101.
But that is, after all, to be expected in a post-worldly age, in an age
dominated by antihumanist criteria to an extent which is no longer genuine in
the phenomenal 'below' but increasingly pseudo, and therefore partial to what
towers above it in genuinely noumenal terms. America, as I said,
signifies a tendency on the part of the pseudo-phenomenally sensible masses to
ethnically defer to noumenal sensuality, both in contemporary pseudo- and
cosmically or savagely genuine terms, and this in turn has wrenched the
phenomenally sensual from their traditional Catholic moorings in the world and
'elevated' them to a quasi-state-hegemonic secular deference to all things
noumenally sensual, making them both the playthings and contrived victims of
the sort of commercial exploitation which stems from free enterprise of an
explicitly somatic nature.
102.
But they portend, in spite of themselves, the possibility - indeed, the
inevitability - of noumenal sensibility, of a no less synthetically artificial
order of noumenal sensibility to that which now obtains in noumenal sensuality,
and it is in the establishment and development of this contrary order of
noumenal freedom that their future salvation and counter-damnation lies; for it
is this alone that can restore church-hegemonic criteria to them as it
resurrects the axis in question and lifts them from pseudo-phenomenal
sensuality to genuine noumenal sensibility, the sort of sensibility which is
not only beyond mankind, and therefore the Catholic Church, in its explicit
commitment to God the Father and, for females, the Antidaughter of the
Antidevil, but antithetical to anything rooted, Old Testament-wise, in Devil
the Mother and, for males, the Antison of Antigod, and therefore only possible
on the understanding that everything applying to metachemical and
antimetaphysical sensuality, including their bound psychic corollaries, is
repudiated and utterly rejected.
103.
Therefore this genuine manifestation of noumenal sensibility, commensurate with
the overhauling of human criteria in the supra-human criteria of true godliness
and beautifully true antidevilishness, can only come to pass via utilization of
the secular freedom that has opened up, like a crack, in the edifice of
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate tradition, by those concerned, as Social
Theocrats, with the bringing of religious sovereignty to the
pseudo-phenomenally sensual masses, that the masses in question may come to
vote, at the appointed time, for religious sovereignty as the solution both to
their pseudo-worldly limitations and to the exploitation of those limitations
by the noumenally sensual elites of the American or Americanized 'Vanity Fair'
who currently prey upon them with such devastating commercial success.
104.
Thus it is that, in the event of a majority mandate for religious sovereignty
in the most paradoxical of elections, the pseudo-phenomenally sensual can
expect to be saved and counter-damned from their pseudo-worldly predicament to
an otherworldly Paradise equating, at its topmost level, with genuine noumenal
sensibility, which, in both metaphysics and antimetachemistry, will give a lead
to whatever transmutations of phenomenal sensibility in physics and
antichemistry may also transpire in respect of what I have customarily
described as the lower (two) tiers of the triadic Beyond and conceive to be
primarily for persons of Protestant descent, such as Puritans and Low Anglicans.
105.
However that may be, the concept of religious sovereignty in connection with a
triadic Beyond and, where any fobbed off 'sins and/or pseudo-crimes of the
world' are concerned, administrative aside to the said Beyond, is one that
takes republican freedom from tyranny, from autocracy and aristocracy, coupled
to antitechnocracy and antitheocracy, to its logical resolution in a context
equivalent to 'Kingdom Come'; for it is only in relation to Messianic
intervention of an order equating with the Second Coming that such a concept is
possible, since this sovereignty is truly godly in its theocratic freedom from
worldly 'sin', and only a godly individual has the right, never mind
wherewithal, to conceive of such a sovereignty and to help, in the interests of
the liberation of the People from Evil, bring it to pass.
106.
Thus you know, when once the concept of religious sovereignty is put before
you, that you are dealing not only with a credibly Messianic concept, but with
the ne plus ultra of republican freedom, freedom not merely from
political tyranny, as in conventional republicanism, but from such religious
tyranny as continues to exist and to wear a theocratic mask over its
fundamentally aristocratic and even autocratic disposition, an upper-class
disposition confirmed by the hierarchical structures of the Roman Catholic
Church, as a dogmatically infallible pope reigns over his red-robed cardinals
like Jehovah (not Christ!) over a plethora of satanic 'fallen angels' whose
revolutions about the central axis is more than slightly suggestive of cosmic
precedent and all that, in noumenally sensual vein, proclaims a disposition at
complete variance from everything truly sacred and divine, which is to say,
everything removed, in re-born fashion, from the brute realities of
metachemical/antimetaphysical savagery.
107.
Thus until the People, the electorate of countries like Eire, come to vote in a
paradoxical election for religious sovereignty, and a majority mandate for such
an ultimate sovereignty is forthcoming, the job, as they say, will not have
been finished, and they will continue to languish under the oldest tyranny of
all, a tyranny that, these days, has been renewed and replenished with the
fresh blood of that pseudo-noumenal sensuality we have equated with the
American Dream, not least in its Hollywood guise, and which now tyrannizes over
the People or, at any rate, over those of a pseudo-phenomenally sensual
disposition, with such a ruthless tenacity for authoritarian solutions to every
problem that even the Creator-God Jehovah can afford to take a back seat and
rest its case while its more contemporary extrapolation goes about its
predatory business seemingly unfettered by moral constraints.
108.
But Jehovah-as-Creator-God or Cosmic First Mover is still there in a variety of
religious contexts, not least Judaic, and the pseudo-phenomenally sensual
masses of countries that may once have been more genuinely Catholic are still
subject, from time to time, to His or, more correctly, Her recall from the
shadows of religious convention as and when it suits those who preach Christ's
gospel to lay whatever sections of the Old Testament they choose to cite upon
the minds of those who would ordinarily consider themselves either atheistically
indifferent to such a Testament or sufficiently lapsed from strict Catholic
observance as not to be much interested in it or, for that matter, in religious
traditions generally. No matter! the Bible, the so-called Book of Books,
is still there, still officially obtains, and can be cited at the drop of a hat
and imposed upon the masses under a variety of pretexts and with scant regard
for their political freedom as 'People', 'electorate', 'republicans', or what
have you. The People of countries like Eire may be relatively free, as
from political tyranny, but they are not absolutely free, as from religious
tyranny, no matter how disguised or attenuated it may now seem over two
thousand years after Christ, and until they vote for religious sovereignty such
disguised tyranny, underpinned by papal infallibility and an authoritarian will
to prevail at all costs, can only persist ... to their moral and spiritual
detriment, their bound somatic and free psychic loss.
109.
But in the event of a majority mandate for religious sovereignty - what a
difference! For steps could then be taken to seriously develop not only
the means whereby that sovereignty could be honoured and advanced, but to
remove all traditional obstacles to such a development, the Bible and other
such religious books not least! For no matter how politically sovereign
you may now be you are still subject to religious impositions of a traditional
order, and so you will continue to be until, with the coming to pass of that
paradoxical election which I have equated with Judgement, a majority mandate
for religious sovereignty permits the Social Theocratic servants of the
religiously sovereign People to act on their behalf and set about encouraging
the removal of such books and related matter from society as would obstruct the
development of the Centre, or the context, as already outlined, in which
religious sovereignty would be encouraged to develop, the context, that is, of
the triadic Beyond and, behind this, of the administrative aside to the said
Beyond which would be the focus of the Social Theocratic bearing of the 'sins
and pseudo-crimes', not to mention 'follies and pseudo-evils', of what had been
the pseudo-phenomenally sensual 'world', as it sought to develop in the
religiously sovereign masses an enhanced sense of their true destiny in Social
Transcendentalism.
110.
For religious sovereignty cannot develop in a vacuum, nor should it be left to
one's individual whim as to whether or not one chooses to be religiously
sovereign in the privacy of one's home. One can only be and remain
religiously sovereign if one confirms one's religious sovereignty by partaking
of one's rights in respect of the Social Theocratic Centre, and thus by
actively participating in the development and functioning of the Centre
conceived, primarily, in relation to the triadic Beyond, with its three tiers
subdivided three ways in order to permit of both gender segregation and, for
males, an intellectual/emotional, or egoistic/psychoistic distinction between
an attenuated humanism and a more intensive transcendentalism, as previously
described in several texts, such that would constitute the basis of Social
Transcendentalism, which is nothing less than the religious aspect of the
Centre conceived in relation to both politico-economic and religio-scientific
affairs.
111.
Now much as no-one could force anyone to attend the Centre conceived in
relation to the triadic Beyond that it would be the duty of the ideological
leadership, the Social Theocrats proper, to both protect and advance, a
religiously sovereign People would have something approaching a moral duty to
attend the Centre at certain times, varying from individual to individual, in
order both to confirm their sovereignty and protect their rights, not least
from the threat of reaction in the event of a perceived want of enthusiasm on
their part and a call, from some quarters, for a restoration of tradition, even
unto the extent of bringing back priests and Bibles, cassocks and altars, and
all the rest of it.
112.
For of course priests and Bibles and other such ecclesiastical matters are
deeply intertwined, and if you want to be rid of them, and thus free from the
curse of Creatoresque primitivity which both holds religion back from its full
potential and plays into the hands of a plethora of noumenally sensual
predators and exploiters, whether traditional or contemporary, then you have to
ensure that, in the event of opting, come Judgement, for religious sovereignty,
you are prepared to assert your rights in regard to such a sovereignty, and
thereby protect and advance it by attending the Centres and confirming your
new-found enhanced republican freedom from all modes of tyranny, not least the
priestly and Bible-based forms of it.
113.
Therefore it would be incumbent upon the People to demonstrate their resolve to
remain, once they had opted for religious sovereignty, religiously free of all
forms of ecclesiastic tyranny, and to do this it would be necessary for them
both to support at the developmental stage and then attend the Centres that
would be erected in their name, pretty much as an extrapolation from the kinds
of Health or Leisure Centres which now exist and which, being anything but
cinema-like, this writer regards as a sort of prototype of or blueprint for the
Centres to come, when once the People elect for religious sovereignty and
acquire rights in relation to it, not the least of which would be freedom from
any form of priestly tyranny and, hence, priests in general.
114.
For priests are a symptom of a want of religious sovereignty in the People,
just as feudal barons and other autocrats and aristocrats were a symptom of a
want of political sovereignty in the People or, at any rate, the labouring
masses, and they will not go away by themselves, any more than did the feudal
barons and other so-called nobles who tyrannically oppressed the masses before
the coming of democracy and, most especially, republicanism as the political
form of democracy par excellence.
115.
Therefore backing for and attendance of the Centres that would be developed
within the overall Centre, or state/church context of a religiously sovereign
people, would be crucial to their future success and guarantee of long-term
viability. But all this could only be voluntary, not compulsory, since a
people that is sovereign cannot be coerced to do anything, whether that implies
voting or demonstrating or whatever, and only they have the right to decide how
much or how often they choose to attend such a context as would be officially established
in the event of a majority mandate for religious sovereignty.
116.
But there would be incentives, not just negative ones, as alluded to above, but
also, and more importantly, positive ones, such that put the existence or
non-existence of clerics and all their 'stock in trade' somewhat in the
shade. Even the fact of the pseudo-meek's exploitation by predators of a
noumenally sensual cast is a massive incentive, insofar as such creatures -
film producers and the like - are responsible, in no small degree, for keeping
the People, as pseudo-phenomenally sensual masses, in the particular kind of
slough of worldly despond to which their shortcomings also confine them, albeit
their elevation above the traditional 'Slough of Despond' to which the more conservatively
Catholic masses still in some degree pertain is indicative, in itself, of a
decision on the part of the pseudo-meek to acquiesce in such
quasi-state-hegemonic elevation rather than remain bogged down in the mire of
traditional meekness to which the pseudo-noumenal sensibility of the Church
confines their conservative counterparts for want of a more efficacious - I
might even say 'elevated' - deliverance from sinful and pseudo-criminal, not to
mention foolish and pseudo-evil, shortcomings.
117.
Yet caught in a sort of No Man's Land, a kind of paradoxical Limbo, in between
traditional meekness and the pseudo-righteousness of the clerical dispensers of
verbal absolution for penitential contrition, it is no wonder if the majority
of contemporary 'Catholics' of countries like Eire resign themselves to the
more elevated pseudo-meekness which the Americanization of contemporary life
has engendered and thereby continue to persevere with the fact of their
exploitation for want of a viable alternative which, unlike the Church, really
would set about substantially saving and counter-damning them from the
predicament in which they inevitably find themselves.
118.
For, given the environmental circumstances in which these urban proletarians
live, it really is nothing short of inevitable that they should be in the
predicament they are now in, unable to take the religious traditions seriously,
but equally unable to resist and reject the moral corruptions and seductive
blandishments that the great enemy of religion, the focus of all evil and
pseudo-folly, coupled to crime and pseudo-sin, is able to inflict upon them
more or less at will. And so it will continue until, with the coming of
Social Theocracy, the possibility of a more elevated order of noumenal sensibility
affiliated to the concept and hopefully, one day, actuality of religious
sovereignty provides the pseudo-meek masses with a viable alternative to their
predicament, enabling them to reject both their own worldly shortcomings and
the exploitative predations to which they are subject in the interests,
following a majority mandate for religious sovereignty in the paradoxical
election that has been equated with Judgement, of Righteousness and hence
deliverance from the pseudo-Slough of Despond of their pseudo-meekness to a
very genuine 'Celestial City' of godly and antidevilish righteousness 'On
High', such as Social Theocracy would be instrumental in furthering.
119.
For there is no other way that the exploitation of pseudo-women and
pseudo-antimen by devils and antigods who are themselves aided and abetted by
pseudo-antiwomen and pseudo-men can be ended ... except through a paradoxical
election for religious sovereignty in countries, like Eire, with a fairly
strong Catholic tradition, in which the politically sovereign People elect to
fob off their 'sins and/or pseudo-crimes' on to the Messianic advocate of the
Social Theocratic Centre, the most credible interpretation of 'Kingdom Come'
there could ever be, in return for rights accruing to religious sovereignty
which would deliver them not only from the last bastion of religious tyranny,
going all the way back, via the Old Testament, to the so-called Creator or
'Almighty', but, as hinted at above, from those who currently prey upon them
with such a callous disregard for their moral well-being and force them to
grovel before the spectacles of an unceasing barrage of the most disgusting and
disgraceful somatic licence, transforming them into the pseudo-meek playthings
of barbarities and vanities and profanities and aridities which, in their
vacuous negativities, could only be the product of devils and antigods!
120.
Thus if the pseudo-meek People are to be delivered from the Evil and
pseudo-Folly of the noumenally sensual exploiters, they must elect to be
delivered, first of all, from their own sins and pseudo-crimes, twisted, so
paradoxically, towards those very quasi-state-hegemonic follies and
pseudo-evils which genuine Evil, triumphant over pseudo-Folly like Devil the
Mother over the Antison of Antigod, is able so ruthlessly to exploit, and opt
for religious sovereignty in that most paradoxical of elections which I have
outlined as being commensurate with Judgement, so that they can fall
progressively back into line with church-hegemonic/state-subordinate criteria
and increasingly live in a society that will be characterized by the grace and
pseudo-punishment of God the Father and the Antidaughter of the Antidevil, a
society centred in noumenal sensibility and taking every measure it can to
ensure that Righteousness triumphs over pseudo-meekness and, via the salvation
and counter-damnation of the pseudo-meek, over the Vanity and pseudo-justness
of those ranged against them on what has been called the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis of Anglo-American, but most especially
American, secular imperialism.
121.
For America is an outward-tending country rooted in the Star, as in cosmic
stars and the synthetically artificial 'stars' of which so-called 'film stars'
are especially conspicuous, and such a country, deriving as it does from Europe
in general but Britain in particular, can only impose its will upon other
countries and peoples, making them if not more akin to itself then, at any
rate, prepared to defer to its somatic licence and idolatrously worship at the
shrine of its particular brand of free enterprise, which, in typically female
vein, knows how to seduce and exploit and mesmerize and allure and, finally,
defeat utterly and uncompromisingly! All that America fundamentally
stands for will not go away peacefully, and those who strive to combat it on
its own terms are playing, as historically in the case of opposition to
Britain, a very dangerous and potentially self-defeating game!
122.
One can only reject it, and in rejecting it from the standpoint of
Righteousness, of the 'Celestial City', of 'Kingdom Come', one can begin to
develop that inner alternative to its plethora of outer freedoms, and never
more determinedly than when the rejection is official because stemming from a
rejection of one's own worldly limitations which are responsible, in no small
measure, for exposing one to the netherworldly seductions and liberties of
noumenally sensual countries like America anyway, and thus of adding insult to
injury.
123.
But only Social Theocracy can effect the counter-strategy, as it were, to such
noumenal sensuality; for nothing short of that more elevated order of noumenal
sensibility which has been identified with the Centre, and thus with a context of
religious sovereignty in the People, will have the wherewithal to save and
counter-damn them to enhanced free psyche and bound soma to the extent
necessary to deliver them from Evil and pseudo-Folly, not to mention, more
pertinently to a feminine/antimasculine dichotomy, their own somatically free
pseudo-evil and folly and, in what would be a church-hegemonic context,
psychically bound sin and pseudo-crime, and thereby lead them up a mountain of
righteousness from which they will not return, in traditional Catholic fashion,
to be sinful and pseudo-criminal (not to mention preyed upon) all over again,
but stay up on, stay as within the Celestial City-proper that would constitute
their deliverance from the pseudo-Slough of Despond, as though in consequence
of a transmutation in keeping with an ever-increasing commitment to
synthetically artificial criteria of a sensible order and thus to the
'overcoming of man', as Nietzsche would say, in terms of the Cyborg, as of the
systematic cyborgization of life to a noumenally sensible end, the end, in
short, of the Omega Point, and thus the most universally transcendent of
celestial cities of which it would be possible to conceive, a 'city' set not
merely on earth but, ultimately, in the so-called heavens, meaning in space and
therefore at a transcendent remove from everything earthly.
124.
But that is rather long term. We must content ourselves, in the event of
a majority mandate for religious sovereignty, with short-term measures to
improve the lot of the pseudo-meek masses, even if this does mean that their
elevation to the righteousness of noumenal sensibility will be by degrees and
only very gradually, given the immense complexities of the undertaking.
Nevertheless with the requisite systemic orientation following official backing
from the People, one may be confident that significant progress would ensue, and
it would not be long before the religiously sovereign People found themselves
in a better position, morally and socially, than they had been prior to the
paradoxical election which I am opting to approach, in anticipation, from an
optimistic standpoint. For once the necessary trends have been set in
motion, the transformation of society will gather momentum, and what in other
circumstances might have been thought impossible will prove otherwise within an
actual system or society characterized by religious sovereignty in the masses
and specifically geared to their notself-overcoming in the interests of the
Self.
125.
But such a system would also be characterized, at its topmost, or noumenally
sensible, level by the triumph of time over antispace, as of Eternity over
Anti-Infinity, and thus be significant of the hegemony of metaphysical
classlessness over antimetachemical anti-upperclassness, pretty much, in gender
terms, as divine males over antidiabolic females, the former epitomized by the
Truth of God the Father and the Joy of Heaven the Holy Soul in the
transcendentalism of primary church-hegemonic criteria and the latter by the
beautiful approach to Truth of the Antidaughter of the Antidevil and the loving
approach to Joy of the Unclear Soul of Antihell in the antifundamentalism of
secondary church-hegemonic criteria, each of which would be coupled, needless
to say, to the truthful approach to Beauty of the Son of God and the joyful
approach to Love of the Holy Spirit of Heaven in the idealism of primary
state-subordinate criteria and, for females, to the Beauty of Antidevil the
Antimother and the Love of Antihell the Unclear Spirit in the antimaterialism of
secondary state-subordinate criteria, so that a virtuous circle of primary and
secondary orders of free psyche and bound soma would be the benevolent
consequence of such an overall noumenally sensible lead of society as germane
to the attainment of 'Kingdom Come'.