DEVOLUTION AND EVOLUTION IN NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE MODES

The state-hegemonic axis is ruled at the metachemical northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass by devolutionary positivity and led at the pseudo-chemical southeast point of the said compass by devolutionary negativity, both of which, compared with anything pseudo-metaphysical and physical, are primary state-hegemonic, which is to say, characterized by a female/pseudo-female polarity between free will and bound spirit, evil and good, as also in relation to free spirit and bound will, if to a less representative metachemical/pseudo-chemical extent.

The church-hegemonic axis is led at the metaphysical northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass by evolutionary positivity and ruled at the pseudo-physical southwest point of the said compass by evolutionary negativity, both of which, compared with anything pseudo-metachemical and chemical, are primary church-hegemonic, which is to say, characterized by a male/pseudo-male polarity between free soul and bound ego, as also in relation to free ego and bound soul, if to a less representative metaphysical/pseudo-physical extent.

Hence a polarity between, in general terms, free will and bound spirit on the one axis, contrasted to which we shall find a polarity, likewise, between free soul and bound ego on the other axis.

Even with a pseudo-metaphysical/physical polarity between bound soul and free ego on the one axis, and a pseudo-metachemical/chemical polarity between bound will and free spirit on the other axis, such secondary state- or church-hegemonic polarities detract little from the fact that each axis is primarily characterized by a positive/negative devolutionary polarity in the one case, that of metachemical/pseudo-chemical state-hegemonic criteria, and by a positive/negative evolutionary polarity in the other case, that of metaphysical/pseudo-physical church-hegemonic criteria, with distinctions, in consequence, between evil and good, free will and bound spirit, on the one hand, and grace and sin, free soul and bound ego, on the other hand.

I am, and always shall be, in favour of evolutionary positivity, which, being metaphysical, is subjectively convergent, albeit to a degree that globally and universally transcends anything Western or Eastern, Catholic or Buddhist, since ideologically germane to the ‘true communism’ of Social Theocracy and thus to the politico-religious realization of ‘Kingdom Come’ conceived as the post-historical (eternal) destiny of church-hegemonic axial criteria.