RETURNING
TO MEANING
1. Human life requires meaning if it is to
progress and not simply stagnate in a swamp of moral decay. For without meaning it becomes reduced to a
matter of mere survival, and survival too easily revolves around propagation,
and hence sex.
2. Perhaps things are not quite as bad as that
these days, but it was not so long ago that sex and, via sex, propagation was
the virtual be-all-and-end-all of things, as people lived not in relation to
something beyond and greater than themselves, but merely in relation to
physical survival in a meaningless universe.
3. Such, at any rate, was the negative doctrine
under which so many of them lived, and it is small wonder, in consequence, that
sex became so all-important, and eternity (to the extent that the term figured
at all) was reduced to generative persistence through propagation.
4. Such must continue to remain the fate of
those who refuse to attribute meaning to life or who, blinded by intellectual
mentors of an Existentialist or a Nihilistic persuasion, find it undesirable to
do so. For so long as life is regarded
as meaningless, it ceases to have any value beyond sexual reproduction. But as soon as you introduce meaning into
life, it becomes an experiment in self-transcendence in which the world is but
a passing parade and life - human life in particular - an ongoing voyage of
self-discovery.
5. Meaninglessness hails from a vacuum and is
accordingly of female persuasion.
Meaningfulness, on the contrary, stems from a plenum and is accordingly
of male persuasion. An age or society that
champions or recognizes the pre-eminence of meaninglessness will be dominated
by female criteria in typically 'free' vein.
One that recognizes the pre-eminence of meaningfulness, on the other
hand, will be led by male criteria in typically 'bound' vein. The former will be 'open', the latter
'closed'. The one will be secular and
... left wing, the other religious and ... right wing.
6. The twentieth
century was, by and large, an age of meaninglessness. It remains to be seen whether the
twenty-first century can officially embrace meaningfulness in one or a number
of countries and move beyond 'freedom' into a higher order of binding than that
which obtained during the more authentically Christian centuries of, for
example, Western civilization.
7. Only binding or loyalty through faith to a
'higher way', a new meaning for life or interpretation of life, can deliver man
from the vacuous freedoms which continue to reduce life, in typically
meaningless vein, to survival, both physical and sexual. But only where man has the courage to be
'true' to himself, or his gender, and stand up for that which stems from a
plenum and gives meaning to his existence ... can a new meaningfulness, a new
doctrine of progressive life, come to pass.
Man needs the courage to be loyal to himself if
he is to have the will to subscribe to this new doctrine and the confidence to
advance it.
8. And what is this new doctrine? Precisely that life, if it is to have meaning,
real purposeful meaning, must depart the worldly rule of the not-self and
selflessness and return more absolutely to self conceived in terms of the
soul. Only thus will redemption of the
ego come to pass, especially of the metaphysical ego, and life become
orientated towards a final paradise which owes nothing to the so-called Edenic paradise from which mankind expelled themselves
during the course of their evolution towards the world.
9. Thus because the world increasingly manifests
itself as a context of 'freedom', of meaningless survival in relation to
not-self and selflessness, it is fitting that the world should be rejected by
those men who are capable of being 'true' to themselves, in order that progress
can be made in climbing beyond it towards the heights of that paradise where
binding to self is of the very essence of meaning, and nothing more meaningful
could ever be envisaged.
10. For it is only with regard to binding to self
at the expense of freedom from self or, rather, of freedom for not-self and
selflessness that the world, conceived in relation to the dominance of, in
particular, the female, or objective, manifestations of these latter entities,
can be overcome, to be replaced by a society in which otherworldly criteria of
a truly paradisiacal order become paramount.
Such is the meaning of 'Kingdom Come', which will be a kingdom beyond
the world rather than either of or before it.