101. Therefore I do not regard the formation of a
Gaelic federation as a fanciful aspiration which religious divisions could only
obstruct, because although I fully acknowledge the existence of such divisions
- and have allowed for them in the overall structural integrity of our
projected triadic Beyond - it is important, it seems to me, to distinguish the
Celts from their Anglo-Saxon neighbours, as one would, in topographical
terms, distinguish highlanders from
lowlanders, and to grant them the benefit of the doubt that, when push comes to
shove, they would rather cooperate with one another in a new order that
ideologically did away with Catholic/Protestant divisions than continue to be
divided and ruled by the English from Westminster, the seat not only of Her
Majesty's Government but of the Monarchy itself.
102. Such a new order would of course be Social
Theocratic, and it would have to take the form of a Gaelic federation which was
fundamentally republican, though of a new elevated order of republicanism
compared to that which exists in the current Irish Republic, capable of
adequately serving the religiously sovereign People should the electorates so
elect, in the paradoxical election or series of elections we have equated with
'Judgement', and thereby acquire rights in relation to religion which would not
only absolve them from worldly sin and deliver them from all forms of religious
tradition and primitivity, but ensure, where applicable, that such pseudo-grace
and pseudo-sin as some of them might alternatively have been partial to would
find a redemptive niche in the triadic Beyond of 'Kingdom Come', in reality a
republican theocracy with an executive presidency responsible to the
religiously sovereign People and their future spiritual (or, rather,
antispiritual), intellectual, and emotional well-being.
103. Therefore if 'Kingdom Come' is not really a
'Kingdom', neither would the Gaelic federation be a monarchy, even under a sort
of Messianic 'Philosopher-King' or 'God-King', the nearest equivalent to a
Second Coming, but a new type of republic which is able to address the heights
as well as the depths, with a bias for the heights in true Celtic, highlander
fashion. Strictly speaking, I guess a
term like Federation of Social Theocratic Centres would make more sense within
the ideological context of 'the Centre'; though it should not be forgotten that
before any such Centrist federation could be forged, the Celts themselves,
particularly in Ireland, must be persuaded of the desirability and even moral
necessity of it, in order that it can develop from there to the other proposed
countries of the federation and, hopefully thereafter, even abroad, not least
in respect of the European Union, or certain countries thereof, like France and
Germany, which might initially be more enthusiastic about such a prospect and
desirous that Europe in general should become more civilized, which is to say,
sensibly orientated.
104. But in England, even in the not altogether
implausible event of a truncated England following regional devolution, there
would be opposition to such a development, not least in terms of the extent to
which monarchy still persisted and either prevented or inhibited, through its
executive government, any democratic move by the People to vote for a
republic.
105. Frankly, even in the event of England
democratically losing Scotland, Wales, etc., to a Gaelic federation (which in
any case might initially be under legal constraints in respect of the position
of monarchy vis-à-vis the Scots and Welsh and the position of the Scots and
Welsh, as subjects of the Crown, vis-à-vis the monarchy), there would still be
those in power who would resist the threat, as they saw it, of republicanism
and maintain that the People, as electorate, had no right to vote to get rid of
the Monarchy when they were subjects of the reigning monarch and had voted, in
the General Election, for a specific HM Government which, as a manifestation of
the overall state-hegemonic integrity of Great Britain, would be unable, if not
unwilling, to put forward meaningful legislation in that regard, the acting
Government not being in a position to 'bite the hand that feeds it', so to
speak, but being an executive instrument of the monarch's reign.
106. Therefore short of the Monarchy opting to
wind itself up, with the People's consent, it is difficult if not impossible to
foresee a situation (even in the event of England being threatened with the
loss of Scotland, Wales, etc., should the peoples of those countries succeed in
democratically ridding themselves of monarchic constraints in the interests of
religious freedom), in which the English people could just vote, at
parliament's behest, to get rid of the monarchy.
107. It will, I think, be necessary for the
Monarchy to make a gesture to that end before any meaningful prospect of
republican change can be entertained in England, never mind Scotland, Wales,
and Northern Ireland. And if the
Monarchy, or leading members of the Royal Family, do come to any such decision
in the interests of the English or British people, it would not be
independently of what has been outlined in this and other texts concerning the
desirability, if true progress is to be achieved, of 'Kingdom Come' as here
interpreted, but in relation to confidence in both the logical necessity and
moral desirability of such a 'Kingdom', both as an alternative to the
sinful/pseudo-punishing 'world' of the existing Irish Republic and as a means
of making amends for the heretical aberration of Henry VIII which, subsequently
reinforced 'down below' by Cromwell, led to the schismatic
autocratic-plutocratic diagonally descending axis in the first place and
ensured that the Church, whether Anglican or Puritan, would ever afterwards
remain subordinate to the State, whether monarchic or parliamentary, with
pseudo-graceful and pseudo-sinful consequences, not least in terms of damnation
from the fiery ungodliness of the one to the he-devil earthly profanity of the
other.
108. It is, I think, for the monarchy, for the
reigning British Monarch, to decide at the end of the day whether or not the
time has come to right the wrongs of the past and assist in the dismantlement
of the system which has barred the greater percentage of the British people
from any prospect of salvation from authentic sin to authentic grace, as from
unholiness to God, and politics itself of any likelihood of release from
pseudo-punishment to pseudo-crime, as from injustice to the Law, as germane to
the diagonally rising axis of meritocracy-theocracy and, in state-subordinate
vein, bureaucracy-technocracy.
109. It is for the Monarchy, I maintain, to admit
of its own responsibilities in relation to this heretical situation which an
English monarch foisted, through his own wilful perversity, upon England and
subsequently the peoples of the British Isles in general, at a terrible cost to
peace and stability, and for both it and the Royal Family in general to take
the necessary steps to facilitate the rectification of this heathenistic
aberration which, several centuries later, still leaves a majority of the
people of these islands in want of true self-respect and an end to the
female-hegemonic freedoms of pro-notself - wrongly identified with selfishness
to the detriment of the true self - and anti-notself which twist the male
against himself, as against his self, and render him physically subordinate to
the reign of crime and punishment in state-hegemonic vein.
110. Only when the majority of people on these
isles - and not only on the island of Ireland - are in a position to vote for
religious sovereignty at the expense of such worldly sovereignty as, contrary
to what punishingly and pseudo-sinfully obtains on the other side of the
worldly fence, holds them to sin and pseudo-punishment at the expense of
enhanced grace and pseudo-crime ... will there be any prospect of true
self-respect, and such self-respecting selfishness, no longer compromised or
eclipsed by a false concept of self owing much if not everything to the somatic
not-self, will bring them the grace not simply of God but, more importantly, of
that resurrection of metaphysical ego in metaphysical soul which is
commensurate with Heaven the Holy Soul and thus with the universal goal of life
in the bliss of perfect being, transcendent and supreme for ever and ever and
ever ... eternity-without-sublime-end.
111. So be it!
May history provide and leave the People to decide for themselves in
what will be the biggest turning point, the greatest decision in their
lives. For afterwards, if judgement
favours Heaven, there will be no more history but simply ... eternal being of
an ever-more perfect and summational order, a beingful supremacy destined to
culminate in the 'space-centre' omega point of our projected ultimate
universality.
LONDON 2003 (Revised 2012)
Preview
STAIRWAY TO JUDGEMENT eBook
