The Madness of Antisanity. I have no hesitation in equating the antisanity of the anti-elemental positions with madness and in differentiating it from both ‘outsanity’, viz. outer sanity, and ‘insanity’, viz, inner sanity, since it is in all instances a product, primarily, of binding, of psychic binding in the antimetaphysical and antiphysical anti-elements under the free-somatic hegemonic pressure of metachemistry and chemistry respectively, and of somatic binding in the antichemical and antimetachemical anti-elements under the free-psychic hegemonic pressure of physics and metaphysics respectively.  Hence that which, in the one case, is anti-insane in the antisanity of antimetaphysical or antiphysical bound psyche and that which, in the other case, is anti-outsane in the antisanity of antichemical or antimetachemical bound soma is alone mad, in the sense of being at cross-purposes with its gender actuality under hegemonic pressure from the opposite gender, be that gender female and given to free soma (outer sanity) or male and given to free psyche (inner sanity), the former type of sanity low and the latter type of sanity high in both phenomenal and noumenal elemental contexts.