26. Likewise, it can be maintained that, in sensibility, crudity, and therefore inferior negativity, accrues to the categories of elemental particles and molecular particles, whereas refinement, and therefore superior positivity, accrues to the categories of molecular wavicles and elemental wavicles.

27. The use of verbal expletives, while morally deplorable, is applicable to the particle categories but quite inapplicable to the wavicle ones, insofar as such expletives accord with the will and/or spirit in both sensuality and sensibility.

28. There is not just one category of verbal expletives, nor even two, but four categories corresponding to the planes of space, time, volume, and mass, which therefore range from the upper-class context of space/time to the lower-class context of volume/mass, whether in terms of the elemental and molecular particle axial categories of space-time, of time-space, of volume-mass, or of mass-volume, the first and third axes female and falling diagonally between contiguous class planes, the second and fourth axes male and rising diagonally between contiguous class planes, as from sensuality to sensibility in either case.

29. These four categories of verbal expletives can be characterized in terms of 'snogging' for the plane of space, whether in relation to 'jerks' in spatial space (female) or to 'bums' in spaced space (male); 'frigging' for the plane of time, whether in relation to 'bums' in sequential time (male) or to 'jerks' in repetitive time (female); 'sodding' for the plane of volume, whether in relation to 'cunts' in volumetric volume (female) or to 'pricks' in voluminous volume (male); and 'fucking' for the plane of mass, whether in relation to 'pricks' in massive mass (male) or to 'cunts' in massed mass (female).

30. We may thus distinguish between the 'snogg*** jerks' of spatial space and the 'frigg*** jerks' of repetitive time in relation to the particle negativity of space-time metachemistry, the falling axis - as, in human terms, from eyes to heart - of fire par excellence.

31. We may thus distinguish between the 'frigg*** bums' of sequential time and the 'snogg*** bums' of spaced space in relation to the particle negativity of time-space metaphysics, the rising axis - as, in human terms, from ears to lungs - of air par excellence.

32. We may thus distinguish between the 'sodd*** cunts' of volumetric volume and the 'fuck*** cunts' of massed mass in relation to the particle negativity of volume-mass chemistry, the falling axis - as, in human terms, from tongue to womb - of water par excellence.

33. We may thus distinguish between the 'fuck*** pricks' of massive mass and the 'sodd*** pricks' of voluminous volume in relation to the particle negativity of mass-volume physics, the rising axis - as, in human terms, from phallus to brain - of vegetation (earth) par excellence.

34. When such verbal expletives are coupled with denigratory nouns, as in the above examples, it is evident that one has a sexually-conditioned gender differential between female 'jerks' and 'cunts' in relation to fire and water, metachemistry and chemistry, on the one hand, and male 'pricks' and 'bums' in relation to vegetation and air, physics and metaphysics, on the other hand, with due class and/or Elemental differentiation.

35. Doubtless the denigratory nouns can be applied right across the category board, as it were, from elemental particle to elemental wavicle via molecular particle and molecular wavicle, since one is recognizably one thing or another irrespective of whether in particle or wavicle mode, but it would be quite inappropriate, I feel, for such nouns to be coupled with verbal expletives in relation to the wavicle categories of any particular Element, since those categories, whether molecular or elemental, appertain to psychic positivity in respect of ego and/or soul and should never be confounded with the instinctual and/or spiritual particles of somatic negativity.

36. In effect, the use of verbal expletives with or without denigratory nouns of a sexual or gender import is usually confined to, and identifiable with, persons who are habitually less intellectually egocentric or emotionally psychocentric than instinctual or spiritual, and therefore less psychic than somatic, less 'heads' than 'bodies', less 'educated' than 'uneducated'. Indeed, one is tempted to say this is especially true of the 'mass man', though in actuality one need not be somatically of the plane of mass alone to qualify in this respect, since volume, time, and space also have their denigrations and denigrators, with or without accompanying expletives, if less pervasively so in relation to those for whom 'fucking' is the principal if not sole verbal expletive, whether from a male or a female standpoint, and life tends to be reduced to the lowest-common-denominator in terrestrial-to-oceanic fashion, the phallus and the womb being the principal organs of gender rivalry.

37. Certainly there is about the use of verbal expletives a connotation with power and/or glory which owes more to a scientific and/or political disposition than to anything overly economic or religious in character, since, in their per se manifestations, science and politics are female disciplines and therefore affiliated with the will and the spirit par excellence, and never more so, obviously, than in metachemistry and chemistry respectively, whereas economics and religion are male disciplines and therefore affiliated, in their per se manifestations, with the ego and the soul par excellence, as in physics and metaphysics.

38. Therefore those who are beyond power and glory in first-principal terms, being affiliated, in male vein, with form and contentment, the respective 'ideals' of economics and religion in their per se manifestations, are likewise beyond the range or application of verbal expletives, with their power- and/or glory-besotted implications rooted in nature, and are more likely to find such expletives highly offensive and to avoid them as much as possible, if not altogether, in their nurture-conditioned predilections for psychic positivity, a positivity that will only be truly superior in sensibility, wherein psyche is able to be free, whether on hegemonic (male) or subordinate (female) terms, thanks to the emphasis falling on physics or metaphysics, economics or religion, at the expense of chemistry or metachemistry, politics or science, and the quasi-economic or quasi-religious transmutation of the latter disciplines in consequence.

39. Thus the properly economic-minded and the properly religious-minded, being sensibly physical and metaphysical respectively, will tend to avoid the use of verbal expletives and condition their female counterparts accordingly, since the quasi-economic or quasi-religious transmutation of politics and science, chemistry and metachemistry, under the hegemonic sway of physics or metaphysics, will make for a much less particle-oriented disposition than would otherwise be the case, one necessarily deferential to the prevailing molecular and/or elemental wavicle 'ideal'.

40. However, the underlying distinction between particles and wavicles across the subatomic board means that the categories more subject to verbal expletives, with or without accompanying denigratory nouns, will be scientific and/or political rather than economic and/or religious, since these are the disciplinary categories in which particles take precedence over wavicles in either elemental or molecular fashion.

41. I propose to distinguish these particle categories from their wavicle counterparts in terms of a distinction between materialism and fundamentalism in space-time objectivity, the metachemical context par excellence of photons-photinos; between realism and nonconformism in volume-mass objectivity, the chemical context par excellence of electrons-electrinos; between naturalism and humanism in mass-volume subjectivity, the physical context par excellence of neutrons-neutrinos; and between idealism and transcendentalism in time-space subjectivity, the metaphysical context par excellence of protons-protinos; always remembering that objectivity and subjectivity are to be defined in terms of a gender differential between that which diverges in sensuality and/or converges in sensibility on a straight-line basis, as in convolutional terms in relation to a vacuum, and that which diverges in sensuality and/or converges in sensibility on a curved-line basis, as in involutional terms in relation to a plenum, the former options having their origins in soma, the latter in psyche.

42. Consequently space-time objectivity, rooted (vacuum-wise) in metachemistry, is divisible between the materialism of photonic elemental particles and the fundamentalism of photonic elemental wavicles in both sensuality and sensibility, the materialism of the former being negatively superior to the materialism of the latter, the fundamentalism of the former being positively inferior to the fundamentalism of the latter, but it is also divisible, as we have seen, between what could be termed the fundamentalist materialism of photonic molecular particles and the materialist fundamentalism of photonic molecular wavicles, as between 'bovaryized' political and economic positions in between a scientific per se and a 'bovaryized' order of religion.

43. Similarly volume-mass objectivity, rooted (vacuum-wise) in chemistry, is divisible between the realism of electronic elemental particles and the nonconformism of electronic elemental wavicles in both sensuality and sensibility, the realism of the former being negatively superior to the realism of the latter, the nonconformism of the former being positively inferior to the nonconformism of the latter, but it is also divisible between what could be termed the nonconformist realism of electronic molecular particles and the realist nonconformism of electronic molecular wavicles, as between a political per se and a 'bovaryized' economics in between 'bovaryized' orders of science and religion.

44. Conversely mass-volume subjectivity, centred (plenum-wise) in physics, is divisible between the naturalism of neutronic elemental particles and the humanism of neutronic elemental wavicles in both sensuality and sensibility, the naturalism of the former being negatively superior to the naturalism of the latter, the humanism of the former being positively inferior to the humanism of the latter, but it is also divisible between what could be called the humanist naturalism of neutronic molecular particles and the naturalist humanism of neutronic molecular wavicles, as between a 'bovaryized' politics and an economic per se in between 'bovaryized' orders of science and religion.

45. Similarly time-space subjectivity, centred (plenum-wise) in metaphysics, is divisible between the idealism of protonic elemental particles and the transcendentalism of protonic elemental wavicles in both sensuality and sensibility, the idealism of the former being negatively superior to the idealism of the latter, the transcendentalism of the former being positively inferior to the transcendentalism of the latter, but it is also divisible between what could be called the transcendentalist idealism of protonic molecular particles and the idealist transcendentalism of protonic molecular wavicles, as between 'bovaryized' political and economic positions in between a 'bovaryized' order of science and a religious per se.

46. Thus in all contexts there are intermediate positions or realities in between the absolute extremes of the elemental particles and wavicles, positions which, though distinct from each, are nevertheless compromised by them in contrary ways, the molecular particle position in terms of the wavicle extreme, the molecular wavicle position in terms of the particle extreme, so that we can speak, for instance, of fundamentalist materialism and materialist fundamentalism, in respect of metachemistry, and contrast each of these compromised positions with the materialist and fundamentalist extremes characterizing the absolute positions in which particles and wavicles are elemental rather than molecular.

47. And what applies to metachemistry, the noumenally objective Element (in space-time) of photons in sensuality and photinos in sensibility, applies to each of the other Elements - the phenomenal objectivity (in volume-mass) of electrons in sensuality and electrinos in sensibility of chemistry; the phenomenal subjectivity (in mass-volume) of neutrons in sensuality and neutrinos in sensibility of physics; and the noumenal subjectivity (in time-space) of protons in sensuality and protinos in sensibility of metaphysics.

48. Thus while science remains science and religion remains religion, whether per se or 'bovaryized', politics and economics are less straightforwardly one thing or another but effective paradoxes in which there is a leaning towards religion, and even a pseudo-religious dimension, about politics and a leaning towards science, and even a pseudo-scientific dimension, about economics, even though neither are commensurate with the disciplines towards which they are drawn or, alternatively, with which they may compete when an age or society is such that things are less extreme than moderate, or less noumenal than phenomenal, in typically worldly vein, and extreme positions or disciplines tend to get squeezed out of the overall frame in consequence.

49. But if science is the discipline of free will in metachemical soma par excellence, then politics is the discipline of free spirit in chemical soma par excellence, each of which contrast, as female to male, with economics as the discipline of free ego in physical psyche par excellence, and religion as the discipline of free soul in metaphysical psyche par excellence - all in relation, of course, to their per se manifestations and not in respect of whatever degree of 'bovaryization' may be attendant upon the subordination of any given discipline to that discipline which, in accordance with a specific societal tendency, happens to correspond to the per se mode of science, politics, economics, or religion, as the case may be.

50. For although in theory you can have it all ways, in practice only one discipline will be in its per se mode in any given type of society or civilization, everything else being 'bovaryized' and therefore subordinated to the prevailing norm, be it scientific and of free will in the noumenal objectivity of sensual metachemistry; political and of free spirit in the phenomenal objectivity of sensual chemistry; economic and of free ego in the phenomenal subjectivity of sensible physics; or religious and of free soul in the noumenal subjectivity