THE MEANING OF SOCIAL TRANSCENDENTALISM
1. That civilization can evolve into the
omega-oriented sensibilities of 'Kingdom Come', I have no doubt whatsoever; but
it will amount to nothing short of a transvaluation
of existing and traditional values, as the somatic concept of freedom is
eclipsed by the psychic concept of freedom, and the factual concept of sanity
by its truthful antithesis, and state freedom makes way for church freedom of a
sort of universality the West - and even the world at large - has not seen
before, with an enhanced sense of and commitment to rationality at the expense
of those unreasoning forces which spring from the free will and free spirit of,
in particular, materialism and realism, and would hold the People to the
unedifying spectacle of the triumph of power and glory over form and
contentment, of somatic darkness over psychic light.
2. This transvaluation
of a civilization currently more somatic than psychic will require that
transcendentalism and humanism come to the psychic fore at the expense not
merely of idealism and naturalism, their somatic counterparts, but in
subjective ascendancy over fundamentalism and nonconformism,
the secondary psychic freedoms of female sensibility which will not emerge into
the light of ecclesiastic day until and unless males opt for salvation,
according to class and denominational disposition (as already described), from
idealism to transcendentalism and from naturalism to humanism, and females are
obliged, in following suit, to abandon the vicious hegemonies of materialism
and realism for the virtuous under-plane subordinations, in fundamentalism and nonconformism, to transcendentalism and humanism, each
gender consigning to the rubbish heap of secular irrelevance all those
barbarous and philistine state freedoms to which the contemporary manifestations
of Western civilization are only too criminally or sinfully prone.
3. Obviously, to progress subjectively as a male
from sensuality to sensibility and to regress objectively as a female from
sensuality to sensibility are two entirely different things, the former
diagonally up between contiguous class planes, the latter diagonally down
between contiguous class planes, but they are committed to the same goal of
psychic freedom and thus of salvation/blessedness, whether on primary terms in
physics and metaphysics for males, or on secondary terms in chemistry and metachemistry for females, so that, at the end of the day,
not barbarism and philistinism but culture and civility, not crime and sin but
grace and punishment are the prevailing realities of society, and one can
safely say that modern civilization, which is overwhelmingly urban on
synthetically artificial terms, has at last come into its wise/holy and
good/unclear own, with nothing to hold it back from infinite evolution towards
some summation set in space centres in the very distant ultra-cyborg future.
4. For, ultimately, the cyborgization
of mankind is the key to the future, to the coming of life into the maximizing
of its evolutionary potential and ability to transvaluate
from alpha to omega, from the outside to the inside, even from a concept of cyborg in which living tissue is outside machine to one in
which living tissue - namely the self - is very much inside a mechanical
envelope designed to protect it and grant to it a longevity completely beyond
the scope of the natural or organic body upon which it still depends.
5. For the self, with especial reference to its
male manifestation, does not really want to die, being too positive in the psychic
precedence of soma to entertain any such negative wish, but is simply obliged
to endure the decomposition and final dissolution of the body and to suffer the
consequences, including a comparatively brief flare-up of afterlife experience
as it is obliged to withdraw from bodily concerns and almost cannibalistically
self-consume itself towards eventual extinction, nerve fibres turning upon
themselves in visionary or mystical illumination, whether for better or,
especially in the case of bent males, for worse!
6. The future opens up the possibility of
everlasting life in an altogether more literal and potentially satisfying way
than anything Christianity or kindred world religions may have envisaged, and
will doubtless encourage a higher solution of the gender problem which, though
fundamentally serving life from a female urge to reproduce, has also plagued it
with ambivalence and indecision, uncertainty and ambiguity, to the detriment of
a clear or, rather, holy moral directive, not least of all in terms of
transcendentalism.
7. For one cannot risk any return, in this transvaluated future phase of modern civilization, to the
somatic freedoms and negativities of the present, much less the past, but must
allow that steps will have to be taken to ensure that civilization stays on
course for its apotheosis in maximum psychic freedom, whether this implies the
design and siting of special blocking devices in
cosmic space to reduce or filter harmful incoming energies or, beyond the
world, of special reproductive techniques that will be no less synthetically
artificial than everything else about the coming civilization, one that will,
no doubt, harness the power of certain drugs, or synthetic derivatives, to
constrain the objective impulses of, in particular, females from negatively
intruding into realms of enhanced subjectivity where, by their very somatic
natures, they could only do subversive harm to the nurtures being psychically
cultivated by manly or godly males.
8. For the distinction between soma and psyche,
not-self and self, is actually between nature and nurture, appearance/quantity
on the one hand, and quality/essence on the other, the hand not of will and
spirit but of ego and soul, and if the latter are not merely to gain but to
retain the ascendancy, then the former will have to be muzzled and effectively
curbed, reduced, ultimately even eliminated on all but an intensively
artificial basis such that will better serve the ends of nurture to attain to a
maximum of free psyche in blissful being.
9. For, eventually, the chemical, physical, and
metaphysical tiers of the triadic Beyond to which all world-overcoming points
will tend to blend towards a synthetic unity favouring metaphysics, there being
no reason for lesser or contrary realities to have their own way in defiance of
the prevailing reality, namely that of a metaphysical hegemony in truth and
joy, albeit some differentiation will still prove necessary in the interests of
structural stability in elemental comprehensiveness, a purely metaphysical
outcome to evolution being no less unlikely of attainment than an income, as it
were, based solely upon metachemistry, the Cosmos
being both metachemical and more than metachemical, even if still predominantly metachemical in its stellar roots.
10. For at the end of the day metaphysics is about
air, but to have air you need the physics of vegetation, to have vegetation you
need the chemistry of water, and to have water you need the metachemistry
of fire, without which, in whatever transmuted guise any or all of these may
subsequently exist, nothing genuinely metaphysical can be guaranteed at all,
least of all in sensibility.
11. So we do not aim, in overly utopian fashion,
for 'pie in the sky' or 'castles in the air', or any other delusory partisanship
which would reduce the prospects of 'Kingdom Come', as the ultimate phase of
modern civilization, a phase more than Western and less than Eastern, to
absolute zero, but look forward to using the various elements that make up the
totality of life in such a way that the best possible combination of them in
hierarchical priorities can be developed to the end of enhanced sensibility for
all, the metachemical element of what would amount to
the administrative aside to the triadic Beyond not excepted.
12. For there can be no Antidevil-the-Unevil-Daughter
and Antihell-the-Unclear-Spirit without
God-the-Wise-Father and Heaven-the-Holy-Soul, but neither can the latter exist
without the deferential assistance of the former, since metaphysical psyche is
only free when metachemical soma is bound, and only
when metachemical soma is indirectly bound, in
sensibility, can metachemical psyche be indirectly
free enough to allow metaphysical psyche to directly have its soul-oriented
sensible way.
13. Similarly, if rather more in the phenomenal
context of mass/volume than the noumenal one of time/space, there can be no Antiwoman-the-Unevil-Daughter and Antipurgatory-the-Unclear-Spirit
without Man-the-Wise-Father and Earth-the-Holy-Soul, but neither can the latter
exist without the deferential assistance of the former, since physical psyche
is only free when chemical soma is bound, and only when chemical soma is
indirectly bound, in sensibility, can chemical psyche be indirectly free enough
to allow physical psyche to directly have its ego-oriented sensible way.
14. In the recent past I
have tended to argue that females are by nature competitive in metachemistry and co-operative in chemistry, while males
are by nurture collectivistic in physics and individualistic in metaphysics,
thereby distinguishing metachemical and chemical
norms on the one side of the gender fence from their physical and metaphysical
counterparts on its other side.
15. Certainly I still hold that competition and
co-operation are more female than male in their objectivity and, conversely,
collectivism and individualism more male than female in their subjectivity, but
now perceive the ascription of each tendency to a separate element to have been
too liberal or comprehensively facile.
16. For, if we recall the respective particle/wavicle ratios of females and males, the former
characterized by a particle predominance and the latter by a wavicle predominance in either relative or absolute terms,
it would seem that females are both competitive and co-operative irrespective
of their class, and males likewise both collectivistic and individualistic
irrespective of elemental differences.
17. In other words, females will be competitive in
primary free soma but co-operative in secondary free psyche, whereas males will
be collectivistic in secondary free soma and individualistic in primary free
psyche, so that in the sensual contexts of free soma competition and
collectivism will be the respective female and male realities, whilst in the
sensible contexts of free psyche individualism and co-operation will be the
respective male and female realities - competition and collectivism pertaining
to the alternatives modes of nature, individualism and co-operation to the
alternative modes of nurture, the former pair respectively evil and foolish,
criminal and sinful, the latter pair, by contrast, wise and good, graceful and
punishing.
18. Therefore we can contrast the competitive
absolutism of upper-class females in the most particles/least wavicles of sensual metachemistry
with their co-operative absolutism of least wavicles/most
particles in sensible metachemistry, noumenal females always likely to be much more competitive
by nature in metachemical sensuality than
co-operative by nurture in metachemical sensibility,
which means that special pressures have to be applied by noumenal
males to the latter context if a sensibly metaphysical hegemony on their part
is to be maintained.
19. Likewise we can contrast the competitive relativity
of lower-class females in the more (relative to most) particles/less (relative
to least) wavicles of sensual chemistry with their
co-operative relativity of less (relative to least) wavicles/more
(relative to most) particles in sensible chemistry, phenomenal females always
likely to be more competitive by nature in chemical sensuality than
co-operative by nurture in chemical sensibility, which again entails the
application of special pressures by phenomenal males to the latter context if a
sensibly physical hegemony is to be maintained.
20. Contrariwise we can contrast the
individualistic relativity of lower-class males in the more (relative to most) wavicles/less (relative to least) particles of sensible
physics with their collectivistic relativity of less (relative to least)
particles/more (relative to most) wavicles in sensual
physics, phenomenal males always likely to be more individualistic by nurture
in physical sensibility than collectivistic by nature in physical sensuality,
which means that special pressures have to be applied by phenomenal females to
the latter context if a sensually chemical hegemony is to be maintained.
21. Similarly we can contrast the individualistic
absolutism of upper-class males in the most wavicles/least
particles of sensible metaphysics with their collectivistic absolutism of least
particles/most wavicles in sensual metaphysics, noumenal males always likely to be much more
individualistic by nurture in metaphysical sensibility than collectivistic by
nature in metaphysical sensuality, which again entails the application of
special pressures by noumenal females to the latter
context if a sensually metachemical hegemony is to be
maintained.
22. Consequently I think it is fairly safe to
conclude that females will always, in general terms, be more competitive by
nature than co-operative (with male individualism) by nurture, whereas males
will always be more individualistic by nurture than collectivistic (vis-à-vis
female competitiveness) by nature, since in the one case soma predominates over
psyche in the particle-based precedence of psyche by soma in either absolute
(3:1) or relative (2½:1½) ratios according to whether metachemistry
or chemistry is the prevailing element, whilst in the other case psyche
predominates over soma in the wavicle-centred
precedence of soma by psyche in either relative (2½:1½) or absolute (3:1)
ratios according to whether physics or metaphysics is the prevailing element.
23. Collectivism is the secondary mode of somatic
freedom in notself-oriented nature which tends to
defer to the competitiveness of its primary mode, wherein the will and/or
spirit are objective rather than subjective and free soma is accordingly either
barbarous or criminal, evil or clear, in female vein, rather than either philistine
or sinful, foolish or unholy, in male vein.
24. By contrast, co-operativeness
is the secondary mode of psychic freedom in self-oriented nurture which tends
to defer to the individualism of its primary mode, wherein the ego and/or soul
are subjective rather than objective and free psyche is accordingly either
cultural or graceful, wise or holy, in male vein, rather than either civil or
punishing, good or unclear, in female vein.
25. Therefore we can sensibly equate the secondary
virtue of co-operation for females with the primary virtue of individualism for
males, and contrast each of these positive realities with the secondary vice,
in sensuality, of collectivism for males and the primary vice of
competitiveness for females, so that, in the one case, co-operation and
individualism testify to the virtues of psychic freedom, while, in the other
case, collectivism and competitiveness attest to the vices of somatic freedom,
the former pair moral and the latter pair immoral, the former pair rational (reasonable)
in self and the latter pair irrational (unreasonable) in not-self, the former
religious and the latter irreligious, the former positive and the latter
negative, the former of nurture and the latter of nature, the former only
possible in societies upholding the free church, the latter in societies
upholding the free state - all the difference between the light and the dark,
enlightenment and unenlightenment, sensibility and
sensuality, inner and outer, private and public, cross and star (in whatever
permutation).
26. Social Transcendentalism identifies itself
with a society in which females co-operate with male individualism, in which
the secondary virtues of goodness and punishment have their subordinate place
under the primary virtues of wisdom and grace, whether on the relative terms of
chemistry under physics, woman or, rather, antiwoman
under man, or on the absolute terms of metachemistry
under metaphysics, the Antidevil or, rather, Antihell under Heaven, so that we can imagine the metachemical aside to the triadic Beyond in which
chemistry, physics, and metaphysics would be brought to a sensible resolution
and the psychic co-operation of both antiwoman and Antiheaven with the psychic individualism of both Man and
God or, rather, Heaven (to focus on the main metaphysical attribute) guarantees
society a Social Transcendentalist, or socially transcendent, eternity,
'kingdom come' without otherworldly end.
27. That is what my philosophy points to, and it
understands that while the truthful sanity of the primary moral freedom, in
physical or metaphysical psychic nurture, of individualism in either ego or
soul will more suit males than the fictional insanity of the secondary moral
freedom, in chemical or metachemical psychic nurture,
of co-operation with that in terms of the clamping-down on will and spirit from
a standpoint centred in the goodness and punishment, civility and unclearness
of a psychic emphasis, contrary to gender reality, will suit females, it
nevertheless maintains, without any equivocation, that it is better that males
should have their truthfully sane way at females' fictional expense, pretty
much as genuine philosophers at the expense of fiction writers, than that
females should have their factually sane way, pretty much as dramatists, to
extend the metaphor, at the expense of the illusory insanity of males in the
folly and unholiness, philistinism and sin, of a
poetic disposition, and that a free society centred in the light of psychic
nurture is incomparably preferable, not to say morally superior, to a free
society rooted in the darkness of somatic nature, in consequence of which no
self-respecting male should shirk responsibility not only for bringing such a
society to pass, but maintaining it in the face of reactionary or devolutionary
threats from, in particular, females and bent males of a secular disposition,
not least of all in relation to the objective literary arts of drama and poetry
vis-à-vis their subjective counterparts.
28. For until the concept of a free society is transvaluated from that which upholds state freedom in
somatic darkness to that which upholds church freedom in psychic light, not to
mention lightness, there can be no prospect of the positivity
accruing to the latter and no likelihood, in consequence, of a reduction in the
negativity which characterizes the former and makes words like virtue and
morality seem devoid of meaning and only fit subject for mockery from a
dramatic or poetic point of view, one necessarily more disposed to free will
and spirit either directly, in drama, or indirectly through a turning against
ego and soul from a standpoint rooted in a secondary order of free soma, one
necessarily naturalistic or idealistic rather than realistic or materialistic.
29. The justification of morality in the virtues
of psychic freedom will only become fully evident when people are free to be
co-operative and individualistic after their respective gender fashions, and
have accordingly been delivered from the immoral vices of somatic freedom,
which in evil and/or criminal competition and foolish and/or sinful
collectivism continue to cast a pall of life-denying darkness over contemporary
civilization, to the will- or spirit-denying virtues of fictional insanity, as
of genuine fiction, and the ego- or soul-affirming virtues of truthful sanity,
as of genuine philosophy, so that both the secondary orders of free psyche in nonconformism and fundamentalism and the primary orders of
free psyche in humanism and transcendentalism serve, whether indirectly or directly,
on female or male, co-operative or individualistic, terms, the same moral end,
in which the psychic freedoms and positivities of
salvation and blessedness are everywhere virtuously prevalent.
30. Only the promise of religious sovereignty can
deliver mankind from the dark beast of a synthetically artificial nature to the
angelic light of a synthetically artificial nurture in 'Kingdom Come', and for
that promise to be fulfilled the People will have to judge for themselves and
act accordingly, act, that is, within the parameters of an alternative approach
to democracy such that would make the ultimate sovereignty possible.
31. For in hegemonic
nature, as in free soma, there is only work.
In hegemonic nurture, as in free psyche, there is only play, and those
who want a society led by play rather than ruled by work, led by self-affirming
taking and being rather than ruled by self-rejecting doing and giving, must
heed the message of Social Transcendentalism and opt, democratically and
methodically, for salvation/blessedness from the damnation/cursedness of
selfless work, as of the free star, to a world in which, under the guiding
light of a new cross (the Social Transcendentalist subcross
of that which more symbolizes the psychocentrically
subconscious aspect of the self in harmony, through the lungs, with the subnatural element of air, than the egocentrically
conscious aspect of the self in harmony, through the brain, with the natural
element of vegetation), self-oriented play would be the norm, both co-operatively
and, especially, individualistically.
32. For the ultimate freedom of the ultimate
church can only take psychic play further than any free church has ever taken
it before and thus ensure that somatic work - at any rate in its free guise,
not necessarily in the quasi-playful guise of bound soma - is consigned to the
rubbish heap of an immoral history from which, barring the unlikely return of
state freedom, it can never arise again.
33. For until we reject the work ethic of somatic
darkness we shall never come into the full flowering of our civilized
development in the play ethic of psychic light, the virtuous ethic of moral
freedom on both primary (individualistic) and secondary (co-operative) terms.
34. Verily, civilization is at the cross-roads,
and its transvaluation is just a matter of passing,
in the British Isles, from one 'Kingdom' to another, the 'Kingdom of Work' to
the 'Kingdom of Play', the 'Kingdom' ruled by metachemistry
to the 'Kingdom' led by metaphysics, the 'Kingdom of Darkness' to the 'Kingdom
of Light', the 'Kingdom' of somatic sovereignty to the 'Kingdom' of psychic
sovereignty, a 'Kingdom' in state devolution to a 'Kingdom' in church
evolution, with all due respect to the Irish Republic as the most suitable
base, with its traditional deference towards the Roman Catholic Church, for
such a divine 'Kingdom' - verily a transvaluation of
the concept 'Kingdom' - to begin, the otherworldly sovereignty, beyond the
worldly secularities of parliamentary and republican freedom alike, of 'Kingdom
Come', in which, under the wise guidance of the 'Philosopher-King', the Church
attains to its maximum free development in Social Transcendentalism and
ultimately becomes truly universal, the universal church of evolving life's
psychic omega point in the metaphysical soul, the soul-of-souls and
being-of-beings.
LONDON 2002 (Revised 2012)
Preview VALUATIONS OF A SOCIAL TRANSCENDENTALIST eBook