the last thing that the
barbarous Strong would want, since any accommodation with cultural truth can
only be at their expense, the Devil and God not seeing 'eye to eye' or being
able to coexist on an amicable basis.
3. ATONEMENT FOR HISTORICAL WRONGS.
A Britain in which the majority of people, being Anglican and/or
Puritan, want salvation from the evil of barbarous strength ... will join with
Catholics in voting for devolution and disestablishment (of the Anglican
Church), so that the triadic Beyond can become a reality. Such a Britain, fully apprised of the
advantages thereof, will do what is necessary to bring 'Kingdom Come' to pass,
turning against those who would oppose the will of God (the Second Coming) in
the interests of barbarous strength, in order that the civilized Beautiful, the
natural Good, and the cultural True may go forward together into Eternity,
where the Time of the Father and the Father of Time would have no place. Such a Britain will join with Ireland in the
development of a federation of Social Theocratic/Transcendentalist Centres,
wherein popular religious sovereignty will be the prevailing norm. Such a Britain will carry out the Last
Judgement and damn to the Hell of eternal exile those strength-mongering
barbarians who stand in the way of God.
It will do this as an atonement for historical wrongs inflicted upon
Ireland, and then, with atonement accomplished, it will join Ireland in the
establishment of 'Kingdom Come'.
4. FROM THREAT TO PARTNERSHIP.
There is no other way that peace and progress can come to these islands,
effectively an archipelago, than through British devolution and
disestablishment. Great Britain will
always remain a threat to and actual persecutor of Ireland and, by implication,
the Catholic Irish ... so long as the superstate barbarism of that which is
rooted in strength continues to exist.
Only the British, it seems to me, can rectify this situation and become
not a threat but a partner of Ireland ... as free Englishmen, Scotsmen, and
Welshmen step forth from the barbarism of Great Britain ... to democratically
proclaim their desire for salvation from the evil under which they have
existed, as British subjects, since the foundation of, first, Great Britain
and, then, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and, subsequent to
partition, Northern Ireland.
CYCLE 98
1. REAPPRAISAL OF ELEMENTS AND ELEMENTINOS. Previously, when distinguishing elements from
elementinos, I have tended to keep them aligned in overlapping spectra, so
that, for instance, photons and photinos stood side-by-side above protons and
protinos, and these in turn above neutrons and neutrinos, with electrons and
electrinos at the bottom. It seemed, at
the time, a good idea. But time, of
course, has a way of moving on, and what may have previously seemed a good idea
can become, under pressure of fresh insights and logical gains, an outdated and
even untenable one afterwards. Such is
the case here concerning elements and elementinos, and it arises in connection
with the dubiousness of considering, for example, protons subjective but
protinos objective, or, alternatively, electrons subjective but electrinos
objective. Surely, if protons and
electrons are subjective, given their correlation with the senses of hearing
and touching, then protinos and electrinos should be so too, only more so,
bearing in mind their smaller and more refined constitution. And surely, to reverse the argument, if
photons and neutrons are objective, given their correlation with the senses of
sight and taste, then photinos and neutrinos should not be subjective so much
as less objective than their larger counterparts? A self-evident contention, you may say, and
one, I am confident, that will enable us to reappraise the standing of elements
and elementinos in terms of a sort of oblique progression and/or regression,
depending on the context, from an element to its corresponding elementino,
thereby doing away with the notion of overlapping spectra. Thus, for example, the photon could be said
to regress to the photino, as from idealism to fundamentalism, while the proton
would be seen to progress to the protino, as from naturalism to transcendentalism. Similarly, the neutron could be said to
regress to the neutrino, as from materialism to humanism, while the electron
would be seen to progress to the electrino, as from realism to
nonconformism. Whether or not an
oblique, or diagonal, progression or regression from one spectrum to another
actually takes place, we now have an alternative structure in which to envisage
the existence of elements and elementinos.
Let us now put it to the test!
2. IDEALISM AND FUNDAMENTALISM.
To contrast the idealism of photons with the fundamentalism of photinos,
the former affiliated to the light/eyes and the latter to the blood/heart ...
in what amounts to an extreme right-wing distinction between primal and supreme
modes of doing.
3. NATURALISM AND TRANSCENDENTALISM.
To contrast the naturalism of protons with the transcendentalism of
protinos, the former affiliated to the fire/ears and the latter to the
air/lungs ... in what amounts to an extreme left-wing distinction between
primal and supreme modes of being.
4. MATERIALISM AND HUMANISM.
To contrast the materialism of neutrons with the humanism of neutrinos,
the former affiliated to the ice/tongue and the latter to the child/womb ... in
what amounts to a right-wing distinction between primal and supreme modes of
giving.
5. REALISM AND NONCONFORMISM.
To contrast the realism of electrons with the nonconformism of
electrinos, the former affiliated to the soil/flesh and the latter to the
intellect/brain ... in what amounts to a left-wing distinction between primal
and supreme modes of taking.
6. PHOTON/PHOTINO BASIS OF DOING.
Thus primal doing and supreme doing would have the same
element/elementino in common, the only difference being that primal doing is of
the photon and supreme doing of the photino, a distinction, in effect, between
idealism and fundamentalism or, in theological terms, the Antifather (more
correctly, the Anti-allah, or Clear Light, in relation to fundamentalism per se)
and the Father (more correctly, Allah in relation to genuine fundamentalism).
7. PROTON/PROTINO BASIS OF BEING.
Thus primal being and supreme being would have the same
element/elementino in common, the only difference being that primal being is of
the proton and supreme being of the protino, a distinction, in effect, between
naturalism and transcendentalism or, in theological terms, the Antispirit and
the Holy Spirit (more correctly, the Holy Spirit of Heaven in relation to
transcendentalism per se).
8. NEUTRON/NEUTRINO BASIS OF GIVING.
Thus primal giving and supreme giving would have the same
element/elementino in common, the only difference being that primal giving is
of the neutron and supreme giving of the neutrino, a distinction, in effect,
between materialism and humanism or, in theological terms, the Antimother and
the Mother.
9. ELECTRON/ELECTRINO BASIS OF TAKING. Thus primal taking and supreme taking would
have the same element/elementino in common, the only difference being that
primal taking is of the electron and supreme taking of the electrino, a
distinction, in effect, between realism and nonconformism or, in theological
terms, the Antichrist and Christ.
CYCLE 99
1. BARBAROUS DOING AND CULTURAL BEING. Whereas doing is barbarous, being is
cultural, whether negatively or positively, in relation to photons/photinos or
protons/protinos.
2. CIVILIZED GIVING AND NATURAL TAKING. Whereas giving is civilized, taking is
natural, whether negatively or positively, in relation to neutrons/neutrinos or
electrons/electrinos.
3. SUPERFEMININE/SUBFEMININE MODES OF DOING. Doing is superfeminine in the primal context
of idealism and subfeminine in the supreme context of fundamentalism.
4. SUBMASCULINE/SUPERMASCULINE MODES OF BEING. Conversely, being is submasculine in the
primal context of naturalism and supermasculine in the supreme context of
transcendentalism.
5. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE FEMININE MODES OF GIVING. Giving is negatively feminine in the primal
context of materialism and positively feminine in the supreme context of
humanism.
6. NEGATIVE/POSITIVE MASCULINE MODES OF TAKING. Taking is negatively masculine in the primal
context of realism and positively masculine in the supreme context of
nonconformism.
CYCLE 100
1. DIAGONAL AXES. It would
seem that, like elements and their corresponding elementinos, the relationship
of, say, the Antichrist to Christ is less between materialism and
nonconformism, as previously supposed, than between realism and nonconformism,
so that we have the notion of an oblique, or diagonal, progression/regression
from the one to the other, rather than contiguous spectra appertaining, in
parallel alignment, to the Overworld.
Instead, it would seem that, like electrons, the context of Antichrist
appertains to the alpha World and the context of Christ, by contrast, to the
omega Overworld (Purgatory). Likewise,
with regard to the Antimother and the Mother, it would seem that the former is
affiliated to the alpha Overworld and the latter to the omega World, since the
distinction between neutrons and neutrinos is one of materialism and humanism. Similarly, with regard to the distinction
between the Antispirit and the Holy Spirit, we would have, contrary to my
original contentions, a diagonal axis comprising of naturalism and
transcendentalism, the former appertaining, through protons, to the alpha
Netherworld, and the latter, through protinos, to the omega Otherworld, so to
speak. Finally, the distinction between
the Antifather, or, better, Anti-allah (which is more genuinely extreme), and
the Father/Allah would appertain to an idealist/fundamentalist axis, the photon
aspect of which had relevance to the alpha Otherworld, the photino aspect ...
relevance, by contrast, to the omega Netherworld.
2. RISES AND FALLS. The
diagonal axes we have adumbrated in relation to complementary
elements/elementinos and their theological parallels ... could be regarded as
allowing for the possibility of a rise in the case of the subjective contexts,
and of a fall in the case of the objective contexts, this in turn permitting
flexibility with regard to an escape from negative salvation/damnation into
their positive counterparts. Thus one
can envisage a rise from the Antichrist to Christ, ugliness to knowledge, but a
fall from the Anti-allah to Allah, illusion to strength. A rise from the Antispirit to the Holy
Spirit, as from weakness to truth, but a fall from the Antimother to the
Mother, as from ignorance to beauty.
Such rises and falls should not, however, be confounded with damnation
and salvation. On the contrary, they cut
across the boundary line, so to speak, between elements and elementinos,
whereas salvations and damnations don't.
Also unique to rises and falls is the possibility of a regression within
a rise (as from Christ to Antichrist) or a progression within a fall (as from
the Mother to the Antimother). This would
be because of the structural affinity of the complementary elements/elementinos
on any given axis.
3. FROM THE ANTICHRIST TO CHRIST.
To rise from the Antichrist to Christ, as from the sensuality of touch subjectivity
to the sensibility of thought subjectivity, flesh to brain, anti-id to mind,
soil to intellect, electrons to electrinos, ugliness to knowledge, sinner to
saint.
4. FROM THE ANTIMOTHER TO THE MOTHER. To fall from the Antimother to the Mother, as
from the sensuality of taste objectivity to the sensibility of maternal
objectivity, tongue to womb, antimind to id, ice to child, neutrons to
neutrinos, ignorance to beauty, crook to angel.
5. FROM THE ANTISPIRIT TO THE HOLY SPIRIT. To rise from the Antispirit to the Holy
Spirit, as from the sensuality of aural subjectivity to the sensibility of
breath subjectivity, ears to lungs, antispirit to spirit, fire to air, protons
to protinos, weakness to truth, beast to God.
6. FROM THE ANTI-ALLAH/FATHER TO ALLAH/THE FATHER. To fall from the Anti-allah/Father to
Allah/the Father, as from the sensuality of optical objectivity to the
sensibility of pulse objectivity, eyes to heart, antisoul to soul, light to
blood, photons to photinos, illusion to strength, Devil to warrior.
7. FROM COMMON SENSE TO UNCOMMON SENSIBILITY. To rise or fall from common sense to uncommon
sensibility, thereby setting oneself up for the possibility of genuine
damnation or salvation, the former from Mass to Time, and the latter from
Volume to Space.
8. FALSITY OF NEGATIVE DAMNATION/SALVATION. Negative, or pseudo, damnation/salvation
differs from its positive counterpart not only in terms of sensuality vis-à-vis
sensibility, but with regard to the falsity of ‘salvation’ from Mass to Time
and of ‘damnation’ from Volume to Space - the opposite, in effect, of their
genuine counterparts.
9. PSEUDO VIS-À-VIS GENUINE SALVATION. Hence to contrast the pseudo-salvation of the
Antichrist in the Antispirit (Satan/Jehovah), realism in naturalism, with the
genuine salvation of Christ in the Holy Spirit, nonconformism in
transcendentalism (whether with regard to Christianity or Superchristianity,
Christ Child in Holy Ghost or Second Coming in Holy Spirit of Heaven).
10. PSEUDO VIS-À-VIS GENUINE DAMNATION. Hence to contrast the pseudo-damnation of the
Antimother in the Antifather/Anti-allah (the Clear Light of the Void),
materialism in idealism, with the genuine damnation of the Mother in the
Father/Allah, humanism in fundamentalism (whether with regard to the emotional
brain or, more completely, the heart/blood, which is effectively a distinction,
so I contend, between the Father and Allah).
11. SUBMASCULINE/SUPERMASCULINE DISTINCTIONS IN SALVATION. The pseudo-salvation of the Antichrist in the
Antispirit is from negative masculine to submasculine, whereas the genuine
salvation of Christ in the Holy Spirit is from positive masculine to
supermasculine.
12. SUPERFEMININE/SUBFEMININE DISTINCTIONS IN DAMNATION. The pseudo-damnation of the Antimother in the
Antifather/Anti-allah is from negative feminine to superfeminine, whereas the
genuine damnation of the Mother in the Father/Allah is from positive feminine
to subfeminine.
13. GENDER BASES OF DAMNATION AND SALVATION. What the above tells us is that damnation and
salvation, whether pseudo or genuine, are basically gender-based, with females,
when functioning in a predominantly feminine manner, exposed to the former and
males, when functioning in a predominantly masculine manner, entitled to the latter. A woman can generally do no better than fall
into a context embracing the possibility of a less severe damnation, as from
humanism to fundamentalism, whereas men have the option of rising to a context
embracing the possibility of a more genuine salvation, as from nonconformism to
transcendentalism.
14. NO 'FALL OF MAN'. Strictly
speaking, there is no such thing as the 'fall of man', considered from a gender
standpoint. Men can only rise and women
fall, the former from electrons to electrinos, negative to positive nature, and
the latter from neutrons to neutrinos, negative to positive civilization, with
the contrary fates of cultural salvation and barbarous damnation waiting in the
wings, so to speak, to claim from nature and civilization their respective
noumenal dues.
CYCLE 101
1. ELEMENTINOS OF THE TRIADIC BEYOND. Since the recent series of revisionary
exercises, we can now maintain, without reservation, that the three tiers of our
projected 'Kingdom Come' in the triadic Beyond, viz. the 'New Earth', the 'New
Purgatory', and the 'New Heaven', will be contexts in which the neutrino, the
electrino, and the protino are taken to their respective peaks ... in the
ultimate beauty of the 'Mary Child', the ultimate goodness (knowledge) of the
Second Coming, and the ultimate truth of the Holy Spirit of Heaven. There will be no place, however, for the
photino, and thus for anything associated with the Father/Allah in what is
patently a diabolically barbarous context of fundamentalist strength. Likewise, all elements will be officially
'beneath the pale' of that which, in elementino refinement, properly pertains
to the institutional embodiments of Eternal Life.
2. FROM FIRST- TO FOURTH-RATE.
Curiously, I made no mention, before, of the fact that, in relation to
Christianity, Catholics are first-rate Christians, since affiliated, through
the Christ Child, to the possibility of truth in the Holy Spirit, whereas
Puritans are second-rate Christians in their affiliation, through the Son, to
knowledge, Anglicans third-rate Christians in their affiliation, through the
Mother, to beauty, and Dissenters fourth-rate Christians in their affiliation,
through the Father, to strength. Yet it
is the fourth-rate who, as in Northern Ireland, so often hold dominion over the
second- and third-rate, from fear, no doubt, that the first-rate should wrest
control from them and replace the hegemony of strength with the hegemony of
truth, and all, needless to say, at Great bloody Britain's barbarous expense!
3. THE GOOD AND THE BEAUTIFUL.
In England, however, it tends to be the second- and third-rate who
effectively rule the roost, largely at the expense of both the fourth- and
first-rate. But, then, England is more
middle-of-the-road than Northern Ireland or even Scotland, which tend, by
contrast, to reflect the in-some-ways unfortunate Celtic tendency to divide,
almost manic depressively, into barbarous and cultural extremes, as religiously
manifested in the radical distinction between Presbyterian fundamentalism and
Catholic transcendentalism. Certainly
Britain is by and large governed, through the English, by the second-rate, with
the third-rate forming the main opposition, whether in terms of Anglicanism
vis-à-vis Puritanism or, more pointedly in this context, the Labour Party
vis-à-vis the Conservatives. Yet this is
arguably preferable to the nineteenth-century tussle between the Good and the
Great, Conservatism and Liberalism, which tended to exclude the working class
from democracy ... as the second- and fourth-rate fought it out among
themselves in the interests, primarily, of middle- and upper-class values.
4. RATINGS OF PROFESSIONS.
Generally speaking, politics is a third-rate profession, economics a second-rate
profession, religion a first-rate profession, and science indubitably a
fourth-rate profession. Thus science is
either the alpha-most, relative to elements, or the omega-least, relative to
elementinos, with a sort of upper-class standing that is as far removed from
the classlessness of religion ... as war from peace, or the Devil from God.
5. RATINGS OF ELEMENTS.
Metachemically and/or metaphysically speaking, the proton is a
first-rate element, the electron a second-rate element, the neutron a
third-rate element, and the photon a fourth-rate element. The proton corresponds to primal being, the
electron to primal taking, the neutron to primal giving, and the photon to
primal doing. Negative culture, nature,
civilization, and barbarism, with the pseudo-salvation of electrons to protons,
negative nature to negative culture, on the one hand, but the pseudo-damnation
of neutrons to photons, negative civilization to negative barbarism, on the
other hand.
6. RATINGS OF ELEMENTINOS.
Likewise, the protino is a first-rate elementino, the electrino a
second-rate elementino, the neutrino a third-rate elementino, and the photino a
fourth-rate elementino. The protino
corresponds to supreme being, the electrino to supreme taking, the neutrino to
supreme giving, and the photino to supreme doing. Positive culture, nature, civilization, and
barbarism, with the salvation of electrinos to protinos, positive nature to
positive culture on the one hand, but the damnation of neutrinos to photinos,
positive civilization to positive barbarism, on the other hand.
7. BODILY DESCENT. To
descend, in zigzagging fashion, from the superfemininity of the eyes to the
positive femininity of the womb via the subfemininity of the heart and the
negative femininity of the tongue, as from idealism to humanism via
fundamentalism and materialism.
8. BODILY ASCENT. To ascend,
in zigzagging fashion, from the negative masculinity of the flesh (penis) to
the supermasculinity of the lungs via the positive masculinity of the brain and
the submasculinity of the ears, as from realism to transcendentalism via
nonconformism and naturalism.
CYCLE 102
1. SPACE/TIME CONTRASTS. To
contrast the fall of doing from primal Space to supreme Time, idealism to
fundamentalism, with the rise of being from primal Time to supreme Space,
naturalism to transcendentalism.
2. VOLUME/MASS CONTRASTS.
Likewise, to contrast the fall of giving from primal Volume to supreme
Mass, materialism to humanism, with the rise of taking from primal Mass to
supreme Volume, realism to nonconformism.
3. BARBARISM/CULTURE CONTRASTS.
Thus to contrast the fall of barbarism from primal Space to supreme
Time, the Devil to the warrior, with the rise of culture from primal Time to
supreme Space, the beast to God.
4. CIVILIZATION/NATURE CONTRASTS.
Thus to contrast the fall of civilization from primal Volume to supreme
Mass, the slut to the angel, with the rise of nature from primal Mass to
supreme Volume, the sinner to the saint.
5. PRIMAL/SUPREME ORDERS OF TIME AND SPACE. The fall of barbarism from spatial Space to
repetitive Time contrasts with the rise of culture from sequential Time to
spaced Space.
6. PRIMAL/SUPREME ORDERS OF VOLUME AND MASS. The fall of civilization from volumetric
Volume to massive Mass contrasts with the rise of nature from massed Mass to
voluminous Volume.
7. HUMAN EXTREMES. From the
alpha-most sensuality of those rooted in their eyes to the omega-most
sensibility of those centred in their lungs - a distinction, in effect, between
the Devil and God, superwoman and superman.
8. CRUDE/FINE DISTINCTIONS IN THE ARTS. All art is divisible, along
element/elementino lines, between that which is predominantly of the senses in
its sensuality, and therefore crude, and that which is predominantly of the
sensibilities, and therefore fine - the former effectively anti-art and the
latter alone genuine art.
CYCLE 103
1. FROM HARDBACKS TO SOFTBACKS.
To fall, relevant to civilization, from hardbacks to softbacks, as from
neutrons to neutrinos, ignorance to beauty, the Antimother to the Mother.
2. FROM LONG PLAYERS (LPs) TO COMPACT DISCS (CDs). To rise, relevant to nature, from long
players to compact discs, as from electrons to electrinos, ugliness to
knowledge, the Antichrist to Christ.
3. FROM CINEMA TO VIDEO. To
fall, relevant to barbarism, from cinema to video, as from photons to photinos,
illusion to strength, the Anti-allah to Allah.
4. FROM TAPE RECORDERS TO CASSETTES.
To rise, relevant to culture, from tape recorders to cassettes, as from protons
to protinos, weakness to truth, the Antispirit to the Holy Spirit.
5. FROM LONG PLAYERS TO TAPE RECORDERS. To be negatively saved from long players
(LPs) to tape recorders, as from earth to fire, the flesh to the ears.
6. FROM HARDBACKS TO CINEMA.
To be negatively damned from hardbacks to cinema, as from ice to light,
the tongue (taste) to the eyes.
7. FROM COMPACT DISCS TO CASSETTES.
To be positively saved from compact discs to cassettes, as from
intellect to spirit, the brain to the lungs.
8. FROM SOFTBACKS TO VIDEOS.
To be positively damned from softbacks to videos, as from instinct to
soul, the womb to the heart.
9. FROM PHYSICAL GOOD TO CHEMICAL BETTER. Salvation, whether negative or positive, is
always from phenomenal subjectivity to noumenal subjectivity, from physical
good to chemical better.
10. FROM PHYSICAL BAD TO CHEMICAL WORSE. Damnation, whether negative or positive, is
always from phenomenal objectivity to noumenal objectivity, from physical bad
to chemical worse.
11. CULTURAL GENDER DISTINCTIONS.
Books and films are, by and large, feminine entities, whereas records
and tapes are comparatively masculine.
12. COLLOQUIAL DISTINCTIONS. To
distinguish, colloquially speaking, the 'cunts' and 'jerks' of books and films
from the 'pricks' and 'bums' of records and tapes, whether negatively with
regard to the elements or positively with regard to the elementinos, the former
largely 'outer' and the latter 'inner', a distinction, in short, between the
'once born' and the 'reborn'.
13. CULTURAL PARALLELS TO TRIADIC BEYOND. Perhaps the triadic Beyond, in appealing to
the Beautiful, the Good, and the True, would have to exclude videos from its
virtuous eternities, bearing in mind their blood-like correlation with the
Strong, and thus give pride of place to softbacks, compact discs, and cassettes
- the first and second affiliated to the Beautiful and the Good respectively,
while the third alone has reference to the True, as we ascend from civilization
and nature to culture, which is to say, from the Mother of 'Kingdom Come', viz.
the Mary Child, and the Son of 'Kingdom Come', viz. the Second Coming, to the
Holy Ghost of 'Kingdom Come', viz. the Holy Spirit of Heaven, with appropriate
refinements upon softbacks, compact discs, and cassettes in each case.
14. CONFOUNDING FACT WITH TRUTH.
One of the stupidest mistakes people make is to confound fact with
truth, estimating that which is merely factual to be true. Small wonder that there is little room for
truth in their lives, when they identify fact with it and thus detract from the
altogether separate status and meaning of the latter!
CYCLE 104
1. INSTRUMENTAL UGLINESS AND BEAUTY.
Compared to the violin, the guitar is musically an ugly instrument which
relies upon a reactive, or plucking/strumming, technique vis-à-vis its
strings. Yet both violins and guitars
are arguably bodily or 'worldly' instruments ... having a mundane significance,
in flesh/touch sensuality and womb/id sensibility, as germane to negative
nature and positive civilization respectively, the former masculine and the
latter feminine.
2. MODES OF GUITAR UGLINESS.
To distinguish modes of ugliness with regard to the guitar ... from the most
ugly mode of single-note plucking without slide to the least ugly mode of
single-note plucking with slide via the more (relative to most) ugly mode of
chordal strumming without slide and the less (relative to least) ugly mode of
chordal strumming with slide.
3. MODES OF VIOLIN BEAUTY. To
distinguish modes of beauty with regard to the violin ... from the least
beautiful mode of single-note pizzicato to the most beautiful mode of
single-note bowing via the less (relative to least) beautiful mode of double-stopped
pizzicato and the more (relative to most) beautiful mode of double-stopped
bowing.
4. ATOMIC BREAKDOWN OF GUITAR UGLINESS. Hence, with regard to the guitar, from the
alpha-most technique of elemental electron particles to the alpha-least technique
of elemental electron wavicles via the alpha-more (relative to most) technique
of molecular electron particles and the alpha-less (relative to least)
technique of molecular electron wavicles.
5. ATOMIC BREAKDOWN OF VIOLIN BEAUTY. Hence, with regard to the violin, from the
omega-least technique of elemental neutrino particles to the omega-most
technique of elemental neutrino wavicles via the omega-less (relative to least)
technique of molecular neutrino particles and the omega-more (relative to most)
technique of molecular neutrino wavicles.
6. IDEOLOGICAL DIVISIBILITY OF GUITARISTS. One could say that guitarists are divisible,
relevant to the realist essence of primal taking, the quality of negative
nature, between 'stupid' and 'smart' ... according to the absence or presence
of a slide, the former comparatively 'stupid' and the latter comparatively
'smart'. For the 'stupid' modes of
guitar playing correspond to realist science (elemental) and politics (molecular),
whereas the 'smart' modes of guitar playing correspond to realist economics
(molecular) and religion (elemental).
7. IDEOLOGICAL DIVISIBILITY OF VIOLINISTS. Likewise, one could say that violinists are
divisible, relevant to the humanist essence of supreme giving, the quality of
positive civilization, between 'stupid' and 'smart' ... according to the
presence or absence of pizzicato, the former comparatively 'stupid' and the
latter comparatively 'smart'. For the
'stupid' modes of violin playing correspond to humanist science (elemental) and
politics (molecular), whereas the 'smart' modes of violin playing correspond to
humanist economics (molecular) and religion (elemental).
8. CONTRARY FATALITIES OF GUITARISTS AND VIOLINISTS. Compared to the 'smartness' of violinists,
who almost invariably use a bow, thereby aligning themselves with the
omega-more and omega-most modes of playing technique in a bias towards humanist
economics and religion, most guitarists would seem to be 'stupid', since
biased, by and large, towards the alpha-more and alpha-most techniques of
guitar playing - the former political and the latter scientific, a distinction,
in short, between chordal strumming and single-note plucking, neither of which
have reference to the use of a slide. In
fact, the use of a plectrum to enhance plucking and/or strumming is almost
mandatory with these alpha-more and alpha-most modes of guitar playing.
CYCLE 105
1. FULL GAMUT OF SENSIBILITY.
From the Devil of sensibility, viz. Allah/the Father, to the God of
sensibility, viz. the Holy Spirit/the Holy Spirit of Heaven, via the woman of
sensibility, viz. the Mother, and the man of sensibility, viz. Christ. In other words, from the heart to the lungs
via the womb and the brain.
2. FULL GAMUT OF SENSUALITY.
From the Antidevil of sensuality, viz. the Anti-allah/Antifather, to the
Antigod of sensuality, viz. the Antispirit, via the antiwoman of sensuality,
viz. the Antimother, and the antiman of sensuality, viz. the Antichrist. In other words, from the eyes to the ears via
the tongue and the flesh.
3. COMMON SENSE VIS-À-VIS UNCOMMON SENSIBILITY. Men of uncommon sensibility are invariably
outnumbered by men of common sense.
4. EITHER OR, NOT BOTH. Those
who have the most common sense usually have the least uncommon sensibility, and
vice versa.
5. VICIOUS NATURE OF SENSES.
Common sense flies in the face of virtue and, indeed, of all that is
holy. For, at bottom, the senses are
vicious, appertaining to Original Sin.
6. GRADES OF ORIGINAL SIN. There
is, besides the most Original Sin of the eyes, the more (relative to most)
Original Sin of the tongue, the less (relative to least) Original Sin of the
flesh, and the least (relative to less) Original Sin of the ears. That is to say, there are descending grades
and degrees of Original Sin ... from the Antidevil to the Antigod via the
Antiwoman and the Antiman, as from science to religion via politics and
economics within the framework, necessarily negative, of the elements, viz.
photons, neutrons, electrons, and protons.
7. GENUINE AND FALSE LITERATURE.
That which is predominantly written from the standpoint of sensibility
is the genuine literature of virtue, whereas that which is predominantly
written from the standpoint of sensuality is the false literature of vice.
8. CATEGORIES OF LITERARY SENSIBILITY. When written from the standpoint of
sensibility, poetry is the literature of intellectual fundamentalism, drama the
literature of intellectual humanism, fiction the literature of intellectual nonconformism,
and philosophy the literature of intellectual transcendentalism.
9. CATEGORIES OF LITERARY SENSUALITY. When written from the standpoint of
sensuality, poetry is the 'literature' of anti-intellectual idealism, drama the
'literature' of anti-intellectual realism, fiction the 'literature' of
anti-intellectual materialism, and philosophy the 'literature' of
anti-intellectual naturalism.
10. ANTI-LITERATURE. All
vicious literature, written from the standpoint of sensuality, is effectively
anti-literary, and hence basically philistine in its negativity. It is the antipoetry, antidrama, antifiction,
and antiphilosophy of the 'once born' who, for reasons best known to
themselves, scorn the 'reborn', in pursuance of sensual vice.
11. SEX AND MATERNITY. Sex is
both masculine and vicious, rooted in the less (relative to least) Original Sin
of the flesh and, in particular, the penis.
Maternity, on the other hand, is virtuous, and thus the redemption of
woman in and through the mundane sensibility of the womb.
12. MALE VICE AND FEMALE VIRTUE.
Man sins through the flesh, whereas woman is (or can be) saved to the
mundane sensibility of maternal virtue as a result of sex, falling from
ignorance into beauty.
13. UGLINESS OF COITUS. Man
cannot rise from ugliness to knowledge whilst he is yet subject to the flesh
and its sexual sin. He remains, on the
contrary, antichristically disposed to the ugliness of coitus.
14. REDEMPTIVE GRACE. To
distinguish the damnation of Original Sin from the salvation of what could be
called Redemptive Grace, further distinguishing the least Redemptive Grace of
the heart from the less (relative to least) Redemptive Grace of the womb, and
the more (relative to most) Redemptive Grace of the brain from the most
Redemptive Grace of the lungs, as one ascends from the Devil to God via woman
and man, or science to religion via politics and economics within the
framework, necessarily positive, of the elementinos, viz. photinos, neutrinos,
electrinos, and protinos.
CYCLE 106
1. FALL FROM MOST ORIGINAL SIN TO LEAST REDEMPTIVE GRACE. To fall (diagonally) from the most Original
Sin of primal doing to the least Redemptive Grace of supreme doing, as from the
eyes to the heart, idealism to fundamentalism, superfeminine Devil to subfeminine
warrior, barbarism in its negative extreme right-wing manifestation to
barbarism in its positive extreme right-wing manifestation.
2. RISE FROM LEAST ORIGINAL SIN TO MOST REDEMPTIVE GRACE. To rise
(diagonally) from the least Original Sin of primal being to the most Redemptive
Grace of supreme being, as from the ears to the lungs, naturalism to
transcendentalism, submasculine beast to supermasculine God, culture in its
negative extreme left-wing manifestation to culture in its positive extreme
left-wing manifestation.
3. FALL FROM MORE ORIGINAL SIN TO LESS REDEMPTIVE GRACE. To fall from the more (relative to most)
Original Sin of primal giving to the less (relative to least) Redemptive Grace
of supreme giving, as from the tongue to the womb, materialism to humanism,
negative-feminine shrew to positive-feminine angel, civilization in its
negative right-wing manifestation to civilization in its positive right-wing
manifestation.
4. RISE FROM LESS ORIGINAL SIN TO MORE REDEMPTIVE GRACE. To rise from the less (relative to least)
Original Sin of primal taking to the more (relative to most) Redemptive Grace
of supreme taking, as from the flesh to the brain, realism to nonconformism,
negative-masculine sinner to positive-masculine saint, nature in its negative
left-wing manifestation to nature in its positive left-wing manifestation.
5. DAMNED FROM MORE TO MOST ORIGINAL SIN. To be negatively damned from the more
Original Sin of primal giving to the most Original Sin of primal doing, as from
the Antimother to the Anti-allah/Antifather, ice to light, negative phenomenal
objectivity to negative noumenal objectivity.
6. SAVED FROM LESS TO LEAST ORIGINAL SIN. To be negatively saved from the less Original
Sin of primal taking to the least Original Sin of primal being, as from the
Antichrist to the Antispirit, earth to fire, negative phenomenal subjectivity
to negative noumenal subjectivity.
7. DAMNED FROM LESS TO LEAST REDEMPTIVE GRACE. To be positively damned from the less
Redemptive Grace of supreme giving to the least Redemptive Grace of supreme
doing, as from the Mother to the Father/Allah, id to soul, positive phenomenal
objectivity to positive noumenal objectivity.
8. SAVED FROM MORE TO MOST REDEMPTIVE GRACE. To be positively saved from the more Redemptive
Grace of supreme taking to the most Redemptive Grace of supreme being, as from
the Son to the Holy Ghost, intellect to spirit, positive phenomenal
subjectivity to positive noumenal subjectivity.
9. FROM SENSUAL TO SENSIBLE DEVILS.
To fall from the Devil of sensuality, viz. the Anti-allah/Antifather, to
the Devil of sensibility, viz. the Father/Allah, as from the eyes to the heart,
light to blood.
10. FROM SENSUAL TO SENSIBLE GODS.
To rise from the God of sensuality, viz. the Antispirit, to the God of
sensibility, viz. the Holy Spirit, as from the ears to the lungs, fire to air.
11. FROM SENSUAL TO SENSIBLE WOMEN.
To fall from the woman of sensuality, viz. the Antimother, to the woman
of sensibility, viz. the Mother, as from the tongue to the womb, water to
children.
12. FROM SENSUAL TO SENSIBLE MEN.
To rise from the man of sensuality, viz. the Antichrist, to the man of
sensibility, viz. Christ, as from the flesh to the brain, earth to thoughts.
13. DIRECTION OF PRAYER.
Genuine prayer, which appertains to the Christ Child, the symbol of
thoughtful intellect, can only be directed towards the Holy Spirit, the 'peace
that surpasses all understanding', inasmuch as one sincerely wishes for that
peace. You cannot direct it towards the
Mother or the Father, since these deities appertain to the non-thinking modes
of the intellect in speaking and reading respectively. Neither can you pray to the Son, Who
appertains to writing as opposed to thinking.
Prayer, to repeat, is in and of the Christ Child, and when the intellect
enters that context it becomes thought, wherein it should be directed towards
God, viz. the Holy Spirit, within the relative framework, necessarily
intellectual, of Christianity. To pray
to man (the Son) or to woman (the Mother) would be illogical, albeit less
illogical, from a religious standpoint, than praying to the Devil (the Father),
Who is the opposite of God, and thus as far removed from the Holy Spirit as
Hell from Heaven, or the emotional brain and/or heart from the spiritual brain
and/or lungs with regard to the Christian context, also of course embracing the
intellectual brain, of the 'Three in One'.
True prayer, by which is meant thought-centred intellectuality, can only
be logically directed towards the Holy Spirit, which is the goal and redemption
of religious striving, relative to the broadly purgatorial sphere of
Christianity.
14. SUPERCONSCIOUS PEACE OF HEAVEN.
The Holy Spirit and/or Ghost is not, however, the same as the Holy
Spirit of Heaven, for which, as already noted in an earlier cycle of this book,
the Second Coming is required ... less on a basis of people praying than of
their passively acquiescing in his thoughts - preferably, so I now contend, via
aural means such as compact discs and cassettes which, in appealing to the
ears, open the way for a rise towards the spirit. Only thus will the way be prepared for the
total triumph of the lungs in a salvation, germane to the Holy Spirit of
Heaven, beyond the egocentricity of mind-dominated meditation and antithetical not
to the Father/Allah, the Devil(s) of sensibility, but to the Clear Light of the
Void, the Devil of sensuality. Only then
will there be a true attainment to Heaven and deliverance from evil in the pure
superconsciousness of universal self.
CYCLE 107
1. FALL FROM IMMORAL SENSUALITY TO SENSIBILITY. To fall from the immoral sensuality of seeing
... in the primal doing of the objective noumenal not-self, or eyes, to the
immoral sensibility of feeling ... in the supreme doing of the objective
noumenal self, or heart.
2. RISE FROM MORAL SENSUALITY TO SENSIBILITY. To rise from the moral sensuality of hearing
... in the primal being of the subjective noumenal not-self, or ears, to the
moral sensibility of breathing ... in the supreme being of the subjective
noumenal self, or lungs.
3. FALL FROM AMORAL SENSUALITY TO SENSIBILITY. To fall from the amoral sensuality of tasting
... in the primal giving of the objective phenomenal not-self, or tongue, to
the amoral sensibility of conceiving ... in the supreme giving of the objective
noumenal self, or womb.
4. RISE FROM AMORAL SENSUALITY TO SENSIBILITY. To rise from the amoral sensuality of
touching ... in the primal taking of the subjective phenomenal not-self, or
flesh, to the amoral sensibility of thinking ... in the supreme taking of the
subjective phenomenal self, or brain.
5. FROM EXTERNAL TO INTERNAL HELL/HEAVEN. People who are already, by and large, on the
noumenal planes of doing and being ... cannot be damned or saved, but can only
fall or rise from sensuality to sensibility, thereby passing from an external
Hell/Heaven to an internal Hell/Heaven ... as they exchange the negativity of
divergence within the centrifugal for the positivity of convergence within the
centripetal.
6. WILL TOWARDS THE NOUMENAL.
Damnation and salvation are primarily for those who exist, by and large,
on the phenomenal planes of giving and taking, but who evince a will towards
the noumenal planes above, whether with regard to sensuality or to sensibility,
centrifugal alpha or centripetal omega, the negativity of a divergent
objectivity/subjectivity or the positivity of a convergent
objectivity/subjectivity. Thus is giving
eclipsed by doing ... and taking by being ... on both primal and supreme
levels.
CYCLE 108
1. RULED AND LED. Whereas the
British are a people (if that's the right word) ruled by the Devil, the Irish
are a people led by God. Thus whereas
the British are subjects of a monarch, the personification on Earth of the
Father (though, in the case of a female monarch, 'the Mother' would probably be
the more relevant theological parallel), the Irish are loyal to a pope, the
personification on Earth of the Holy Spirit.
Hence whereas the British are rooted, through the monarchy, in strength,
the Irish are centred, through the papacy, in truth. Unfortunately strength and truth are as
incommensurable as Hell and Heaven or, which amounts to the same thing, the
Devil and God.
2. LEVEL PLAYING FIELD. The
Irish cannot trust the British and have no reason to be enamoured of them. Only when the British have done away with
themselves through devolution ... will it be possible for the Irish to treat
the Scots, Welsh, and even English as friends rather than potential if not
actual enemies. Then there will be a
'level playing field', so to speak, between the former countries which
constitute what is loosely termed 'the British Isles'.
3. GENDER IMPLICATIONS OF MONARCHY.
A female monarch, like Queen Elizabeth II, is arguably less the
personification of the Father than of the Mother, and therefore closer, in a
sense, to beauty than to strength.
Especially must this be so when, like the Queen, the monarch is
figurehead of the Anglican Church, which is closer, relevant to Christianity,
to beauty than to strength, goodness, or truth.
Hence the Queen is less a Devil than a woman, and therefore eligible for
salvation to the 'New Earth' of the triadic Beyond, in which beauty will
achieve unprecedented peaks of refinement.
Such an eligibility, however, would not apply to a male monarch in the
event of succession, since a king would be the personification on Earth of the
Father, and hence of strength.
CYCLE 109
1. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE DEVILS.
To contrast the Antidevil of primal doing with the Devil of supreme doing,
the Clear Light of the Void (Space) with the Holy Soul of Hell.
2. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE GODS.
To contrast the Antigod of primal being with the God of supreme being,
the Clear Fire of Time with the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
3. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE WOMEN.
To contrast the antiwoman of primal giving with the woman of supreme
giving, the Clear Ice of Volume with the Holy Id of the World.
4. NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE MEN.
To contrast the antiman of primal taking with the man of supreme taking,
the Clear Soil of Mass with the Holy Mind of Purgatory.
5. CHRISTIAN GENDER CONTRASTS.
To contrast the Father with the Holy Spirit on the basis of a lesser
submasculine/supermasculine dichotomy having a masculine cynosure in the Son.
6. TRINITARIAN DISTINCTIONS. Hence
God the Father reigns in an emotional Subheaven, the Son reigns or, rather,
governs in an intellectual Heaven, and the Holy Spirit leads in a spiritual
Superheaven.
7. NATURE OF CHRISTIAN ONENESS.
The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are three deities in the one context,
the context, germane to the purgatorial sphere in which Christianity operates,
of the brain.
8. 'LESSER' AND 'GREATER' DISTINCTIONS. The lesser Subheaven of the Father should no
more be confounded with the greater Subheaven of Jehovah ... than the lesser
Superheaven of the Holy Ghost with the greater Superheaven of the Holy Spirit
of Heaven, which is antithetical not to the Father but to the Clear Light of
the Void.
9. 'LESSER' INTELLECTUAL HEAVEN.
Compared to the intellectual Heaven (Purgatory) of the Son, the
intellectual Heaven of the Christ Child, as germane to Catholicism, is a lesser
intellectual Heaven which is but a means to the Holy Spirit.
10. 'GREATER' SUPERHEAVEN. In
like fashion, the Second Coming is but a means to the Holy Spirit of Heaven,
the greater Superheaven of God per se, which stems from a
purgatorial (intellectual) precondition in his Messianic teachings.
11. CONTRASTING FATES OF THE SON.
The Son leads not to the Holy Spirit but either becomes a purgatorial writerly
end-in-himself (Puritanism) or stands in the shadow of the Father
(Dissenterism) or of the Mother (Anglicanism), wherein He is effectively
subordinated, in the one case, to an emotional Subheaven of readerly import
and, in the other case, to the sensual World, wherein speech has its throne.
12. CATHOLIC 'ATHEISM' VIS-À-VIS THE FATHER. Only the Christ Child leads to the Holy
Spirit ... in due Catholic, and prayerful, fashion, a Christ Who is less the
Son of the Father/Mother, in Protestant fashion, than of the Virgin Mary, whose
miraculous impregnation, in effectively transcending and dispensing with the
Father, is the basis from which attainment of the Holy Ghost via the Christ
Child subsequently becomes possible.
13. MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE EXTREMES.
Hence the achievement of a Christian transcendentalism in the Holy
Spirit presupposes the minimization of a Christian fundamentalism in the
Father, as well as the reduction of Christian nonconformism to the purgatorially
prayerful level of the Christ Child.
14. ALTERNATIVE HELLS AND HEAVENS.
Such a Christian transcendentalism should no more be confounded with
transcendentalism per se than its fundamentalist counterpart in the Subheaven of
the Father ... with fundamentalism per se, which, in any case, is less a
thing of Subheaven, whether greater or lesser, than of Subhell, the Allahesque
Subhell of the subfeminine blood/heart, which stands in a contrary relationship
to the greater Subheaven of Jehovah in the sun/ears, and in a fallen
relationship to the Superhell of the Clear Light of the Void, rooted in the
superfeminine cosmos/eyes.
CYCLE 110
1. PHENOMENAL SELVES FOR BETTER OR WORSE. Better than the subjective phenomenal self of
the brain is the subjective noumenal self of the lungs. Worse than the objective phenomenal self of
the womb is the objective noumenal self of the heart.
2. PHENOMENAL NOT-SELVES FOR BETTER OR WORSE. Better than the subjective phenomenal
not-self (antiself) of the flesh is the subjective noumenal not-self of the
ears. Worse than the objective
phenomenal not-self (antiself) of the tongue is the objective noumenal not-self
of the eyes.
3. SUPREME QUALITIES FOR BETTER OR WORSE. Better than the supreme taking of
nonconformism is the supreme being of transcendentalism. Worse than the supreme giving of humanism is
the supreme doing of fundamentalism.
4. PRIMAL QUALITIES FOR BETTER OR WORSE. Better than the primal taking of realism is
the primal being of naturalism. Worse
than the primal giving of materialism is the primal doing of idealism.
5. SENSIBILITIES FOR BETTER OR WORSE. Better than the subjective amoral sensibility
of thinking is the subjective moral sensibility of breathing. Worse than the objective amoral sensibility
of conceiving is the objective immoral sensibility of feeling.
6. SENSUALITIES FOR BETTER OR WORSE.
Better than the subjective amoral sensuality of touching is the
subjective moral sensuality of hearing.
Worse than the objective amoral sensuality of tasting is the objective
immoral sensuality of seeing.
7. CONSTITUTIONALITY FOR BETTER OR WORSE. Better than constitutional economics is
constitutional religion. Worse than
constitutional politics is constitutional science.
8. UNCONSTITUTIONALITY FOR BETTER OR WORSE. Better than unconstitutional economics is
unconstitutional religion. Worse than
unconstitutional politics is unconstitutional science.
9. APPARENT/ESSENTIAL DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN SENS-UALITY AND
SENSIBILITY. Sensuality can be objective
or subjective, sensibility likewise, but all sensuality is apparent, whereas
all sensibility is essential.
10. SENSUAL ALPHA VIS-À-VIS SENSIBLE OMEGA. To contrast the alpha of sensuality with the
omega of sensibility on the basis of an apparent/essential, centrifugal/centripetal,
divergent/convergent dichotomy which is subdivisible into objective and
subjective manifestations thereof - seeing and tasting being objective modes of
sensuality compared with hearing and touching; thinking and breathing being
subjective modes of sensibility compared with conceiving and feeling.
CYCLE 111
1. GENERIC MODES OF RELIGIOUS SENSIBILITY. Humanism is the religion of the id, or womb;
nonconformism the religion of the intellect, or brain; fundamentalism the
religion of the soul, or heart; transcendentalism the religion of the spirit,
or lungs.
2. NONCONFORMIST INTELLECTUALITY.
Christianity is essentially a nonconformist religion, since centred in
Christ Who, as the Son of Man, aptly epitomizes purgatorial
intellectuality. Yet the intellect is
divisible between thinking, writing, reading, and speaking, the four forms or
modes of its presentation, two of which are private (and therefore properly
Christian), the other two of which are public (and comparatively Heathen). Thus there are four basic kinds of
nonconformism, each of which corresponds to the modal subdivisions of
intellectuality. There is the Catholic
nonconformism of the thought word; the Puritan nonconformism of the written
word; the Dissenter nonconformism of the read word; and the Anglican
nonconformism of the spoken word. Only
the written word, corresponding in its literary introversion to the epistolary
nature of the New Testament, correlates with the Christian intellect per se,
the thought word being, in its philosophical introversion, quasi-spiritual, or
orientated, through prayer, towards the Holy Ghost; the read word being, in its
poetic extroversion, quasi-soulful, or orientated, through the Old Testament,
towards the Father/Jehovah; and the spoken word being, in its dramatic
extroversion, quasi-sensual, or orientated, through responsive chanting, etc.,
towards the Mother. However, even the
Holy Ghost, the Father, and the Mother do not square with the per se
modes of transcendentalism, fundamentalism, or humanism, but are the nearest
things to them within the framework, necessarily purgatorial, of Christianity.
3. STANDINGS OF THE ALTERNATIVE MODES OF RELIGIOUS SENSIBILITY. Humanism is no more Christian than
fundamentalism or transcendentalism.
Humanism is Heathen, fundamentalism Superheathen (or Heathen from a
noumenal standpoint), and transcendentalism Superchristian (or Christian from a
noumenal standpoint). Humanism is about
the World per se, fundamentalism about Hell per se, and
transcendentalism about Heaven per se.
A pagan Goddess like Venus is much more genuinely humanist than the
Mother, just as Allah is much more genuinely fundamentalist than the Father,
and, if you will, the Holy Spirit of Heaven much more genuinely transcendentalist
than the Holy Ghost. The Mother, the
Father, and the Holy Ghost always exist in relation to the Son. By contrast, these other and more genuine
manifestations of humanism, fundamentalism, and transcendentalism are
completely independent of such a purgatorial and intellectual cynosure. In fact, one could say that whereas there is
something fundamentally lunar about Christianity, or nonconformism, the other
kinds of religious sensibility would have more in common with the Earth, Venus,
and Saturn, respectively, than with the Moon as such.
CYCLE 112
1. CLASS CHARACTERS OF PHENOMENAL/NOUMENAL PLANES. To contrast the lower-class character of Mass
with the middle-class character of Volume, contrasting each of these with the
upper-class character of Time and the classless character of Space.
2. RISING AND FALLING THROUGH NATURE AND CIVILIZATION. To rise, through nature, from the lower-class
character of realism to the middle-class character of nonconformism, as from
massed Mass to voluminous Volume, but to fall, through civilization, from the
middle-class character of materialism to the lower-class character of humanism,
as from volumetric Volume to massive Mass.
3. RISING AND FALLING THROUGH CULTURE AND BARBARISM. To rise, through culture, from the
upper-class character of naturalism to the classless character of
transcendentalism, as from sequential Time to spaced Space, but to fall,
through barbarism, from the classless character of idealism to the upper-class
character of fundamentalism, as from spatial Space to repetitive Time.
4. SLANG CORRELATIONS. Of
yobs, slobs, nobs, and snobs in relation to 'pricks', 'cunts', 'bums', and
'jerks' (in that order). For the yob is
effectively a 'prick', the slob a 'cunt', the nob a 'bum', and the snob a 'jerk'
(and this contrary to what I used to think).
5. FALLING WITHIN SNOBBERY.
To fall from the classless snobbery of idealism to the upper-class
snobbery of fundamentalism, as from primal doing to supreme doing, the eyes to
the heart.
6. RISING WITHIN NOBBERY. To
rise from the upper-class nobbery of naturalism to the classless nobbery of
transcendentalism, as from primal being to supreme being, the ears to the
lungs.
7. FALLING WITHIN SLOBBERY.
To fall from the middle-class slobbery of materialism to the lower-class
slobbery of humanism, as from primal giving to supreme giving, the tongue to
the womb.
8. RISING WITHIN YOBBERY. To
rise from the lower-class yobbery of realism to the middle-class yobbery of
nonconformism, as from primal taking to supreme taking, the flesh to the brain.
9. MORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMAN.
Woman is usually both a snob and a slob, or, as Baudelaire put it, a
tyrant and a slave.
10. MORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MAN.
Man is usually both a yob and a nob, a 'prick' and a 'bum', rather than,
like woman, a 'cunt' and a 'jerk'.
11. ROOTED IN VANITY. Unlike
man, woman is rooted in vanity, the basis of all snobbery.
12. NOBLE ASPIRATION. Man
aspires, if honourable, towards the universal centre of all nobility, which, as
spirit, is as far removed from the light of vanity as it is possible to
be. Man has the capacity to go
beyond. Woman doesn't!
13. CHARACTERISTIC ORIENTATIONS IN RELATION TO GENDER. Woman is both a civilized slob and a
barbarous snob whose characteristic orientation in life, being objective, is
right wing, in contrast to the left-tending orientation, through subjectivity,
of that which, as man, is both a natural yob and a cultural nob. In fact, man and woman are transcended by God
and the Devil when culture and barbarism are at issue, the nob being no less
divine than the snob is diabolic, and this whether negatively or positively, in
relation, in other words, to naturalism/transcendentalism or to
idealism/fundamentalism.
14. FALL FROM CLASSLESS TO UPPER-CLASS SNOBBERY. From the snob of sensuality, rooted in the
eyes, to the snob of sensibility, rooted in the heart - a devolutionary
regression (fall) from idealism to fundamentalism, the 'snogg*** jerk' of
classless snobbery to the 'frigg*** jerk' of upper-class snobbery.
15. RISE FROM UPPER-CLASS TO CLASSLESS NOBBERY. From the nob of sensuality, centred in the
ears, to the nob of sensibility, centred in the lungs - an evolutionary
progression (rise) from naturalism to transcendentalism, the 'frigg*** bum' of
upper-class nobbery to the 'snogg*** bum' of classless nobbery.
16. FALL FROM MIDDLE- TO LOWER-CLASS SLOBBERY. From the slob of sensuality, rooted in the
tongue, to the slob of sensibility, rooted in the womb - a devolutionary
regression (fall) from materialism to humanism, the 'sodd*** cunt' of
middle-class slobbery to the 'fuck*** cunt' of lower-class slobbery.
17. RISE FROM LOWER- TO MIDDLE-CLASS YOBBERY. From the yob of sensuality, centred in the flesh,
to the yob of sensibility, centred in the brain - an evolutionary progression
(rise) from realism to nonconformism, the 'fuck*** prick' of lower-class
yobbery to the 'sodd*** prick' of middle-class yobbery.
CYCLE 113
1. RISE FROM PHYSICAL TO METAPHYSICAL NATURE. To rise, within phenomenal terms, from the
physical nature of realism to the metaphysical nature of nonconformism, as from
the Antichrist to Christ, the negative Left to the positive Left.
2. FALL FROM METAPHYSICAL TO PHYSICAL CIVILIZATION. To fall, within phenomenal terms, from the
metaphysical civilization of materialism to the physical civilization of
humanism, as from the Antimother to the Mother, the negative Right to the
positive Right.
3. RISE FROM CHEMICAL TO METACHEMICAL CULTURE. To rise, within noumenal terms, from the
chemical culture of naturalism to the metachemical culture of
transcendentalism, as from the Antispirit to the Holy Spirit, the negative
Extreme Left to the positive Extreme Left.
4. FALL FROM METACHEMICAL TO CHEMICAL BARBARISM. To fall, within noumenal terms, from the
metachemical barbarism of idealism to the chemical barbarism of fundamentalism,
as from the Anti-allah/Antifather to the Father/Allah, the negative Extreme
Right to the positive Extreme Right.
5. RISE FROM PHYSICAL TO METAPHYSICAL SUBJECTIVITY. To rise, within nature, from the physical
subjectivity of the flesh to the metaphysical subjectivity of the brain, as
from earth to the mind, massed Mass to voluminous Volume.
6. FALL FROM METAPHYSICAL TO PHYSICAL OBJECTIV-ITY. To fall, within civilization, from the
metaphysical objectivity of the tongue to the physical objectivity of the womb,
as from water to the id, volumetric Volume to massive Mass.
7. RISE FROM CHEMICAL TO METACHEMICAL SUBJECTIVITY. To rise, within culture, from the chemical
subjectivity of the ears to the metachemical subjectivity of the lungs, as from
fire to the spirit, sequential Time to spaced Space.
8. FALL FROM METACHEMICAL TO CHEMICAL OBJECTIVITY. To fall, within barbarism, from the
metachemical objectivity of the eyes to the chemical objectivity of the heart,
as from light to the soul, spatial Space to repetitive Time.
9. RISE FROM PHYSICAL TO METAPHYSICAL MASCULINITY. To rise, as a yob, from the physical
masculinity of ugliness to the metaphysical masculinity of knowledge, as from
primal taking to supreme taking, the Underworld of lower-class sensuality to
the Overworld of middle-class sensibility.
10. FALL FROM METAPHYSICAL TO PHYSICAL FEMININITY. To fall, as a slob, from the metaphysical
femininity of ignorance to the physical femininity of beauty, as from primal
giving to supreme giving, the Overworld of middle-class sensuality to the
Underworld of lower-class sensibility.
11. RISE FROM CHEMICAL TO METACHEMICAL MASCULINITY. To rise, as a nob, from the chemical
masculinity of weakness to the metachemical masculinity of truth, as from
primal being to supreme being, the Netherworld of upper-class sensuality to the
Otherworld of classless sensibility.
12. FALL FROM METACHEMICAL TO CHEMICAL FEMININITY. To fall, as a snob, from the metachemical
femininity of illusion to the chemical femininity of strength, as from primal
doing to supreme doing, the Otherworld of classless sensuality to the
Netherworld of upper-class sensibility.
13. RISE FROM PHYSICAL TO METAPHYSICAL HEAVEN. To rise, as a 'prick', from the physical
Heaven of pleasure to the metaphysical Heaven of love, as from sinner to saint,
electrons to electrinos.
14. FALL FROM METAPHYSICAL TO PHYSICAL HELL. To fall, as a 'cunt', from the metaphysical
Hell of hate to the physical Hell of pain, as from shrew to angel, neutrons to
neutrinos.
15. RISE FROM CHEMICAL TO METACHEMICAL HEAVEN. To rise, as a 'bum', from the chemical Heaven
of humility to the metachemical Heaven of joy, as from beast to God, protons to
protinos.
16. FALL FROM METACHEMICAL TO CHEMICAL HELL. To fall, as a 'jerk', from the metachemical
Hell of woe to the chemical hell of pride, as from Devil to warrior, photons to
photinos.
CYCLE 114
1. STANDING OF METACHEMICAL TO CHEMICAL. The metachemical stands to the chemical as
Space to Time, being the preserve of both the Devil (superfeminine) and God
(supermasculine).
2. STANDING OF METAPHYSICAL TO PHYSICAL. The metaphysical stands to the physical as
Volume to Mass, being the preserve of both woman (negative feminine) and man
(positive masculine).
3. AIR AND WATER. Air is a
metachemical element, whereas water is metaphysical.
4. STANDING OF POSITIVE METAPHYSICAL TO POSITIVE METACHEMICAL. The positive metaphysical stands to the
positive metachemical as Christ to the Holy Spirit (of Heaven).
5. PHENOMENAL LIMITATION OF CHRISTIC SALVATION. Christ saves from the negative physicality of
the World or, more correctly, the realistic Underworld ... to the positive
metaphysicality of the nonconformist Overworld, which is to say, from a
physical Heaven in the flesh to a metaphysical Heaven in the brain. However, Christ does not save beyond that
point, since the metachemical Heaven of the lungs is above the phenomenal plane
of metaphysics, which is something one would have to abandon in order to attain
to a definitive salvation - the salvation, more specifically, of the Holy
Spirit of Heaven.
6. NOUMENAL INFINITY OF SUPERCHRISTIC SALVATION. It could be said that the Superchrist, or
Second Coming, saves from the negative chemistry of the naturalistic
Netherworld ... to the positive metachemistry of the transcendental Otherworld,
which is to say, from a chemical Heaven in the ears to a metachemical Heaven in
the lungs. Yet, over and above this,
salvation is also from the phenomenal plane of nonconformist understanding, or
intellectuality, to the noumenal plane of transcendentalist peace, from the
metaphysical to the metachemical, so that, ultimately, even Christ is something
from which one needs to be saved, if true divinity in the Holy Spirit of Heaven
is to become the norm. Yet how can such
a salvation happen if not through the Second Coming, and thus effectively via
the negative chemistry of the naturalistic Netherworld, so that one can rise
up, presumably via some audio appreciation of his truth, towards the positive
metachemistry of the transcendental Otherworld, wherein the lungs will speak for
themselves on truly transcendent (in relation to the brain) terms.
CYCLE 115
1. DEVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEW FROM SCIENCE TO RELIGION IN
SENSUALITY. From the metachemistry of
science to the chemistry of religion via the metaphysicality of politics and the
physicality of economics.
2. EVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEW FROM SCIENCE TO RELIGION IN
SENSIBILITY. From the chemistry of
science to the metachemistry of religion via the physicality of politics and
the metaphysicality of economics.
3. DEVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEW FROM LIGHT TO FIRE. From the negative metachemistry of light to
the negative chemistry of fire via the negative metaphysicality of water and
the negative physicality of earth, as from brightness to hotness via coldness
and darkness.
4. EVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEW FROM BLOOD TO AIR. From the positive chemistry of blood to the
positive metachemistry of air via the positive physicality of offspring and the
positive metaphysicality of thought, as from rashness to lightness via
heaviness and shrewdness.
5. DEVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEW FROM EYES TO EARS. From the negative metachemistry of the eyes
to the negative chemistry of the ears via the negative metaphysicality of the
tongue and the negative physicality of the flesh.
6. EVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEW FROM HEART TO LUNGS. From the positive chemistry of the heart to
the positive metachemistry of the lungs via the positive physicality of the
womb and the positive metaphysicality of the brain.
CYCLE 116
1. DEVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEW FROM IDEALISM TO NATURALISM. From the elemental metachemistry of
scientific idealism to the elemental chemistry of religious naturalism via the
molecular metaphysicality of political materialism and the molecular
physicality of economic realism.
2. EVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEW FROM FUNDAMENTALISM TO TRANSCENDENTALISM. From the elemental chemistry of scientific
fundamentalism to the elemental metachemistry of religious transcendentalism
via the molecular physicality of political humanism and the molecular metaphysicality
of economic nonconformism.
3. RISE OF ECONOMICS. To
rise, in massed Mass, from the physicality of economic realism to the
metaphysicality, in voluminous Volume, of economic nonconformism, as from
negative to positive masculinity, the Antichrist to Christ, socialism to
capitalism, democratic to bureaucratic economics.
4. FALL OF POLITICS. To fall,
in volumetric Volume, from the metaphysicality of political materialism to the
physicality, in massive Mass, of political humanism, as from negative to
positive femininity, the Antimother to the Mother, parliamentarianism to
republicanism, bureaucratic to democratic politics.
5. RISE OF RELIGION. To rise,
in sequential Time, from the chemistry of religious naturalism to the
metachemistry, in spaced Space, of religious transcendentalism, as from
negative to positive divinity, the Antispirit to the Holy Spirit (of Heaven),
Communism to Social Transcendentalism, autocratic to theocratic religion.
6. FALL OF SCIENCE. To fall,
in spatial Space, from the metachemistry of scientific idealism to the
chemistry, in repetitive Time, of scientific fundamentalism, as from negative
to positive devility, the Anti-allah to Allah, Fascism to Islamic
fundamentalism, theocratic to autocratic science.
CYCLE 117
1. DISCIPLINARY CONTRASTS. To
contrast the divinity of religion with the devility of science, and the
masculinity of economics with the femininity of politics, whether in sensuality
or sensibility, appearance or essence.
2. DISCIPLINARY ANTAGONISMS.
It is as logical for politics to want to do away with economics, woman
with man, as for science to want to do away with religion, the Devil with
God. The ‘objective’ are no friends of
the ‘subjective’!
3. THEOCRATIC DICHOTOMY OF SPACE.
With the idealism of spatial Space, sensual science is in its per se
mould, while sensual economics, politics, and religion are all in 'bovaryized'
subordination to such idealism. With
the transcendentalism of spaced Space, by contrast, sensible religion is in its
per se mould, while sensible science, politics, and economics are all in
'bovaryized' subordination to such transcendentalism.
4. AUTOCRATIC DICHOTOMY OF TIME.
With the naturalism of sequential Time, sensual religion is in its per se
mould, while sensual economics, politics, and science are all in 'bovaryized'
subordination to such naturalism. With
the fundamentalism of repetitive Time, by contrast, sensible science is in its per
se mould, while sensible religion, politics, and economics are all in
'bovaryized' subordination to such fundamentalism.
5. BUREAUCRATIC DICHOTOMY OF VOLUME.
With the materialism of volumetric Volume, sensual politics is in its per se
mould, while sensual economics, science, and religion are all in 'bovaryized'
subordination such materialism. With the
nonconformism of voluminous Volume, by contrast, sensible economics is in its per
se mould, while sensible science, politics, and religion are all in
'bovaryized' subordination to such nonconformism.
6. DEMOCRATIC DICHOTOMY OF MASS.
With the realism of massed Mass, sensual economics is in its per se
mould, while sensual politics, science, and religion are all in 'bovaryized'
subordination to such realism. With the
humanism of massive Mass, by contrast, sensible politics is in its per se
mould, while sensible science, economics, and religion are all in 'bovaryized'
subordination to such humanism.
CYCLE 118
1. MORAL DEFINITION OF THE SUPERHUMAN. So far as I am concerned, that which is
generically superhuman can only come properly to pass with the democratic assumption
of religious sovereignty by the People, when and if the opportunity were to
arise. Hence the superhuman would not
exist until the electorate vote, via the Second Coming, for religious
sovereignty and, in the event of a majority mandate, the triadic Beyond
officially comes to pass.
2. GRADES OF SUPERHUMANITY.
In the event of the triadic Beyond officially coming to pass, there
would be three grades or tiers of superhumanity, viz. those who pertain,
through Mass, to the 'New Earth' ... of the most refined beauty; those who
pertain, through Volume, to the 'New Purgatory' ... of the most refined
knowledge; and those who pertain, through Space, to the 'New Heaven' ... of the
most refined truth. One might distinguish,
on this triadic basis, between superhuman superbeings in relation to the
earthly Beautiful; superhuman suprabeings in relation to the purgatorial Good;
and superhuman ultrabeings in relation to the heavenly True. For these three categories of superhumanity
would correspond to the resurrected Mass of the Mother, the resurrected Volume
of the Son, and the resurrected Space of the Holy Ghost. The first I have customarily identified with
the Mary Child, the second with the Second Coming, and the third with the Holy
Spirit of Heaven. They are the utmost
refinements, respectively, of the Beautiful, the Good, and the True, such that
would correlate, most perfectly, with the triadic Beyond.
3. FROM MASS TO SPACE IN THE BEYOND.
At first 'Heaven' would come down to Earth, in the sense that the triadic
Beyond, conceived in terms of a three-tier edifice of monolithic structure,
would be composed of a 'New Heaven' in relation to ultimate truth, a 'New
Purgatory' in relation to ultimate goodness (knowledge), and a 'New Earth' in
relation to ultimate beauty. Thus, to
begin with, Heaven would simply be the top tier of a structure set, in
curvilinear form, on Earth within the overall context, therefore, of Mass. Ultimately, however, both the 'New Earth' and
the 'New Purgatory' would ascend into Space together with the 'New Heaven' ...
to the extent that we envisage a tower-like structure for the Space Centre that
would be the final setting for the triadic Beyond, a setting which brings
millennial evolution to a transcendent culmination in what could be described
as a supermillennial context, or a millennium set not on Earth but in the
'Heavens'. Such, then, is the goal of
superhuman striving!
4. BEYOND SUPERHUMANITY.
Whereas the 'mundane towers' of our projected triadic Beyond would
correlate with the superhuman, the 'transcendent towers' of the Supermillennium
would pass beyond superhumanity to the full realization of superbeings,
suprabeings, and ultrabeings in their own post-human right. That is to say, the Space Centres would be
host not to superhuman superbeings, suprabeings, and ultrabeings but to their per se
manifestations, which would have been engineered out of the superhuman stage of
millennial life. Until the backbrain was
removed from the millennial life-forms of the triadic Beyond, they would not be
post-human but superhuman, and thus reflective of that transition between human
and post-human which I tend to equate with the cyborg, or the gradual
cyborgization, so to speak, of life.
Only with the transcendence of the backbrain at a more advanced juncture
in millennial evolution ... would superbeings, suprabeings, and ultrabeings
come into their post-human or, rather, post-superhuman own ... as
right-midbrain, left-midbrain, and forebrain collectivizations gradually took
shape at the expense of cerebral uniformity, and their respective commitments
to the Beautiful, the Good, and the True were consequently fine-honed to a
point of perfection which would permit of the development, beyond Earth, of a
Supermillennium set in Space.
5. FROM SUPERHUMAN TO POST-SUPERHUMAN SUPERBEINGS. Hence whereas the superhuman superbeing would
have a brain primarily dedicated to the maximum realization of the Beautiful in
the 'New Earth' of the Mary Child, the superbeing per se
would be a right-midbrain collectivization more perfectly dedicated to the same
Eternal Virtue within the transcendent context of a Space Centre's first tier.
6. FROM SUPERHUMAN TO POST-SUPERHUMAN SUPRABEINGS. Likewise whereas the superhuman suprabeing
would have a brain primarily dedicated to the maximum realization of the Good
in the 'New Purgatory' of the Second Coming, the suprabeing per se
would be a left-midbrain collectivization more perfectly dedicated to the same
Eternal Virtue within the transcendent context of a Space Centre's second tier.
7. FROM SUPERHUMAN TO POST-SUPERHUMAN ULTRABEINGS. Finally, whereas the superhuman ultrabeing
would have a brain primarily dedicated to the maximum realization of the True
in the 'New Heaven' of the Holy Spirit of Heaven, the ultrabeing per se
would be a forebrain collectivization more perfectly dedicated to the same
Eternal Virtue within the transcendent context of a Space Centre's third tier.
8. HEAVENLY LAST WORD. Woman
may have the first word, and man the second, but God will have the last! For everything will return, in a manner of
speaking, unto Space, wherein the triadic Beyond achieves maximum fulfilment.
CYCLE 119
1. GOOD AND EVIL GODS. Just
as there is a God of sensibility, a good God, so there is a God of sensuality,
an evil God - the former true and the latter weak.
2. GOOD AND EVIL DEVILS. Just
as there is a Devil of sensibility, a good Devil, so there is a Devil of
sensuality, an evil Devil - the former strong and the latter illusory.
3. GOOD AND EVIL MEN. Just as
there is a man of sensibility, a good man, so there is a man of sensuality, an
evil man - the former knowledgeable and the latter ugly.
4. GOOD AND EVIL WOMEN. Just
as there is a woman of sensibility, a good woman, so there is a woman of
sensuality, an evil woman - the former beautiful and the latter ignorant.
5. CONTRAST BETWEEN GOOD AND EVIL.
Sensuality is everywhere evil compared to or, rather, contrasted with
sensibility, which is alone good ... in terms of its relationship to virtue as
opposed to vice.
6. FROM EVIL TO GOOD DIVINITY.
From the evil God of fiery naturalism to the good God of airy
transcendentalism, as from Jehovah to the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
7. FROM EVIL TO GOOD DEVILITY.
From the evil Devil of cosmic idealism to the good Devil of bloody
fundamentalism, as from the Clear Light of the Void to Allah.
8. FROM EVIL TO GOOD MASCULINITY.
From the evil man of earthy realism to the good man of cerebral
nonconformism, as from the Antichrist to Christ.
9. FROM EVIL TO GOOD FEMININITY.
From the evil woman of watery materialism to the good woman of fecund
humanism, as from the Antimother to the Mother.
10. RELIGIOUS GOOD AND EVIL.
The evil God is a religious communist and the good God a religious
centrist (pronounced centerist).
11. SCIENTIFIC GOOD AND EVIL.
The evil Devil is a scientific fascist and the good Devil a scientific
monarchist.
12. ECONOMIC GOOD AND EVIL. The
evil man is an economic socialist and the good man an economic capitalist.
13. POLITICAL GOOD AND EVIL.
The evil woman is a political parliamentarian and the good woman a
political republican.
14. SENSUAL EVIL VIS-À-VIS SENSIBLE GOOD. Evil is everywhere the sensual alpha and
good, by contrast, the sensible omega, irrespective of whether objective or
subjective. For there is, besides the
more blatant forms of evilness, subjective evil, as in naturalism and realism,
no less than, besides the more blatant forms of goodness, objective good, as in
fundamentalism and humanism.
CYCLE 120
1. SMOKING VICE. Smokers tend
to display a lack of spiritual self-esteem, especially with regard to the
lung-deep inhalation of cigarette tobacco.
2. WEAK AND ILLUSORY SMOKING.
Cigarette smoking is a weak form of evil, compared to the illusory evil
of pipe smoking.
3. IGNORANT AND UGLY SMOKING.
The smoking of roll-ups is an ignorant form of evil, compared to the
ugly evil of cigar smoking.
4. NEGATIVE NOUMENAL FATES OF SMOKERS. Cigar smokers can be negatively saved to
cigarette smoking, progressing from phenomenal subjectivity to noumenal
subjectivity, just as the smokers of roll-ups can be negatively damned to pipe
smoking, regressing from phenomenal objectivity to noumenal objectivity.
5. SMOKING CORRELATIONS OF NOUMENAL EVIL. Pipe smoking corresponds to the evil Devil of
idealism, whereas cigarette smoking corresponds to the evil God of naturalism.
6. SMOKING CORRELATIONS OF PHENOMENAL EVIL. The smoking of roll-ups corresponds to the
bad woman of materialism, whereas cigar smoking corresponds to the bad man of
realism.
7. ELEMENTAL DESCENT OF TOBACCO SMOKING. To descend, in elemental terms, from the
'light' of pipes to the 'soil' of cigars via the 'fire' of cigarettes and the
'water' of roll-ups, as from the Anti-allah to the Antichrist via the
Antispirit and the Antimother.
8. RUBBISHING TRUTH. There is
something almost British about smoking, which reflects a lack of respect for
spirituality, and hence the lungs, as though they were effectively 'beyond the
pale' of that which is rooted in sensuality.
The smoker pollutes the lungs through tobacco inhalation, and thus
effectively rubbishes the Holy Spirit/Holy Spirit of Heaven from a vicious
basis in something which, whatever the exact form it takes, is fundamentally
evil. Especially is this so of all forms
of cigarette smoking, which, availing of lung-deep inhalation, are a direct
rejection of moral sensibility.
9. SENSIBLE SMOKING. If there
is such a thing as sensible smoking, or smoking in relation to sensibility, it
could only be with regard to dope of one form or another, and thus the use of
'joints' and/or so-called bubble pipes.
My impression is that the use of 'joints' for the smoking of, say,
marijuana in conjunction with tobacco would correspond to the Father, as
pertaining to Christian fundamentalism, and would thus fall within the category
of immoral sensibility vis-à-vis the moral sensibility, relative to
Christianity, of the Holy Spirit, which would be the victim, willy-nilly, of
its abuse, a lesser submasculine nonconformism in the emotional brain vis-à-vis
a lesser supermasculine nonconformism in the spiritual brain, with the
possibility, in each case, of a greater submasculine/supermasculine
overlap. The purer smoking of, say,
marijuana in a bubble pipe, however, would correspond not to the Father but to
Allah, and thus to a subfeminine parallel the essence of which was genuinely
fundamentalist, given its correlation with the heart and thus, by implication,
with blood. Whether such a mode of
sensible smoking could be accused of 'rubbishing' the lungs is a moot point,
though any kind of lung-deep inhalation would be less than respectful to them,
were such a thing to occur without the inducement of tobacco. Certainly it could be regarded as a fall from
the idealism of pipe smoking, with consequences no less diabolical with regard
to the cultivation of an inner, or sensible, Hell.
CYCLE 121
1. DIVINE IRRELEVANCE.
Although the term 'human being' covers all persons, irrespective of gender,
it nonetheless remains a demonstrable fact that woman are, by and large, much
less human beings than 'human doings' and/or 'human givings', so to speak, for
whom being is largely a divine irrelevance.
2. ADVANCING AND DEFENDING.
To advance giving through doing is the opposite of to defend being
through taking, and, generally speaking, it is women who are disposed to the
former and men or, at any rate, the most evolved men whose disposition is
towards the latter.
3. PARADOXICAL PRECONDITIONS.
In human affairs, there can be no being without taking, nor any giving
without doing. Women do to give,
whereas men take to be.
4. CONTRARY STANDINGS OF GIVING AND TAKING. Giving stems from doing, as woman from the
Devil, whereas taking aspires towards being, as man towards God.
5. NO GODLY RESOLVE FROM THE DEVIL.
It is much more difficult, in this world, to aspire towards God than to
stem from the Devil. That is to say, it
is much more difficult to aspire, as a man, towards supreme being than to
accept what stems from primal doing which, being feminine, has no such
aspiration and therefore is not subject to the likelihood of self-division.
6. REFERENCE TO CONTRARY PLANES OF EXISTENCE. Doing and being have reference to the
noumenal planes of chemical and metachemical existence, whereas giving and
taking have reference to the phenomenal planes of physical and metaphysical
existence.
7. DOING AND BEING AGAINST.
To do, through idealistic sensuality, against primal being ... is the
opposite of to be, through naturalistic sensuality, against primal doing.
8. GIVING TO AND TAKING FROM.
To give, through materialistic sensuality, to primal taking ... is the
opposite of to take, through realistic sensuality, from primal giving.
9. DOING AND BEING FOR. To
do, through fundamentalist sensibility, for the objective noumenal self ... is
the opposite of to be, through transcendentalist sensibility, for the
subjective noumenal self.
10. GIVING AND TAKING OF. To
give, through humanist sensibility, of the objective phenomenal self ... is the
opposite of to take (partake), through nonconformist sensibility, of the
subjective phenomenal self.
11. INTOLERANCE AND TOLERANCE.
Intolerance of one type of sensuality (on noumenal or phenomenal planes)
towards another is the antithesis of tolerance of one kind of sensibility for
another. Intolerance stems from a
particle vacuum, whereas tolerance appertains to a wavicle plenum, each
sensibility attuned to its own wavelength rather than competitively imposing,
like the senses, upon their nearest rivals.
12. INSTITUTIONAL MANIFESTATIONS OF SENSUALITY AND SENSIBILITY. The distinction between sensuality and
sensibility, which goes to the very core of the struggle between evil and good,
exists no less in the contexts of State and Church than in the more obvious
contexts of, say, science and religion, or politics and economics. Sensuality legitimizes the State and
sensibility the Church.
13. CONTRARY DISPOSITIONS OF STATE AND CHURCH. Whereas the State is traditionally a largely
intolerant institution, particularly vis-à-vis other states (polities), the
Church, by contrast, is or should be tolerant ... of other churches
(denominations).
14. ULTIMATE TRIUMPH OF GOOD OVER EVIL. It is difficult to conceive of an end to
evil, and hence the State, so long as there are senses in existence. The end of the State is deeply connected, it
seems to me, with the evolution of mankind towards the post-human, and hence
with the expansion of sensibility at the expense of sensuality in a context of
religious sovereignty germane to the Superchurch (the Centre). A life form largely if not exclusively
disposed to sensibility would have no place for the State, since it would
signify the triumph of good over evil through the transmutation of man into
superman, whether with regard to superbeing, suprabeing, or ultrabeing levels
of superhumanity (as already discussed), or, ultimately, with regard to the
transmutation of supermen into superbeings, suprabeings, and ultrabeings per se
... as beauty, knowledge, and truth were taken beyond the post-Human Millennium
to Supermillennial peaks of Eternal Life.
CYCLE 122
1. QUANTIFYING QUANTITATIVE VIRTUES.
Compared with the most good virtue of truth through the lungs, strength through
the heart is the least good virtue, beauty through the body (womb) the less
(relative to least) good virtue, and knowledge through the brain the more
(relative to most) good virtue.
2. QUANTIFYING QUANTITATIVE VICES.
Compared with the most evil vice of illusion through the eyes, weakness
through the ears is the least evil vice, ugliness through the flesh the less
(relative to least) evil vice, and ignorance through the tongue the more
(relative to most) evil vice.
3. QUALIFYING QUALITATIVE VIRTUES.
Compared with the most good virtue of joy through the spirit, pride
through the soul is the least good virtue, pleasure through the id the less
(relative to least) good virtue, and love through the mind the more (relative
to most) good virtue.
4. QUALIFYING QUALITATIVE VICES.
Compared with the most evil vice of woe through the light, humility
through the heat is the least evil vice, pain through the dark the less
(relative to least) evil vice, and hatred through the cold the more (relative
to most) evil vice.
5. FROM ORGANISMS TO ORGASMS IN DEVOLUTIONARY/EVOLUTIONARY
MODES. To devolve from organisms to
organizations, as from elemental to molecular particles, and to evolve from
organs to orgasms, as from molecular to elemental wavicles.
6. DISCIPLINARY CORRELATIONS OF THE ABOVE. From the organisms of science to the orgasms
of religion via the organizations of politics and the organs of economics.
7. DEVOLUTION FROM ORGANISMS TO ORGANIZATIONS. From the scientific organisms of idealism,
naturalism, materialism, and realism ... to the political organizations of
totalitarianism, authoritarianism, parliamentarianism, and republicanism.
8. EVOLUTION FROM ORGANS TO ORGASMS.
From the economic organs of socialism, capitalism, communism, and
corporatism ... to the religious orgasms of humanism, nonconformism,
fundamentalism, and transcendentalism.
9. EXTROVERSION AND INTROVERSION.
Like objectivity with regard to either sensuality or sensibility,
extroversion is a feminine attribute, whereas introversion, like subjectivity,
is a comparatively masculine attribute.
10. OBJECTIVE SIEGE TO SUBJECTIVITY.
Woman makes war on man in a similar fashion to the way in which the
Devil makes war on God - namely by laying objective siege, in her extroversion,
to his subjectivity.
11. DEFENCE AGAINST OBJECTIVE SIEGE.
Man's only defence against this objective siege is, like God's, to
withdraw into his introversion. This is
what makes one a man/God.
12. FAILURE TO STEM SIEGE. The fool
loses his head to a woman/Devil, and is duly torn apart.
13. NEW TESTAMENT VIS-À-VIS OLD TESTAMENT. The man/God of sensibility 'turns the other
cheek', whereas the man/God of sensuality exacts revenge after a fashion,
thereby exposing his lack of sensibility.
14. BEYOND SENSUAL RESPONSE. He
who calls another an 'arsehole' and/or 'bum' is effectively a 'jerk'; but it is
not necessary for the God of sensibility to expose him as such, any more than
the man of sensibility need expose the denigrator of 'pricks' as a 'cunt'
and/or 'cocksucker'.
15. EXTRINSIC VIS-À-VIS INTRINSIC.
'Extrinsic' differs from 'intrinsic' as appearance from essence, or
divergence from convergence, or centrifugal from centripetal.... In other
words, it is that which, being extrinsic, is germane to sensuality ... as
opposed to that which, being intrinsic, is germane to sensibility. The senses are extrinsic to the self, whereas
the sensibilities are intrinsic to the self ... in each of its sensible
manifestations.
CYCLE 123
1. MORE EVIL AND LESS GOOD.
Although it cannot be said that women are evil and men ... good, as
though sensuality were the exclusive preserve of femininity and sensibility the
exclusive preserve of masculinity, it can, with reason, be maintained that
woman is both more evil and less good than man.
By which I mean that she has a bias, through her femininity, for the
objective senses over the subjective ones, thereby being more evil, and a bias,
likewise, for the objective sensibilities over the subjective ones, thereby
being less good.
2. MOST EVIL AND LEAST GOOD.
Strictly speaking, woman is more evil than man with regard to the
phenomenal objectivity of the tongue as opposed to the phenomenal subjectivity
of the flesh, and less good than man with regard to the phenomenal objectivity
of the womb as opposed to the phenomenal subjectivity of the brain. For when we bring the noumenal objectivity of
the eyes as opposed to the noumenal subjectivity of the ears into consideration,
or, alternatively, the noumenal objectivity of the heart as opposed to the
noumenal subjectivity of the lungs, we are dealing less with man and woman than
with the Devil and God, the negative devility and divinity of the most and
least evil modes of sensuality on the one hand, and the positive devility and
divinity of the least and most good modes of sensibility on the other hand.
3. NOUMENAL/PHENOMENAL DISTINCTIONS OF EVIL VIS-À-VIS GOOD. Hence it should be maintained that, with
regard to sensuality and sensibility, devility is both most evil and least good
vis-à-vis divinity, whereas femininity is more (relative to most) evil and less
(relative to least) good vis-à-vis masculinity.
4. DEVILITY VIS-À-VIS DIVINITY IN SENSUALITY AND SENSIBILITY. Whereas negative devility is most evil and
negative divinity ... least evil in relation to their respective noumenal
sensualities, positive devility is least good and positive divinity ... most
good in relation to their respective noumenal sensibilities.
5. FEMININITY VIS-À-VIS MASCULINITY IN SENSUALITY AND
SENSIBILITY. Whereas negative femininity
is more (relative to most) evil and negative masculinity ... less (relative to
least) evil in relation to their respective sensualities, positive femininity
is less (relative to least) good and positive masculinity ... more (relative to
most) good in relation to their respective sensibilities.
6. MOST AND LEAST EVIL SENSUALITIES.
Compared with the most evil vice of optical sensuality (staring), the
vice of aural sensuality (listening) is least evil, and therefore the noumenal
distinction between negative devility and divinity is one in which the former
is most evil and the latter least.
7. MOST AND LEAST GOOD SENSIBILITIES. Compared with the most good virtue of spiritual
sensibility (breathing), the virtue of emotional sensibility (feeling) is least
good, and therefore the noumenal distinction between positive divinity and
devility is one in which the former is most good and the latter least.
8. MORE AND LESS EVIL SENSUALITIES.
Compared with the more (relative to most) evil vice of lingual
sensuality (tasting/talking), the vice of tactile sensuality (touching) is less
(relative to least) evil, and therefore the phenomenal distinction between
negative femininity and masculinity is one in which the former is more evil and
the latter less.
9. MORE AND LESS GOOD SENSIBILITIES.
Compared with the more (relative to most) good virtue of intellectual
sensibility (thinking), the virtue of maternal sensibility (conceiving) is less
(relative to least) good, and therefore the phenomenal distinction between
positive masculinity and femininity is one in which the former is more good and
the latter less.
CYCLE 124
1. MUSICAL BIASES OF THE TRIADIC BEYOND. The harmonies of sensible Mass, the melodies
of sensible Volume, and the pitch of sensible
Space ... would all be acceptable in, and therefore applicable to, their
respective tiers of 'Kingdom Come'. Only
the rhythms of sensible Time would be unacceptable, and therefore inapplicable,
there, since connoting with the Father, and hence with that which, in strength,
falls morally short of the beauty of the Mother, the knowledge of the Son, and
the truth of the Holy Spirit.
2. NO PLACE FOR SENSIBLE RHYTHM.
Hence while there would be a place in 'Kingdom Come' for the amoral
goodness of sensible harmony, the amoral goodness of sensible melody, and the
moral goodness of sensible pitch, there would be no place for the immoral
goodness of sensible rhythm. Nor,
needless to say, would there be any place for the sensual counterparts of the
above, since evil would be beneath the pale of that which was germane to
sensibility.
3. NO STRUGGLE OF GOOD AGAINST EVIL.
Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as a struggle, directly and
intentionally, of good against evil.
That which struggles violently with evil is not goodness but an
alternative kind of evil, say, naturalism against idealism, or realism against
materialism. Goodness turns its back on
evil because it is an attribute of sensibility.
4. COMPETING SENSIBILITIES.
Of course, there may be competition between alternative sensibilities,
but that would not be a struggle between good and evil ... so much as
competition between different kinds of goodness, say objective against subjective,
or phenomenal against noumenal.
5. EVIL AGAINST GOOD.
However, if goodness does not wage war on evil, it could certainly be
argued that evil wages war on goodness, both directly and indirectly, by
deriding it and flaunting itself. Yet
goodness has to 'turn the other cheek' if its devotee is not to succumb to evil
by fighting back, thereby abandoning good.
6. NO REJECTION OF EVIL BEING.
One could argue that the Old Testament stands to the New Testament as
evil being to good being, or religious sensuality to religious sensibility, and
that the God of the one is a refutation of the God of the other, 'turning the
other cheek' and exacting 'an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth' being
incommensurate. Yet Christians, with
their phenomenal relativity, have more usually sought a compromise between
sensuality and sensibility than a wholesale rejection of evil being, and hence
the God of the Old Testament, viz. Jehovah.
7. DENOMINATIONAL THEORY OF BIBLICAL BIASES. Such a compromise is not incompatible with a
bias for the one testament over the other, and if the Puritan bias is for the
New Testament, then the Dissenter has no great difficulty accommodating the Old
Testament, passing from the Father in connection with Christ to Jehovah in
connection with Satan. Anglicans, on the
other hand, might well be more disposed, in their bias towards the Mother, to
striking a balance between Old and New Testaments, rather like a mother seeking
to accommodate the often conflicting biases of her husband and son - the former
identifiable with Dissenterism, the latter with Puritanism.
8. BASIS OF GENUINE PRAYER.
There is no way in which prayer can be genuine when not associated, in
Catholic fashion, with the Christ Child, Who is naturally close to the Virgin Mary,
that young and miraculously impregnated Mother.
Those who pray without due institutional regard to the necessity of
upholding both the Virgin Mary and Christ Child ... deceive themselves as to
the authenticity of their prayers. Thus
most Protestants are deceived if they be not disillusioned with prayer (rightly
so, with regard to their denominational departures from orthodoxy) and more
disposed, in consequence, to other forms of worship. Only a Catholic can pray sincerely, and
therefore it is not to be wondered at if Catholics generally take prayer more
seriously than their Protestant counterparts.
For prayer is the most subjective use, as thought, of the intellect, and
thus it conforms to the most subjective mode of Christianity, that which is closer
to the truth of the Holy Spirit in the 'peace that surpasses all
understanding', the lung-biased subjectivity-of-subjectivities. Yet the truth of the Holy Spirit and the
supertruth of the Holy Spirit of Heaven are, as the reader may already have
gathered, two quite different things, the one germane to true Christianity, or
Catholicism, and the other germane to what I am disposed to regarding as Social
Transcendentalism, which is effectively Superchristian.
9. PLACE FOR ALTERNATIVE VIRTUES.
You may, as a disillusioned Protestant, regard Catholicism as closer to
the truth than Protestantism, but that would be no reason to convert to
Catholicism, as though the truth alone was what mattered. Certainly it is that which applies to genuine
religion, and Catholicism is nothing if not the nearest thing, within
Christianity, to genuine religion. But
there are other virtues or goods (sensibilities) as well, and they have just as
much entitlement to exist (outside 'Kingdom Come') as the truth. I allude, of course, to beauty, knowledge,
and strength, and thus to virtues which I believe to be more the preserve of
Anglicanism, Puritanism, and Dissenterism, respectively, than of Catholicism,
and which duly correlate with the Mother, the Son, and the Father ... as opposed
to the Holy Spirit. Yes, Catholicism is religious
Christianity, but there is still a place in life for 'political Christianity',
'economic Christianity' (the Christianity-of-Christianities), and 'scientific
Christianity', even if, ultimately, the truth is morally superior to each and
every one of the alternative virtues.
Certainly, the Beautiful and the Knowledgeable would have a place
alongside the True in any 'Kingdom Come' to which I sign my name! For it is not necessary to become a Catholic
in order to qualify for millennial salvation.
Only if you would prefer truth to knowledge or beauty, and thus the 'New
Heaven' to the 'New Purgatory' or the 'New Earth'.
CYCLE 125
1. BOUND AND FREE IN SENSUALITY AND SENSIBILITY. Just as one can be masculine or feminine,
subjective or objective, so one can be bound or free ... in both sensuality and
sensibility. 'The Bound' are ever
subjective, and hence masculine, while 'the Free' are ever objective, and hence
feminine. Generally, 'the Free' make war
on 'the Bound', as Devil upon God (noumenal planes) or woman upon man
(phenomenal planes).
2. BOUND AND FREE IN SENSUALITY.
To be sensually free in the noumenal objectivity of idealism and/or the
phenomenal objectivity of materialism, as opposed to being sensually bound in
the noumenal subjectivity of naturalism and/or the phenomenal subjectivity of
realism.
3. BOUND AND FREE IN SENSIBILITY.
To be sensibly free in the noumenal objectivity of fundamentalism and/or
the phenomenal objectivity of humanism, as opposed to being sensibly bound in
the noumenal subjectivity of transcendentalism and/or the phenomenal
subjectivity of nonconformism.
4. GOOD AND EVIL MODES OF BINDING AND FREEDOM. Thus there is the 'evil freedom' and 'evil
binding' of the sensualities on the one hand, but the 'good freedom' and 'good
binding' of the sensibilities on the other hand.
5. MORAL DISTINCTION IN GENDER BETWEEN BINDING AND FREEDOM. Therefore freedom is, like binding, neither
specifically good nor evil in itself, but depends for its ascertainment in such
fashion on whether it is germane to sensuality (evil) or to sensibility
(good). Yet bound sensuality is no less
preferable to free sensuality ... than bound sensibility to free sensibility,
whether in noumenal or phenomenal terms.
The Naturalist is no less morally preferable to the Idealist than the
Realist to the Materialist with regard to the sensualities, while the
Transcendentalist is no less morally preferable to the Fundamentalist than the
Nonconformist to the Humanist where the sensibilities are concerned. Binding is in every context a masculine
attribute and freedom, by contrast, a feminine one - the former subjective and
the latter objective.
6. CONFIRMATION OF GENDER BASIS FOR THE ABOVE. Of course, we can distinguish, more
pedantically, between superfeminine freedom (idealism) and subfeminine freedom
(fundamentalism), as also between submasculine binding (naturalism) and
supermasculine binding (transcendentalism), but that is only to confirm rather
than refute the basic gender distinction which exists between freedom and
binding.
7. ALPHA AND OMEGA OF FREEDOM AND BINDING. The highest, most sensible binding is of
course to be bound, through the lungs, to the God of sensibility, the Holy
Spirit of Heaven, and this contrasts, absolutely, with the highest, most
ignoble (in idealistic snobbery) freedom, through the eyes, in the Devil of
sensuality, the Clear Light of the Void (Space), which is the superfeminine
antithesis of supermasculine salvation.
8. RISING FROM EVIL BEING TO GOOD BEING. One cannot get to the Holy Spirit of Heaven
except via the Clear Fire of Time, the submasculine binding through the ears,
from which it is possible to be saved to the supermasculine binding of ultimate
divinity, rising from evil being to good being, from subjective noumenal
sensuality to subjective noumenal sensibility, the binding-of-bindings.
9. THE ULTIMATE PHILOSOPHER.
The Holy Mind of Purgatory, or Christ, leads no further, on the other
hand, than the Holy Spirit, which is a Christian shortfall, relative to
cerebral spirituality, from the Holy Spirit of Heaven, the lung-centred
deliverance from aural sensuality that is antithetical not to the Father (of
cerebral emotionality) but to the Clear Light of the Void, and thus beyond all
trinitarian reference. The Holy Spirit,
by contrast, delivers from prayerful understanding, or the most subjective
intellectuality, to the spiritual peace that owes not a little to the lungs,
which fact won't, as a rule, be consciously acknowledged, since it is of the
purgatorial and effectively lunar nature of Christianity to affirm cerebral
spirituality in preference to the spirit per se, just as, with
regard to the Father, it affirms cerebral emotionality in preference to the
soul per se which, according with the Holy Soul of Hell (Allah), is less
a thing of (in relation to the Father) Subheaven than of Subhell, the Hell of
sensibility, as germane to the blood and its overly fundamentalist associations
thereof. Hence 'lunar' Christianity
fights shy of both the 'Venusian' heart of fundamentalism per se and the
'Saturnalian' lungs of transcendentalism per se, preferring its
purgatorial intellectuality to the diabolic emotionality and divine
spirituality of these fundamentalist and transcendentalist extremes. The soul and the spirit are alike rejected by
dint of their reduction to cerebral manifestations conjoined with the intellect
per se in what we recognize as the 'Holy Trinity'. Christ may lead, through His juvenile
manifestation, the Catholic Christ Child, to the Holy Spirit, but only the
Second Coming can lead to the Holy Spirit of Heaven, which is the supreme being
of ultimate God and ultimate Heaven. By
comparison to Christ, the Second Coming is the supreme taking of ultimate
Purgatory, the ultimate philosopher whose thought should endure forever,
setting mankind, or the most worthy sections of it, on course for supreme being
... in what must be the highest good, the sensible binding, through noumenal
subjectivity, to the ultimate manifestation of Eternal Life.
______________________
REVALUATING APPENDIX
1. It seems to me that, contrary to what I may previously have
thought on the subject, salvation is, for want of a better definition, to progress
from sensuality to sensibility, whereas damnation, by contrast, is to regress
from sensibility to sensuality. Hence
there are four kinds of salvation, no less than four kinds of damnation, each
of which I shall list below.
2. To be saved from evil being to good being, the ears to the lungs,
protons to protinos, naturalism to transcendentalism, primal culture to supreme
culture, sequential Time to spaced Space, submasculinity to supermasculinity,
the Antispirit, or Clear Fire of Time, to the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
3. To be saved from evil doing to good doing, the eyes to the heart,
photons to photinos, idealism to fundamentalism, primal barbarism to supreme
barbarism, spatial Space to repetitive Time, superfemininity to subfemininity,
the Antisoul, or Clear Light of the Void, to the Holy Soul of Hell (Allah).
4. To be saved from evil giving to good giving, the tongue to the
womb, electrons to electrinos (not neutrons to neutrinos!), materialism to
humanism, primal civilization to supreme civilization, volumetric Volume to
massed (not massive!) Mass, outer femininity to inner femininity, the Anti-id,
or Clear Ice of Volume, to the Holy Id of the World (the Mother).
5. To be saved from evil taking to good taking, the (phallic) flesh
to the brain, neutrons to neutrinos (not electrons to electrinos!), realism to
nonconformism, primal nature to supreme nature, massive (not massed!) Mass to
voluminous Volume, outer masculinity to inner masculinity, the Antimind
(Antichrist) to the Holy Mind of Purgatory (Christ).
6. Conversely, to be damned from good being to evil being, the lungs
to the ears, protinos to protons, transcendentalism to naturalism, supreme
culture to primal culture, spaced Space to sequential Time, supermasculinity to
submasculinity, the Holy Spirit of Heaven to the Clear Fire of Time (Satan).
7. To be damned from good doing to evil doing, the heart to the
eyes, photinos to photons, fundamentalism to idealism, supreme barbarism to
primal barbarism, repetitive Time to spatial Space, subfeminine to
superfeminine, the Holy Soul of Hell to the Clear Light of the Void.
8. To be damned from good giving to evil giving, the womb to the
tongue, electrinos to electrons (not neutrinos to neutrons!), humanism to
materialism, supreme civilization to primal civilization, massive (not massed!)
Mass to volumetric Volume, inner femininity to outer femininity, the Holy Id of
the World to the Clear Ice of Volume (the Antimother).
9. To be damned from good taking to evil taking, the brain to the
flesh, neutrinos to neutrons (not electrinos to electrons!), nonconformism to
realism, supreme nature to primal nature, voluminous Volume to massive (not
massed!) Mass, inner masculinity to outer masculinity, the Holy Mind of
Purgatory to the Clear Soil of Mass (the Antichrist).
10. The Damned, then, are of sensuality and the Saved, by contrast, of
sensibility. This is effectively the
difference between elements and elementinos, divergence from a vacuum and convergence
upon a plenum, centrifugal alpha and centripetal omega of extrinsic and
intrinsic evaluation.
11. Whatever one is saved to ... is an end-in-itself, not a means to
an alternative end (say, a different kind of salvation). Humanism, nonconformism, fundamentalism, and
transcendentalism are different kinds of salvation relative to different kinds
of people. There is no way in which,
say, a Humanist can become a Fundamentalist, or a Nonconformist become a Transcendentalist....
No way, that is, short of changing one's religion (converting) because one
realizes that one is in the wrong religion relative to what one is in oneself,
i.e. predominantly beautiful or knowledgeable or strong or true. Beauty accords with humanism, knowledge with
nonconformism, strength with fundamentalism, and truth with
transcendentalism. Three of these kinds
of salvation are capable of being extended into Eternity (as already
discussed). Only fundamentalism would
have no place there. (The solution for
fundamentalists, now as before, is to backtrack, so to speak, towards
naturalism ... as a precondition of transcendentalism, thereby rising from the
ears to the lungs.)
12. One is saved to good being through the Holy Spirit of Heaven;
saved to good doing through the Holy Soul of Hell; saved to good taking through
the Holy Mind of Purgatory; saved to good giving through the Holy Id of the
World.
13. Conversely, one is damned to evil being through the Clear Fire of
Time; damned to evil doing through the Clear Light of Space; damned to evil
taking through the Clear Soil of Mass; damned to evil giving through the Clear
Ice of Volume.
14. Conversion differs from salvation/damnation by being from one kind
of salvation/damnation to another, so that the convertee effectively changes
religion/science, like one moving from one class, gender, race, etc., to
another. By and large, however, the
Divine remain divine, the Diabolic remain diabolic, the Purgatorial (masculine)
remain purgatorial, and the Worldly (feminine) remain worldly. For as it was in the Beginning, so shall it
be in the End. Space is Space, Time is
Time, Volume is Volume, and Mass is Mass.
Short of abandoning Mass for Time or Volume for Space, there is no way
that Mass can be transformed into Time or Volume into Space.
15. Soul is dependent on the heart, mind on the brain, and spirit on
the lungs. Without a heart to pump blood
with, there would be no soul; without a brain to think with, there would be no
mind; and without lungs to breathe with, there would be no spirit. Although there is both soul and spirit in the
brain, where they co-exist with mind on a trinitarian basis, the soul per se
is of the heart, and accordingly of the Devil in what is the sensible form of
Hell, whereas the spirit per se is of the lungs, and accordingly of God
in what is the sensible form of Heaven.
The Devil stands to Hell as the heart to blood, or strength to pride,
while God stands to Heaven as the lungs to air, or truth to joy. No more than one can be soulful, and hence
demonic, without experiencing pride through strength ... can one be spiritual,
and hence angelic, without experiencing joy through truth. Soulfulness and spirituality are consequent
upon the relationship, consciously recognized, between strength and pride on
the one hand ... and truth and joy on the other, being the synthetic products,
respectively, of a dialectic involving, in each case, a quantitative thesis and
a qualitative antithesis.
16. No less than the angelic Being is spiritually conscious of the
relationship between truth and joy, or God and Heaven, in the realization of
his spirituality (which is thus beyond mere happiness), and the demonic Being
is emotionally conscious of the relationship between strength and pride, or the
Devil and Hell, in the realization of his emotionality (which is thus beyond
mere vanity), so the saintly Being, the 'good man' (Christian), is
intellectually conscious of the relationship between knowledge and love, or
Christ and Purgatory, in the realization of his intellectuality (which is thus
beyond mere pedanticism). For Christ
stands to Purgatory as the brain to the mind, or knowledge to love, and one
cannot be properly intellectual, and hence saintly, without experiencing love
through knowledge, the Christian ideal.
Yet such an ideal falls short, as Purgatory from Heaven, of joy through
truth, and thus of angelic spirituality, the key to divinity.
17. The Superchristian triad of deities, relative to our projected
'triadic Beyond', differs from the Christian one in terms of an up-ended
hierarchy comprised of the Mary Child, the Second Coming, and the Holy Spirit
of Heaven, which contrasts with the Blessed Virgin, the Christ Child, and the
Holy Spirit of Christian, or Catholic, precedence ... in terms of its more
complete liberation from feminine domination.
Instead of an oblique triad in which the masculine, symbolized by the
Christ Child, is effectively dominated by the feminine, represented by the
Blessed Virgin, the Superchristian triad, though no-less oblique, would signify
a liberation from any such domination owing not a little to the much greater
distance between the Mary Child and the Second Coming Who, being fully adult,
would not be dependent, in any degree, on that attenuation of the Virgin, the
way the Christ Child must necessarily be dependent on His Mother by dint of His
infantile proximity to Her. Hence the
Second Coming would be the gateway to the Holy Spirit of Heaven, the complete
lightness of universal being in supermasculine salvation, which would not be
held back, like the Holy Spirit, by any adult feminine heaviness, germane to
the World, from below. In this respect,
the Superchristian revolution would resemble the full flowering of the Heathen
alternative to Christianity which, manifesting in Puritanism/Dissenterism, won
its freedom, through bloody struggle, from Anglican domination, and thus set
the masculine, represented by the Son and the Father, in the ascendancy over
the feminine, symbolized by the Mother, with greater parliamentary freedom from
monarchic control the political concomitance.
Hence Protestantism bespeaks, through Puritan will, the triumph of the
masculine over the feminine, both within itself and vis-à-vis Catholicism, or
that which, being non-triangular, is more genuinely religious. Such a triumph has been symbolized by the
inverted triangle, and it contrasts with the conventional triangle, or pyramid,
of Superheathen tradition and, for that matter, modernity, in which a
superfeminine apex is in the ascendant over a submasculine and a subfeminine
base, like Hinduism over both Judaism and Mohammedanism, the light over both
the fire and the blood. Thus the final
revolution in religious progress should lead to the triumph, via the Second
Coming, of the supermasculine, which will signify maximum liberation from the
feminine, become effectively subfeminine, through the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
LONDON 1995 (Revised 2012)
