THE AXIAL RELATIVITY OF FACT, FICTION, FALSITY, AND TRUTH

To contrast the fact of metachemistry with the fiction of pseudo-chemistry on the female (primary) side of the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis stretching from the northwest to the southeast points of the intercardinal axial compass, as one would contrast vanity with justice, or barbarity with civility, or clearness with unclearness, or, indeed, drama (wilfully active theatre) with fictitious literature (novelistic long prose).

To contrast the pseudo-falsity of pseudo-metaphysics with the pseudo-truth of physics on the male (secondary) side of the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis stretching, as above, from the northwest to the southeast points of the intercardinal axial compass, as one would contrast pseudo-meekness with pseudo-righteousness, or pseudo-philistinism with pseudo-culture, or pseudo-unholiness with pseudo-holiness or, indeed, pseudo-poetry (stanza divisible verse) with pseudo-philosophy (essayistic in its long-prose-like prolixity).

Hence the co-existence on the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis of fact with pseudo-falsity (metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical northwest) and of pseudo-truth with fiction (physical/pseudo-chemical southeast) - fact and fiction no less polar on the female side of this axis than pseudo-falsity and pseudo-truth are such on its male, or secondary, side.

Contrariwise, to contrast the truth of metaphysics with the falsity of pseudo-physics on the male (primary) side of the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis stretching from the northeast to the southwest points of the intercardinal axial compass, as one would contrast righteousness with meekness, or culture with philistinism, or holiness with unholiness or, indeed, philosophy (aphoristic in its noumenal concision) with poetry (indivisible block-like verse).

To contrast the pseudo-fiction of pseudo-metachemistry with the pseudo-fact of chemistry on the female side (secondary) of the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis stretching, as above, from the northeast to the southwest points of the intercardinal axial compass, as one would contrast pseudo-justice with pseudo-vanity, or pseudo-civility with pseudo-barbarity, or pseudo-unclearness with pseudo-clearness or, indeed, pseudo-literature (fictitious short prose) with pseudo-drama (speech-oriented theatre that is accordingly more spirit than will).

Hence the co-existence on the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis of truth with pseudo-fiction (metaphysical/pseudo-metachemical northeast) and of pseudo-fact with falsity (chemical/pseudo-physical southwest) - truth and falsity no less polar on the male side of this axis than pseudo-fiction and pseudo-fact on its female, or secondary, side.

Fact and truth are the alpha and omega of things hegemonically noumenal; pseudo-falsity and pseudo-fiction the pseudo-omega and pseudo-alpha of things subordinately noumenal, as in relation to pseudo-metaphysics under metachemistry and pseudo-metachemistry under metaphysics.

Pseudo-fact and pseudo-truth are the alpha and omega of things hegemonically phenomenal; falsity and fiction the pseudo-omega and pseudo-alpha of things subordinately phenomenal, as in relation to pseudo-physics under chemistry and pseudo-chemistry under physics.

Hence the absolute distinction between metachemistry and metaphysics in relation to the alpha and omega of the hegemonic noumenal positions has to be contrasted with the pseudo-absolute distinction between pseudo-metaphysics and pseudo-metachemistry in relation to the pseudo-omega and pseudo-alpha of the subordinate noumenal positions.

Hence, too, the relative distinction between chemistry and physics in relation to the alpha and omega of the hegemonic phenomenal positions has to be contrasted with the pseudo-relative distinction between pseudo-physics and pseudo-chemistry in relation to the pseudo-omega and pseudo-alpha of the subordinate phenomenal positions.

In terms of axial polarity, the clearness of space in the space of clearness vis-à-vis the unclearness of pseudo-volume in the pseudo-volume of unclearness has to be contrasted with the pseudo-unholiness of pseudo-time in the pseudo-time of pseudo-unholiness vis-à-vis the pseudo-holiness of mass in the mass of pseudo-holiness on the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis stretching from the northwest to the southeast points of the intercardinal axial compass.

Again, in terms of axial polarity, the holiness of time in the time of holiness vis-à-vis the unholiness of pseudo-mass in the pseudo-mass of unholiness has to be contrasted with the pseudo-unclearness of pseudo-space in the pseudo-space of pseudo-unclearness vis-à-vis the pseudo-clearness of volume in the volume of pseudo-clearness on the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis stretching from the northeast to the southwest points of the intercardinal axial compass.