51.
All of which is not to say that one cannot have a genuinely virtuous circle of
metaphysics and antimetachemistry in noumenal sensibility independently of axial control, even
if its sensual counterpart requires axial control over phenomenal sensibility
in order to maintain a genuinely vicious circle for itself from a standpoint
rooted in noumenal objectivity; for that would be to
rule out the subjectively centred possibility of a noumenally
sensible transmutation in respect of some future extensive cyborgization
of life that changed the terms of gender reference in such fashion that it
would become less difficult, if not comparatively more easy, for antimetachemistry to accommodate itself to metaphysics
independently of simultaneous phenomenal commitments, albeit still within the
parameters of antifundamentalism and antimaterialism vis-à-vis transcendentalist and idealist
modes of church-hegemonic and state-subordinate criteria.
52.
Be that as it may, in general terms, not least in respect of naturalistic and
humanistic contexts, the noumenal positions in both
sensuality and sensibility benefit from their respective types of axial control
of the phenomenal world; for any inconvenience to that section of the Few who
are fated to play a secondary role in the overall balance of powers can be
justified in relation to the benefits accruing to the Many in terms of worldly
stability, so that both the Few and the Many
alike have something to gain from axial continuity in respect of either state-
or church-hegemonic criteria.
53.
Until quite recently I would have characterized the noumenal
Few, whether sensual or sensible, as upper class and their phenomenal
counterparts in the respective types of worldly Many as lower class, but while
this enables one to logically maintain a facile equation of the noumenal Few with upper-class criteria and of the
phenomenal Many with lower-class criteria, a more insightful appraisal of the
distinctions between the Few and the Many would allow, on an axial basis, for a
distinction between upper-class criteria in respect of noumenal
sensuality and middle-class criteria in respect of phenomenal sensibility, as
between the vain and the just, while contrasting this appraisal of the Few and
the Many with a distinction between lower-class criteria in respect of
phenomenal sensuality and classless criteria in respect of noumenal
sensibility, as between the meek and the righteous, so that instead of a simple
upper-class/lower-class distinction between noumenal
and phenomenal, we find the noumenal contexts
divisible between upper-class and classless criteria, and the phenomenal
contexts divisible between lower-class and middle-class criteria, with the axis
diagonally descending from noumenal sensuality to
phenomenal sensibility signifying a state-hegemonic orientation in relation to
both upper-class and middle-class elements, but the axis diagonally
ascending from phenomenal sensuality to noumenal
sensibility signifying a church-hegemonic orientation in relation to both
lower-class and classless elements.
54.
Verily, just as one can be damned on state-hegemonic terms and counter-saved on
church-subordinate terms from noumenal sensuality to
phenomenal sensibility, upper-class criteria (in which free soma takes
precedence over bound psyche) to middle-class criteria (in which bound soma
takes precedence over free psyche), so, in complete contrast, one can be saved
on church-hegemonic terms and counter-damned on state-subordinate terms from
phenomenal sensuality to noumenal sensibility,
lower-class criteria (in which bound psyche takes precedence over free soma) to
classless criteria (in which free psyche takes precedence over bound soma).
55.
Thus, in overall class terms, the upper and middle classes are axially ranged
against the lower class and the classless, and because they are state-hegemonic
and therefore characterized by a female domination and subversion of society,
it is in the somatically oriented natures of the upper class, in particular, to
prey upon the lower class and ensure, as far as possible, that the latter are
precluded from attaining to anything like a classless salvation in noumenal sensibility, the context of metaphysics and antimetachemistry, and thus of God the Father/Heaven the
Holy Soul and the Antidaughter of the Antidevil/the Unclear Soul of Antihell
as far as the free psyche of transcendentalist and antifundamentalist
persuasions in what amount to primary and secondary manifestations of
church-hegemonic criteria are concerned, and of the Son of God/the Holy Spirit
of Heaven and Antidevil the Antimother/Antihell the Unclear Spirit as far as the bound soma of
idealist and antimaterialist persuasions in what
amount to primary and secondary manifestations of state-subordinate criteria
are concerned.
56.
Of course, what I have written above in respect of noumenal
sensibility is more comprehensively exacting, and therefore arguably much
truer, than anything to be found in Catholic tradition, and consequently I
could be accused of giving a fuller and more radical picture of the context in
question than would be found in conventional Catholic thinking, notwithstanding
the fact that Catholic clergy have rarely been genuinely classless in their
Christian shortfall from a properly transcendentalist/antifundamentalist status
in respect of noumenal sensibility but, while being
implicitly committed to some degree of transcendentalism/antifundamentalism,
have been constrained by Old Testament criteria from ever embracing God the
Father/the Antidaughter of the Antidevil
in a more theologically open and unequivocal manner.
57.
Consequently there has been a degree of what could be termed quasi-upperclass vitiation of New Testament classlessness about
the Catholic clergy which, varying in extent from era to era, has precluded
their functioning on a more genuinely classless basis vis-à-vis the Catholic
laity who, when not also quasi-upperclass or
quasi-middleclass, have tended to be lower class and thus of the meek-proper,
but subject, as noted, to a want of proper classless resolve on the part of the
clergy, whose ability to save and/or counter-damn them has always had to
contend with their own limitations both in respect of an entrenched
ecclesiastic hierarchy and the extents to which criteria appertaining to noumenal sensuality have factored-in, Old Testament-wise,
to the overall Christian equation, thereby allowing more openly upper-class and
even middle-class elements to take advantage of this paradoxical situation to
ends which owe nothing whatsoever to God the Father and/or the Antidaughter of the Antidevil
but, in complete contrast, stem from the objective exploitations of Devil the
Mother and/or the Antison of Antigod
in respect of somatic freedom of a noumenally sensual
order.
58.
Of course, it would also be true to say that the synthetically artificial
preconditions for a more efficacious deliverance of the lower-class Many to
classless salvation and/or counter-damnation in noumenal
sensibility were less than evident in the Medieval and even post-Counter
Reformation past, and that the Catholic clergy would have been unable, even
with the best will in or, rather, over the world, to effect the deliverance of
the Catholic laity on more than an intermittent and, by noumenal
standards, rather imperfect basis, as confirmed by the reliance, New
Testament-wise, on verbal absolution for penitential contrition in consequence
of Christianity's marked predilection towards the Word, a predilection which,
appertaining in no small measure to an intellectual predisposition in physical
and/or antiphysical criteria having especial
applicability to the world, as to Western civilization as the worldly form of
civilization par excellence, given its verdant nature in relation to a
temperate climate, was always bound to leave more genuinely transcendentalist
techniques for achieving salvation out of the frame, the Church's mundane
concern with the broad masses obliging it to compromise its approach to 'world
overcoming' in the aforementioned manner.
59.
However that may be, even a less hierarchical clergy would have found it
impossible to offer more than a token salvation to the confessorial
masses, who were fated to return to the world ... of phenomenal sensuality ...
and become bogged down not only in their own sin and/or pseudo-crime, male and
female bound psyche in antihumanism and nonconformism, but to have their state-subordinate folly
and/or pseudo-evil, male and female free soma in antinaturalism
and realism, preyed upon anew by the more freely somatic barbarities of the noumenally sensual, who would wrench their
state-subordinate free soma apart from its church-hegemonic bound psyche in
such fashion that it became quasi-state hegemonic and rendered them capable of
idolatrously worshipping at the shrine of evil and pseudo-folly, female and
male free soma in materialism and anti-idealism, whose church-subordinate
corollary in crime and pseudo-sin, female and male bound psyche in
fundamentalism and antitranscendentalism, would be
more than capable of displacing its Christian counterpart in an effective Old
Testament eclipse of anything New Testament, thereby seducing the meek from
their own hegemonic bound psyche to a subordinate mode of bound psyche that
would ever play second fiddle, so to speak, to Devil the Mother's and the Antison of Antigod's hegemonic kinds
of free soma in metachemistry and antimetaphysics.
60.
For just as hegemonic free soma in noumenal
sensuality is the parallel state enemy of subordinate free soma in phenomenal
sensuality, so subordinate bound psyche in noumenal
sensuality is the parallel church enemy of hegemonic bound psyche in phenomenal
sensuality, as the lower class become subject not to classless salvation and/or
counter-damnation from the phenomenally sensual world to the noumenally sensible overworld,
but, on the contrary, subject to upper-class criteria indirectly impinging upon
it and effectively upending it in such fashion that free soma takes precedence
over bound psyche.
61.
Conversely, one might argue that just as hegemonic bound soma in phenomenal
sensibility is the parallel state enemy of subordinate free soma in noumenal sensibility, so subordinate free psyche in
phenomenal sensibility is the parallel church enemy of hegemonic free psyche in
noumenal sensibility, as the classless become subject
not simply to saving and/or counter-damning the phenomenally sensual world,
which is their overworldly duty, but also to
middle-class criteria indirectly impinging upon them and effectively upending
them in such fashion that bound soma takes precedence over free psyche.
62. However,
that is another argument, even if one that cannot be left out of the total
picture of inter-axial rivalry, since the vain can only be guaranteed
significant success against the meek if the just have been pretty successful in
underscoring the righteous and rendering them more accountable to a sort of
bound somatic deference at the expense of free psyche, something that an undue
emphasis, New Testament-wise, upon the Word is always likely to effect in
relation to a more pedantic approach to Christ, as to Christianity, in which
the Son tends to take precedence over the Father, as soma over psyche, if more
from the standpoint of man than of God, whether or not this 'man' is hyped as
'God'.
63.
Therefore the righteous are not just subject to the contrary pull of noumenally sensual criteria having more reference to the
Old Testament than to the New, but are also beset by the danger of a more
pedantic approach to Christianity which, following from an antichemical subversion of physics at the behest of metachemistry over antimetaphysics,
places undue significance on the Son of Man in what amounts to a secondary
state-hegemonic approach to bound soma which cannot but clash with the sort of
primary state-subordinate approach to bound soma typifying the Son of God.
64.
It is as though an undue emphasis on bound soma in the context of phenomenal
sensibility, whether antichemically primary or
physically secondary, is bound to have a detrimental effect not only upon free
psyche in its own context, a context, be it not forgotten, in which such psyche
is church subordinate on both primary and secondary terms, but upon that which
pertains, in noumenal sensibility, to a hegemonic
free psyche and a subordinate bound soma should the properly religious context
be brought into contact with, or otherwise be ecumenically influenced by,
criteria appertaining to phenomenal sensibility.
65.
Because of the importance attaching to the Word in relation to the New
Testament, this is always a danger for Christianity irrespective of whether or
not its Catholic, and more authentic, manifestation is being undermined,
consciously or unconsciously, by puritanical endeavour stemming from phenomenal
sensibility, so that the Church finds its own diagonally ascending axis under
assault from contrary manifestations of the diagonally descending axis in which
not the Church but the State is hegemonic, the noumenally
sensual preying, as we have noted, upon the phenomenally sensual, their
phenomenally sensible counterparts always capable, by their very existence, of
undermining the psyche-over-soma ethos of the noumenally
sensible, since their emphasis on soma at the expense of psyche tends to grant
undue significance, from a religious point of view, to state-hegemonic criteria
in which Antiwoman the Antimother
will take precedence over the Antidaughter of Antiwoman in the antichemical
context and the Son of Man likewise take precedence over Man the Father in the
physical context, neither of which could possibly be helpful to a context in
which, with metaphysics, God the Father should take precedence over the Son of
God and, with antimetachemistry, the Antidaughter of the Antidevil
take precedence over Antidevil the Antimother or, in straightforward terms, psyche take
precedence over soma in church-hegemonic and state-subordinate vein.
66.
Therefore between the Scylla of Old Testament noumenal
sensuality and the Charybdis of New Testament
phenomenal sensibility, the Catholic Church has had to tread a difficult path
that diagonally rises from phenomenal sensuality to noumenal
sensibility in spite of all the attempts being made by the enemies of the meek
and of the righteous to deflect them from their appointed course and somehow
render them accountable to the predations of the vain and the subversions of
the just.
67.
Often enough, as the evidence would suggest, the enemies of the meek and of the
righteous are able to succeed in achieving at least part of their respective
aims; for even with their own ethnically aligned lower class to deceive and
exploit and prevent, at all costs, from extending the diagonally ascending axis
down towards a humanistic nadir of proletarian dictatorship, it is evident that
the vain and the just do not exist independently of the meek and the righteous
but impact, in reverse parallel vein, upon them to their mutual exploitative
benefit, traditionally associated with imperialism but more subtly diffused,
these days, through the culture of free enterprise and global capitalism in
what is tactfully characterized as a post-imperial age.
68.
But even if they didn't impact, as they so obviously do, upon the meek and the
righteous as the latter are and have been in times past, they would be a threat
and an obstacle to the salvation and/or counter-damnation of the meek by the
righteous simply through their very existence in opposition to anything and
everything church-hegemonic and state-subordinate, an opposition which turns
moral criteria upon their head and uses its considerable power and influence to
disseminate secular values as a matter of commercial and ideological
necessity.
69.
One cannot live in the contemporary world, no matter how Catholic or moralistic
or religious one may consider oneself, and be unaffected by criteria stemming
from a state-hegemonic and church-subordinate system which makes free soma its
positive ideal and bound soma its negative one in a sort of parliamentary
counterweight to the constitutionally monarchic and/or executively presidential
'first mover' from which it derives both its legitimacy and
justification.
70.
Even without the gross folly of ecumenicism, as
cutting across Catholic and Protestant (Anglican and Puritan) boundaries, there
is no way that the Church is able to exist in splendid isolation from the push
and pull of conflicting secular currents which stem from the enemies of both
the meek and the righteous and exploit and/or undermine them on a daily basis,
always seeking to further their state-hegemonic and church-subordinate aims
whether on an upper-class basis or, as with the phenomenally sensible, on the
rather more parliamentary and puritanical basis of the middle-class, whose
false righteousness, upending the relationship of free psyche to bound soma, is
ever prepared to undermine what genuinely pertains to the true.
71.
And because the traditional Church powers-that-be are powerless to reverse time
and set about saving and/or counter-damning the phenomenally sensual as though
the state-hegemonic axis didn't exist and their own Scylla and Charybdis-like limitations were unlikely to be exploited
and turned back upon themselves in consequence, it is only possible to conclude
that nothing short of a new and effectively more radical approach to the
problem of 'world overcoming' that takes up the classless challenge where
Catholicism left off will suffice to 'resurrect' the axis diagonally ascending
from phenomenal sensuality to noumenal sensibility
and 'resurrect' it in such fashion that it will gradually become less of an
axis and more of an omega point of noumenal
sensibility that, with the maximum development of synthetic artificiality, will
take the meek, should they democratically endorse such a destiny, to a level of
church-hegemonic and state-subordinate criteria in relation to what, in
previous texts, has been called the Social Theocratic Centre ... that will
effectively signify their saved and/or counter-damned transmutation from
lower-class to classless standing, thereby removing them from those who would
prey upon them in upper-class fashion and taking them to a stage and type of
classlessness that would be beyond the ability of the New Testament-wielding
middle class to subvert or undermine from a standpoint based, through
phenomenal sensibility, in somatic emphasis, whether in respect of Antiwoman the Antimother in
primary, or antichemical, state-hegemonic vein or of
the Son of Man in secondary, or physical, state-hegemonic vein.
72.
That and that alone is what will enable the meek to return to righteousness on
a more thoroughgoing and even permanent basis, but it will not be the priestly
righteous, whose own clerical classlessness leaves something to be desired from
this more radical point of view, who will restore them to the 'Kingdom of God',
but a new and priest-rejecting order of the righteous who will encourage the
phenomenally sensual to vote for religious sovereignty and, in the event of a
majority mandate for such an ultimate sovereignty, commensurate with the utmost
republican evolution, make it their sworn business to protect and advance the
rights of the religiously sovereign People in what has been metaphorically
described as 'Kingdom Come', in which it will be for the People to determine,
under the Social Theocratic guidance of the Second Coming equivalent, how they
will exercise those rights to the end of developing the self and constraining
the not-self in respect of free psyche and bound soma of, in particular, a noumenally sensible order, such that will permit, on
primary church-hegemonic and state-subordinate terms, of the due experience of
God the Father coupled, in metaphysical bound soma, to the utilization of the
Son of God/the Holy Spirit of Heaven towards a self-transcending end in Heaven
the Holy Soul, and in secondary church-hegemonic and state-subordinate terms of
the due experience of the Antidaughter of the Antidevil coupled, in antimetachemical
bound soma, to the utilization of Antidevil the Antimother/Antihell the Unclear
Spirit towards a self-transcending end in the Unclear Soul of Antihell, so that not only Truth and Joy coupled to a
truthful approach to Beauty and a joyful approach to Love, but Beauty and Love
coupled to a beautiful approach to Truth and a loving approach to Joy may also
obtain in the virtuous circle of a noumenal
sensibility supreme, the per se manifestation of noumenal
sensibility that will be as most evolved, in its cyborgistic
unfolding and subsequent fulfilment, as anything humanistic was more (compared
to most) evolved, anything naturalistic less (compared to least) evolved, and
anything cosmic least evolved in respect of such sensibility.
73.
Therefore it is only under the aegis of the Second Coming equivalent and his
advocacy, via religious sovereignty, of the Social Theocratic Centre that this
more efficacious salvation and counter-damnation of the meek to righteousness
and pseudo-justness, of the Catholic lower class to Centrist classlessness, can
be effected; for nothing conventionally or traditionally sensible on noumenal terms has the wherewithal or ability to deliver
the phenomenally sensual from the predations of the noumenally
sensual, being itself subject to phenomenally sensible subversion at the hands
of those who, hand-in-glove with the vain, would justly, and therefore
pseudo-righteously, seek the hegemonic eclipse of subordinate bound soma and
the subordinate eclipse of hegemonic free psyche in noumenal
sensibility, being, to all intents and purposes, the class enemies of the
classless!
74.
For just as those who, from a noumenally sensual
vantage-point, seek the hegemonic eclipse of subordinate free soma and the
subordinate eclipse of hegemonic bound psyche in phenomenal sensuality are the
upper-class reverse parallel enemies of the lower class, so the middle class,
as defined above, are the reverse parallel enemies of the classless and hence
of anything genuinely godly and antidevilish, being
the falsely righteous for whom free psyche is subordinated to bound soma as antiwomanly and manly values take their phenomenally
sensible place in axial antithesis to the values vaingloriously touted by the
devilish and antigodly, or all those who have overall
control over the diagonally descending axis and, confident of the co-operation
of the just in their mutual struggle against its diagonally ascending
counterpart, seek to convince the phenomenally sensual that they are not really
their devilish and antigodly enemies but their
liberators from religious superstition and cant.
75.
Be that as it may, all the vain actually liberate the meek from is their
prospect of salvation and counter-damnation from the alpha-world to the
omega-overworld, and such false liberation comes at a
high price, as all who are addicted to idolatrous worship of the various types
of synthetically artificial 'stars' will know. Instead of being released
from their lowly estate into beatific classlessness in the noumenally
sensible Beyond, these dupes of free enterprise become the bewitched devotees
of upper-class spectacles which set them back from the prospect of authentic
liberation in a world characterized by Truth and Beauty to one dominated by
Ugliness and Falsity. Little wonder that some people, disgusted or
disillusioned by the daily bombardment of cinematic and kindred types of
violence and vulgarity, take to drugs as an antidote to the externalization of
culture which both the vain and the just, though the latter to a lesser extent,
take so much for granted.