DISTINGUISHING
BETWEEN STRAIGHT AND CURVED ELEMENTS
1. Life, like the Universe, is divisible between
objectivity and subjectivity, divergence (in sensuality) and/or convergence (in
sensibility) in either straight lines (objective) or curved lines (subjective),
the one hailing from a vacuum in female vein and the other from a plenum in
male vein, so that it hangs or, better, balances between the genders, as
between gender.
2. Space is only one of four spectrums of
existence, the others being time, volume, and mass, and so there has, of
necessity, to be a space which is objective, or straight, and a space which is
subjective, or curved. Ditto for time,
volume, and mass. To limit any one of
these planes of existence to just one gender factor, say curved, is to take a
one-sided view of them which, no matter how justified it may seem from one's
own particular standpoint, must fail to do justice to the spectrum in question. Likewise where the 'straight' interpretation
of a given plane is concerned.
3. Therefore it behoves anyone attempting to
plot a more comprehensive perspective in the interests of philosophical
wholeness and credibility to divide space, time, volume, and mass between objective
and subjective, straight and curved, female and male alternatives, so that
each, in general, is conceived as being both straight and curved rather than
simply straight or curved.
4. Let us take one spectrum at a time, starting
with space, and divide it between the straight, or objective, nature of spatial
space and the curved, or subjective, nature of spaced space, the former
appertaining to sensuality and the latter to sensibility.
5. Likewise with time, the division there being
rather more between the curved, or subjective, nature of sequential time and
the straight, or objective, nature of repetitive time, the former appertaining
to sensuality and the latter to sensibility.
6. Similarly with volume, whose division is
between the straight, or objective, nature of volumetric volume and the curved,
or subjective, nature of voluminous volume, the former appertaining to
sensuality and the latter to sensibility.
7. Finally the division of mass, the lowest
spectrum, will be between the curved, or subjective, nature of massive mass and
the straight, or objective, nature of massed mass, the former appertaining to
sensuality and the latter to sensibility.
8. Returning to the axial theory which I
developed in earlier texts, it is demonstrably the case that a gender division
exists between that which rises diagonally from sensuality to sensibility due
to a subjective disposition and that which falls diagonally from sensuality to
sensibility due to an objective disposition, the one male and the other female.
9. Hence we can distinguish rising through time
and space in time-space subjectivity from falling through space and time in
space-time objectivity, with a distinction, in consequence, between the curved
nature of time and space in the one case, and the straight nature of space and
time in the other case.
10. Hence we can distinguish rising through mass
and volume in mass-volume subjectivity from falling through volume and mass in
volume-mass objectivity, with a distinction, in consequence, between the curved
nature of mass and volume in the one case, and the straight nature of volume
and mass in the other case.
11. Therefore in the noumenal,
or upper class, contexts of the planes of space and time, time-space
subjectivity affords us evidence of a rise from curved time in its sequential
mode to curved space in its spaced mode, while space-time objectivity affords
us evidence of a fall from straight space in its spatial mode to straight time
in its repetitive mode.
12. Likewise in the phenomenal, or lower class,
contexts of the planes of volume and mass, mass-volume subjectivity affords us
evidence of a rise from curved mass in its massive mode to curved volume in its
voluminous mode, while volume-mass objectivity affords us evidence of a fall
from straight volume in its volumetric mode to straight mass in its massed
mode.
13. Hence a subjective rise, whether noumenal or phenomenal, is from one type of curved
existence to another, as germane to a male disposition, whereas an objective
fall, whether noumenal or phenomenal, is from one
type of straight existence to another, as germane to a female disposition.
14. Since that which rises from sensuality to
sensibility in either phenomenal or noumenal contexts
is germane to a male experience, it follows that a rise on the one side of life
will condition a fall on the other; for the female will not automatically elect
to fall diagonally from sensuality to sensibility within the objective
parameters of her noumenal/phenomenal options unless
the male first elects to rise diagonally from sensuality to sensibility within
the subjective parameters of his noumenal/phenomenal
options, given the hegemonic advantages that accrue to female sensuality.
15. Rises within both time-space subjectivity and
mass-volume subjectivity have been identified with alternative forms of
salvation, the former upper class and metaphysical, the latter lower class and
physical. Conversely, falls within both
space-time objectivity and volume-mass objectivity have been identified with
alternative forms of damnation, the former upper class and metachemical,
the latter lower class and chemical.
16. Thus we have noumenal
distinctions between the straight nature of metachemical
space and time and the curved nature of metaphysical time and space, which
contrast, on an upper class/lower class basis, with the phenomenal distinctions
between the straight nature of chemical volume and mass and the curved nature
of physical mass and volume.