CYCLE TWELVE

1. One thing we can be sure about is that males and females are not equal, or equivalent, creatures but organic opposites on both noumenal (diabolic and divine) and phenomenal (feminine and masculine) planes, since females stem from or operate in relation to a vacuum, the objectivity of which necessarily precludes genuine ego and soul, while males stem from or operate in relation to a plenum, the subjectivity of which renders will and spirit transmutably subordinate to ego and soul.

2. Hence while the one gender is selflessly objective and inclined to subordinate self to not-self, or Psyche to Nature, in respect of metachemistry and chemistry, or the objective elements par excellence, the other gender is selfishly subjective and inclined to subordinate not-self to self, Nature to Psyche, in respect of physics and metaphysics, or the subjective elements par excellence.

3. The objective predominance of the Will and the Spirit with females means that, in both metachemistry and chemistry, Nature tends to condition Psyche, making less for Soul and Ego than for their metachemical or chemical modifications in terms of Id and Superego, the one at once more instinctual and the other more spiritual.

4. Contrariwise, the subjective predominance of the Ego and the Soul with males means that, in both physics and metaphysics, Psyche tends to condition Nature, making less for Will and Spirit than for their physical and metaphysical modifications in terms of Mind and Subspirit, the one at once less instinctual and the other less spiritual.

5. It could be said that, transmuted exceptions to the rule notwithstanding, females only achieve a real sense of Ego and Soul in relation to males, and that these become aspects of their male makeup, while males likewise only achieve a real sense of Will and Spirit in relation to females, which then become aspects of their female makeup.

6. However that may be, it is incontrovertibly the case that females relate primarily to the Will and the Spirit in those unnatural and supernatural contexts which approximate to metachemical and chemical Nature and only secondarily to the Soul and the Ego, duly modified as Id and Superego, in those unconscious and superconscious contexts which approximate to metachemical and chemical Psyche, so that they are forever driven to subordinate self to not-self in due objective fashion.

7. Likewise, it is incontrovertibly the case that males relate primarily to the Ego and the Soul in those natural and subnatural contexts which approximate to physical and metaphysical Nature and only secondarily to the Will and the Spirit, duly modified as Mind and Subspirit, in those conscious and subconscious contexts which approximate to physical and metaphysical Psyche, so that they are forever driven to subordinate not-self to self in due subjective fashion.

8. Clearly, a society which treats males and females alike, as the same, is going to be in for a lot of disillusionment and confusion! For criteria conceived as relevant by the one gender will largely prove irrelevant to and even undermining of the other gender, and either an androgynous muddle or the disguised tyranny of one gender over the other will ensue, with unsavoury consequences!

9. Even the attempt to reduce mankind to one class flies in the face of reality and backfires on those foolish or ignorant enough to espouse and even, in certain tragic circumstances, to further a class-partisan point of view. No more than criteria applicable to one gender will suffice for both genders, can criteria applicable to one class suffice for both classes, whether noumenal or phenomenal, upper (in time and space) or lower (in volume and mass). For the reduction of society to one class, say the lower class, is likely to deprive mankind of beauty and truth in the interests of strength and knowledge, whether or not these are then hyped out of all proportion to their true worth, while the reduction of society to one gender, say the female gender, can deprive mankind of a moral lead, and thus the possibility of holiness on both civilized and, especially, cultural terms.

10. In reality, the division of mankind between two genders and two classes ensures that the full gamut of elemental reality is accounted for and that not only generation and civilization but, of higher significance still, race and culture are granted due recognition whether in sensuality or, preferably, in sensibility, where, as I have attempted to demonstrate, civilization and culture would be wise, and generation and race good, and therefore germane to a morally-oriented society in which truth and knowledge were characterized by holiness, and race and generation by unclearness, as females deferred to males in acknowledgement of a greater binding than that to which they were subject (in due operation of a damned good predicament and moral paradox) - the binding, in other words, of a saved wise elevation in which self-enhancement was the sensible - and righteous - order of the day.

11. For only through wisdom can those who are capable of genuine ego in civilized knowledge and genuine soul in cultural truth constrain those who are incapable of both manliness and godliness to the goodness of generative strength in the superego and of racial beauty in the id.

12. The absence of such constraints is - and always will be - testimony to a wont of true wisdom; for things will revert to a context in which Nature has the better of Psyche and evil and folly accordingly freely prevail under the secular, not to mention paganistic or heathenistic, banners of sensual culture/race and/or civilization/generation, with the clear righteous dominating the unholy unrighteous from the blessed advantage-point of objective freedom.

13. Such is, in effect, the nature of modern reality, and if there is to be any prospect of a less evil and foolish and even more good and wise outcome to historical development, then judgement will need to be done and those who are now effectively blessed or cursed with sensual freedom be saved or damned, according to gender (both literal and denominational, in response to a majority mandate for religious sovereignty), to the sensible bindings of a triadic Beyond and administrative aside in 'Kingdom Come'.

14. For there is no other way forward, and no other way, ultimately, in which the sanctity of the individual, but the male individual above all, can be both protected and maintained in the face of those collectivistic or socialistic moral aberrations which stem from a wont of both ego and, especially, soul, in due female vein, and banner forth the false doctrines of cultural, racial, social, and sexual equality under the scientific and political audacities of secular freedom, to the detriment of all that is wise and holy, as well as to the detriment, in female terms, of all that is good and unclear.

15. Only when the myth of equality has been consigned to the rubbish heap of history will the inequalitarian truth of 'Kingdom Come' actually stand a chance of coming to pass, to the lasting advantage of mankind, and not only of mankind with a masculine emphasis, as embodied in the concept of a sinful fulcrum, but, in a more comprehensive manner of speaking, of womankind, devilkind, and especially godkind, with the possibility of corresponding 'afterlife' experiences according with the nature or, rather, psychic nature of the various types of gender and/or class-based self, from metachemical and chemical to physical and metaphysical, beautiful and strong to knowledgeable and true, with the inevitable psychic corollaries of love, pride, pleasure, and joy.

LONDON 2001 (Revised 2012)

Preview THE MYTH OF EQUALITY eBook