26.
Thus if the current gulf between traditional Church-hegemonic criteria and
contemporary state freedom is to be exploited in a way most befitting Irish
interests and, indeed, the interests of civilization in respect of a cultural
lead of society, then it cannot be on terms which derive from the 'enemy camp',
the state-hegemonic axis, but rather on terms which owe something to moral
criteria and would be determined to resurrect or renew the Church-hegemonic
axis in such fashion that the pseudo-meek acquire access to genuine righteousness;
that the pseudo-phenomenal sensuality of the lapsed catholic proletarianized
masses is appealed to from a standpoint centred in genuine noumenal
sensibility, and that their salvation and counter-damnation, in free psyche and
bound soma, from the pseudo-world to otherworldly heights will consequently be
of a more lasting and permanent character than anything available to their more
inherently Catholic counterparts in the Western past, when verbal absolution
for penitential contrition was the religious norm in what manifestly fell short
- and continues so to do - of anything genuinely noumenal and sensible.
27.
The reader will recall that I have gone into this subject in some detail in
previous texts, and that the whole context of genuine noumenal sensibility,
being global rather than Western in character, requires nothing less than the
cyborgization of life and consequent 'overcoming of man', in order that the
said pseudo-phenomenally sensual masses may be elevated above their
pseudo-worldly status in such fashion and to such an extent that the failings
of their Catholic ancestors are not repeated, but that they remain saved and/or
counter-damned up the otherworldly mountain and therefore comparatively safe
from the exploitative predations of the noumenally sensual and their
pseudo-phenomenally sensible counterparts on what has been described as the
state-hegemonic axis of contemporary American civilization.
28.
Bear that in mind, for permanent salvation and counter-damnation will not - and
cannot - occur on any other basis than that to which I have alluded
above. If you want to end the exploitation of the pseudo-meek by the Vain
and their pseudo-just collaborators, you have to engineer a new and altogether
more genuine order of the Righteous, who will not only parallel, from a
church-hegemonic standpoint, the state-hegemonic changes that have occurred,
under American auspices, across the axial divide of contemporary civilization,
but effectively provide the basis whereby the pseudo-world may be more
effectively 'overcome' in the interests of enhanced otherworldly satisfaction
and an end to the exploitation of the pseudo-meek by the Vain, thereby
hastening the end of state-hegemonic civilization itself.
29.
For when there is no longer any prey for the noumenally sensual predators to
avail of, they will be 'out of business', and it will not be long before the
consequences of that begin to percolate down the entire axis of state-hegemonic
society and it collapses in upon itself for want of adequate external
nourishment. For an imperial beast, driven, in objective vein, by
female-dominated criteria, cannot long survive the removal of its prey, and
even the threat of such removal may be enough to drive it over the brink and
into the most irrational and barbarous of manoeuvres in order to prevent or
preclude the other axis from fully getting its act together and leaving it in
the lurch.
30.
That, however, remains to be seen. But one must be aware of the
possibilities and be prepared and able, moreover, to take all necessary
measures either to prevent or, if that proves impossible, deal with them when
the time comes. For one cannot expect a fundamentally irrational and
predatorily objective beast to go away quietly when its whole immoral ethos is based
around commercial exploitation through free enterprise of an explicitly somatic
nature. It will resent and, as far as possible, resist every attempt by
the New Righteous, the genuinely noumenally sensible, to deliver the
pseudo-meek from their much-put-upon predicament, especially since the terms of
deliverance, amounting to a new order of salvation and counter-damnation,
require the exploitation of democracy to a profoundly theocratic end, the sort
of end which every society rooted in Creationism and/or Creatorism, no matter
how ostensibly democratic or even republican, is hell-bound to resist, since it
flies in the face of all that would theocratically hype autocracy and make a
God out of Devil the Mother.
31.
Be that as it may, the utilization of the paradoxical subversion of
contemporary state freedom in Eire and other such countries can only be from
the standpoint of the overhauling of traditional church-hegemonic criteria in
the interests not only of a more efficacious salvation of the People from worldly
sins and pseudo-crimes than would otherwise be possible but, no less
importantly, of their deliverance from those who, ever rooted in Evil and
pseudo-Folly, would otherwise continue to prey upon and corrupt them from the
libertarian vantage-point of the more radical state-hegemonic criteria which
issue from an order of 'Vanity Fair' which puts even the libertarian audacities
of British imperialism in the pseudo-noumenally sensual shade, guilty though
they are of endeavouring to emulate their American counterparts.
32.
Thus and only thus can the pseudo-meek, lapsed catholic masses be delivered
from Evil, as well as, when once the pseudo-foolish corollary of Evil has been
taken into account, from their own pseudo-worldly shortcomings which may still
be dignified with reference to sin and pseudo-crime, not to mention, in free
soma, to folly and pseudo-evil. And this in spite of
the fact that they signify a shift from phenomenal sensuality to
pseudo-phenomenal sensuality. For that is a parallel axial shift,
as, conversely, in the state-hegemonic drift from Britain to America, from
phenomenal sensibility to pseudo-phenomenal sensibility and from
pseudo-noumenal sensuality to noumenal sensuality, and does not alter the
fundamental distinctions between genuine sin and grace, coupled to pseudo-crime
and pseudo-punishment, in the bound to free psyche of church-hegemonic axial
criteria, and genuine crime and punishment, coupled to pseudo-folly and
pseudo-wisdom, in the free to bound soma of state-hegemonic axial criteria,
each of which has to be juxtaposed with subordinate criteria in respect of
either the State, as from free to bound soma, or the Church, as from bound to
free psyche, the former the foolish to wise and pseudo-evil to pseudo-good
counterparts, according to gender, of sin and grace, pseudo-crime and
pseudo-punishment, and the latter the criminal to punishing and pseudo-sinful
to pseudo-graceful counterparts of evil and good, pseudo-folly and
pseudo-wisdom.
33.
Therefore while we need to distinguish pseudo from genuine in relation to the
axial transformations which have come to pass from a post-worldly standpoint, a
standpoint favouring the noumenal heights, we need not doubt that the logic of
genuine sin and grace in relation to church-hegemonic criteria and genuine
crime and punishment in relation to state-hegemonic criteria more or less
persists irrespective of whether the axial integrity is worldly or
post-worldly; for that is an altogether different logical holon, as it were,
which operates by rules determined by the particular class of hegemonic
criteria, be they of the Church or of the State, and has little or nothing to
do with the axial emphasis towards genuine or pseudo manifestations of
phenomenal or noumenal criteria, despite superficial appearances to the
contrary.
34.
For that is an historical and devolutionary and/or evolutionary matter, whereas
the axes as such are established on the basis of either church-hegemonic or
state-hegemonic criteria, psyche or soma, maleness or femaleness, subjectivity
or objectivity, and cannot deviate from the principles of either a male lead of
society or a female rule of it, principles which ensure that, no matter how
pseudo-noumenal the Church may be within a worldly era, the acceptance of grace
as something one rises to from sin (as, for females, one rises, in secondary
church-hegemonic vein, to pseudo-punishment from pseudo-crime), is forever
distinct from the rejection of goodness as something one falls to from evil
(as, for males, one falls, in secondary state-hegemonic vein, to pseudo-wisdom
from pseudo-folly), no matter how pseudo-noumenal the State may be within a
worldly era.
35.
For the principal aspects of these antithetical axes are forever at
cross-purposes with each other, a male lead of society in church-hegemonic
terms ensuring that genuine sin and grace, the principal attributes of
church-hegemonic society, exist no less within the diagonally ascending axis
than pseudo-sin and pseudo-grace within its diagonally descending counterpart,
while, conversely, a female rule of society in state-hegemonic terms ensures
that genuine evil and good, the principal attributes of state-hegemonic
society, exist no less within the diagonally descending axis than pseudo-evil
and pseudo-goodness within its diagonally ascending counterpart, quite apart
from the secondary positions of female church-hegemonic and male
state-hegemonic criteria within their respective axes.
36.
All this is of course very complicated and not at all easy to understand, even
though logically incontestable. For compared to church-subordinate
criteria within a state-hegemonic society, a society characterized by a bias
for soma at the expense of psyche, only the sins and graces of a
church-hegemonic society, which rather favours a bias for psyche at the expense
of soma, will accord with a more genuine approach to and interpretation of sin
and grace, not to mention, in secondary terms, with a less genuine approach to
and interpretation of crime and punishment, the female 'pseudo' corollaries in
sensuality and sensibility of the primary - and male - manifestations of
church-hegemonic criteria as applying to bound and free psyche within
antiphysical and metaphysical, as opposed to chemical and antimetachemical,
contexts.
37. Conversely,
compared to state-hegemonic criteria within a state-subordinate society, a
society characterized by a bias for psyche at the expense of soma, only the
evils and goodnesses of a state-hegemonic society, which rather favours a bias
for soma at the expense of psyche, will accord with a more genuine approach to
and interpretation of evil and good, not to mention, in secondary terms, with a
less genuine approach to and interpretation of folly and wisdom, the male
'pseudo' corollaries in sensuality and sensibility of the primary - and female
- manifestations of state-hegemonic criteria as applying to free and bound soma
within metachemical and antichemical, as opposed to antimetaphysical and
physical, contexts.
38.
Therefore despite shifts from genuine to pseudo or from pseudo to genuine
manifestations of phenomenality and noumenality, the overall attributes of each
axis remain more or less consistent with the terms under which they operate and
exist, even if degrees of genuineness or pseudoness in relation to those
attributes of state or church can be adduced from the status of the axis, a
pseudo-noumenally sensible position incapable of conferring or, more correctly,
overseeing the development of genuine grace to anything like the same extent as
would characterize a fully functioning metaphysical and antimetachemical
position in genuine noumenal sensibility and, conversely, a pseudo-noumenally
sensual position likewise incapable of encouraging the development of genuine
evil to anything like the same extent as a fully functioning metachemical and
antimetaphysical position in genuine noumenal sensuality - such comparative
distinctions also applying, in lower terms, to their phenomenal counterparts.
39.
However that may be, we can be under no doubt that evil and crime are no less
genuine, in general terms, in pseudo-noumenal sensuality than they would be in
noumenal sensuality, even if their degree of genuineness is apt to be
beneficially affected by and to reflect the worldly relativity to which they are
perforce subject by the prevalence of phenomenal sensibility.
40.
Likewise we may rest confident that goodness and punishment are no less
genuine, in general terms, in pseudo-phenomenal sensibility than they would be
in phenomenal sensibility, even if their degree of genuineness is apt to be
adversely affected by and to reflect the netherworldly absolutism to which they
are perforce subject by the prevalence of noumenal sensuality.
41.
Conversely, we can take it as axiomatic that grace and wisdom are no less
genuine, in general terms, in pseudo-noumenal sensibility than they would be in
noumenal sensibility, even if their degree of genuineness is apt to be
adversely affected by and to reflect the worldly relativity to which they are
perforce subject by the prevalence of phenomenal sensuality.
42.
Likewise we may be assured that sin and folly are no less genuine, in general
terms, in pseudo-phenomenal sensuality than they would be in phenomenal
sensuality, even if their degree of genuineness is apt to be beneficially
affected by and to reflect the otherworldly absolutism to which they would be
subject by the prevalence of noumenal sensibility.
43.
In actuality, where this latter eventuality is concerned, we may well believe
that such sin and folly, together with its female complements in pseudo-crime
and pseudo-evil, would be subject to progressive reduction and even eventual
elimination, the more the vain powers that currently prevail over them were
countered by that enhanced order of righteousness accruing to genuine noumenal
sensibility, the objective of which would be to save and counter-damn the
pseudo-phenomenally sensual masses up to free psyche and bound soma more
efficaciously and lastingly than would otherwise be possible, and precisely by transforming
them, bit by bit, into mirror images of the Righteous themselves, whose grace
and wisdom, coupled for females to pseudo-punishment and pseudo-goodness, would
owe much if not everything to the progressive cyborgization of life over which
they were destined to preside following the revolutionary supersession of the
world or, more correctly, the new pseudo-world of the pseudo-meek and,
ironically, the old pseudo-otherworld of the pseudo-righteous, all those
priests and other religious traditionalists whose grace and wisdom, though
comparatively genuine, was insufficiently such as to accord with or permit of
'world overcoming' on a more than relative and, indeed, provisional basis, the
basis owing much, if not everything, to verbal absolution for penitential
contrition on the part of the meek, the more genuinely phenomenally sensual
forerunners of today's much-preyed upon Americanized, democratized, urbanized,
and proletarianized lapsed catholic masses, whom we have accordingly termed
'pseudo-meek' and believe - indeed know - to be in line for direct access to
that more genuine order of righteousness which will only come, in 'Kingdom
Come', with genuine noumenal sensibility, following a majority mandate for
religious sovereignty in what has been described as a paradoxical utilization
of the democratic process in countries with the right kind of axial
precondition of such a utilization, commensurate, as has often been said, with
'Judgement'.
44.
Of course, one cannot take the staging of such a paradoxical election for
granted even in countries which would seem to be most likely to permit or
encourage it; for this would not be in consequence of just another political
party manoeuvring itself towards power but would be a development that had the
potential to put an end to democracy once and for all, in the event, sooner or
later, of a majority mandate for religious sovereignty, such as I have
identified, all along, with an ultimate mode of sovereignty as germane to the
furthermost development of republicanism in what would seem to be the nearest
ideological equivalent to 'Kingdom Come', a rather inadequate, because
traditional, term for a society led by the most credible approximation to a
Second Coming, a Messianic leader who desires nothing less than the democratic
overthrow of worldly or, more correctly, pseudo-worldly society in the
interests of the utmost otherworldly salvation and counter-damnation of the
pseudo-meek to genuine righteousness, an eventuality only likely to transpire
in conjunction with the elevation and advancement of theocracy to its most
genuine level and stage of existence, a stage commensurate with what has been
termed Social Theocracy, or the theocracy of a religiously sovereign People who
are their own approximations to God the Father and, for females, the
Antidaughter of the Antidevil, as well, as in state-subordinate terms, to the
Son of God and Antidevil the Antimother, as described in previous texts.
45.
Therefore those who are now the pseudo-phenomenally sensual pseudo-meek have
the prospect, with this paradoxical utilization of the democratic process in
countries like Eire, of becoming, following a majority mandate for religious
sovereignty, germane to a genuinely righteous order of noumenal sensibility, an
order overhauling the pseudo-noumenal sensibility of the pseudo-righteous
priests that currently still function, if less credibly and effectively so than
of old, but are unable to prevail over the pseudo-meek, even if elements of the
genuine meek are still subject to their influence and persuasions.
46.
That matters little! For in the overall picture the genuine phenomenally
sensual are of small account beside that greater proportion of antimen and
women who constitute the pseudo-meek of contemporary Americanized civilization,
and who can be persuaded, I firmly believe, to use the democratic process to
vote, paradoxically, for religious sovereignty in the event of the Movement for
Social Theocracy not only 'setting up shop', so to speak, among them, but
appealing to them to opt, via such a vote, for deliverance from their
pseudo-worldly predicament to a salvation and counter-damnation that will
follow from religious sovereignty, since one must first opt for religious
sovereignty if one wishes to be saved and counter-damned from the political
sovereignty of the pseudo-world in which one remains trapped, not merely in
relation to one's own sinful and/or pseudo-criminal bound psychic shortcomings,
never mind the more state-oriented foolish and/or pseudo-evil free somatic
corollaries thereof which take on an increasingly significant role and standing
in the pseudo-world but, no less importantly, in relation to the genuine evils
and crimes, not to mention pseudo-follies and pseudo-sins, that 'rain down'
upon one from above, not, to be sure, in terms of pseudo-noumenal sensibility,
still less the as-yet-nonexistent noumenal sensibility of the coming righteous,
but in terms of the noumenal sensuality that is everywhere the fount of all
somatic licence and libertarian immorality, and thus the focus of that which
corrupts and degrades those whose fate it is to suffer the exploitations of the
netherworldly Vain, call them predators, wolves, devils, antigods, celluloid
'stars', or what have you.
47.
Yes, it is the Vain who are the primal cause of the pseudo-meek, for the
pseudo-meek have not been created by the (as yet nonexistent) Righteous the way
the meek were largely the product of the pseudo-righteous, but thanks to the
extent to which noumenal sensuality, appertaining to state-hegemonic criteria
and thus to the opposite axis from anything Catholic or lapsed Catholic Irish,
is able to do its business at their expense, financially aided and abetted by
the pseudo-just, so that they are the product, in large measure, of its
exploitative zeal and ability to induce them to 'suck up', in
quasi-state-hegemonic vein, to an idolatrous worship of its neo-heathenistic
liberties, liberties which, no matter how superficial and ethnically corrupt,
exert a fascinating influence over their lives and, indeed, keep them in that
comparatively elevated position over their traditional counterparts which
portends, it seems to me, the possibility of a genuinely noumenal sensible
overhaul of church-hegemonic/state-subordinate criteria in due course, as outlined
here and elsewhere in my works.
48.
Thus far from a situation in which antimen and women are saved to and/or
counter-damned by pseudo-gods and/or pseudo-antidevils or, more correctly, the
pseudo-godly and/or pseudo-antidevilish, the revolutionary overhaul of the
church-hegemonic and state-subordinate axis would indicate that, with the
establishment of 'Kingdom Come', the salvation and counter-damnation diagonally
up the said axis will be from the pseudo-phenomenally sensual world of
pseudo-antimen and pseudo-women to the genuinely noumenally sensible otherworld
of the godly and antidevilish, who, in their grace and wisdom,
pseudo-punishment and pseudo-goodness, will encourage the cyborgization of what
had formerly been the pseudo-meek masses towards a level of righteousness not
only transcending that of the principal religious tradition of the West, but
going beyond its Eastern counterpart in transcendental meditation, so that
things actually move forward, in synchronization with global criteria, beyond mankind
to the properly universal heights of what has, in previous texts, been called
Cyborgkind, the rightful - and righteous - destiny of antiman and woman or,
rather, pseudo-antiman and pseudo-woman, since genuine godliness and
antidevilishness is nothing if not intensively cyborgistic in its transcendence
of what approximates to mankind in terms less of man and antiwoman, still less
pseudo-man (superman) and pseudo-antiwoman (super-antiwoman), than of their
pseudo-phenomenally sensual counterparts in what is, by all accounts, the
pseudo-worldliness of the Americanized, democratized, urbanized,
proletarianized lapsed catholic present.
49.
Therefore two critical points arise from the above statement. The first
is that the Catholic priesthood are there to be overhauled by a religiously
sovereign People who will have rights in relation to such sovereignty, and the
second is that it is not so much, in Nietzschean parlance, man who has to be
overcome as, from the standpoint of the pseudo-meek, the pseudo-antimen and
pseudo-women of pseudo-phenomenal sensuality, who are precisely those for whom
a more genuine noumenal sensibility is both possible and desirable. Of
course, in the broader species perspective, 'man' is something that has to be
overcome ... if godliness, for example, is to prevail. But there is a
world of difference, all the difference of the mass positions, or position of
the masses, at the foot of each axis, between the antimen and women or, in
contemporary terms, pseudo-antimen and pseudo-women of pseudo-phenomenal
sensuality and the men and antiwomen or, again in contemporary terms,
pseudo-men and pseudo-antiwomen of pseudo-phenomenal sensibility. For
while the latter are hand-in-glove with the noumenally sensual (not merely the
pseudo-noumenally sensual), in the mutual exploitation of the former, the
pseudo-phenomenally sensual pseudo-meek in question are bereft of religious
guidance, and thus the possibility of salvation, not to mention its
state-subordinate corollary of counter-damnation, so long as there is no
godliness and antidevilishness in genuine noumenal sensibility to appeal to
them and thereby save them from their pseudo-worldly predicament.
50.
This is and must be the otherworldly task of Social Theocracy. This is
what those dedicated to the advancement and consolidation of religious
sovereignty in the People must set about overseeing. For the
pseudo-phenomenally sensual People can no more save and/or counter-damn
themselves to noumenal sensibility than the pseudo-righteous save and/or
counter-damn them to pseudo-noumenal sensibility, when the Catholic priesthood
are merely an anachronism that is powerless to intervene on their behalf, their
clerical remit only extending as far as the phenomenally sensual, and such
traditional Catholics are hardly representative of life in the contemporary
urban contexts of ongoing secularity, being, if anything, a dwindling minority
of largely rural and provincial types who have been overtaken by the march of
contemporary civilization as it advances to the tune of an American horn.