PRIVATE OBSERVATIONS - 'Personal and Universal': Here, at last, at opus
85 in my total oeuvre, is a much more informal and even relaxed work which
enabled me to lay one or two old autobiographical ghosts to rest while still
continuing to haunt the realm of philosophy in no uncertain metaphysical
terms! In fact, it may be that this
further 2001 project enabled me to lay one or two long-standing philosophical
ghosts to rest as well, since I did not shy away from a fresh look at some old
theories and was duly rewarded, I think, by a new perspective on certain things
which I had begun to take - foolishly or naively - for granted, even though my
previous treatment of them had been anything but conventional or standard. I believe that courage is its own reward and
that he who dares to venture where none has gone before deserves the beneficial
consequences, whatever they may be. All
I can say is that in this text certain very complicated and even paradoxical
philosophical and moral issues have been tackled afresh and solved, to the best
of my ability, in a way and with a structural comprehensiveness which leaves
very little room for dissent. In that, I
think I have achieved, with a text that went on to become more universal than
personal, far more than I could possibly have hoped for at the beginning!
THE MYTH OF EQUALITY: Reworking much of the material contained in the
above, this text goes deeper into the distinction between gender-conditioned
forms of culture and civilization, as well as develops a more comprehensive
perspective on sin and grace on the one hand, and crime and punishment on the
other, specifically with regard to a distinction between nature and psyche in
both sensuality and sensibility. Also of
special note here is the departure from previous ascriptions of will, spirit,
ego, and soul to each gender in favour of the modification of psyche attendant
upon a natural bias and, conversely, the modification of nature attendant upon
a bias towards the psyche. All in all,
THE MYTH OF EQUALITY succeeds in bringing my philosophy to an inequalitarian and very pluralistic head, such that
confirms the desirability of elemental comprehensiveness on both class- and
gender-conditioned terms.
FREEDOM AND DETERMINISM - 'The Gender Agenda': Building on the
greater comprehensiveness achieved above, this text returns us to the concept,
already well-explored in my work, of the triadic Beyond and explains the
distinction, hitherto unstressed, between primary and secondary forms of both
salvation and damnation, according to denominational predisposition and gender
affiliation, within the subdivisions of any given tier. It also builds upon the dichotomy between
nature and psyche in both sensuality and sensibility to explain in greater
detail why either nature conditions psyche or, more sensibly, psyche
conditions nature. Of course, the author
openly acknowledges the extent to which gender factors-in to the distinction
between free nature and free psyche, but suggests that, through environmental progress, we have the ability to change the relationship of
the one to the other in the interests of a more sensible outcome. Finally, he reaffirms his opposition to
religious affiliations based on psychic determinism and argues in favour of the
environmental justification for an ultimate religious manifestation, within the
triadic framework alluded to above, of psychic freedom, simultaneously
restating the terms and means by which this may officially be brought to pass.
POINT OMEGA POINT - 'The Omega Standpoint': This directly follows on
from the above text not only with a deeper understanding of the distinction
between Nature and Civilization, but with greater insight into the division
within both Nature and
Civilization of sensual and sensible alternatives, as well as with a wider
interpretation of Nature and Civilization such that brings a more exactingly
comprehensive perspective to bear on each, whilst still adhering to a specific
civilized bias, as before. But as well
as an enlargement of perspective which allows for a sharp differentiation
between the natural and the man-made, there is an enhancement of logic such
that clarifies the issues of salvation and damnation as never before, so that
there can be no doubt as to the issues involved and on what basis a sensible alternative
to a sensual predominance must be achieved, if it is to be achieved. In this respect, the distinction between
freedom and binding, so characteristic of various earlier texts, is less
symptomatic of one or the other than of both sensual and sensible contexts, if
with vastly different emphases, as described in some detail in what is, by any
accounts, the most lucidly and logically consistent apologetics for an omega
alternative to an alpha-besotted decadence and/or barbarity that could be imagined. Finally, I have to say that the appendix is
virtually as significant as the work itself in the way in which it brings to a
long-overdue head a dichotomy which until quite recently I hadn't realized was
expressive of a generalization but which at last, in rather more than Kantian
or Schopenhauerian fashion, I was able to utilize in
both concrete and abstract, natural and psychic realms on terms which do it
altogether more specific contextual justice - the dichotomy, I mean, between
the phenomenal and the noumenal which, at long last,
I have decided to bring into line with that elemental comprehensiveness for
which, I hope, my philosophy will be esteemed in times to-come.
Copyright © 2001-2012 John O’Loughlin