CYCLE THREE: NATURES OF THE ELEMENTS
1. That which is fiery is metachemical,
but the (un)nature of metachemistry is materialistic
on account of its subatomic derivation from the most basic, or elemental
particle, subdivision of the metachemical element par
excellence, viz. the photon in external ('once-born') contexts and the photino in internal ('re-born') ones, the former affiliated
to noumenal sensuality and the latter to noumenal sensibility.
Hence we may speak of metachemical
materialism.
2. That which is watery is chemical, but the
(un)nature of chemistry is realistic on account of its subatomic derivation
from the more (in relation to most) basic, or molecular particle, subdivision
of the chemical element par excellence, viz. the electron (if conventional)
and/or positron (if radical) in external contexts and the electrino
(if conventional) and/or positrino (if radical) in
internal ones, the former affiliated to phenomenal sensuality and the latter to
phenomenal sensibility. Hence we may
speak of chemical realism.
3. That which is vegetative is physical, but the
nature of physics is naturalistic on account of its subatomic derivation from
the more (in relation to most) advanced, or molecular wavicle,
subdivision of the physical element par excellence, viz. the neutron
(if conventional) and/or deuteron (if radical) in external contexts and the
neutrino (if conventional) and/or deuterino (if
radical) in internal ones, the former affiliated to phenomenal sensuality and
the latter to phenomenal sensibility.
Hence we may speak of physical naturalism.
4. That which is airy is metaphysical, but the
nature of metaphysics is idealistic on account of its subatomic derivation from
the most advanced, or elemental wavicle, subdivision
of the metaphysical element par excellence, viz. the proton
in external ('once-born') contexts and the protino in
internal ('re-born') ones, the former affiliated to noumenal
sensuality and the latter to noumenal
sensibility. Hence we may speak of
metaphysical idealism.
5. Just as it is in the (un)nature
of metachemistry to be materialistic and in the
(un)nature of chemistry to be realistic, so it is in the nature of physics to
be naturalistic and in the nature of metaphysics to be idealistic.
6. The Materialist is
therefore one for whom metachemistry is paramount on
account of an identification with the most basic subdivision, in elemental
particles, of photons and/or photinos.
7. The Realist is therefore one for whom
chemistry is paramount on account of an identification with the more (in
relation to most) basic subdivision, in molecular particles, of electrons
and/or electrinos (if conventional) or positrons
and/or positrinos (if radical).
8. The Naturalist is therefore one for whom
physics is paramount on account of an identification with the more (in relation
to most) advanced subdivision, in molecular wavicles,
of neutrons and/or neutrinos (if conventional) or deuterons and/or deuterinos (if radical).
9. The Idealist is
therefore one for whom metaphysics is paramount on account of an identification
with the most advanced subdivision, in elemental wavicles,
of protons and/or protinos.
10. Generally speaking, materialists and realists
are 'she's' on account of the objective (un)natures of
metachemistry and chemistry.
11. Generally speaking, naturalists and idealists
are 'he's' on account of the subjective natures of physics and metaphysics.
12. Where the wavicle
subdivisions of the objective elements are concerned, we can speak of their
molecular and elemental manifestations as less and least basic in relation to
the most and more basic elemental and molecular manifestations of the particle
subdivisions of these same elements.
13. Where the particle subdivisions of the
subjective elements are concerned, we can speak of their elemental and
molecular manifestations as least and less advanced in relation to the more and
most advanced molecular and elemental manifestations of the wavicle
subdivisions of these same elements.
14. Hence to descend, in either metachemical materialism or chemical realism, from most to
least basic via more and less basic manifestations of subatomic presentation,
as from elemental particles to wavicles via molecular
particles and wavicles.
15. Hence to ascend, in either physical naturalism
or metaphysical idealism, from least to most advanced via less and more
advanced manifestations of subatomic presentation, as from elemental particles
to wavicles via molecular particles and wavicles.