THE
COMING 'KINGDOM'
1. I have taught the way to 'Kingdom Come' on the
basis of Social Transcendentalism and a democratically-mandated assumption of
religious sovereignty by the People, as the type of society commensurate with
the achievement of deliverance from 'sins and/or punishments of the world' -
the former having more relevance to the Church, and the latter to the State.
2. I have also stressed the desirability of
Ireland, Scotland, and Wales joining together into a Gaelic Federation within
the European Union, and I believe that such a federation, commensurate with
'Kingdom Come' so far as the British Isles is concerned, would deliver the
Gaels from both English rule and/or domination and, no less importantly, the
political and religious divisions which currently still keep them apart, as in
Northern Ireland, where Protestant Unionism is ever at variance with Catholic
Nationalism, despite the racial similarities which exist between a majority of
people on each side of the ethnic divide.
3. Thus I have offered a way out of the divided
predicament in which, due to English meddling traditionally, the Gaels of
Ireland, both Protestant and Catholic, still find themselves, and I have
stressed that any prospect of a united Ireland can only be premised upon the
basis of a Gaelic federation of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, such that would
deliver the peoples concerned from their respective nationalities and
correlative sectarian divisions, making, in the long run, for a new nation with
a new and (so far as I am concerned) altogether superior religion to that
which, in the dichotomous nature of the world, was and continues to be
responsible, in no small measure, for their divided predicament, a predicament
over which England still profitably prevails, as of yore.
4. For until Christianity
is democratically rejected on both sides of the ethnic divide, the people of
Ireland, and hence Gaels in general, will continue to be divided and, what's
worse, divisible between Irish and British nationality.
5. But if the acceptance, through a majority
democratic mandate for religious sovereignty, of Social Transcendentalism is
the way out of the dualistic and even pluralistic divisions of the world for
peoples of Irish and/or British nationality, making for a Gaelic identity
common to both traditions in which, for literally the first time in their
history, people of Irish, Scotch, and Welsh descent can join together in a new
and altogether superior 'Kingdom' to anything that has gone before, could not
such a solution to the major political and religious problems of the British
Isles also have applicability elsewhere, where similar ethnic divisions exist,
as in the Middle East?
6. For if Gaels of Irish and British nationality
can be prevailed upon, through Social Transcendentalism, to abandon their respective
nationalities in favour of a new and better nationality ... such that enables
them to unite in a supra-national framework commensurate, so I believe, with
'Kingdom Come', why shouldn't Semites of Israeli and Palestinian nationality,
of Jewish and Arab descent, be prevailed upon to put the past behind them and
build towards a better future on the basis of the religious ideology in
question?
7. For people are divided, in Israel, between
those who, being Jewish, properly identify with Israel and those who, being
Arabic, aspire towards the establishment of a Palestinian State, a State which
can only be achieved with the consent of Israel.
8. Yet Israel is reluctant, for a variety of
reasons, to relinquish too much territory to Palestinian aspirations, since
Israel is a small country anyway, and one that is surrounded, moreover, by
numerous Arab nations, most of which, being Moslem, have no great love of
Israel, homeland, traditionally, to Jewish refugees and immigrants, more
recently, from the Diaspora.
9. Hence there is a reluctance on the part of
Israel to allow for the establishment of a Palestinian State in its midst, a
State which could further threaten Israel's existence in the future by striving
after more land for its growing population(s) and simply adding, in the
process, yet another Arab nation to the mass of such nations which already
exist, and which Israel, being Judaic, has every reason to fear.
10. For the Arabs have never shown any great love
of Israel, and Israel, for its part, has refused to allow itself to be bullied
and intimidated by Arab opposition to its existence, even to the extent of
waging terrible war for its survival.
11. Yet so long as Jews and Arabs, Israelis and
Palestinians, Judaists and Mohammedans exist, there will be the threat, if not
actuality, of war; for the one side can only profit at the other's expense,
since, beyond a certain restricted point, mutual compromise is impossible.
12. But supposing Israel, which, despite giving
citizenship to Arabs and other non-Jewish minorities, continues to be a
solution to the Jewish Diaspora and to the terrible crimes of the Holocaust,
were to compromise with Social Transcendentalism and thus cease being a
predominantly Jewish state, as at present, would not a solution to the problem
of Israel vis-à-vis Palestine, or Palestinian aspirations, then be possible, a
solution, I mean, which transcended both Judaic and Moslem, Jewish and Arab,
Israeli and Palestinian divisions?
13. For the divisions which currently exist between
Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland are to a certain extent similar
to those which exist between Judaists and Moslems in Israel, whereby religion
rather than race is the underlining reason for separate national identities or,
at any rate, for aspirations towards independence from Britain by Irish
Catholics and for independence from Israel by Palestinian Moslems?
14. Whether such aspirations were to result in
unity with traditional co-religionists, as in Ireland, or in a separate
Palestinian State, complete, one can only suppose, with defence and diplomatic
rights, as in Israel, the fact of the existence of such aspirations cannot be
denied, though it is difficult, to the point of impossible, to see them ever
being fulfilled.
15. Old religions create the divisions between
Irish and British, Israelis and Palestinians: therefore only by democratically
abandoning such religions can there be any prospect of unity between the
peoples concerned, unity in a new religion which, offering people deliverance
from Creator-based religious traditions, brings the possibility of a new nation
to pass on the basis of either a Gaelic Federation (for the British Isles) or a
Semitic Federation (for the Middle East), a federation that leaves the state/church,
state/synagogue, state/mosque relativities behind it, as it brings those on
each side of the ethnic divide to a common religious and cultural identity in
Social Transcendentalism, thereby allowing things to pass from alpha to omega,
from the Beginning to the End, and hence from the Creator to the Ultimate
Creation.
16. Thus a Semitic Federation for those who,
whether Jew or Moslem, Hebrew or Arab, Judaist or Islamicist,
Davidian or Mohammedan,
Talmudic or Koranic, Israeli or Palestinian, etc.
etc., democratically opt, if and when the opportunity were officially to arise
(with due consent from all concerned) to abandon both their religious
traditions and, no less importantly, the 'sins and/or punishments of the world'
which, in the dichotomous nature of state/church relativity, still divide them,
precluding the possibility of genuine and lasting peace.
17. For how else can Israel move forward, in the
medium-to-long-term future, except on the basis of a new religion in 'Kingdom
Come', a 'Kingdom' that effectively transcends Israel, as Social
Transcendentalism would transcend Judaism as well as Palestine and
Mohammedanism, neither of which can do anything more than perpetuate the past.
18. For Israel is inseparable from Jehovah,
Judaism, Jews, Hebrews, and other such Creator-based traditions deriving from
Judea and now owing allegiance, via Jerusalem, to the 'Star of David', the
Israeli national flag, while Palestine is inseparable from Allah,
Mohammedanism, Moslems, Arabs, and other such Creator-based traditions deriving
from Arabia and now owing allegiance, via Mecca, to the Palestinian
emblem. The one is rooted in the Torah,
or Jewish Bible, and the other in the Koran, the Moslem Bible. Neither can prevail except at the other's
expense, and that is the real problem.
19. Consequently, only be abandoning what divides
them in favour of what they have in common, namely their Semitic ancestry and
culture, can Jews and Moslems, Hebrews and Arabs, unite, creating, under
Messianic auspices, a Semitic Federation based on Social Transcendentalism,
which would allow, under religious sovereignty, for a triadic Beyond of
religious praxis in which persons of Islamic, Christian, and Judaic descent
could practise emotional self-realization according to their tier entitlements
within the overall structure of the Centre, the context of religious praxis for
a religiously sovereign People.
20. Such a federation, commensurate with 'Kingdom
Come' in the Middle Eastern context, will have an emblem of its own, the Supercross, with colour-variations applicable to the
context of Israeli and Palestinian fusion, and be akin to a butterfly escaping
from a chrysalis, the 'butterfly', in this case, being a Semitic Federation
that democratically emerges from the 'chrysalis' of Israel and its Palestinian
host.
21. Should this prove acceptable to both the
Israeli (Jewish, Hebrew, Davidian) and Palestinian
(Moslem, Arab, Mohammedan) peoples, then I can see no
reason why the solution to their divided predicament should not be found within
it, since unity rather than conflict is what will guarantee genuine peace, even
if further struggles lie ahead, both within Israel/Palestine and without ...
vis-à-vis the Arab states in general and hard-line fundamentalist ones in
particular.
22. Certainly, it is probable that an internal deal
between Jewish and Moslem elements in Israel of the sort that I have been
hinting at on these pages, a deal, or 'New Covenant', that left not only Israel
and Palestine behind but, no less significantly, Judaist and Islamicist, would prove less than attractive or even
acceptable to the rulers of certain Arab states, fearful lest their own
fundamentalist power base be undermined and democratically eroded in due
course.
23. There will always be opposition or reaction from
vested interests to revolutionary and progressive proposals or implementations,
and a Semitic Federation that was Social Transcendentalist, given to complete
independence from Creator-based religious primitivity,
could expect nothing less from those who felt vulnerable to the threat of or
clamour for religious sovereignty, and the deliverance from fundamentalism
which it expressly implied.
24. Whatever form this reactionary opposition to
religious deliverance were to take, I am confident that Israel or, rather, our
hypothetical Semitic Federation, the coming 'Kingdom' of a united Social
Transcendentalist people, would be able to deal with it, especially with the
prospect of external advice and/or assistance from other peoples, including
those of our hypothetical Gaelic federation of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales who
would be on the side of religious progress against religious tradition,
determined to ensure that the exponents of 'environmental determinism', and
other such reactionary ruses, were not able to prevail over the 'free spirits'
who believe that environment can be artificially modified and religious and
other matters along with it, to the end of evolutionary progress away from
cosmic evil and towards an ever deeper universal wisdom.
25. For, in the end, however difficult the path,
God and Heaven must prevail over the Devil and Hell, truth and joy over beauty
and love (to say nothing of their negative equivalents), if mankind are to
maximize their wisdom and minimize their evil, thereby affirming the soul-self
at the expense of the id-self in 'Kingdom Come'.