CONCERNING MALE AND FEMALE CHROMOSOMES

The XY chromosomal integrity of the male, so paradoxically combining the physical with the metaphysical, has always meant that his Achilles heel, so to speak, is the X of physical departure from and, in an underlining sense, support for the Y which, no matter how inevitable and even humanly desirable, always leaves him vulnerable to female predation from the opposing chromosomal standpoints of the metachemical and chemical XX’s, with especial immediate, or short-term, reference to the former, the fiery nature (supernature) of which is commensurate with beauty and love, both of which conspire to exploit the physical vulnerability (old adam) of the male in the (ungodly) interests of reproduction (the ‘increasing and multiplying’ of Old Testament sanction), so that he becomes the plaything and, to some extent, devotee of female beauty (and love), deferring, artist-like, to the whorish freedom a plane above him at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, where metachemistry reigns over pseudo-metaphysics, and ceases, in consequence, to live in and for his Y at the northeast point of the said compass, much as Adam fell from his Edenic innocence once he had allowed Eve to seduce him (with the apple of forbidden knowledge, i.e. carnal knowledge) and ceased to be true to his self (his metaphysical self), with consequences with which we are only too familiar!

For it was from the tree of forbidden knowledge, corresponding to the physical X, that the apple was plucked, and it was thanks to its appeal to the ‘old Adam’ in him, his baser or lower self, that he was seduced and duly found himself, all too inevitably, cast out of the Edenic paradise of perfect self-harmony in metaphysical acknowledgement of and loyalty to the Y of his deeper and higher self.

Thus from the curse of Adam, the self-divisions of physical X and metaphysical Y, came the ‘fall of man’ from his godly image or likeness, a fall at first not self-evident if only because the offering of an XX-chromosomal seduction by the female has its roots in the metachemical self of beauty and love, thereby providing something higher than – and axially contrary to – the physical X of his lower self.

But this metachemical X, rooted in somatic freedom, is only a means for the female to a lower end, the end, once the male Y has been twisted to a loving admiration, artist-like, of female beauty at the expense of joyful self-awareness, of the chemical X in the surrogate plenum (for someone rooted, as females are, in a vacuum) of maternal resolution, the X of strength and pride that has little or no time (or inclination) for the placating of physical knowledge and pleasure, duly carnally debased, through beauty and love because it has other – and better – things to do or to concern itself with, things that will increasingly marginalize the X of the male even as it was formerly held in an XX-chromosomal grip and unable to be true to its Y, something which in the XX-X context (or predicament) of worldly subjection is even more remote, and to the point where the justification for faith (by the Y-severed male, or pseudo-male) in messianic intervention in order to return him, duly transfigured, to the Y of his youthful idealism and almost Edenic innocence, through the process of deliverance known as salvation, is virtually inevitable.

For salvation (from the world of his self-denying predicament at the hands of maternal resolution of the female) is for the male, more specifically the pseudo-masculine male of pseudo-physics, and involves his restoration to the godly heights of perfect self-transcendence in Y-chromosomal truth to metaphysical self, which is of the Soul.  His rise, should it transpire, and restoration to an Edenic-like innocence, presupposes the concomitant counter-fall, or counter-damnation, of the chemical female, the feminine female, to the pseudo-devilish or pseudo-diabolic counter-depths of pseudo-metachemical binding, wherein the free somatic X of metachemical selfhood, duly severed from the free somatic X of chemical selfhood, will be neutralized, so that never again will beauty and love be able to seduce knowledge and pleasure in the interests of strength and pride to the detriment – and exclusion – of truth and joy.  Never again, in other words, will the free will of metachemistry, rooted in free soma, be able to seduce the free ego of physics from its support of the free soul, centred in free psyche, of metaphysics in the name of the free spirit of chemistry, rooted, below, in the somatic freedom of maternity.

In a world – necessarily otherworldly in its metaphysical aspects – characterized, on the other hand, by free soul, there could be no place for free ego, much less free spirit or free will.  Therefore the binding of will shall accompany, in pseudo-metachemistry, the freeing of soul through metaphysics, as the Lord Y (more than Yahweh, Yoni, Yogi, etc, and effectively the Yohalin precondition of perfect Y-ness for the religiously sovereign [a subject I have gone into elsewhere]) reigns over the neutralized X of the vanquished female, the avenging angel, when necessary, of the Lord Y whose paradise will be for ever, lasting, in other words, for all Eternity in the cyborg-oriented metaphysical structure of a St George and the (prone or neutralized or slain) Dragon-like parallelism, a parallelism which, for all eternity, will signify the dragon, or lion, that, duly neutralized, ‘lies down’ ... in pseudo-metachemical subjection ... with the lamb of God, whose metaphysical joy in perfect Y-contentedness will be all the sweeter.