PROGRESSIVE/REGRESSIVE
PARTNERSHIPS
1. To distinguish between progressive evolution
from the id-self to the not-self and selflessness and regressive evolution from
the not-self and selflessness to the soul-self, as between that which leads
from the alpha paradise to the world, including the ego-self, and that which
leads from the latter to the omega paradise in relation to natural/synthetic
orders of not-self and selflessness.
2. To distinguish between regressive devolution
from the not-self and selflessness to the id-self and progressive devolution
from the not-self and selflessness to the soul-self, as between that which
leads away from the world, including the ego-self, to the alpha paradise and
that which leads away from the world to the omega paradise in relation to natural/synthetic
orders of self.
3. Hence to further distinguish, on the one
hand, between progressive evolution and regressive devolution, as between the
development of not-self and selflessness at the expense of the id-self and the
rejection of not-self and selflessness in favour of the id-self.
4. Hence to further distinguish, on the other
hand, between regressive evolution and progressive devolution, as between the
rejection of not-self and selflessness in relation to naturalistic criteria and
the development of the soul-self.
5. That which progresses and regresses in
relation to naturalistic criteria does so both from the alpha paradise to the
world and from the world to the alpha paradise, whereas that which progresses
and regresses in relation to synthetic criteria does so only from the world to
the omega paradise, not from the omega paradise to the world.
6. Regressive evolution from the world is
designed, in its synthetic transmutation of naturalistic criteria in relation
to the not-self and selflessness, to serve progressive devolution from the
ego-self to the soul-self.
7. Regressive devolution from the world has the
effect, in rejecting the not-self and selflessness from the standpoint of the
id-self, of countering progressive evolution from the id-self to the ego-self.
8. Thus whereas regressive evolution from the
world would manifest in the synthetic transmutation of not-self and
selflessness in the interests of the soul-self, regressive devolution from the
world manifests in the rejection of not-self and selflessness in the interests
of the id-self.
9. That which returns us to 'the Garden', viz.
the alpha paradise, is a very different proposition from that which would
advance us towards the post-Human Millennium, viz. the omega paradise. The former operates within naturalistic
criteria and the rejection of artificiality, the latter in relation to
synthetic criteria that are designed to operate in harmony with the self, and
are not therefore at artificial variance with it.
10. It is in relation to regressive
evolution/progressive devolution that one should view Social Transcendentalism,
the religious basis (so far as I am concerned) of 'Kingdom Come', which is
therefore antithetical to all forms of neo-primitivism, including fascism, but
is not on that account communist, i.e. worldly on a socialist/proletarian
basis, and hence no more than a more exclusively democratic attenuation of the
world. Social Transcendentalism has
nothing less than world-overcoming as its raison d'être, for it is that which
leads beyond the world to the omega paradise of 'Kingdom Come'.
11. It fully accepts, however, that such
world-overcoming as would lead to a new order of society in which, for example,
religious sovereignty was the norm can only be achieved by using the means of
the world, viz. democracy, to advance beyond the world, so that the final
decision as to whether the world is overcome in relation to the development of
'Kingdom Come' rests with the People, the electorate, themselves, and is not and
never could be something imposed upon them from above.
12. For the People must demonstrate a willingness
to entertain salvation from the world to the otherworldly context of 'Kingdom
Come' if the latter is authentically and legally to come to pass, and to come
to pass in relation to a specific politico-religious structure which has been
named Social Transcendentalism and which appeals, initially, to peoples of
Gaelic descent living first and foremost in Ireland (North and South), but
also, in the longer term, in countries like Scotland and Wales, not to mention
islands like the Isle of Man, so that the end-result would be a Gaelic
federation of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales in which not political sovereignty
but religious sovereignty was the appropriate mode of sovereignty for peoples
who had democratically elected - in judgmental vein - to be delivered from the
world, with its sins and/or punishments, to the omega paradise in its inceptive
manifestation.