Axial Subversion and Inversion doesn’t change Fundamental Status of Phenomenal Hegemonic Positions. Of course, this detracts nothing from the fact that the hegemonic phenomenal positions are normally subject to axial subversion and paradoxical inversion at the behest of the noumenal positions axially corresponding to themselves, so that, far from an outright heathenism of free somatic emphasis in the chemical/antiphysical gender dichotomy at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass one finds, traditionally at any rate, the paradoxical inversion to bound psychic emphasis vis-à-vis such free psyche ostensibly obtaining in metaphysics over antimetachemistry at the northeast point of what constitutes church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial criteria in Roman Catholic fashion.  Likewise, if in contrary terms, far from an outright Christianity of free psychic emphasis in the physical/antichemical gender dichotomy at the southeast point of the intercardinal axial compass, one finds, again traditionally, the paradoxical inversion to bound somatic emphasis vis-à-vis such free soma as indubitably obtains in metachemistry over antimetaphysics at the northwest point of what constitutes state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial criteria in Anglican Monarchic fashion.  Nevertheless, even then, we have a logical right to distinguish, according to gender, between the phenomenal low/phenomenal antihigh on the one axial hand, and their phenomenally high/phenomenally antilow ethnic counterparts on the other axial hand, as between the generality of persons of Irish Catholic and British Puritan descent.