RATIOS
OF
SOMA
TO PSYCHE AND OF PSYCHE TO SOMA
The
3:1
ratio of free soma (body) to bound
psyche (mind) in metachemistry, a noumenally
objective element (protonic), could be
described in
terms of the super-predominance (superdominance)
of
free
soma over the sub-preponderance (subponderance)
of
bound
psyche, corresponding to a superfeminine/submasculine
dichotomy which, on other occasions, I have identified with a
distinction
between supersensuousness and subconsciousness,
or superheathenism and subchristianity,
or even supernaturalism (evil) and subnurturalism
(crime).
By
contrast,
the 3:1 ratio of free psyche to
bound soma in metaphysics, a noumenally
subjective
element (photonic), could be described in terms of the
super-preponderance (superponderance) of
free psyche over the sub-predominance (subdominance)
of
bound soma, corresponding to a supermasculine/subfeminine
dichotomy which, on other
occasions, I have identified with a distinction between superconsciousness
and subsensuousness, or superchristianity
and subheathenism, or even supernurturalism
(grace) and subnaturalism (wisdom).
On
the
other hand, the 2½: 1½ ratio of free
soma to bound psyche in chemistry, a phenomenally objective element
(electronic), could be described in terms of the predominance of free
soma over
the un-preponderance (unponderance) of
bound psyche,
corresponding to a feminine/unmasculine
dichotomy
which, on other occasions, I have identified with a distinction between
sensuousness and unconsciousness, or heathenism and unchristianity,
or even naturalism (pseudo-evil) and unnurturalism
(pseudo-crime).
By
contrast,
the 2½: 1½ ratio of free psyche to
bound soma in physics, a phenomenally subjective element (neutronic),
could be described in terms of the preponderance of free psyche over
the
un-predominance (undominance) of bound
soma,
corresponding to a masculine/unfeminine dichotomy which, on other
occasions, I
have identified with a distinction between consciousness and unsensuousness, or christianity
and unheathenism, or even nurturalism
(pseudo-grace) and unnaturalism
(pseudo-.wisdom).
Passing
from
the elements to the
pseudo-elements, the 3:1 ratio of bound soma to free psyche in pseudo-metachemistry, a noumenally
pseudo-objective pseudo-element (pseudo-protonic)
conditioned
by
the noumenally subjective hegemony of
metaphysics, could be described in terms of the super-predominance (superdominance) of bound soma over the
sub-preponderance (subponderance) of free
psyche, corresponding to a pseudo-superfeminine/pseudo-submasculine
dichotomy which I would
identify with a distinction between pseudo-supersensuousness
and pseudo-subconsciousness, or pseudo-superheathenism and pseudo-subchristianity,
or
even
pseudo-supernaturalism (pseudo-goodness) and pseudo-subnurturalism
(pseudo-punishingness).
By
contrast,
the 3:1 ratio of bound psyche to
free soma in pseudo-metaphysics, a noumenally
pseudo-subjective pseudo-element (pseudo-photonic) conditioned by the noumenally objective hegemony of metachemistry,
could be described in terms of the super-preponderance (superponderance)
of bound psyche over the sub-predominance (subdominance)
of
free
soma, corresponding to a pseudo-supermasculine/pseudo-subfeminine
dichotomy which I would identify with a distinction between pseudo-superconsciousness and pseudo-subsensuousness,
or pseudo-superchristianity and pseudo-subheathenism, or even pseudo-supernurturalism
(pseudo-sin) and pseudo-subnaturalism
(pseudo-foolishness).
On
the
other hand, the 2½:1½ ratio of bound
soma to free psyche in pseudo-chemistry, a phenomenally
pseudo-objective
pseudo-element (pseudo-electronic) conditioned by the phenomenally
subjective
hegemony of physics, could be described in terms of the predominance of
bound
soma over the un-preponderance (unponderance)
of
free
psyche, corresponding to a pseudo-feminine/pseudo-unmasculine
dichotomy which I would identify with a distinction between pseudo-unsensuousness and pseudo-consciousness, or
pseudo-unheathenism and pseudo-christianity,
or even pseudo-unnaturalism (goodness) and
pseudo-nurturalism (punishingness).
Finally,
the
2½: 1½ ratio of bound psyche to
free soma in pseudo-physics, a phenomenally pseudo-subjective
pseudo-element
(pseudo-neutronic) conditioned by the
phenomenally
objective hegemony of chemistry, could be described in terms of the
preponderance of bound psyche over the un-predominance (undominance)
of free soma, corresponding to a pseudo-masculine/pseudo-unfeminine
dichotomy
which I would identify with a distinction between
pseudo-unconsciousness and
pseudo-sensuousness, or pseudo-unchristianity
and
pseudo-heathenism, or even pseudo-unnurturalism (sin)
and pseudo-naturalism (foolishness).