CURSED DAMNATION VIS-À-VIS BLESSED SALVATION

1. In the past I have tended to draw a Heathen/Christian distinction, with the Heathen blessedness of somatic freedom of females and the Heathen cursedness of somatic or, rather, psychic enslavement of males contrasting with the Christian salvation of psychic freedom of males and the Christian damnation of psychic or, rather, somatic enslavement of females. For salvation, I have argued, tends to be from the curse of psychic subjection of males and damnation, by contrast, from the blessing of somatic freedom of females, so that as the former rise diagonally through two contiguous class planes from sensuality to sensibility, the latter are obliged to fall diagonally through the equivalent planes from sensuality to sensibility, becoming enslaved to the opposite gender's freedom.

2. Consequently salvation for males has been construed as being either from mass to volume in mass-volume subjectivity, as from phallus to brain, or from time to space in time-space subjectivity, as from ears to lungs, the former physical and the latter metaphysical, whereas damnation for females was construed to be either from space to time in space-time objectivity, as from eyes to heart, or from volume to mass in volume-mass objectivity, as from tongue to womb, the former metachemical and the latter chemical.

3. The contrary fates of the genders as they rise or fall through two contiguous class planes seems to be incontrovertibly valid. But the connection of being cursed with unholiness in physical and/or metaphysical sensuality for males and of being blessed with clearness in metachemical and/or chemical sensuality for females now seems to me partly specious, as does the contrary, or sensible, connection of being saved or damned according to gender, when one could - and probably should - argue that the sensual are invariably damned and the sensible saved, if for no other reason than that somatic negativity rules in the former case and psychic positivity in the latter.

4. Let me attempt to clarify. If we attach the concept of being cursed to somatic negativity and of being blessed to psychic positivity, given that soma, when free, is more usually negative and psyche positive in freedom, then the metachemical ratio of most particles/least wavicles will equate with a context of most negativity/least positivity, and therefore of most cursedness/least blessedness, whereas the chemical ratio of more (relative to most) particles/less (relative to least) wavicles will equate with a context of more (relative to most) negativity/less (relative to least) positivity, and therefore of more (relative to most) cursedness/less (relative to least) blessedness, in contrast to the physical ratio, across the gender divide, of more (relative to most) wavicles/less (relative to least) particles equating with a context of more (relative to most) positivity/less (relative to least) negativity, and therefore of more (relative to most) blessedness/less (relative to least) cursedness, and also in contrast to the metaphysical ratio of most wavicles/least particles equating with a context of most positivity/least negativity, and therefore of most blessedness/least cursedness.

5. Therefore as we range across the elements from metachemistry and chemistry on the objective, or female, side of life to physics and metaphysics on its subjective, or male, side, as from fire and water to vegetation (earth) and air, we find a situation in which somatic negativity devolves through the particle and psychic positivity evolves through the wavicle, making for a devolution of cursedness proportionate to an evolution of blessedness.

6. The most cursed elemental context of fiery metachemistry is also the most clear in its somatic absolutism of most particles/least wavicles, whereas the most blessed elemental context of airy metaphysics is also the most holy in its psychic absolutism of most wavicles/least particles, while, in between these space/time noumenal planes, and therefore lower down on the phenomenal planes of mass/volume, the relatively cursed and blessed elemental contexts of watery chemistry and vegetative physics are respectively more (relative to most) clear in the somatic relativity of more (relative to most) particles/less (relative to least) wavicles and more (relative to most) holy in the psychic relativity of more (relative to most) wavicles/less (relative to least) particles - at least when each is free to be either somatically or psychically hegemonic, as the case may be.

7. Consequently life can be said to devolve from the clear absolutism of metachemical objectivity to the clear relativity of chemical objectivity, and to evolve, on the opposite side of the gender fence, from the holy relativity of physical subjectivity to the holy absolutism of metaphysical subjectivity, as from fire to water on the one hand, and from vegetation to air on the other. But while clearness is hegemonic in sensuality, then unholiness will be its male counterpart there, and such sensual metaphysics and/or physics will constitute a secondary order of cursedness which cannot but defer, in under-plane subservience, to the primary order of cursedness which is less sinful than criminal and accordingly less foolish than evil.

8. Conversely, while holiness is hegemonic in sensibility, then unclearness will be its female counterpart there, and such sensible chemistry and/or metachemistry will constitute a secondary order of blessedness which cannot but defer, in under-plane subservience, to the primary order of blessedness which is less punishing than graceful and accordingly less good than wise.

9. For males, remember, are characterized by a psychic predominance in either relative (physically masculine) or absolute (metaphysically divine) terms and cannot but be at cross-purposes with their gender in contexts where, under female hegemonic pressures, they are obliged to grant greater prominence to soma than to psyche and to behave in a foolishly sinful manner which is both unholy and damned, whereas females, by contrast, are characterized by somatic predominance in either absolute (metachemically diabolic) or relative (chemically feminine) terms and cannot but be at cross-purposes with their gender in contexts where, under male hegemonic pressures, they are obliged to grant greater prominence to psyche than to soma and to behave in a goodly punishing manner which is both unclear and saved.

10. For the primary blessings of holiness for males only follow from a free psyche, and such freedom is only possible in sensibility, whether on relative or absolute terms, since then they are in harmony with their gender constitution as creatures for whom psyche predominates over soma in response to the fact or, rather, truth that, with them, psyche precedes soma, as in the more (relative to most) wavicle/less (relative to least) particle context of physics and in the most wavicle/least particle context of metaphysics, and a blessed control of soma by free psyche ensures that the former is less cursed than quasi-blessed in concentric deference to the prevailing freedom, be it egocentric in physics or psychocentric (soulful) in metaphysics.

11. In partnership with this, the secondary blessings of goodness for females only follow from a bound soma, and such binding is only possible in sensibility, whether on relative or absolute terms, since then they are at cross-purposes with their gender constitution as creatures for whom soma predominates over psyche in response to the truth or, rather, fact that, with them, soma precedes psyche, as in the most particle/least wavicle context of metachemistry and in the more (relative to most) particle/less (relative to least) wavicle context of chemistry, and a blessed control of soma by free or, more correctly, pseudo-free psyche ensures that the former is less cursed than pseudo-blessed in concentric deference to the prevailing freedom.

12. Yet the primary cursings of clearness for females only follow from a free soma, and such freedom is only possible in sensuality, whether on absolute or relative terms, since then they are in harmony with their gender constitution as creatures for whom soma predominates over psyche in response to the fact that, with them, soma precedes psyche, as in the most particle/least wavicle context of metachemistry and in the more (relative to most) particle/less (relative to least) wavicle context of chemistry, and a cursed control of psyche by free soma ensures that the former is less pseudo-blessed than quasi-cursed in eccentric deference to the prevailing freedom.

13. In partnership with this, the secondary cursings of folly for males only follow from a bound psyche, and such binding is only possible in sensuality, whether on relative or absolute terms, since then they are at cross-purposes with their gender constitution as creatures for whom psyche predominates over soma in response to the truth that, with them, psyche precedes soma, as in the more (relative to most) wavicle/less (relative to least) particle context of physics and in the most wavicle/least particle context of metaphysics, and a cursed control of psyche by free or, more correctly, pseudo-free soma ensures that the former is less blessed than pseudo-cursed in eccentric deference to the prevailing freedom.

14. The clearness of the female in harmony with her gender disposition of somatic predominance in hegemonic sensuality has to be contrasted with the unclearness of the female at loggerheads, due to psychically free male hegemonic pressures, with her gender disposition of somatic predominance in subordinate sensibility, while, conversely, the holiness of the male in harmony with his gender disposition of psychic predominance in hegemonic sensibility has to be contrasted with the unholiness of the male at loggerheads, due to somatically free female hegemonic pressures, with his gender disposition of psychic predominance in subordinate sensuality.

15. Therefore we must distinguish the primary damned females of metachemical and/or chemical sensuality from the secondary saved females of chemical and/or metachemical sensibility, the former cursed, in the evil and clearness of their somatic freedom, with the primary vice of crime and the latter blessed, in the goodness (unevil) and unclearness of their somatic binding, with the secondary virtue of punishment, while likewise distinguishing the primary saved males of physical and/or metaphysical sensibility from the secondary damned males of metaphysical and/or physical sensuality, the former blessed, in the wisdom and holiness of their psychic freedom, with the primary virtue of grace and the latter cursed, in the folly (unwisdom) and unholiness of their psychic binding, with the secondary vice of sin.