DISCIPLINARY AND OTHER CONTRASTS IN AXIAL
PERSPECTIVE
To contrast the science and pseudo-religion of
the northwest point of the intercardinal axial
compass … with the religion and pseudo-science of the northeast point of the
said compass, as one would contrast metachemistry and
pseudo-metaphysics with metaphysics and pseudo-metachemistry.
To contrast the politics and pseudo-economics
of the southwest point of the intercardinal axial
compass … with the economics and pseudo-politics of the southeast point of the
said compass, as one would contrast chemistry and pseudo-physics with physics
and pseudo-chemistry.
To contrast the evil and crime of metachemistry and the pseudo-folly and pseudo-sin of
pseudo-metaphysics … with the grace and wisdom of metaphysics and the
pseudo-punishment and pseudo-goodness of pseudo-metachemistry,
as one would contrast barbarity and pseudo-philistinism with culture and
pseudo-civility.
To contrast the pseudo-evil and pseudo-crime of
chemistry and the folly and sin of pseudo-physics … with the pseudo-grace and
pseudo-wisdom of physics and the punishment and goodness of pseudo-chemistry,
as one would contrast pseudo-barbarity and philistinism with pseudo-culture and
civility.
To contrast the superfemininity
and submasculinity of metachemistry
and the pseudo-subfemininity and pseudo-supermasculinity of pseudo-metaphysics … with the supermasculinity and subfemininity
of metaphysics and the pseudo-submasculinity and
pseudo-superfemininity of pseudo-metachemistry,
as one would contrast materialism/fundamentalism and
pseudo-idealism/pseudo-transcendentalism with transcendentalism/idealism and
pseudo-fundamentalism/pseudo-materialism.
To contrast the femininity and unmasculinity of chemistry and the pseudo-masculinity and
pseudo-unfemininity of pseudo-physics … with the
masculinity and unfemininity of physics and the
pseudo-femininity and pseudo-unmasculinity of
pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast naturalism/pantheism and
pseudo-realism/pseudo-humanism with humanism/realism and
pseudo-pantheism/pseudo-naturalism.
To contrast the superheathenism
and subchristianity of metachemistry
and the pseudo-subheathenism and pseudo-superchristianity of pseudo-metaphysics … with the superchristianity and subheathenism
of metaphysics and the pseudo-subchristianity and
pseudo-superheathenism of pseudo-metachemistry,
as one would contrast vanity and pseudo-meekness with righteousness and
pseudo-justice.
To contrast the heathenism and unchristianity of chemistry and the pseudo-christianity and pseudo-unheathenism
of pseudo-physics … with the Christianity and unheathenism
of physics and the pseudo-heathenism and pseudo-unchristianity
of pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast pseudo-vanity and meekness with
pseudo-righteousness and justice.
To contrast the supersensuousness
and subconsciousness of metachemistry
and the pseudo-subsensuousness and pseudo-superconsciousness of pseudo-metaphysics … with the superconsciousness and subsensuousness
of metaphysics and the pseudo-subconsciousness and
pseudo-supersensuousness of pseudo-metachemistry, as one would contrast free will and bound
soul with free soul and bound will.
To contrast the sensuousness and unconsciousness
of chemistry and the pseudo-consciousness and pseudo-unsensuousness
of pseudo-physics … with the consciousness and unsensuousness
of physics and the pseudo-sensuousness and pseudo-unconsciousness of
pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast free spirit and bound ego with free ego
and bound spirit.
To contrast the supernaturalism and subnurturalism of metachemistry
and the pseudo-subnaturalism and pseudo-supernurturalism of pseudo-metaphysics … with the supernurturalism and subnaturalism
of metaphysics and the pseudo-subnurturalism and
pseudo-supernaturalism of pseudo-metachemistry, as
one would contrast protons and pseudo-photons with photons and pseudo-protons.
To contrast the naturalism and unnurturalism of chemistry and the pseudo-naturalism and
pseudo-unnurturalism of pseudo-physics … with the nurturalism and unnaturalism of
physics and the pseudo-naturalism and pseudo-unnurturalism
of pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast electrons and pseudo-neutrons with
neutrons and pseudo-electrons.
To contrast the virtuously (free) and viciously
(bound) clear morality of metachemistry and the
pseudo-virtuously (pseudo-free) and pseudo-viciously (pseudo-bound)
pseudo-unholy pseudo-unmorality of pseudo-metaphysics
… with the virtuously (free) and viciously (bound) holy morality of metaphysics
and the pseudo-virtuously (pseudo-free) and pseudo-viciously (pseudo-bound)
pseudo-unclear pseudo-unmorality of pseudo-metachemistry, as one would contrast space and pseudo-time
with time and pseudo-space.
To contrast the pseudo-virtuously (pseudo-free)
and pseudo-viciously (pseudo-bound) pseudo-clear pseudo-morality of chemistry
and the virtuously (free) and viciously (bound) unholy unmorality
of pseudo-physics … with the pseudo-virtuously (pseudo-free) and
pseudo-viciously (pseudo-bound) pseudo-holy pseudo-morality of physics and the
virtuously (free) and viciously (bound) unclear unmorality
of pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast volume and pseudo-mass with mass and
pseudo-volume.
Although both metachemistry
and pseudo-metaphysics on the one hand and metaphysics and pseudo-metachemistry on the other reflect parallel distinctions
between the genuine and pseudo elements, as regards an unequivocally hegemonic
and an unequivocally subordinate gender position, the same cannot be said of
chemistry and pseudo-physics on the one hand and of physics and
pseudo-chemistry on the other, since in each case the hegemonic position is
merely equivocal and the subordinate position likewise, if subject to primary
(as against secondary) polar interplay with its corresponding gender element in
the unequivocally hegemonic position to which it is axially polar, which
element, whether metachemical or metaphysical,
indirectly causes a subversive switch of emphasis on the subordinate position
from soma to psyche or from psyche to soma, as the gender case may be, in
consequence of which the equivocally hegemonic element, be it chemical or
physical, is forced into a secondary (as against primary) polar relationship
with its corresponding gender polarity in the unequivocally subordinate
position contrary to it, making for either secondary (as against primary)
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate or state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial
relativity vis-à-vis its primary counterpart on the opposite side of the gender
fence, be that male or female.
Hence the secondary standing of chemistry and
pseudo-metachemistry to pseudo-physics and
metaphysics on the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis stretching from
southwest to northeast points of the intercardinal
axial compass, and hence, too, the secondary standing of physics and
pseudo-metaphysics to pseudo-chemistry and metachemistry
on the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis which stretches, by contrast,
from the southeast to the northwest points of the said compass.
But even without overall axial relativity, or
interaction between the noumenal and phenomenal
like-gender positions, chemistry would be pseudo-clear vis-à-vis the clearness
of metachemistry, while pseudo-physics would be
unholy vis-à-vis the pseudo-unholiness of
pseudo-metaphysics, if only because two genuine or, for that matter, pseudo
positions cannot co-exist as noumenal or phenomenal,
ethereal or corporeal, absolute or relative pairings.
And the same, of course, applies to the pseudo-holiness
of physics vis-à-vis the holiness of metaphysics on the one hand, and the
unclearness of pseudo-chemistry vis-à-vis the pseudo-unclearness of pseudo-metachemistry on the other hand.
The clearness of metachemistry
is vain, whereas the pseudo-holiness of pseudo-metaphysics is pseudo-meek. Hence the viable co-existence of vanity with
pseudo-meekness, like space with pseudo-time, devilishness/hellishness with
pseudo-godliness/pseudo-heavenliness, elemental particles with elemental
pseudo-wavicles.
Conversely, the holiness of metaphysics is
righteous, whereas the pseudo-unclearness of pseudo-metachemistry
is pseudo-just. Hence the viable
co-existence of righteousness with pseudo-justice, like time with pseudo-space,
godliness/heavenliness with pseudo-devilishness/pseudo-hellishness, elemental wavicles with elemental pseudo-particles.
Likewise, the pseudo-clearness of chemistry is
pseudo-vain, whereas the unholiness of pseudo-physics
is meek. Hence the viable co-existence
of pseudo-vanity with meekness, like volume with pseudo-mass,
womanliness/purgatory with pseudo-manliness/pseudo-earthiness, molecular
particles with molecular pseudo-wavicles.
Conversely, the pseudo-holiness of physics is
pseudo-righteous, whereas the unclearness of pseudo-chemistry is just. Hence the viable co-existence of
pseudo-righteousness with justice, like mass with pseudo-volume,
manliness/earthiness with pseudo-womanliness/pseudo-purgatory, molecular wavicles with molecular pseudo-particles.
Thus the primary state-hegemonic/church-subordinate
axial polarity of metachemical vanity and
pseudo-chemical justice, with the axial polarity of pseudo-metaphysical
pseudo-meekness and physical pseudo-righteousness secondarily
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate.
One can be damned from vanity to justice and
counter-saved from pseudo-meekness to pseudo-righteousness.
Likewise, the primary
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial polarity of metaphysical righteousness
and pseudo-physical meekness, with the axial polarity of pseudo-metachemical pseudo-justice and chemical pseudo-vanity
secondarily church-hegemonic/state-subordinate.
One can be saved from meekness to righteousness
and counter-damned from pseudo-vanity to pseudo-justice. For, in ‘Kingdom Come’, the chemical ‘first’
(equivocally hegemonic at the southwest point of the intercardinal
axial compass) will be pseudo-metachemically ‘last’
(unequivocally subordinate at the northeast point of the said compass), whereas
the pseudo-physical ‘last’ (equivocally subordinate at the southwest point of
the intercardinal axial compass) will be
metaphysically ‘first’ (unequivocally hegemonic at the northeast point of the
said compass), as though in the final triumph (global) of St George over a
prone (neutralized by counter-damnation) dragon, a pseudo-dragon of absolute
pseudo-metachemical subordination to the metaphysical
triumph of our proverbial saint.