ONTOLOGICAL AND OTHER CONTRASTS IN ELEMENTAL PERSEPCTIVE

To contrast the doing of metachemistry with the pseudo-being of pseudo-metaphysics, as one would contrast power with pseudo-contentment.

To contrast the being of metaphysics with the pseudo-doing of pseudo-metachemistry, as one would contrast contentment with pseudo-power.

To contrast the giving of chemistry with the pseudo-taking of pseudo-physics, as one would contrast glory with pseudo-form.

To contrast the taking of physics with the pseudo-giving of pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast form with pseudo-glory.

To contrast the devility of metachemistry with the pseudo-divinity of pseudo-metaphysics, as one would contrast hell with pseudo-heaven.

To contrast the divinity of metaphysics with the pseudo-devility of pseudo-metachemistry, as one would contrast heaven with pseudo-hell.

To contrast the femininity of chemistry with the pseudo-masculinity of pseudo-physics, as one would contrast purgatory with pseudo-earth.

To contrast the masculinity of physics with the pseudo-femininity of pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast earth with pseudo-purgatory.

To contrast the positive absolute somatic predominance (over psyche) of metachemistry with the negative absolute psychic preponderance (over soma) of pseudo-metaphysics, as one would contrast elemental particle protons with elemental wavicle pseudo-photons.

To contrast the positive absolute psychic preponderance (over soma) of metaphysics with the negative absolute somatic predominance (over psyche) of pseudo-metachemistry, as one would contrast elemental wavicle photons with elemental particle pseudo-protons.

To contrast the positive relative somatic predominance (over psyche) of chemistry with the negative relative psychic preponderance (over soma) of pseudo-physics, as one would contrast molecular particle electrons with molecular wavicle pseudo-neutrons.

To contrast the positive relative psychic preponderance (over soma) of physics with the negative relative somatic predominance (over psyche) of pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast molecular wavicle neutrons with molecular particle pseudo-electrons.

To contrast the evil (as against crime) of metachemistry with the pseudo-sin (as against pseudo-folly) of pseudo-metaphysics, as one would contrast beauty and love (as against ugliness and hate) with pseudo-illusion and pseudo-woe (as against pseudo-truth and pseudo-joy).

To contrast the grace (as against wisdom) of metaphysics with the pseudo-crime (as against pseudo-evil) of pseudo-metachemistry, as one would contrast truth and joy (as against illusion and woe) with pseudo-ugliness and pseudo-hate (as against pseudo-beauty and pseudo-love).

To contrast the pseudo-evil (as against pseudo-crime) of chemistry with the sin (as against folly) of pseudo-physics, as one would contrast strength and pride (as against weakness and humility) with pseudo-ignorance and pseudo-pain (as against pseudo-knowledge and pseudo-pleasure).

To contrast the pseudo-grace (as against pseudo-wisdom) of physics with the goodness (as against punishment) of pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast knowledge and pleasure (as against ignorance and pain) with pseudo-weakness and pseudo-humility (as against pseudo-strength and pseudo-pride).

To contrast the absolute explosiveness of metachemistry with the absolute pseudo-implosiveness of pseudo-metaphysics, as one would contrast noumenal objectivity with noumenal pseudo-subjectivity.

To contrast the absolute implosiveness of metaphysics with the absolute pseudo-explosiveness of pseudo-metachemistry, as one would contrast noumenal subjectivity with noumenal pseudo-objectivity.

To contrast the relative explosiveness of chemistry with the relative pseudo-implosiveness of pseudo-physics, as one would contrast phenomenal objectivity with phenomenal pseudo-subjectivity.

To contrast the relative implosiveness of physics with the relative pseudo-explosiveness of pseudo-chemistry, as one would contrast phenomenal subjectivity with phenomenal pseudo-objectivity.

The absolute is always a three-to-one ratio in favour, depending on the element, of soma to psyche (female) or of psyche to soma (male), whereas the relative is always a two-and-a-half-to-one-and-a-half ratio, depending on the element, of psyche to soma (male) or of soma to psyche (female), thereby enabling us to categorically distinguish between the noumenal and the phenomenal, as between ethereal and corporeal alternatives on both particle and wavicle, female and male terms, with respect to both soma and psyche.