THE WISDOM OF SENSIBLE TRUTH
1. Truth, for anyone who arrives at it after a
long and often difficult intellectual and emotional journey, is its own reward,
beyond any financial or material value.
For truth is more important to its devotee, the philosopher, than
beauty, strength, or knowledge, and is something, moreover, that is beyond
everything else - everything else, that is to say, but joy, which is that to
which truth leads and by which it can be tested.
2. The poet revels in beauty; the playwright, or
dramatist, in strength; the novelist, or writer, in knowledge; and the
philosopher alone in truth. For the
philosopher is the ultimate kind of literary figure, who goes beyond everyone
else in his concern with what is ultimate.
3. Not the fieriness of metachemistry,
nor the wateriness of chemistry or the vegetativeness
(earthiness) of physics, but the airiness of metaphysics - this is the
principal concern of the philosopher, whose interest in the ultimate element
distinguishes him from those for whom fire, water, or vegetation (earth) are of
principal concern.
4. Muddleheads there
are and have, of course, long been, but the true or genuine philosopher is as
much a creature of airiness, and hence metaphysics, as the genuine poet is a
creature of fieriness, and hence metachemistry, or
the genuine dramatist a creature of wateriness, and hence chemistry, or the
genuine novelist a creature of vegetativeness, and
hence physics.
5. All philosophers who are genuine know that
truth is their principal concern, but only a rare type of philosopher can
distinguish fool's truth from wise truth and identify with the latter, as
indeed a philosopher should do. For
truth is not germane to sensibility alone but is also to be found in
sensuality, and it is in sensuality that it is cursed with folly, as opposed to
being saved from folly by the wisdom of sensibility.
6. Yes, the highest type of genuine philosopher
is a creature of wisdom, more particularly of metaphysical wisdom, and he knows
that so long as people persist in metaphysical folly, the truth of sensuality,
they will not be of the metaphysically Saved but, on the contrary, of the
metaphysically Cursed ... with the folly of sensual truth.
7. Such foolish truth has as much to do with the
ears and the consciousness that is into the ears aurally as wise truth has to
do with the lungs and the consciousness that is into the respiratory essence of
the lungs. Therefore the person whose
habitual mode of metaphysical truth is aural is a fool compared to the one for
whom metaphysical truth requires of consciousness a respiratory focus, having
to do with the lungs and their will to breathe.
8. Of course, one must distinguish between
primary truth and secondary truth in both metaphysical sensuality and
sensibility, since before there can be aural consciousness or respiratory
consciousness there must firstly be a consciousness which is given over, in
metaphysical fashion, to either the ears or the lungs, as the case may be, and
thus to that which hears or breathes but does not listen or meditate, like the
consciousness in question.
9. For the consciousness that listens or
meditates, depending on the context, is of the self, the central nervous
system, but the organ that hears or breathes, again depending on the context,
is a not-self, which is to say, an organ distinct from, though affiliated with,
the self, and which enables that self - both the brain stem and spinal column
of the central nervous system - to function in either a sensual or a sensible
manner.
10. Thus we have to distinguish primary truth from
secondary truth on the basis of this distinction between self and not-self, the
one identifiable with the metaphysical ego and the other with the metaphysical
will, whether in sensuality or in sensibility.
11. Now just as truth leads to joy, so we must
distinguish between a primary and a secondary manifestation of joy, again on
the basis of self and not-self, since the one is essential to the metaphysical
self, whereas the other emanates from the metaphysical not-self and is thus
less a matter of metaphysical soul than of metaphysical spirit.
12. Such spirit is, of course, germane to the
airwaves in the context of sensual metaphysics and to the breath in the context
of sensible metaphysics, but in both contexts it is a secondary order of joy
compared to the joy which accrues to the self and to the self, more
specifically, as soul. For only primary
truth can achieve primary joy, not that which emanates from either of the
metaphysical not-selves, the ears or the lungs, and is accordingly fated to
remain secondary.
13. Metaphysical ego into metaphysical will equals
metaphysical soul via metaphysical spirit, for once metaphysical consciousness
chooses, in meditating, to identify with the lungs, it is borne out upon the
selfless breath and encouraged to recoil to self more profoundly than would
otherwise have been the case, thereby achieving its redemption in metaphysical
soul - the soul of souls even for the metaphysical consciousness that, scorning
sensibility, prefers to identify with the ears and to recoil from the cursed
spirituality of the airwaves to self more profoundly.
14. Yet the latter redemption of metaphysical ego
in metaphysical soul, of primary truth in primary joy, would be a folly in the
persistence of aural sensuality and therefore not something to rank alongside
metaphysical sensibility, which is the metaphysics of the Saved as opposed to
the Cursed.
15. For the metaphysics of sensuality is ever
subordinate to the metachemistry of sensuality, as
sequential time to spatial space, and is therefore fated to 'look up to' what
is in fact a blessed hegemony on the part of the latter, whereas the
metaphysics of sensibility is hegemonic over the metachemistry
of sensibility, as spaced space over repetitive time, and is therefore saved
from any such foolish deference on the part of the metaphysically Cursed. And precisely in its elevated independence of
such folly is metaphysical sensibility alone wise!
16. Thus he who climbs from time to space in a
rejection of metaphysical sensuality is saved by the metaphysical sensibility
which bears the name of ultimate wisdom (compared to, say, the penultimate
wisdom of physical sensibility) and enables one to seek deliverance from
egocentric universality in the trans-universal psychocentricity,
so to speak, of the metaphysical soul, which is the joyful redemption of
primary truth.
17. For truth, whether primary or secondary, of
the self or of the not-self, is but a divine means to a sublime end, in
sensuality no less than sensibility, and therefore something from which to seek
redemption - and resurrection - in terms of the joy which is its just reward -
spiritual in relation to the metaphysical will of secondary truth, soulful in
relation to the metaphysical ego of primary truth.
18. And, to be sure, this distinction is
paralleled in religion, in musical and meditative praxis, by the relationship,
ever secondary, between the Father and the Holy Spirit (of Heaven) on the one
hand, and the Son and the Holy Soul (of Heaven) on the other hand, so that
Son-into-Father-equals-Holy-Soul-via-Holy-Spirit, whether aurally with regard to metaphysical folly or respiratorally, as it were, with regard to metaphysical
wisdom.
19. For the Son is that which, corresponding to a
primary order of deity, seeks deliverance from egocentric selfhood in psychocentric selfhood via the metaphysical will of the
Father and the metaphysical spirit of the Holy Spirit of Heaven, the secondary
order of deity and heaven which, whether associated with the ears and airwaves
in relation to metaphysical sensuality or with the lungs and breath in relation
to metaphysical sensibility, appertains to the not-self metaphysically and
therefore to that which is truly a means for the self to achieve
self-transcendence in the primary heaven, as it were, of the Holy Soul.
20. Thus both the will and the spirit of secondary
truth and joy, secondary God and Heaven, are means for the primary truth and
godliness of the Son to achieve His end in the primary joy and heavenliness of
the Holy Soul of Heaven, which is His resurrection - and redemption - in the
most sublime self-transcendence it is possible to experience. But it should be remembered that while this
can be experienced foolishly in the cursed context of metaphysical sensuality,
it will only be experienced wisely in the saved context of metaphysical
sensibility, and that the wise God is ever superior to the divine fool.